Open Access

Effects of L-carnitine against oxidative stress in human hepatocytes: involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha

  • Jin-Lian Li1Email author,
  • Qiao-Yun Wang1,
  • Hai-Yun Luan2,
  • Ze-Chun Kang2 and
  • Chun-Bo Wang3
Journal of Biomedical Science201219:32

DOI: 10.1186/1423-0127-19-32

Received: 3 January 2012

Accepted: 21 March 2012

Published: 21 March 2012

Abstract

Background

Excessive oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation have been demonstrated to play important roles in the production of liver damage. L-carnitine is a natural substance and acts as a carrier for fatty acids across the inner mitochondrial membrane for subsequent beta-oxidation. It is also an antioxidant that reduces metabolic stress in the cells. Recent years L-carnitine has been proposed for treatment of various kinds of disease, including liver injury. This study was conducted to evaluate the protective effect of L-carnitine against hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced cytotoxicity in a normal human hepatocyte cell line, HL7702.

Methods

We analyzed cytotoxicity using MTT assay and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release. Antioxidant activity and lipid peroxidation were estimated by reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, activities and protein expressions of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), and malondialdehyde (MDA) formation. Expressions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha and its target genes were evaluated by RT-PCR or western blotting. The role of PPAR-alpha in L-carnitine-enhanced expression of SOD and CAT was also explored. Statistical analysis was performed by a one-way analysis of variance, and its significance was assessed by Dennett's post-hoc test.

Results

The results showed that L-carnitine protected HL7702 cells against cytotoxity induced by H2O2. This protection was related to the scavenging of ROS, the promotion of SOD and CAT activity and expression, and the prevention of lipid peroxidation in cultured HL7702 cells. The decreased expressions of PPAR-alpha, carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1 (CPT1) and acyl-CoA oxidase (ACOX) induced by H2O2 can be attenuated by L-carnitine. Besides, we also found that the promotion of SOD and CAT protein expression induced by L-carnitine was blocked by PPAR-alpha inhibitor MK886.

Conclusions

Taken together, our findings suggest that L-carnitine could protect HL7702 cells against oxidative stress through the antioxidative effect and the regulation of PPAR-alpha also play an important part in the protective effect.

Keywords

L-carnitine Hydrogen peroxide HL7702 cells Antioxidant effect Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha

Background

L-carnitine (L-3-hydroxy-4-N-N-N-trimethylaminobutyrate) is an essential nutrient that the body uses to convert fat into energy. It acts as a carrier for fatty acids across the inner mitochondrial membrane for subsequent β-oxidation [1]. It is also an antioxidant that reduces metabolic stress in the cells. Studies have reported that L-carnitine have an effective 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging, superoxide anion radical scavenging, hydrogen peroxide scavenging, and total reducing power [2].

Recent years L-carnitine has been proposed for treatment of various kinds of disease, including liver injury. Several studies have shown that L-carnitine administration can ameliorate or prevent liver damage of various etiologies. Animal studies showed that dietary supplementation with L-carnitine could prevent hepatitis and subsequent hepatocellular carcinoma in Long-Evans Cinnamon rats [3] and alleviate alcohol-induced liver damage in rats [4]. In addition, some experimental and clinical data suggested that early intravenous supplementation with L-carnitine could improve survival in severe valproic acid -induced hepatotoxicity [5]. In vitro, L-carnitine has been successfully used to delay the killing of cultured rat hepatocytes by 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) [6].

