Combination of apigenin treatment with therapeutic HPV DNA vaccination generates enhanced therapeutic antitumor effects
© Chuang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 04 December 2008
Accepted: 27 May 2009
Published: 27 May 2009
It is important to develop innovative therapies for advanced stage cancers in addition to the conventional therapies including chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. Antigen-specific immunotherapy has emerged as a novel alternate therapy for advanced stage cancers, which may be employed in conjunction with conventional therapies.
In the current study, we tested the effect of treatment with the chemotherapeutic agent, apigenin in combination with DNA vaccines encoding the HPV-16 E7 antigen linked to heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) in the control of the E7-expressing tumor, TC-1.
We observed that treatment with apigenin rendered the TC-1 tumor cells more susceptible to lysis by E7-specific cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, treatment of TC-1 tumor cells with apigenin was found to enhance apoptotic tumor cell death in vitro in a dose-dependant manner. We showed that TC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated with apigenin combined with E7-HSP70 DNA generate highest frequency of primary and memory E7-specific CD8+ T cells, leading to potent therapeutic anti-tumor effects against E7-expressing tumors.
Thus, apigenin represents a promising chemotherapeutic agent, which may be used in combination with immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced stage cancers. The clinical implications of the current strategy are discussed.
Advanced stage cancers are difficult to control using conventional therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation and/or surgery. Thus, the development of innovative therapies for advanced stage cancers is urgently needed. Antigen-specific immunotherapy has the potency to eradicate systemic tumors at multiple sites in the body, as well as the specificity to discriminate between malignant and normal cells. Thus, immunotherapy, such as DNA vaccination provides a promising alternate approach for advanced stage cancers, which may be employed in conjunction with conventional therapies.
DNA vaccination has the advantages of purity, simplicity of preparation, and stability. In addition, DNA-based vaccines can be prepared inexpensively and rapidly on a large scale (for review, see [1, 2]). However, due to the low immunogenicity of DNA vaccines, strategies need to be developed to enhance DNA vaccine potency. Intradermal administration of DNA vaccines via gene gun represents an efficient way to deliver DNA vaccines into professional APCs in vivo. In addition, several strategies have been developed to enhance the potency of DNA vaccines by modification of the properties of antigen-presenting cells (APCs) (for review see [3–5]).
We have previously developed several intracellular targeting strategies to improve DNA vaccine potency by linkage of antigen to proteins that target the antigen for proteasomal degradation or entry into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), thus facilitating MHC class I presentation of linked antigen in DCs. Vaccination with a fusion DNA construct encoding E7 antigen linked to Mycobacterium tuberculosis heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) (E7-HSP70) was shown to enhance E7-specific CD8+ T-cell-mediated immune responses and protect mice against E7-expressing TC-1 tumor growth . This strategy is currently being translated to phase I/II clinical trials in patients with HPV-16 associated CIN lesions using the GMP grade E7-HSP70 DNA vaccine (pNGVL4a-Sig/E7(detox)/HSP70), which has been tested in human vaccine trials . In addition, the same DNA vaccine has been used in HPV16+ patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (Dr. Maura Gillison, personal communication). Thus, the current DNA vaccine has significant potential for clinical translation for the treatment of HPV-associated malignancies.
Another innovative approach for the control of cancer is the employment of immunomodulatory chemotherapeutic agents such as flavonoids. Flavonoids, such as epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG)) have been shown to have positive immune modulating effects via mechanisms of antioxidant, antiinflammatory, and anti-cyclooxygenase activities [8, 9]. Apigenin is of particular interest as an antitumor agent since it exhibits lower intrinsic toxicity and is not mutagenic as compared to other structurally related flavonoids . Furthermore, apigenin has been shown to demonstrate antitumor effects in several tumor cell lines, including those derived from prostate, pancreatic and breast cancer [11–13]. Thus, apigenin represents a promising chemotherapeutic agent for cancer therapy.
