Open Access

Detection of vascular endothelial growth factor in colon cancer xenografts using bevacizumab based near infrared fluorophore conjugate

  • Bishnuhari Paudyal1, 2Email author,
  • Pramila Paudyal2,
  • Dilip Shah3,
  • Hideyuki Tominaga2,
  • Yoshito Tsushima2 and
  • Keigo Endo2, 4
Journal of Biomedical Science201421:35

DOI: 10.1186/1423-0127-21-35

Received: 10 March 2014

Accepted: 23 April 2014

Published: 29 April 2014

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to develop the near infrared fluorescence (NIRF)-based imaging agent for the visualization of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in colon cancer. AlexaFluor 750 conjugating with bevacizumab, and injected intravenously into nude mice bearing VEGF over-expressing HT29 human colorectal cancer. Optical imaging was performed at 15 min, 24 h and 48 h post injection. Immunofluorescences staining of the tumor sections were performed. HT29 colorectal cancer xenografts were clearly visualized with bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750.

Results

Ex vivo analysis showed 2.1 ± 0.4%, 37.6 ± 6.3% and 38.5 ± 6.2% injected dose/g accumulated in the tumors at 15 min, 24 h and 48 h respectively. Tumor uptake was significantly decreased in pretreated with excess of bevacizumab (p = 0.002). Immunofluorescence analysis showed strong staining of anti-CD 31 antibody around the blood vessels. Anti-VEGF-A and bevacizumab showed heterogeneous expression throughout the tumor.

Conclusions

Current study successfully detected the VEGF expression in HT29 colorectal cancer xenografts, signifying as a potential agent for non-invasive imaging of VEGF expression, which may be applied in clinical practice.

Keywords

Near infrared fluorescence VEGF Optical Imaging Bevacizumab Colorectal cancer

Background

Molecular imaging has emerged as an indispensable tool in the field of cancer research for in vivo monitoring of specific molecular and cellular processes, such as gene expression, multiple simultaneous molecular events, progression or regression of cancer, reliable diagnostic imaging for various malignancy, and it allows for functional assessment of tumors [16]. Optical imaging is an emerging modality of choice for preclinical studies to evaluate the expression of different kinds of proteins. It allows visualization of subcellular structures on a microscopic scale, as well as macroscopic distribution of fluorescent labels in vivo in small animals [7]. However, high tissue auto fluorescence and limited tissue penetration preclude the use of visible light for most in vivo imaging applications. Near infrared (NIR) light solves these problems by reducing fluorescence background and enhancing tissue penetration [810].

Over the past several years, there has been an explosion of reports describing successful in vivo NIR fluorescence imaging [1118]. Several optical contrast agents have been developed for the detection of various types of cancer [1921]. Although most of these studies are qualitative, quantitative studies are beginning to emerge. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is upregulated in numerous solid malignancies including colon cancer. VEGF induces and the formation of vesiculo-vacuolar organelles that form channels through which blood-borne proteins can extravasate. This leads to the formation of an extravascular fibrin gel, which provides a matrix that supports the growth of endothelial cells and tumor cells and allows invasion of stromal cells into the developing tumor [22]. Several studies have implicated VEGF in human colon cancer angiogenesis [23]. However, the increased in VEGF expression has been associated with poor prognosis. VEGF overexpression is seen in most cancers, providing an attractive target for molecular therapies [17, 2427]. One of the most successful approaches is the development of bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF [28]. Bevacizumab binds with all VEGF-A isoforms and prevents interaction with the VEGF-A receptors, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, and thus inhibits VEGF-mediated angiogenesis [15]. The present study evaluated the feasibility of using NIRF-labeled bevacizumab for tumor imaging in colon cancer xenografts. Bevacizumab was labeled with NIRF agent, and the optical imaging and biodistribution of the conjugate were investigated in nude mice bearing VEGF overexpressing HT29 colorectal cancer xenografts.