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are considered to be involved in liver damage induced by several conditions such as alcohol abuse, fibrosis/cirrhosis of various etiologies, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) liver injury, paracetamol overdose, and viral hepatitis [7]. Therefore, prevention or impairment of oxidative stress constitutes a therapeutic target to be achieved for hepatoprotection. Different antioxidant strategies have shown to be useful to reduce oxidative stress and cell death in hepatocytes [8]. Recently, Dobrzyńska et al. found that L-carnitine protected liver cell membranes against oxidative modifications in ethanol-intoxicated rats through its ability to scavenge free radicals [9]. Therefore, antioxidant activity of L-carnitine may make it play a role in the treatment of liver diseases.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated transcription factors belonging to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily and are involved in energy homeostasis [10]. It consists of three members: PPAR-α, PPAR-γ, and PPAR-β/δ. PPAR-α is distributed in metabolically active tissues including liver, most prominently in hepatocytes [10, 11]. PPAR-α has a central role in fatty acid oxidation, lipid and lipoprotein metabolism, inflammatory responses, and oxidative stress [12]. It was reported that PPAR-α/mice fed ethanol developed marked hepatomegaly, steatohepatitis, liver cell death and proliferation, and portal fibrosis [13]. PPAR-α ligands, such as Wy-14,643, were reported to have an antifibrotic action in the rat thioacetamide (TAA) model of liver cirrhosis [14]. In addition, L-carnitine treatment has been found to be able to elevate PPAR-α activation in renal tubular cells and plays a crucial role in L-carnitine anti-apoptosis effect [15]. Therefore, we hypothesize that PPAR-α may mediated the hepatoprotective effect of L-carnitine.

Our work undertaken was to determine whether L-carnitine exerts cytoprotective properties against ROS-induced cell death in cultured human hepatocytes and explores the mechanisms. For this purpose, normal human hepatocyte HL7702 was treated by H2O2, which was the major component of ROS and has been extensively used as an inducer of oxidative stress models.

Methods

Reagents and drugs

L-carnitine, H2O2, MTT, 2',7'-dichlorfluorescein-diacetate (DCFH-DA) and MK886 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA). Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and malonaldehyde (MDA) assay kits were all purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). Antibodies against PPAR-α, SOD1, and CAT were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Anti-β-actin antibody was purchased from Boisynthesis Biotechnology (Beijing China). All the other reagents used were of analytical grade.

Cells culture and treatment

Human normal hepatocyte cell line HL7702 used in this study was purchased from the Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1,640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and maintained at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator.

To estimate the effects of L-carnitine, HL7702 cells were pretreated with various concentrations of L-carnitine for 12 h before exposed to H2O2. Then, the medium was replaced with serum-free medium and 300 μM H2O2 was added. Control cells were received serum-free medium without H2O2. The cells were incubated in this condition for another 12 h.

Cell viability analysis

Cell viability was analyzed by MTT assay. Briefly, HL7702 cells were cultured in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well for 24 h. L-carnitine at different concentrations (0.01 ~ 5 mM) was added and preincubated for 12 h before exposed to H2O2. After H2O2 treatment as described, the medium was removed and cells were washed twice with PBS. Then, MTT (0.5 mg/ml) was added to each well and incubation for 4 h at 37°C. Finally, medium was removed and 150 μl dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each well. The plate was read using a microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a wavelength of 570 nm.

Measurement of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release

HL7702 cells were first plated in 24-well plates for 24 h. L-carnitine (0.1, 0.5, and 1 mM) was then added to the wells and preincubated for 12 h before exposed to H2O2. After H2O2 treatment, aliquots of culture medium were taken out for extracellular LDH activity analysis. Intracellular LDH activity was determined after lysis by addition of 1% Triton X-100. LDH activity was detected by automatic biochemical analyzer (Mindray, BS-200) with its commercial bio-kit at 340 nm according to manufacturer's protocol. LDH release represents the percentage of LDH in the culture medium relative to the total LDH.

Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) measurement

The fluorescent probe DCFH-DA was used to detect the intracellular ROS. DCFH-DA diffuses into cells and is hydrolyzed to form non-fluorescent 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCFH). DCFH is then oxidised by ROS to form the highly fluorescent 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein. Following H2O2 treatment, cells were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in serum-free medium containing 10 μM DCFH-DA, incubated for 30 min at 37°C, washed with PBS to remove unreacted dye, resuspended in PBS and was detected at 485 nm excitation and at 535 nm emission using flow cytometry.