In the current study, we aim to test the combination of apigenin treatment with E7-HSP70 DNA vaccination in the control of the E7-expressing tumor, TC-1. We observed that treatment with apigenin rendered the TC-1 tumor cells more susceptible to lysis by E7-specific CTLs. Furthermore, treatment of TC-1 tumor cells with apigenin was found to enhance apoptotic tumor cell death in vitro in a dose-dependant manner. We showed that TC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated with apigenin combined with E7-HSP70 DNA generate highest frequency of primary and memory E7-specific CD8+ T cells, leading to potent therapeutic anti-tumor effects against E7-expressing tumors. The clinical implications of the current strategy are discussed.
Materials and methods
Animals and Chemicals
Female C57BL/6 mice (H-2Kb and I-Ab), 5 to 6 weeks of age, were purchased from National Cancer Institute (Frederick, Maryland, USA) and kept in the oncology animal facility of the Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, Maryland, USA). Animals were used in compliance with institutional animal health care regulations, and all animal experimental procedures were approved by the Johns Hopkins Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Apigenin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA).
Murine Tumor Cell Line
The production and maintenance of TC-1 cells  and E7-specific T cells  have been described previously. Luciferase-expressing TC-1 cells (TC-1-luc) were generated by transducing TC-1 cells with retrovirus containing luciferase pLuci-thy1.1 and flow cytometry sorting following the protocol described previously. Briefly, In order to generate a retrovirus containing luciferase, a pLucithy1.1 construct expressing both luciferase and thy1.1 was made. Firefly luciferase was amplified by PCR from pGL3-basic (Promega) using the 5' primer CGGAGATCTATGGAAGACGCCAAAAAC and the 3' primer CGGGTTAACTTACGGCGATCTTTCC. The amplified luciferase cDNA was inserted into the Bgl II and Hpa I sites of the bicistronic vector pMIG-thy1.1. Both luciferase and thy1.1 cDNA are under the control of a single promoter element and separated by an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES). The pLuci-thy1.1 was transfected into Phoenix packaging cell line and the virion-containing supernatant was collected 48 h after transfection. The supernatant was immediately treated using a 0.45-mm cellulose acetate syringe filter (Nalgene, Rochester, New York, USA) and used to infect TC-1 in the presence of 8 mg/ml Polybrene (Sigma, St Louis, Missouri, USA). TC-1-luc cells were sorted using preparative flow cytometry of stained cells with thy1.1 antibody (BD, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA). Both TC-1 cell line and TC-1-luc cell line were maintained in RPMI 1640, supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, 50 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM nonessential amino acids, and 0.4 mg/ml G418 at 37°C with 5% CO2. On the day of tumor challenge, TC-1 cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed twice with 1× Hanks buffered salt solution, and finally resuspended in 1× Hanks buffered salt solution to the designated concentration.
In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay
Luciferase-expressing TC-1 cells  in medium were seeded into a 24-well round-bottom plate (1 × 105 cells/well). Twenty-four hours later, apigenin alone or in combination with E7-specific T cells were added into each well. Apigenin was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and mixed with fresh medium to achieve the desired concentration of 0.2%. This concentration of DMSO did not alter cell growth . Cells treated with solvent DMSO (0.1%) alone were used as controls. E7-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes from the spleens of tumor bearing mice immunized with the DNA vaccine served as effector cells and were added in the amount of 1 × 106 cells/well. TC-1 cells expressing luciferase were used as target cells. After incubation, D-luciferin (potassium salt; Xenogen Corp.) was added to each well at 150 μ g/ml in media 5 min before imaging. Bioluminescence imaging was taken at baseline, 24, 48, and 72 hours using the IVIS Imaging System Series 200 (Xenogen, Cranbury, New Jersey, USA). An integration time of 10 s was used for luminescence image acquisition. CTL-mediated killing was assessed using bioluminescence-imaging systems quantifying the decrease of luminescence from baseline.