Methods

Cell lines

Human colorectal cancer cell line HT29 was purchased from American Type Culture (Rockville, USA) and was cultured in McCoy’s medium (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin).

Reagents

Bevacizumab (Avastin®, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Tokyo, Japan) was conjugated with SAIVI AlexaFluor 750, 3 mg labeling kits (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 3 mg/ml of the bevacizumab was mixed with sodium bicarbonate and conjugated with Alexa Fluor 750. The purification of labeled antibody was performed in a spin column filled with size exclusion resin in PBS, pH 7.2. Spectrophotometer was used to analyze the moles the stoichiometry of dye-to-protein was estimated from absorbance according to the protocol from Invitrogen. The fluorescent protein was aliquoted and stored in the dark at room temperature.

Immunofluorescence studies

Frozen tissue slides were fixed in ice-cold acetone and were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, and blocked with 3% BSA in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. The specimens were then incubated with rat anti-mouse CD 31 antibody (PEGAM-1; Becton-Dickinson, Harlingen, CA, USA), anti-mouse VEGF-A (BioLegend, CA, USA), and bevacizumab for 1 h at room temperature. After thoroughly washing with PBS, the slides were visualized with AlexaFluor 488 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Mounting medium with DAPI (Vector, CA, USA) was used to fix and stain the cell nuclei. The cells were then observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX50, Tokyo, Japan). Average microvessel density (MVD) was calculated by averaging the number of CD31-positive vessel structures counted from three randomized fields per tumor section at a magnification of 200× under the fluorescence microscope.

In vivo tumor model

Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with Gunma University institutional guideline and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee. Female Balb/c nude mice, 6 weeks old (CLEA, Tokyo, Japan) were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions and were provided with sterile food and water. Nude mice were inoculated subcutaneously with VEGF expressing HT29 cells. When the tumors were 7–8 mm in diameter, the animals were injected intravenously with 50 μg of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750. For competitive blocking studies, another group of mice (n = 4) were pretreated with excess fold of unconjugated bevacizumab before administering the fluorescently labeled bevacizumab. Blood was withdrawn from the tail veins of xenografted mice to determine the concentration of VEGF in serum. Mice were examined by optical imaging.

Fluorescence imaging

The in vivo optical imaging was carried out with a small animal in vivo imaging system (Maestro CRI, MA, USA). The animals were anesthetized with 10% pentobarbital sodium before the acquisition was started. A customized filter set (excitation, 710–760 nm; emission, 695–800 nm) was used for NIRF data acquisition. A group of 4 mice were used at each time point for the experiments. The biodistribution of fluorescence intensity was monitored at 15 min, 24 h and 48 h post-injection. In order to quantitatively estimate the accumulation of the probe in selected organs, animals were killed by decapitation. Tissues of interest were excised and weighed. The fluorescence intensity of each tissue was measured and normalized to photons per second with an ROI covering the entire tissue. The total fluorescence flux of each tissue was divided by its weight. The results were calculated as % injected dose/gram (% ID/g).

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Means were compared using unpaired student’s t-test. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Synthesis and characterization of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750

The molar ratio of AlexaFluor 750 to bevacizumab was determined to be 2:1. The absorption and fluorescence emission characteristics of the bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 was found to be similar to those of free AlexaFluor 750, as apparent from the spectra measured in PBS, suggesting that the fluorescence property of the AlexaFluor 750 was not affected by the conjugation to the bevacizumab.

In vivo imaging studies with bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750

Figure 1 shows NIR fluorescence images of mice bearing VEGF positive HT29 tumors at 15 min (a-b), 24 h (c-d), and 48 h (e-f). In vivo fluorescence detection revealed distinct uptake in the VEGF overexpressing HT29 tumors at 24 h and 48 h after the IV injection of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750. The fluorescence signal was clearly visualized in the tumor area as compared with normal regions. The HT29 tumor bearing xenografts pretreated with excess fold of bevacizumab Figure 2(b) showed a significant (p = 0.002) decrease in the accumulation of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 in comparing with untreated tumor Figure 2(a), illustrating the specificity that completely block the bevacizumab-Alexa Fluor750. Quantitative analysis of the ex vivo tissue fluorescence images post-injection with bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 (Figure 3) demonstrates the progressive accumulation of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 by the VEGF positive HT29 tumors (2.1 ± 0.4% ID/g), (37.6 ± 6.3% ID/g) and (38.5 ± 6.2% ID/g) at 15 min, 24 h and 48 h respectively, post injection. The tumor to blood ratio was 1.3 ± 1.1 at 24 h. and 1.5 ± 1.2 at 48 h. Intense fluorescence was seen in the blood and blood-rich organs like lung (78.5 ± 13.8% ID/g) and liver (76.8 ± 3.0% ID/g) at 15 min, which decreased at 24 h to 19.2 ± 3.0% and 48 h to 29.6 ± 5.3% ID/g, respectively (Figure 3). The fluorescence intensity in muscle and other non-target regions were nominal.
Figure 1

NIRF images of HT29 human colon cancer bearing mice obtained at 15 min (a-b), 24 h (c-d) and 48 h (e-f) after intravenous injection of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750. Arrows indicate tumor, L: Liver, I: Intestine, S: Stomach, Sp: Spleen, P: Pancreas, Lu: Lung, H: Heart, M: Muscle, B: Bone, Br: Brain.

Figure 2

The tumor and serum (the representative HT29 tumor bearing mouse) was pretreated with excess fold of bevacizumab: tumor VEGF (a-b) and serum VEGF (c-d). Tumor VEGF in the pretreated group of mice is significantly (p = 0.002) suppressed (b) in the accumulation of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 in comparing with untreated tumor Figure 2(a), while the serum VEGF is relatively higher (d) comparing to the untreated serum (c).

Figure 3

Biodistribution studies of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 in HT29, human colon cancer bearing mice at 15 min, 24 h and 48 h. Data compare in percent injected dose per gram in the organs after injection with bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750. Tumor uptake reached the peak at 24 h.

Immunofluorescence studies

To characterize the localization of VEGF, histological analysis of the tumor specimens was performed using anti-CD31, anti-VEGF-A, and bevacizumab. Figure 4(a-c) shows the expression of CD 31 and VEGF. Strong staining by the anti-CD31 antibody is noted around the blood vessels formed within the tumor section. The expression pattern of VEGF was heterogeneous throughout the cytoplasm. Both bevacizumab and anti-VEGF-A showed similar cytoplasmic staining, suggesting the binding of both antibodies to the VEGF antigen. A significant correlation was obtained between the bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 % ID/g uptake of the tumors and their respective MVD (p = 0.01, r2 = 0.89), as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 4

Immunofluorescence staining of HT29 tumor with: (a) anti-CD 31 antibody (400×), (b) anti-VEGF-A antibody (800×), and (c) bevacizumab (800×) in frozen sections (Green: antibody labeled AlexaFluor 488, blue is DAPI).

Figure 5

Significant correlation is noted ( p= 0.01, r 2 = 0.89), between the presences of average micro vessel density in three random fields and the tumor uptake as measured by % ID/g.

Discussion

The present study reports the development and validation of the bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 conjugates as a NIRF imaging agent for noninvasive imaging of VEGF expression in human colon cancer xenografts in mice. In vivo assessment of VEGF within a tumor using bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 offers further information about the angiogenic activity of the tumor.

Here we showed a significant VEGF specific accumulation of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 in the tumor region. Immunofluorescence microscopy with anti-VEGF-A and bevacizumab showed heterogeneous expression throughout the cytoplasm of HT29 cells. The presence of adequate microvessels was noted when the slides were incubated with anti-CD31 antibody, which might have contributed to the higher accumulation of the bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750. A significant linear correlation was noted between the MVD and the tumor accumulation as determined by % ID/g, in agreement with the role of VEGF in angiogenesis. The mice treated with excess folds of bevacizumab before the administration of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 showed decreases in serum than those without pretreatment however the difference was not significant. This discrepancy may be due to the fact that, even though the energy absorbed due to water or other naturally occurring fluorochromes is low at the near infrared window, the sensitivity is not as high as it is in the case of hemoglobin, suggesting its limited use as a primary imaging modality.

Generally, serum VEGF is measured to monitor the VEGF expression before the initiation of therapy however VEGF concentration determined from circulation are invasive and are obscure due to the fact that circulating VEGF not only measures the tumor VEGF but also the VEGF secreted by platelets, granulocytes, monocytes, mast cells, and lymphocytes which might give a false positive result [29]. Understanding the complex role of VEGF in tumor development has been somewhat limited by the absence of methods to measure this cytokine spatially and temporally [30]. There is a need for the development of noninvasive imaging to allow monitoring of angiogenesis related molecular events. Reliable markers that can predict which patients are more likely to respond to anti-VEGF therapy would be important, but they have been elusive so far.

Few studies have documented the ability to image VEGF in vivo using radiolabeled bevacizumab [3134]. Recently, Scheer et al. found no correlation between the level of antibody accumulation and expression of VEGF, measured by ELISA in the liver metastasis [35]. Even though these studies possess useful information on the diagnosis, imaging with radiolabeled compounds requires expensive equipment and exposes patients to ionizing radiation. Optical imaging is emerging as a sensitive, specific, inexpensive, and convenient technology that permits the study of a variety of cellular and molecular processes in vivo. Earlier studies reported that NIR fluorophores can be detected 7–14 cm deep in tissue [9]. Nevertheless, it suffers from poor detectability due to low tissue penetration. This inspection, together with our results and the continued development of versatile imaging devices, could overcome these issues and therefore make optical imaging the modality of choice.

In clinical settings, optical imaging is relevant for tissues close to the surface of the skin, tissues accessible by endoscopy, and intraoperative visualization. Multimodality imaging approach can be developed such as further labeling of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 with radionuclides for PET and SPECT as well as a contrast agent for MRI to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of biomedical imaging in vivo.

The large size of an antibody impacts its ability to move through a tumor mass. A high interstitial pressure inhibits the diffusion of larger molecules within the tumor migration within the tumor is also inhibited by a binding site barrier [3537]. Administering higher doses of the antibody can reduce the effect of the binding site barrier and allow the antibody to diffuse more deeply into the tumor bed [37]. The present study showed that the tumor uptake of bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 in HT29 xenografts was high, and lower in the non-targeted tissues. The high tumor accumulation is the most important property of the optical imaging tracer. These results warrant the further assessment of this bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 for imaging in colon cancer and other tumor models.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we could successfully detect the VEGF expressing tumors using bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 in vivo. Because the majority of tumor vasculature overexpresses VEGF during angiogenesis, bevacizumab-AlexaFluor 750 has great potential for detecting tumor vasculature in vivo in general for most cancer types. The results reported here open up new perspectives for VEGF-targeted imaging in a less expensive way.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Dr. Paudyal thanks Prof. Mathew Thakur of the Department of Radiology, Prof. Eric Wicktrom of the Department of Biochemistry and Jonathan Gorky of the Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA for their expertise on review and valuable comments. This work was supported by grants-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
(2)
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine
(3)
Center for Translational Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University
(4)
Kyoto College of Medical Science

References

  1. Weissleder R, Mahmood U: Molecular imaging. Radiology. 2001, 219: 316-333. 10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma19316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Herschman HR: Molecular imaging: looking at problems, seeing solutions. Science. 2003, 302: 605-608. 10.1126/science.1090585.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Paudyal B, Zhang K, Chen CP, Wampole ME, Mehta N, Mitchell EP, Gray BD, Mattis JA, Pak KY, Thakur ML, Wickstrom E: Determining efficacy of breast cancer therapy by PET imaging of HER2 mRNA. Nucl Med Biol. 2013, 40: 994-999. 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.08.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Paudyal B, Oriuchi N, Paudyal P, Tsushima Y, Iida Y, Higuchi T, Hanaoka H, Miyakubo M, Takano A, Ishikita T, Endo K: Early diagnosis of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma with 18 F-FDG PET after radiofrequency ablation therapy. Oncol Rep. 2007, 18: 1469-1473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Paudyal B, Paudyal P, Oriuchi N, Tsushima Y, Nakajima T, Endo K: Clinical implication of glucose transport and metabolism evaluated by 18 F-FDG PET in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2008, 33: 1047-1054.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Paudyal P, Paudyal B, Hanaoka H, Oriuchi N, Iida Y, Yoshioka H, Tominaga H, Watanabe S, Ishioka NS, Endo K: Imaging and biodistribution of Her2/neu expression in non-small cell lung cancer xenografts with Cu-labeled trastuzumab PET. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101: 1045-1050. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01480.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoffman RM: The multiple uses of fluorescent proteins to visualize cancer in vivo. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005, 5: 796-806. 10.1038/nrc1717.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ke S, Wen X, Gurfinkel M, Charnsangavej C, Wallace S, Sevick-Muraca EM, Li C: Near-infrared optical imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor in breast cancer xenografts. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 7870-7875.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Weissleder R, Ntziachristos V: Shedding light onto live molecular targets. Nat Med. 2003, 9: 123-128. 10.1038/nm0103-123.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Klohs J, Wunder A, Licha K: Near-infrared fluorescent probes for imaging vascular pathophysiology. Basic Res Cardiol. 2008, 103: 144-151. 10.1007/s00395-008-0702-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Paudyal P, Paudyal B, Iida Y, Oriuchi N, Hanaoka H, Tominaga H, Ishikita T, Yoshioka H, Higuchi T, Endo K: Dual functional molecular imaging probe targeting CD20 with PET and optical imaging. Oncol Rep. 2009, 22: 115-119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mahmood U, Tung CH, Bogdanov A, Weissleder R: Near-infrared optical imaging of protease activity for tumor detection. Radiology. 1999, 213: 866-870. 10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc14866.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang SK, Rizvi I, Solban N, Hasan T: In vivo optical molecular imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor for monitoring cancer treatment. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 4146-4153. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhu Q, Tannenbaum S, Hegde P, Kane M, Xu C, Kurtzman SH: Noninvasive monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy using optical tomography with ultrasound localization. Neoplasia. 2008, 10: 1028-1040.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang Y, Hong H, Engle JW, Yang Y, Barnhart TE, Cai W: Positron Emission Tomography and Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor with Dual-Labeled Bevacizumab. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012, 2: 1-13.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Thakur ML, Zhang K, Paudyal B, Devakumar D, Covarrubias MY, Chen CP, Gray BD, Wickstrom E, Pak KY: Targeting apoptosis for optical imaging of infection. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012, 14: 163-171. 10.1007/s11307-011-0490-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Terwisscha van Scheltinga AG, van Dam GM, Nagengast WB, Ntziachristos V, Hollema H, Herek JL, Schroder CP, Kosterink JG, Lub-de Hoog MN, de Vries EG: Intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence tumor imaging with vascular endothelial growth factor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeting antibodies. J Nucl Med. 2011, 52: 1778-1785. 10.2967/jnumed.111.092833.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Leevy WM, Lambert TN, Johnson JR, Morris J, Smith BD: Quantum dot probes for bacteria distinguish Escherichia coli mutants and permit in vivo imaging. Chem Commun (Camb). 2008, 20: 2331-2333.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pierce MC, Javier DJ, Richards-Kortum R: Optical contrast agents and imaging systems for detection and diagnosis of cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008, 123: 1979-1990. 10.1002/ijc.23858.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bremer C, Ntziachristos V, Weissleder R: Optical-based molecular imaging: contrast agents and potential medical applications. Eur Radiol. 2003, 13: 231-243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Withrow KP, Newman JR, Skipper JB, Gleysteen JP, Magnuson JS, Zinn K, Rosenthal EL: Assessment of bevacizumab conjugated to Cy5.5 for detection of head and neck cancer xenografts. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2008, 7: 61-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Neufeld G, Cohen T, Gengrinovitch S, Poltorak Z: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. FASEB J. 1999, 13: 9-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Brown LF, Berse B, Jackman RW, Tognazzi K, Manseau EJ, Senger DR, Dvorak HF: Expression of vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) and its receptors in adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Cancer Res. 1993, 53: 4727-4735.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Paudyal B, Paudyal P, Oriuchi N, Hanaoka H, Tominaga H, Endo K: Positron emission tomography imaging and biodistribution of vascular endothelial growth factor with 64Cu-labeled bevacizumab in colorectal cancer xenografts. Cancer Sci. 2011, 102: 117-121. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01763.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Folkman J: Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971, 285: 1182-1186. 10.1056/NEJM197111182852108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferrara N, Hillan KJ, Gerber HP, Novotny W: Discovery and development of bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody for treating cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004, 3: 391-400. 10.1038/nrd1381.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gasparini G, Longo R, Fanelli M, Teicher BA: Combination of antiangiogenic therapy with other anticancer therapies: results, challenges, and open questions. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 1295-1311. 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, Berlin J, Baron A, Griffing S, Holmgren E: Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004, 350: 2335-2342. 10.1056/NEJMoa032691.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB, Toi M, Martin L, McCulloch P, Pezzella F, Viale G, Weidner N, Harris AL, Dirix LY: Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumours: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. Eur J Cancer. 1996, 32A: 2474-2484.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J: The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med. 2003, 9: 669-676. 10.1038/nm0603-669.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Stollman TH, Scheer MG, Leenders WP, Verrijp KC, Soede AC, Oyen WJ, Ruers TJ, Boerman OC: Specific imaging of VEGF-A expression with radiolabeled anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody. Int J Cancer. 2008, 122: 2310-2314. 10.1002/ijc.23404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nagengast WB, de Vries EG, Hospers GA, Mulder NH, de Jong JR, Hollema H, Brouwers AH, van Dongen GA, Perk LR, Lub-de Hooge MN: In vivo VEGF imaging with radiolabeled bevacizumab in a human ovarian tumor xenograft. J Nucl Med. 2007, 48: 1313-1319. 10.2967/jnumed.107.041301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Abbas Rizvi SM, Song EY, Raja C, Beretov J, Morgenstern A, Apostolidis C, Russell PJ, Kearsley JH, Abbas K, Allen BJ: Preparation and testing of bevacizumab radioimmunoconjugates with Bismuth-213 and Bismuth-205/Bismuth-206. Cancer Biol Ther. 2008, 7: 1547-1554. 10.4161/cbt.7.10.6538.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Scheer MG, Stollman TH, Boerman OC, Verrijp K, Sweep FC, Leenders WP, Ruers TJ, Oyen WJ: Imaging liver metastases of colorectal cancer patients with radiolabelled bevacizumab: Lack of correlation with VEGF-A expression. Eur J Cancer. 2008, 44: 1835-1840. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jain RK: Transport of molecules, particles, and cells in solid tumors. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 1999, 1: 241-263. 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fujimori K, Covell DG, Fletcher JE, Weinstein JN: A modeling analysis of monoclonal antibody percolation through tumors: a binding-site barrier. J Nucl Med. 1990, 31: 1191-1198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Adams GP, Schier R, McCall AM, Simmons HH, Horak EM, Alpaugh RK, Marks JD, Weiner LM: High affinity restricts the localization and tumor penetration of single-chain fv antibody molecules. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 4750-4755.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Paudyal et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement