Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of TGA-mediating methods

From: An update on targeted gene repair in mammalian cells: methods and mechanisms

Method:

ssODNs

SDF

TFO

AAV

ZFN

Repair pathways involved

NER, HDR? (MMR and NHEJ are suppressive)

SFHR

NER, NHEJ? MMR? HDR?

HDR, NHEJ

HDR, NHEJ

Correction efficiency a

0.1-5% (somatic cells) ~0.1% (ESCs)

0.2-20% (somatic cells) 0.025% (ESCs)

0.1-1.5% (somatic cells)

9.86%-65% (somatic cells) ~1% (ESCs and iPSCs)

~18-30% (somatic cells) 0.15-5% (iPSCs + ESCs)

Advantages

No integration of exogenous DNA, synthesis, stable, reproducible results

Reproducible results, potent episomal repair, artifacts can be circumvented

Synthesis, low toxicity, target specific, functional in hHPCs, stable target-complex formation

High efficiency and fidelity, effective in vivo delivery, broad cell type target field, low pathogenicity

High efficiency, known repair mechanism, normal cell cycle profiles, low background integrations, target silent genes

Disadvantages

Unknown repair mechanism, limited sequence size, PCR artifacts, genotoxicity, cell replication dependency

SFHR mechanism unknown, depend on HDR-like mechanism, synthesis (PCR)

Unknown repair mechanism, homopurine target restriction, G-C-rich sequences, weak DNA-binding, cellular death

Safety concerns, size limitation, integration of exogenous DNA, random integrations, cellular death

Synthesis, off-target cleavage, integration of exogenous DNA, multiple transductions

Targeted disease genes

Dystrophin

α-D-glucosidase

β-PDE

TYR

CFTR

DNA-PKcs

Dystrophin

β-globin

SMN1

β-globin

COL1A1

COL1A2

FANCA

Fah

CFTR

CCR5

IL2Rγ

CFTR

HoxB13

TYR

References b

[4, 9, 12, 14, 41, 46–49, 51, 52, 54, 62, 116, 117]

[4, 8, 35, 39, 40, 63, 64, 118–121]

[16, 66–69, 80, 84, 122]

[4, 11, 31, 54, 85, 88, 90, 92, 93, 123, 124]

[6, 10, 12, 13, 102, 104, 114, 125–127]

  1. a) Note that the correction efficiencies might not be directly comparable due to differences in determination (e.g. efficiency vs. efficacy, factoring in targeting frequency, in vivo vs. in vitro conditions, etc.).
  2. b) References used to construct table.