Measurement of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT) activity and malondialdehyde (MDA) level

After H2O2 treatment, cells were resuspended in 50 mM Tris buffer containing 0.5% Triton X-100, pH 8.0, and lysed by freeze-thawing. Lysates were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatant obtained was used for the following measurements. The total SOD, CAT activities and MDA levels were determined spectrophotometrically using assay kits according to manufacturer's instructions. The protein content of the supernatant was determined using the Bradford method.

Western blot analysis

PPAR-α, SOD1, and CAT protein expressions in HL7702 cells were analyzed by Western blot. Total cellular protein was extracted in lysis buffer and protein levels were quantified using a BCA (bicinchoninic acid) Protein Assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Haimen, China). Aliquots containing 30 μg proteins were loaded on to a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was probed with antibodies against PPAR-α, SOD1, CAT or β-actin. The membrane was then processed with HRP conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Boisynthesis Biotechnology, Beijing, China). Protein bands were visualized using the diamino-benzidine detection kit. The densities of sample bands were analyzed with Quantity One analysis software.

Reverse transcriptase-PCR

After treatment, total RNA was extracted from HL7702 cells using Trizol reagent (Biomed, Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Reverse transcription to cDNA was carried out with All-in-One™ First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (GeneCopoeia, USA) with oligo-dT primer in a final volume of 25 μl at 42°C for 1 h. PCR was performed using PCR Master Mix kit (Fermentas, USA) in a final volume of 50 μl. The primers used were as follows: ACT CAA CAG TTT GTG GCA AGA CA and GGA AGC ACG TCC TCA CAT GA for PPAR-α (119 bp) [16]; GGA GAG GAG ACA GAC ACC ATC CA and CAA AAT AGG CCT GAC GAC ACC TG for CPT1 (244 bp) [17]; TGT CCT ATT TGA ACG ACC TGC CCA and AGG TTC CAA GCT ACC TCC TTG CTT for ACOX (199 bp) [18]; CGT GGA AGG ACT CAT GAC CA and TCC AGG GGT CTT ACT CCT TG for GAPDH (509 bp). Specific PCR products were visualized by agarose electrophoresis. Assessment of the amount of target gene mRNA expression was performed comparatively using GAPDH mRNA as a control.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and its significance was assessed by Dennett's post-hoc test. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and a value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

L-carnitine protected HL7702 cells against H2O2-induced cytotoxicity

Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay. To determine the cytotoxicity of L-carnitine and what concentrations of L-carnitine may exert a cytoprotective effect on H2O2-induced toxicity in HL7702 cells, dose-viability curves were generated, as shown in Figure 1.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1423-0127-19-32/MediaObjects/12929_2012_Article_379_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

The cytotoxicity of L-carnitine and its protective effect on H 2 O 2 -induced toxicity in HL7702 Cells. The upper curve: HL7702 cells were incubated with L-carnitine for 24 h. The lower curve: Cells were treated with or without L-carnitine prior to H2O2 challenge (300 μM, 12 h). Cell viability was assayed by MTT assay. The percentage of cell viability in the control group was treated as 100%. Each value represents the mean of three replicates. ΔP < 0.05, #P < 0.01 vs. control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. H2O2 alone.

The upper curve in Figure 1 showed that, coincubated with L-carnitine, concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 3 mM, cell growth were not be affected significantly, while at a higher concentration of 5 mM, a significant inhibitory effect of L-carnitine was observed (P < 0.05). This finding suggests that the toxicity of L-carnitine increases after 3 mM.

The lower curve in Figure 1 showed that, after exposure to 300 μM H2O2 for 12 h, HL7702 cells displayed markedly decreased viability compared to untreated ones. Doses of L-carnitine ranging from 0.1 to 3 mM significantly reduced the cell viability loss, and a dose-dependent manner was found from 0.1 to 1 mM, we thus decided to use 0.1 ~ 1 mM for all subsequent experiments.