Characterization of apoptotic cell death
The in vitro apoptotic effects of apigenin on TC-1 cells were evaluated using two-colored fluorescence using a phycoerythrin conjugated-Annexin V and 7-AAD apoptosis kit (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, TC-1 cells were co-incubated with the indicated concentrations of apigenin, and DMSO (0.1% v/v) was used as negative controls. At 6 and 48 hr post-incubation, TC-1 cells were harvested and washed twice in cold PBS and resuspended in binding buffer at a concentration of 1 × 106/ml. The cells were then exposed to the labeling solutions phycoerythrin conjugated-Annexin V and 7-AAD for 15 min. Flow cytometry analysis was performed using FACSCalibur with CELLQuest software (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, California, USA). Both early apoptotic (annexin V-positive and 7-AAD-negative) and late apoptotic (annexin V- negative and 7 AAD-positive) cells were included in the analysis.
Plasmid DNA Constructs and Preparations
DNA fragment encoding M. tuberculosis Hsp70 was obtained from pKS70. For the generation of Hsp70-expressing plasmid (pcDNA3-hsp70), the hsp70 was subcloned from pKS70 plasmid into the unique Bam HI and Hin dIII cloning sites of the pcDNA3.1 expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) downstream of the cytomegalovirus promoter . The generation of HPV-16 E7-expressing plasmid (pcDNA3-E7) and the E7-hsp70 chimera DNA (pcDNA-E7-hsp70) has been described previously .
DNA-coated gold particles were prepared, and gene gun particle-mediated DNA vaccination was performed, according to a protocol described previously . Gold particles coated with DNA vaccines (1 μg DNA/bullet) were delivered to the shaved abdominal regions of mice by using a helium-driven gene gun (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, Calif.) with a discharge pressure of 400 lb/in2. C57BL/6 mice (5 per group) were immunized with 2 μg of the DNA vaccine and received a booster dose 7 days after the first vaccination.
Intracytoplasmic Cytokine Staining and Flow Cytometry Analysis
Pooled splenocytes from mice treated with the various treatment regiments were harvested either 14 days (for primary immune response) and 42 days (for memory immune response) after tumor challenge. For the memory recall experiment, the vaccinated mice were re-vaccinated twice with E7-HSP70 DNA vaccine, 60 days after the last vaccination to generate the memory recall response. Ten days after the recall vaccination, splenocytes were harvested and incubated for 20 h with 1 μg/ml of E7 peptide containing an MHC class I epitope (aa49-57, RAHYNIVTF) in the presence of GolgiPlug (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, California, USA) . The stimulated splenocytes were then washed once with FACScan buffer and stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD8a (clone 53.6.7). Cells were subjected to intracellular cytokine staining using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit according to the manufacturer's instruction (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA). Intracellular IFN-γ was stained with FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse IFN-γ. All antibodies were purchased from BD Pharmingen. Flow cytometry analysis was performed using FACSCalibur with CELLQuest software (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, California, USA).
In Vivo Tumor Treatment Experiments
C57BL/6 mice were divided into four groups (control, apigenin only, E7-hsp70 only, and apigenin with E7-hsp70). All mice were inoculated with TC-1 cells (5 × 104) s.c. over right leg. For the control group, mice were regularly followed after TC-1 implantation without specific treatment. For the apigenin only group, 3 days after TC-1 implantation, each mouse was given i.p. apigenin (25 mg/kg) and continued for 10 days. For the E7-hsp70 only group, 3 days after TC-1 implantation, each mouse was vaccinated with E7-hsp70 2 μg via gene gun first, and was boosted 7 d later. For the apigenin with E7-hsp70 group, after TC-1 implantation, each mouse received the same vaccination schedule as the E7-hsp70 only group, and the same i.p. apigenin schedule as the apigenin only group.
Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 3.0 software (GraphPad, San Diego, California, USA). Observed differences in apoptosis between different concentrations of apigenin were evaluated using student's t test. Differences in IFN-γ expression in CD8+ cells were measured using Pearson's chi-square test. Survival curves were plotted using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. For all analyses p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise specified.
