Skip to main content

Table 4 Distribution of C4 polymorphisms in Graves' disease patients with or without Graves' ophthalmopathy

From: Association between copy number variation of complement component C4 and Graves' disease

Variations

GO

P value, individuala

[OR (95%CI), individual]c

P valueb

OR (95%CI)d

 

No, N (%)

Yes, N (%)

   

C4 CNV

     

4

196 (49.4)

118 (52.0)

0.561

0.396

(Reference)

< 4

92 (23.2)

42 (18.5)

0.188

 

0.978(0.614-1.558)

> 4

109 (27.5)

67 (29.5)

0.581

 

1.029(0.687-1.540)

C4A CNV

     

2

238 (39.9)

157 (69.2)

0.025 [1.436 (0.994-2.075)]

0.014

(Reference)

< 2

61 (15.4)

18 (7.9)

0.008 [0.590 (0.328-1.059)]

 

0.549 (0.303-0.998)

> 2

98 (24.7)

52 (22.9)

0.628

 

0.772 (0.509-1.169)

C4B CNV

     

2

229 (57.7)

148 (65.2)

0.074

0.186

(Reference)

< 2

97 (24.4)

46 (20.3)

0.276

 

0.806 (0.520-1.249)

> 2

71 (17.9)

33 (14.5)

0.316

 

0.697 (0.430-1.132)

C4 polymorphisms

     

A2B2

149 (37.5)

105 (46.3)

0.035 [1.283 (0.900-1.828)]

0.005

(Reference)

A2B1

53 (13.4)

25 (11.0)

0.451

 

0.796 (0.449-1.411)

A3B2

37 (9.3)

27 (11.9)

0.338

 

1.067 (0.596-1.912)

A2B3

29 (7.3)

15 (6.6)

0.871

 

0.734 (0.366-1.476)

A3B1

25 (6.3)

7 (3.1)

0.091

 

0.374 (0.146-0.960)

A1B2

28 (7.1)

6 (2.6)

0.026 [0.451(0.176-1.160)]

 

0.374 (0.153-1.056)

Other

65 (16.4)

40 (17.6)

  

0.894 (0.549-1.455)

  1. Abbreviations: GD, Graves' disease; GO, Graves' ophthalmopathy; CNV, copy number variation; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; N, number.
  2. aIndividual C4 CNVs and polymorphisms between GD patients with or without GO were evaluated by Fisher's exact test using 2 × 2 contingency tables.
  3. b CNV of C4, C4A and C4B between GD patients with or without GO were evaluated by Fisher's exact test using 3 × 2 contingency tables.C4 polymorphisms between GD patients with or without GO were evaluated by Fisher's exact test using 7 × 2 contingency tables. The p value was estimated by 100,000 Monte Carlo simulations with 99% confidence intervals (CI).
  4. cORs and 95% CIs were estimated from logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, ever received radioiodine treatment, myxedema and vitiligo.
  5. dORs and 95% CIs were estimated from logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, ever received radioiodine treatment, myxedema and vitiligo.