Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of overall survival benefits among patients with different etiologies of HCC who received anti-PD-1/ anti-PDL1 based therapy

From: Translational research on drug development and biomarker discovery for hepatocellular carcinoma

Etiology

Study

OS hazard ratio (95% CI)

No of subjects ICI-based therapy/Control

Non-viral

IMbrave 150

0.91 (0.52–1.59)

100

53

KEYNOTE-240

0.88 (0.64–1.21)

163

85

CheckMate-459

0.95 (0.74–1.22)

168

168

RATIONALE-301

0.78 (0.55–1.12)

82

80

COSMIC-312

1.18 (0.78–1.79)

169

86

LEAP-002

0.86 (0.66–1.13)

118

133

Camrelizumab + rivoceranib, 2022

0.65 (0.36–1.20)

42

45

HIMALAYA

0.74 (0.67–0.95)

161

166

HCV-HCC

IMbrave 150

0.43 (0.21–0.87)

72

36

KEYNOTE-240

0.96 (0.48–1.92)

43

21

CheckMate-459

0.71 (0.49–1.01)

87

86

RATIONALE-301

0.64 (0.38–1.08)

46

39

COSMIC-312

1.10 (0.72–1.68)

136

67

LEAP-002

0.86 (0.60–1.24)

94

87

Camrelizumab + rivoceranib, 2022

0.56 (0.22–1.45)

22

29

HIMALAYA

1.06 (0.76–1.49)

110

104

HBV-HCC

IMbrave 150

0.51 (0.32–0.81)

164

76

KEYNOTE-240

0.57 (0.35–0.93)

72

29

CheckMate-459

0.77 (0.56–1.05)

116

117

RATIONALE-301

0.91 (0.73–1.14)

214

213

COSMIC-312

0.53 (0.33–0.87)

127

64

LEAP-002

0.75 (0.58–0.97)

192

193

Camrelizumab + rivoceranib, 2022

0.53 (0.41–0.68)

208

197

HIMALAYA

0.64 (0.48–0.86)

122

119