Treatment with apigenin renders the TC-1 tumor cells more susceptible to lysis by E7-specific CTLs
Treatment of TC-1 tumor cells with apigenin enhances the apoptotic tumor cell death in vitro in a dose-dependant manner
TC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated with apigenin combined with E7-HSP70 DNA generate highest frequency of primary and memory E7-specific CD8+ T cells
TC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated with apigenin combined with E7-HSP70 DNA generate a significant memory recall response of E7-specific CD8+ T cells
TC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated with apigenin combined with E7-HSP70 DNA vaccination generate the best therapeutic anti-tumor effects
In the current study, we observed that treatment with apigenin enhanced apoptotic tumor cell death and rendered the TC-1 tumor cells more susceptible to lysis by E7-specific CTLs. TC-1 tumor-bearing mice treated with apigenin combined with E7-HSP70 DNA were found to generate significant effector and memory E7-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses, thus generating strong therapeutic anti-tumor effects. Thus, treatment with the combination of DNA vaccine and apigenin is efficient in generated significant antitumor effects against E7-specific tumors.
In our study, we observed that treatment with apigenin led to an increase in the apoptotic cell death of the TC-1 tumor cells (See Figure 2). Our results are consistent with previous studies by other investigators. For example, apigenin has previously been shown to inhibit the growth of human cervical carcinoma cells by inducing apoptosis through a p53-dependant pathway by Zheng et al . They also showed that the HeLa cells treated with apigenin were arrested at G1 phase and demonstrated increased expression of the pro-apoptotic factors, Fas/APO-1, caspase-3 and p21/WAF1 protein and decreased expression of the anti-apoptotic protein, Bcl-2. Thus, the employment of apigenin may lead to apoptotic cell death in a variety of tumors.
The increased apoptotic tumor cell death caused by treatment with apigenin may contribute to the observed enhancement in antigen-specific immune responses generated by DNA vaccination (See Figure 3). One potential mechanism for the observed effect is that the apoptotic tumor cells may be taken up by antigen-presenting cells, resulting in the activation of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells (so called cross-priming mechanism). We and others have previously shown that chemotherapeutic agents that are capable of causing apoptotic cell death such as EGCG , cisplatin  or bortezomib  can significantly enhance the HPV antigen-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses induced by therapeutic HPV DNA vaccination, resulting in potent antitumor effects. Therefore, the apoptotic cell death caused by apigenin may contribute to the observed enhancement in the DNA vaccine potency.
For clinical translation, it is important to address issues regarding drug toxicity. Apigenin has been tested in several clinical trials and proven to be safe in humans [24, 25]. Furthermore, it is also important to address concerns regarding the potential for oncogenicity associated with administration of E7 as DNA vaccines into the body. Thus, the clinical grade GMP grade E7/HSP70 DNA vaccine that is being used for our clinical studies (pNGVL4a-Sig/E7(detox)/HSP70)  encodes attenuated (detox) versions of E7 antigen that has a mutation at position 24 and/or 26, which will disrupt the Rb binding site of E7, abolishing the capacity of E7 to transform cells . Furthermore, we have also used codon optimized E7 DNA in our vaccine constructs, which has been shown to enhance the expression of E7 antigen in DCs, leading to increased translation of the DNA vaccine in DCs [27, 28].
In addition, clinical translation may preclude the use of the pcDNA3 vector, because it contains an ampicillin resistance gene. Thus, our clinical grade DNA vaccine has used the pNGVL4a vector obtained from the NIH National Gene Vector Laboratory for DNA vaccine development. This vector is a second-generation plasmid derived from pNGVL-3, which has been previously used for human clinical trials . The pNGVL4a vector lacks the ampicillin resistance gene and thus would be suitable for clinical translation of the current DNA vaccines.
In summary, our data suggest that vaccination with E7-HSP70 DNA vaccine in combination with apigenin generates significantly better E7-specific immune responses as well as therapeutic antitumor effects. The preclinical observations serve as an important foundation for future clinical translation using apigenin in combination with therapeutic HPV DNA vaccines for the control of HPV-associated lesions.
We would like to thank Dr. T.-C. Wu for his helpful discussions and critical review of the manuscript. This work was supported by ovarian cancer grants from the Alliance for Cancer Gene Therapy (ACGT), the NCDGG (1U19 CA113341-01), American Cancer Society (ACS), National Cancer Institute SPORE in Cervical Cancer P50 CA098252 and the 1 RO1 CA114425-01.
- Donnelly JJ, Ulmer JB, Liu MA: DNA vaccines. Life Sci. 1997, 60: 163-172. 10.1016/S0024-3205(96)00502-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gurunathan S, Klinman DM, Seder RA: DNA vaccines: immunology, application, and optimization. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000, 18: 927-974. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.927.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hung CF, Wu TC: Improving DNA vaccine potency via modification of professional antigen presenting cells. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2003, 5: 20-24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsen SW, Paik AH, Hung CF, Wu TC: Enhancing DNA vaccine potency by modifying the properties of antigen-presenting cells. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2007, 6: 227-239. 10.1586/147605188.8.131.52.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rice J, Ottensmeier CH, Stevenson FK: DNA vaccines: precision tools for activating effective immunity against cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8: 108-120. 10.1038/nrc2326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen CH, Wang TL, Hung CF, Yang Y, Young RA, Pardoll DM, Wu TC: Enhancement of DNA vaccine potency by linkage of antigen gene to an HSP70 gene. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 1035-1042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trimble CL, Peng S, Kos F, Gravitt P, Viscidi R, Sugar E, Pardoll D, Wu T-C: A Phase I Trial of a Human Papillomavirus DNA Vaccine for HPV16+ Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2/3. Clinical Cancer Research. 2008,Google Scholar
- Hussain T, Gupta S, Adhami VM, Mukhtar H: Green tea constituent epigallocatechin-3-gallate selectively inhibits COX-2 without affecting COX-1 expression in human prostate carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer. 2005, 113: 660-669. 10.1002/ijc.20629.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeong YI, Jung ID, Lee JS, Lee CM, Lee JD, Park YM: (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate suppresses indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression in murine dendritic cells: evidences for the COX-2 and STAT1 as potential targets. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 354: 1004-1009. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.01.076.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Czeczot H, Tudek B, Kusztelak J, Szymczyk T, Dobrowolska B, Glinkowska G, Malinowski J, Strzelecka H: Isolation and studies of the mutagenic activity in the Ames test of flavonoids naturally occurring in medical herbs. Mutat Res. 1990, 240: 209-216. 10.1016/0165-1218(90)90060-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee SH, Ryu JK, Lee KY, Woo SM, Park JK, Yoo JW, Kim YT, Yoon YB: Enhanced anti-tumor effect of combination therapy with gemcitabine and apigenin in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett. 2008, 259: 39-49. 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.09.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen D, Landis-Piwowar KR, Chen MS, Dou QP: Inhibition of proteasome activity by the dietary flavonoid apigenin is associated with growth inhibition in cultured breast cancer cells and xenografts. Breast Cancer Res. 2007, 9: R80-10.1186/bcr1797.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shukla S, Gupta S: Apigenin-induced prostate cancer cell death is initiated by reactive oxygen species and p53 activation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008, 44: 1833-1845. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.02.007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin KY, Guarnieri FG, Staveley-O'Carroll KF, Levitsky HI, August JT, Pardoll DM, Wu TC: Treatment of established tumors with a novel vaccine that enhances major histocompatibility class II presentation of tumor antigen. Cancer Res. 1996, 56: 21-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang TL, Ling M, Shih IM, Pham T, Pai SI, Lu Z, Kurman RJ, Pardoll DM, Wu TC: Intramuscular administration of E7-transfected dendritic cells generates the most potent E7-specific anti-tumor immunity. Gene Ther. 2000, 7: 726-733. 10.1038/sj.gt.3301160.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang B, Mao CP, Peng S, He L, Hung CF, Wu TC: Intradermal administration of DNA vaccines combining a strategy to bypass antigen processing with a strategy to prolong dendritic cell survival enhances DNA vaccine potency. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 7824-7831. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.08.036.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang W, VanAlstyne PC, Irons KA, Chen S, Stewart JW, Birt DF: Individual and interactive effects of apigenin analogs on G2/M cell-cycle arrest in human colon carcinoma cell lines. Nutr Cancer. 2004, 48: 106-114. 10.1207/s15327914nc4801_14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suzue K, Young RA: Adjuvant-free hsp70 fusion protein system elicits humoral and cellular immune responses to HIV-1 p24. J Immunol. 1996, 156: 873-879.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ji H, Wang TL, Chen CH, Pai SI, Hung CF, Lin KY, Kurman RJ, Pardoll DM, Wu TC: Targeting human papillomavirus type 16 E7 to the endosomal/lysosomal compartment enhances the antitumor immunity of DNA vaccines against murine human papillomavirus type 16 E7-expressing tumors. Hum Gene Ther. 1999, 10: 2727-2740. 10.1089/10430349950016474.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng PW, Chiang LC, Lin CC: Apigenin induced apoptosis through p53-dependent pathway in human cervical carcinoma cells. Life Sci. 2005, 76: 1367-1379. 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.08.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang TH, Lee JH, Song CK, Han HD, Shin BC, Pai SI, Hung CF, Trimble C, Lim JS, Kim TW, Wu TC: Epigallocatechin-3-gallate enhances CD8+ T cell-mediated antitumor immunity induced by DNA vaccination. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 802-811. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2638.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tseng CW, Hung CF, Alvarez RD, Trimble C, Huh WK, Kim D, Chuang CM, Lin CT, Tsai YC, He L: Pretreatment with Cisplatin Enhances E7-Specific CD8+ T-Cell-Mediated Antitumor Immunity Induced by DNA Vaccination. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 3185-3192. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0037.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tseng CW, Monie A, Wu CY, Huang B, Wang MC, Hung CF, Wu TC: Treatment with proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enhances antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell-mediated antitumor immunity induced by DNA vaccination. J Mol Med. 2008, 86: 899-908. 10.1007/s00109-008-0370-y.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanerva A, Raki M, Ranki T, Sarkioja M, Koponen J, Desmond RA, Helin A, Stenman UH, Isoniemi H, Hockerstedt K: Chlorpromazine and apigenin reduce adenovirus replication and decrease replication associated toxicity. J Gene Med. 2007, 9: 3-9. 10.1002/jgm.984.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gates MA, Tworoger SS, Hecht JL, De Vivo I, Rosner B, Hankinson SE: A prospective study of dietary flavonoid intake and incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer. 2007, 121: 2225-2232. 10.1002/ijc.22790.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Munger K, Basile JR, Duensing S, Eichten A, Gonzalez SL, Grace M, Zacny VL: Biological activities and molecular targets of the human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein. Oncogene. 2001, 20: 7888-7898. 10.1038/sj.onc.1204860.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin CT, Tsai YC, He L, Calizo R, Chou HH, Chang TC, Soong YK, Hung CF, Lai CH: A DNA vaccine encoding a codon-optimized human papillomavirus type 16 E6 gene enhances CTL response and anti-tumor activity. J Biomed Sci. 2006, 13: 481-488. 10.1007/s11373-006-9086-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu WJ, Gao F, Zhao KN, Zhao W, Fernando GJ, Thomas R, Frazer IH: Codon modified human papillomavirus type 16 E7 DNA vaccine enhances cytotoxic T-lymphocyte induction and anti-tumour activity. Virology. 2002, 301: 43-52. 10.1006/viro.2002.1584.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trimble C, Lin CT, Hung CF, Pai S, Juang J, He L, Gillison M, Pardoll D, Wu L, Wu TC: Comparison of the CD8+ T cell responses and antitumor effects generated by DNA vaccine administered through gene gun, biojector, and syringe. Vaccine. 2003, 21: 4036-4042. 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00275-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.