L-carnitine inhibited H2O2-induced LDH release in HL7702 cells

The integrity of cell membrane was determined by the release of LDH. Figure 2 showed that there was a low LDH leakage ratio under normal conditions. However, H2O2 induced significant LDH release. Pretreatment with 0.1 ~ 1 mM L-carnitine reduced H2O2-induced LDH release in a dose-dependent manner.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1423-0127-19-32/MediaObjects/12929_2012_Article_379_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Effect of L-carnitine on the LDH release of HL7702 cells. Cells were treated with or without L-carnitine prior to H2O2 challenge (300 μM, 12 h). LDH release represents the percentage of LDH in the culture medium relative to the total LDH. Each value represents the mean of three replicates. #P < 0.01 vs. control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. H2O2 alone; ΔP < 0.05 vs. 0.1 mM L-carnitine; P < 0.05 vs. 0.5 mM L-carnitine.

L-carnitine promoted endogenous antioxidant defense in HL7702 cells under oxidative stress

SOD, CAT activities and protein levels were measured to investigate the antioxidative effect of L-carnitine on H2O2-damaged HL7702 cells. The activity was expressed as U/mg protein in cells. Compared with the control group, the activities of total SOD and CAT in the H2O2 alone group were decreased by 30.05% and 38.25% respectively (Figure 3A). Compared to H2O2-damaged cells, 0.5 ~ 1 mM L-carnitine reversed the activities of SOD and CAT. Western blot analysis showed that H2O2 exposure resulted in a marked decrease of Cu,Zn-SOD and CAT protein levels in HL7702 cells, while L-carnitine pretreatment significantly elevated the protein levels (Figure 3B).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1423-0127-19-32/MediaObjects/12929_2012_Article_379_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Effect of L-carnitine on the activities and protein expressions of SOD and CAT in H 2 O 2 -damaged HL7702 cells. Cells were treated with L-carnitine for 12 h and followed by the treatment of H2O2 (300 μM) for 12 h. A: Total SOD and CAT activities were calculated in units of activity per mg of total protein. B: Cu,Zn-SOD and CAT expressions were determined by western blot analysis. Results were expressed as the ratio of expression level of Cu,Zn-SOD or CAT over β-actin. Each value represents the mean of three replicates. #P < 0.01 vs. control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. H2O2 alone.

L-carnitine scavenged H2O2-induced ROS production in HL7702 cells

To determine whether L-carnitine prevents H2O2-induced ROS generation, the concentration of intracellular ROS was evaluated by the changes in DCF fluorescence intensity. The result showed that DCF fluorescence intensity dropped significantly from 23.1 ± 2.0 in cells treated with H2O2 only to values between 16.9 ± 1.3 and 12.8 ± 1.3 in cells to which 0.1 ~ 1 mM L-carnitine was added (Figure 4).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1423-0127-19-32/MediaObjects/12929_2012_Article_379_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Effect of L-carnitine on intracellular ROS levels after H 2 O 2 exposure in HL7702 cells. Cells were treated with or without L-carnitine prior to H2O2 challenge (300 μM, 12 h). ROS levels were measured using fluorescent probe DCFH-DA. Each value represents the mean of three replicates. #P < 0.01 vs. control; **P < 0.01 vs. H2O2 alone.

L-carnitine inhibited lipid peroxidation in H2O2-damaged HL7702 cells

The ability of L-carnitine to inhibit lipid peroxidation in H2O2-treated HL7702 cells was also tested by determining MDA levels. As shown in Figure 5, the exposure of cells to H2O2 increased MDA levels by approximately 1.7 fold relative to control cells. An obvious dose-dependent reduction of L-carnitine on MDA levels in H2O2-treated cells was observed.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1423-0127-19-32/MediaObjects/12929_2012_Article_379_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Effect of L-carnitine on H 2 O 2 -induced MDA formation in HL7702 cells. Cells were treated with or without L-carnitine prior to H2O2 challenge (300 μM, 12 h). Each value represents the mean of three replicates. #P < 0.01 vs. control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. H2O2 alone; ΔP < 0.05 vs. 0.1 mM L-carnitine; P < 0.05 vs. 0.5 mM L-carnitine.

L-carnitine up-regulated PPAR-α expression in H2O2-damaged HL7702 cells

We further analyzed the effect of L-carnitine on PPAR-α mRNA and protein expressions in H2O2-treated HL7702 cells. As shown in Figure 6, treatment of HL7702 cells with 300 μM H2O2 for 12 h reduced the PPAR-α mRNA and protein levels in HL7702 cells. When the cells were preincubated with L-carnitine before H2O2 exposure, PPAR-α expression increased markedly compared to H2O2 alone group, although the mRNA expression was not significantly changed in 0.1 mM L-carnitine group.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1423-0127-19-32/MediaObjects/12929_2012_Article_379_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Effect of L-carnitine on expression levels of PPAR-α and its target genes in H 2 O 2 -treated HL7702 cells. HL7702 cells were pretreated with L-carnitine for 12 h and followed by the treatment of H2O2 (300 μM) for 12 h. A: Cells were collected, total RNA and protein were prepared to determine the mRNA and protein levels of PPAR-α in HL7702 cells using RT-PCR and western blot analysis respectively. B: Total RNA was extracted and expressions of CPT1 and ACOX were quantified using RT-PCR. The data was normalized to GAPDH expression. Each value represents the mean of three replicates. #P < 0.01 vs. control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. H2O2 alone.

To assess if the elevated PPAR-α expression by L-carnitine leads to induction of PPAR-α-regulated genes in H2O2-treated HL7702 cells, we examined mRNA levels of CPT1 and ACOX by RT-PCR. Exposure to H2O2 caused inhibition of the mRNA expression of CPT1 and ACOX. L-carnitine, on the other hand, attenuated the inhibitory effect of H2O2.

L-carnitine increases SOD and CAT expression in H2O2-damaged HL7702 cells via PPAR-α expression

Activation of PPAR-α by agonists has been previously shown to enhance SOD expression and CAT activity in the liver [19, 20]. In order to investigate whether the elevated SOD and CAT expression induced by L-carnitine was due to enhanced levels of PPAR-α, a specific antagonist of PPAR-α, MK886, was used. MK886 (5 μM) was added to cells 2 h prior to H2O2 insult. As shown in Figure 7, MK886 did not alter SOD and CAT protein levels in control cells. However, the up-regulation of SOD and CAT expression by L-carnitine was inhibited by addition of MK886 in H2O2-treated cells.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1423-0127-19-32/MediaObjects/12929_2012_Article_379_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

Influence of MK886 on SOD and CAT protein expression enhanced by L-carnitine in H 2 O 2 -treated HL7702 cells. HL7702 cells were pretreated with L-carnitine (1 mM) for 12 h prior to H2O2 challenge (300 μM, 12 h). MK886 (5 μM) was added to cells 2 h prior to H2O2 insult. Cu,Zn-SOD and CAT expressions were determined by western blot analysis. #P < 0.01 vs. control; **P < 0.01 vs. H2O2 alone; ΔP < 0.05 vs. L-carnitine group. The presented results are representative of three independent experiments.

Discussion

H2O2 is a major component of ROS produced intracellularly during many physiological and pathological processes, and causes oxidative damage. It has been extensively used as an inducer of oxidative stress in vitro models. Our results showed that 300 μM H2O2 exposure for 12 h induced a significantly decreased cell growth and elevated LDH leakage in HL7702 cells. L-carnitine at a concentration of 0.1 to 3 mM showed no harmful effects on the growth of HL7702 cells, however, cell growth was inhibited by 5 mM L-carnitine. The possibility may be that high doses of carnitine possess pro-oxidant activity as has been reported [21]. Our results demonstrated the protective effects of 0.1 ~ 3 mM L-carnitine against the inhibition of cell growth induced by H2O2. LDH leakage was also inhibited by 0.1 ~ 1 mM L-carnitine in a dose-dependent manner. These findings suggest that L-carnitine is capable of reducing H2O2-induced cytotoxicity in HL7702 cells.

Oxidative stress after H2O2 exposure results from intracellular ROS production and decreased ROS scavenging. To further explore the mechanism of the protective effect of L-carnitine on H2O2-induced oxidative damage in HL7702 cells, we examined the effect of L-carnitine on intracellular ROS production. H2O2 challenge caused an apparent increase in ROS levels in HL7702 cells compared to control group, however, in vitro treatment with L-carnitine resulted in reduced ROS levels. Scavenging of ROS is determined by antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and CAT. CAT is considered to be the most relevant enzyme involved in detoxification of H2O2 and protection of hepatocytes from oxidative stress [22]. We observed that the inhibited activities and expressions of SOD and CAT induced by H2O2 were attenuated by L-carnitine. These observations supported the idea that L-carnitine did protect HL7702 cells from H2O2-induced cytotoxicity by its antioxidant property.

Liver damage was associated with enhanced lipid peroxidation and formation of lipid radicals [23, 24]. MDA, as an end product of lipid peroxidation, usually used to estimate the extent of lipid peroxidation. It has been shown that many pathological conditions that resulted in elevation of MDA due to lipid peroxidation were prevented by L-carnitine [25, 26]. In our paper, MDA levels in HL7702 cells increased after H2O2 exposure. However, pretreatment with L-carnitine (0.1 ~ 1 mM) prevented a further increase in MDA levels.

H2O2, a low molecular weight compound, can easily penetrate lipid membrane, cause lipid peroxidation, and disturb lipid homeostasis. PPAR-α is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that is known to have critical roles in the regulation of lipid homeostasis. It has been reported that PPAR-α expression decreased in a rat model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [27] and the absence of PPAR-α have been demonstrated to cause lipid accumulation in liver of rats [28]. Our results showed that HL7702 cells exposed to 300 μM H2O2 for 12 h showed a significant reduction in PPAR-α expression levels, indicating the disturbed lipid homeostasis might occur in H2O2-damaged HL7702 cells. However, L-carnitine pretreatment attenuated the inhibitory effect of H2O2 on the expression of PPAR-α. It is well known that expression of a range of genes involved in lipid homeostasis is controlled by PPAR-α, which binds to the peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE) in the promoters of these genes [29]. Therefore, mRNA expression of CPT1 and ACOX, two PPAR-α target genes that control fatty acid oxidation [30, 31], were also investigated. Results showed that the repression of CPT1 and ACOX expression induced by H2O2 were all attenuated by L-carnitine. Above observations indicate that the disturbed lipid homeostasis induced by H2O2 might be ameliorated by L-carnitine by increasing PPAR-α expression. In fact, as we know, L-carnitine acts as a carrier participate in fatty acids β-oxidation. So, the attenuated lipid metabolism in H2O2-damaged HL7702 cells would be significantly ameliorated by L-carnitine. This observation is consistent with a recent study, which demonstrated that L-carnitine supplementation induced recovery of liver lipid metabolism in cachectic animals [32]. Furthermore, it is likely that the enhancement of β-oxidation induced by L-carnitine would generate ATP, thereby reversing H2O2-initiated depletion of ATP in cells and attenuating cell injury. ATP was considered to be a critical event in lethal cell injury produced by oxygen radicals [33]. The hypotheses need further investigation.

It has been reported that PPAR-α gene expression is associated with SOD gene expression in the liver [20], and CAT has been identified as one of the target enzymes of PPAR-α [34]. In the present study, the up-regulation of SOD and CAT expression by L-carnitine were attenuated by PPAR-α antagonist MK886. The results reveal the crucial role of PPAR-α activation in the protective effect of L-carnitine against H2O2-induced damage in HL7702 cells. L-carnitine might elevate PPAR-α expression, and then activate SOD and CAT, resulting in a decrease in extracellular H2O2 levels and prevention of liver damage.

Conclusions

Taken together, the present results provide evidence that L-carnitine prevented in vitro human hepatocyte oxidative stress induced by H2O2. The protective effects of L-carnitine observed in the current paper can possibly be mediated through its antioxidant potential. The elevated PPAR-α expression by L-carnitine play an important part in the protective effect, which might contribute to the amelioration of lipid homeostasis, the improvement of antioxidant ability, and increased ATP in L-carnitine treated cells.

Abbreviations

H2O2

Hydrogen peroxide

MTT: 

3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

LDH: 

Lactate dehydrogenase

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

SOD: 

Superoxide dismutase

CAT: 

Catalase

MDA: 

Malondialdehyde

PPAR: 

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

CPT1: 

Carnitine palmitoyl transferase 1

ACOX: 

Acyl-CoA oxidase

DPPH: 

1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl

DCFH-DA: 

2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate

DMSO: 

Dimethyl sulfoxide.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. ZR2010HL068).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Functional Physiology, Binzhou Medical University
(2)
Department of Pharmacology, Binzhou Medical University
(3)
Medical College, Qingdao University

References

  1. Rebouche CJ: Kinetics, pharmacokinetics, and regulation of L-carnitine and acetyl-L-carnitine metabolism. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004, 1033: 30-41. 10.1196/annals.1320.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gülçin I: Antioxidant and antiradical activities of L-carnitine. Life Sci. 2006, 78: 803-811. 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.05.103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang B, Nishikawa M, Nishiguchi S, Inoue M: L-carnitine inhibits hepatocarcinogenesis via protection of mitochondria. Int J Cancer. 2005, 113: 719-729. 10.1002/ijc.20636.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bykov I, Järveläinen H, Lindros K: L-carnitine alleviates alcohol-induced liver damage in rats: role of tumour necrosis factor-alpha. Alcohol Alcohol. 2003, 38: 400-406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lheureux PE, Hantson P: Carnitine in the treatment of valproic acid-induced toxicity. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2009, 47: 101-111. 10.1080/15563650902752376.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Snyder JW, Kyle ME, Ferraro TN: L-carnitine delays the killing of cultured hepatocytes by 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1990, 276: 132-138. 10.1016/0003-9861(90)90019-U.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pablo M: Role of free radicals in liver diseases. Hepatol Int. 2009, 3: 526-536. 10.1007/s12072-009-9158-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Medina J, Moreno-Otero R: Pathophysiological basis for antioxidant therapy in chronic liver disease. Drugs. 2005, 65: 2445-2461. 10.2165/00003495-200565170-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobrzyńska I, Szachowicz-Petelska B, Skrzydlewska E, Figaszewski Z: Effect of L-carnitine on liver cell membranes in ethanol-intoxicated rats. Chem Biol Interact. 2010, 188: 44-51. 10.1016/j.cbi.2010.07.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Issemann I, Green S: Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators. Nature. 1990, 347: 645-650. 10.1038/347645a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Braissant O, Foufelle F, Scotto C, Dauça M, Wahli W: Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): tissue distribution of PPAR-alpha, -beta, and -gamma in the adult rat. Endocrinology. 1996, 137: 354-366. 10.1210/en.137.1.354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Burri L, Thoresen GH, Berge RK: The role of PPARα activation in liver and muscle. PPAR Research. 2010, 2010: pii: 542359-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakajima T, Kamijo Y, Tanaka N, Sugiyama E, Tanaka E, Kiyosawa K, Fukushima Y, Peters JM, Gonzalez FJ, Aoyama T: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha protects against alcohol-induced liver damage. Hepatology. 2004, 40: 972-980.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Toyama T, Nakamura H, Harano Y, Yamauchi N, Morita A, Kirishima T, Minami M, Itoh Y, Okanoue T: PPARalpha ligands activate antioxidant enzymes and suppress hepatic fibrosis in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004, 324: 697-704. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen HH, Sue YM, Chen CH, Hsu YH, Hou CC, Cheng CY, Lin SL, Tsai WL, Chen TW, Chen TH: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha plays a crucial role in L-carnitine anti-apoptosis effect in renal tubular cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009, 24: 3042-3049. 10.1093/ndt/gfp258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cardell LO, Hägge M, Uddman R, Adner M: Downregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in nasal polyposis. Respir Res. 2005, 6: 132-10.1186/1465-9921-6-132.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shimoda H, Tanaka J, Kikuchi M, Fukuda T, Ito H, Hatano T, Yoshida T: Effect of polyphenol-rich extract from walnut on diet-induced hypertriglyceridemia in mice via enhancement of fatty acid oxidation in the liver. J Agric Food Chem. 2009, 57: 1786-1792. 10.1021/jf803441c.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bjork JA, Wallace KB: Structure-activity relationships and human relevance for perfluoroalkyl acid-induced transcriptional activation of peroxisome proliferation in liver cell cultures. Toxicol Sci. 2009, 111: 89-99. 10.1093/toxsci/kfp093.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Berger J, Moller DE: The mechanisms of action of PPARs. Annu Rev Med. 2002, 53: 409-435. 10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.104018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Inoue I, Noji S, Awata T, Takahashi K, Nakajima T, Sonoda M, Komoda T, Katayama S: Bezafibrate has an antioxidant effect: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha is associated with Cu2+, Zn2+-superoxide dismutase in the liver. Life Sci. 1998, 63: 135-144. 10.1016/S0024-3205(98)00249-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu ML, Chen YK, Lin YF: The antioxidant and prooxidant activity of some B vitamins and vitamin-like compounds. Chem Biol Interact. 1995, 97: 63-73. 10.1016/0009-2797(95)03608-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. De Bleser PJ, Xu G, Rombouts K, Rogiers V, Geerts A: Glutathione levels discriminate between oxidative stress and transforming growth factor-beta signaling in activated rat hepatic stellate cells. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 33881-33887. 10.1074/jbc.274.48.33881.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsukamoto H, Lu SC: Current concepts in the pathogenesis of alcoholic liver injury. FASEB J. 2001, 15: 1335-1349. 10.1096/fj.00-0650rev.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lu Y, Cederbaum AI: CYP2E1 and oxidative liver injury by alcohol. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008, 44: 723-738. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.11.004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Derin N, Agac A, Bayram Z, Asar M, Izgut-Uysal VN: Effects of L-carnitine on neutrophil-mediated ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat stomach. Cell Biochem Funct. 2006, 24: 437-442. 10.1002/cbf.1251.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Atila K, Coker A, Sagol O, Coker I, Topalak O, Astarcioglu H, Karademir S, Astarcioglu I: Protective effects of carnitine in an experimental ischemia-reperfusion injury. Clin Nutr. 2002, 21: 309-313. 10.1054/clnu.2002.0544.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Yeon JE, Choi KM, Baik SH, Kim KO, Lim HJ, Park KH, Kim JY, Park JJ, Kim JS, Bak YT, Byun KS, Lee CH: Reduced expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-a may have an important role in the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004, 19: 799-804. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03349.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Leone TC, Weinheimer CJ, Kelly DP: A critical role for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) in the cellular fasting response: the PPARα-null mouse as a model of fatty acid oxidation disorders. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 7473-7478. 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7473.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lemberger T, Desvergne B, Wahli W: Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors: a nuclear receptor signaling pathway in lipid physiology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1996, 12: 335-363. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.335.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. McGarry JD, Brown NF: The mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase system: from concept to molecular analysis. Eur J Biochem. 1997, 244: 1-14. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00001.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Qi C, Zhu Y, Reddy JK: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, coactivators, and downstream targets. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2000, 32: 187-204. 10.1385/CBB:32:1-3:187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Silvério R, Laviano A, Fanelli FR, Seelaender M: L-Carnitine induces recovery of liver lipid metabolism in cancer cachexia. Amino Acids. 2011,Google Scholar
  33. Hyslop PA, Hinshaw DB, Halsey WA, Schraufstätter IU, Sauerheber RD, Spragg RG, Jackson JH, Cochrane CG: Mechanisms of oxidant-mediated cell injury. The glycolytic and mitochondrial pathways of ADP phosphorylation are major intracellular targets inactivated by hydrogen peroxide. J Biol Chem. 1988, 263: 1665-1675.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Girnun GD, Domann FE, Moore SA, Robbins ME: Identification of a functional peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor response element in the rat catalase promoter. Mol Endocrinol. 2002, 16: 2793-2801. 10.1210/me.2002-0020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement