Skip to main content
Download PDF

Whole blood-derived microRNA signatures in mice exposed to lipopolysaccharides

Journal of Biomedical Science volume 19, Article number: 69 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is recognized as the most potent microbial mediator presaging the threat of invasion of Gram-negative bacteria that implicated in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock. This study was designed to examine the microRNA (miRNA) expression in whole blood from mice injected with intraperitoneal LPS.

Methods

C57BL/6 mice received intraperitoneal injections of varying concentrations (range, 10–1000 μg) of LPS from different bacteria, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, and Serratia marcescens and were killed 2, 6, 24, and 72 h after LPS injection. Whole blood samples were obtained and tissues, including lung, brain, liver, and spleen, were harvested for miRNA expression analysis using an miRNA array (Phalanx miRNA OneArray® 1.0). Upregulated expression of miRNA targets in the whole blood of C57BL/6 and Tlr4−/− mice injected with LPS was quantified using real-time RT-PCR and compared with that in the whole blood of C57BL/6 mice injected with lipoteichoic acid (LTA) from Staphylococcus aureus.

Results

Following LPS injection, a significant increase of 15 miRNAs was observed in the whole blood. Among them, only 3 miRNAs showed up-regulated expression in the lung, but no miRNAs showed a high expression level in the other examined tissues. Upregulated expression of the miRNA targets (let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, miR-107 and miR-451) following LPS injection on real-time RT-PCR was dose- and time-dependent. miRNA induction occurred after 2 h and persisted for at least 6 h. Exposure to LPS from different bacteria did not induce significantly different expression of these miRNA targets. Additionally, significantly lower expression levels of let-7d, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, and miR-107 were observed in whole blood of Tlr4−/− mice. In contrast, LTA exposure induced moderate expression of miR-451 but not of the other 7 miRNA targets.

Conclusions

We identified a specific whole blood–derived miRNA signature in mice exposed to LPS, but not to LTA, from different gram-negative bacteria. These whole blood-derived miRNAs are promising as biomarkers for LPS exposure.

Background

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from gram-negative bacteria is a potent inflammatory stimulus and is often administered as an infectious insult. LPS-induced Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signal transduction activates well-characterized pathways, including those involving nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and activator protein 1 (AP-1), leading to the production of downstream pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, or leukocyte adhesion molecules [1, 2]. When an initial host defense to an infection magnifies, sepsis can develop, leading to severe adverse outcomes such as organ dysfunction and death [3]; therefore, early diagnosis of bacterial infection is clinically important.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are approximately 22-nt–long small regulatory RNA molecules that modulate the activity of specific mRNA targets and play important roles in a wide range of physiologic and pathologic processes [4, 5]. Alteration of miRNA expression profiles has been observed in various diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, neurological diseases, and several inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Further, differential expression of miRNAs may help distinguish between disease states [6]. miRNA expression regulated by LPS target genes reportedly contributes to inflammatory phenotypes [7]. Furthermore, some studies have identified miRNAs as important regulators of immune responses [8–10] and as fine-tuners of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) [11–13]. Although ribonuclease is present in both plasma and serum, extracellular miRNAs circulate in the blood of both healthy and diseased patients and are remarkably stable, making their isolation and analysis easy [14]. Biochemical analyses indicate that miRNAs are resistant to RNase activity, extreme pH and temperature, extended storage, and large numbers of free-thaw cycles [15, 16]. In contrast to mRNAs, miRNAs are themselves active moieties and should thus reflect physiological alterations more directly [17]. Compared to protein-based blood biomarkers, most circulating miRNAs can be easily detected by PCR, and low abundance can significantly hinder the detection of some protein-based biomarkers [18]. Additionally, protein-based biomarkers may have different post-translational modifications that can affect the accuracy of measurement, while miRNAs are relatively homogeneous [18]. Moreover, with the possibility to analyze multiple miRNAs in parallel to increase sensitivity and specificity by using complex miRNA expression patterns, miRNAs might constitute very useful and accessible diagnostic tools in a cluster pattern [15, 17]. The present study was designed to profile miRNA expression levels in whole blood during in vivo exposure to LPS in mice.

Methods

Animal experiments

C57BL/6 mice were purchased from BioLasco (Taiwan). Tlr4−/− (C57BL/10ScNJ) mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). The mice were maintained in a pathogen-free environment and had access to food and water ad libitum. LPS from different bacteria, including Escherichia coli serotype 026:B6 (catalog no. L3755), Klebsiella pneumonia (L1519), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (L9143), Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis (L6761), and Serratia marcescens (L6136) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). When the mice gained a weight of 20–35 g and became 4–6 weeks old, they were intraperitoneally injected with 10, 100, 1000 μg of LPS reconstituted in 100 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Animals were sacrificed at 2, 6, 24, and 72 h after LPS injection. The control group was injected with 100 μL PBS. Whole blood was drawn and tissues, including lung, brain, liver and spleen, were harvested for miRNA expression analysis. For comparison, intraperitoneal injections of 10, 100, 1000 μg of lipoteichoic acid (LTA) from Staphylococcus aureus (L2515, Sigma) were performed; animals were killed 6 h after injection, and whole blood was drawn. All housing conditions were established and surgical procedures, analgesia, and assessments were performed according to the Animal Care Guidelines and protocols approved by the Animal Care Committee at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

RNA isolation and preparation

For miRNA detection, whole blood samples (1 mL per mouse) were collected into tubes containing EDTA. Total RNA was extracted from whole blood and harvested tissue by using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Purified RNA was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm by using an SSP-3000 Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Infinigen Biotechnology, Inc., City of Industry, CA, USA). For miRNA array analyses, the quality of purified RNA was assessed using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Total RNA (2 μg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA by using the TaqMan miRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Target miRNA was reverse transcribed using sequence-specific stem-loop primers. miRNA cDNA (10 ng) for each target was used for real-time PCR.

miRNA microarray analysis

The Mouse & Rat miRNA OneArray® 1.0 (Phalanx Biotech Group, Hsinchu, Taiwan) contains a total of 2,319 probes, including 135 experimental control probes and 728 unique miRNA probes from mouse (miRBase Release 12.0) and 348 from rat (miRBase Release 12.0). Mouse genome-wide miRNA microarray analysis was performed by Phalanx Biotech. Briefly, fluorescent targets were prepared from 2.5-μg total RNA samples by using the miRNA ULSTM Labeling Kit (Kreatech Diagnostics, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Labeled miRNA targets enriched using NanoSep 100K (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY, USA) were hybridized to the Mouse & Rat miRNA OneArray® 1.0 with Phalanx hybridization buffer by using the OneArray® Hybridization Chamber. After overnight hybridization at 37°C, non-specific binding targets were by 3 washing steps (Wash I: 37°C, 5 min; Wash II: 37°C, 5 min and 25°C, 5 min; and Wash III: rinse 20 times). The slides were dried by centrifugation and scanned using Axon 4000B scanner (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The Cy5 fluorescent intensities of each spot were analyzed using GenePix 4.1 software (Molecular Devices). The signal intensity of each spot was processed using the R program. We filtered out spots for which the flag was <0. Spots that passed the criteria were normalized using the 75% media scaling normalization method. Normalized spot intensities were converted into gene expression log2 ratios for the control and treatment groups. Spots with log2 ratios ≥ 1 or log2 ratio ≤ −1 and P-value < 0.05 are analyzed further. These differentially expressed miRNAs were subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis using average linkage and Pearson correlation as a measure of similarity. The GEO accession number for the microarray data is GSE36472.

Quantification of miRNA expression

miRNA expression was quantified by real-time RT-PCR using Applied Biosystems 7500 Real- Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) to verify the miRNA targets with up-regulated expression that were detected through the miRNA array from whole blood following injection of LPS different doses (10, 100, and 1000 μg) or at indicated survival times (2, 6, 24, and 72 h). Expression of the miRNAs in whole blood following intraperitoneal injections of LTA at doses of 10, 100, and 1000 μg were measured for comparison. Expression of each miRNA was represented relative to the expression of U6 small nuclear RNA (RUN6B) as an internal control. We calculated the fold-expression of induction as the relative expression value obtained from 6 samples in comparison with that from the control group. Intergroup group comparisons were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and an appropriate post hoc test to compensate for multiple comparisons (SigmaStat; Jandel, San Rafael, CA, USA). P-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Up-regulated miRNA targets in microarray analysis

Expression of miRNA was considered significantly different when values for all 5 samples from the whole blood, lung, brain, liver, and spleen of experimental mice at 6 h after 100 μg LPS (L3755) injections were more than double of those for the controls (n = 3 for each subgroup). The hierarchical cluster analysis of all significant miRNAs is shown in Figure 1, which illustrates miRNAs differentially expressed in different tissues. Unsupervised hierarchy clustering was used to separate different sample tissues into different groups. The up-regulated miRNA targets more than double of those of the control is shown in Table 1. 15 miRNAs (miR-223, miR-155, miR-21, miR-21*, miR-667, let-7a, miR-146a, miR-107, miR-34b-5p, miR-146b, miR-133a, miR-15a, miR-191, miR-103, and miR-16) showed significantly up-regulated expression in the lung tissue. No miRNA showed upregulated expression in the brain. Only miR-292-5p and miR-155, miR-21*, and miR-101a showed upregulated expression in the liver and spleen, respectively. There were 15 miRNAs showed significantly increased expression in the whole blood. Among the miRNAs with upregulated expression levels in the whole blood, only 4—miR-16, miR-103, miR-107, and let-7a—showed high expression in the lung. However, no miRNA with upregulated expression levels in the whole blood showed high expression levels in other tissues, including the brain, liver, or spleen. The down-regulated miRNA targets more than double of those of the control is shown in Table 2. There were 23, 10, 8, and 51 miRNAs showed significantly down-regulated expression in the lung, liver, spleen and blood sample, respectively. No miRNA showed upregulated expression in the brain. Among the miRNAs with down-regulated expression levels in the whole blood, miR-690, miR-34b-3p, and miR-34b-3p also showed low expression in the liver, lung, and spleen, respectively. Besides, miR-466d-5p showed low expression in both lung and spleen. Most of the down-regulated miRNAs in the whole blood did not have similar low expression levels in the tissues of lung, brain, liver, and spleen.

Figure 1
figure 1

Hierarchical cluster analysis of significant expression of miRNA in lung, brain, liver, spleen, and whole blood of C567BL/6 mice 6 h after 100-μg LPS injection. The indicated miRNA name by the corresponding gene probe in Phalanx array could be found in: http://www.phalanx.com.tw/Products/MRmiOA_Probe.php.

Full size image
Table 1 Up-regulated miRNA targets (more than double of those of the control) in samples from lung, brain, liver, spleen, and whole blood of experimental mice 6 h following 100-μg LPS (L3755) injection
Full size table
Table 2 Down-regulated miRNA targets (more than double of those of the control) in samples from lung, brain, liver, spleen, and whole blood of experimental mice 6 h following 100-μg LPS (L3755) injection
Full size table

Expression profiles of miRNAs

Considering the signaling pathway which induces the miRNA transcription directly upon LPS stimulation and suitable number of miRNA targets for biomarkers, expression of miRNAs in whole blood following LPS injection was quantified using real-time RT-PCR to verify selected up-regulated, but not down-regulated, miRNA targets with at least 4-fold increase in expression (let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, miR-107, and miR-451). The above-mentioned 8 miRNAs showed approximately 5- to 12-fold increase in expression 6 h after 100 and 1000 μg LPS (L3755) injection (Figure 2A). Following injection with 10 μg of LPS, increased expression was observed in the 8 miRNAs, but expression levels of only let-7d, miR-16, and miR-103 were significantly higher than the control (Figure 2A). In contrast, upon 100 ug and 1000 ug of LPS injection, all these 8 miRNAs (let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, miR-107, and miR-451) had a significant expression than the control (Figure 2A). Therefore, 100 ug of LPS was chosen for injection in the subsequent experiment and we found the induction of the above-mentioned 8 miRNAs was evident as early as 2 h and persisted for at least 6 h following injection with 100 ug of LPS (Figure 2B). At 24 h, only miR-25 and miR-92a continued to be significantly expressed in the blood. No up-regulation of these 8 miRNA targets was detected 72 h after LPS injection. Additionally, no significant difference was observed between groups 6 h after exposure to 100 μg LPS (Figure 3).

Figure 2
figure 2

(A) Dose- and (B) time-dependent upregulation of miRNA expression. Expression of representative up-regulated miRNAs (let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, miR-107, and miR-451) identified using miRNA microarray of whole blood using real-time RT-PCR. Whole blood was drawn following injection of 10, 100, 1000 μg LPS; mice were killed at the indicated survival times (2, 6, 24, and 72 h). Bars represent means ± SEM of 6 experiments; *, P < 0.05 vs. control; **, P < 0.01 vs. control.

Full size image
Figure 3
figure 3

Expression of let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, miR-107, and miR-451 from whole blood of C57BL/6 mice based on real-time RT-PCR experiments 6 h after exposure to 100 μg LPS originating from different bacteria, including Escherichia coli serotype 026:B6, Klebsiella pneumonia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Salmonella enterica , serotype Enteritidis, and Serratia marcescens.

Full size image

miRNA expression in Tlr4 knockout mice

To investigate the role of the TLR4 receptor in inducing expression of the miRNA targets, expression of let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, miR-107, and miR-451 in the whole blood of Tlr4−/− mice 6 h after intraperitoneal injection of 100 μg LPS (L3755) was measured against that from the whole blood of Tlr4−/− mice injected with PBS. In TLR4 receptor knockout mice, significantly lower expression of let-7d, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103 and miR-107 was observed following LPS treatment (Figure 4). The expression of these 8 miRNAs was not significantly different between control C57BL/6 and Tlr4−/− mice.

Figure 4
figure 4

Expression of let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, miR-107, and miR-451 of whole blood from C57BL/6 and Tlr4−/−(C57BL/10ScNJ) mice from real-time RT-PCR experiments 6 h after exposure to 100 μg LPS; **, P < 0.01 vs. control.

Full size image

miRNA expression after LTA injection

To investigate that whether lipoteichoic acid (LTA) originating from gram-positive bacteria induces expression of let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, miR-107, and miR-451, whole blood was drawn at 6 h following intraperitoneal injections of 10, 100, or 1000 μg LTA from S. aureus for real-time PCR. The results showed that LTA only moderately induced miR-451 expression at concentrations of 100 and 1000 μg. Notably, LTA did not up-regulate the expression of the other 7 miRNA targets, and decreased the expression levels of let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-103, and miR-107 at the various concentrations tested (Figure 5).

Figure 5
figure 5

Expression of let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, miR-107, and miR-451 of whole blood from C57BL/6 mice using real-time RT-PCR experiment 6 h after exposure to 10, 100, and 1000 μg LTA originating from Staphylococcus aureus ; *, P < 0.05 vs. control; **, P < 0.01 vs. control.

Full size image

Discussion

In humans and other mammals, innate immunity generally preserves host integrity with respect to the molecular components of invading microbial pathogens through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). PRRs are germ line-encoded receptors that sense specific pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as LPS, and activate responses in cells against the pathogens. While TLR4 recognizes LPS, TLR2, in association with TLR1 or TLR6, recognizes LTA originating from gram-positive bacteria [19]. LPS and LTA induce similar inflammatory responses, and their activation results in either symptoms of sepsis or shock. However, while there are similarities between these responses, signaling and sensing of LPS and LTA differ significantly. Bacterial LPS consists of a hydrophobic lipid A domain, an oligosaccharide core, and a distal polysaccharide (the O antigen) [20]. The lipid A moiety alone is sufficient for activating the innate immune response; adaptive (antibody) responses are generated against the O antigen polysaccharide later during infection [1]. Lipid A consists of a diglucosamine diphosphate head group substituted with 4–8 acyl chains in different bacterial species. Nevertheless, many bacteria produce lipid A species that are similar to E. coli lipid A, which contains a diglucosamine diphosphate head group and 6 acyl chains, and are powerful immunostimulants [1]. In this study, we demonstrated that expression of multiple miRNAs (let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, miR-107, and miR-451) is significantly altered in the whole blood of mice after exposure to LPS in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. LPS from different gram-negative bacteria, including E. coli K. pneumonia P. aeruginosa S. enterica, and S. marcescens, induced similar up-regulation of all the miRNAs examined. miRNA profiles from whole blood may be detectable during very early stages following exposure to LPS, including as early as 2 h after treatment. Additionally, miRNA targets were not up-regulated following treatment with LTA. Thus, this miRNAs expression signature may be useful in differentiating infections caused by gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria.

Despite accumulating evidence of miRNAs in the blood and body fluids, the origin, and particularly, the function of these circulating extracellular miRNAs remains poorly understood [21]. Most circulating miRNAs are part of larger lipid or lipoprotein complexes, such as apoptotic bodies, microvesicles, or exosomes, and are highly stable [15, 17, 21]. Currently, little is known regarding the biologic roles of these molecules at distant sites in the body [22]. Extracellular miRNAs may be mediators of cell–cell communication [23, 24]. Previous studies have shown that circulating miRNAs in body fluids and extracellular fluid compartments show hormone-like effects, leading to widespread responses within cells at some distance away from the secreting cell [25]. Expression of circulating miRNAs is thought to reflect extrusion of miRNAs from relevant remote tissues or organs or disease processes [16]. However, it is likely that peripheral blood miRNAs do not only reflect miRNAs expressed in remote tissues [26]. Studies have also demonstrated that nearly 30% of the released miRNAs in vitro and in vivo do not reflect the expression profile found in donor cells, suggesting that specific miRNAs are selected to be intracellularly retained or released by exosomes [27]. Indeed, the result of this study showed that miRNAs are differentially expressed in blood and various tissues. Only 3 miRNAs with upregulated expression (miR-16, miR-103, and miR-107) in whole blood showed high expression in the lung, and no miRNA in whole blood showed high expression in other tissues, including brain, liver, or spleen. Additionally, following exposure to LPS, expression of only 5 miRNAs (let-7d, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, and miR-107) was significantly lower in TLR4 receptor knockout mice. Among them, only miR-107 had been reported to be associated with TLR4 upon LPS stimulation in the literature [28]. Let-7 family has been shown to function as a tumor suppressor through regulating multiple oncogenic signaling [29]. Knockdown of let-7d promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) traits and migratory/invasive capabilities in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells [29]. miR-25 were significantly upregulated in the serum of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive hepatocellular carcinoma [30]. MiR-92a appears to target mRNAs corresponding to several proangiogenic proteins and controls angiogenesis and functional recovery of ischemic tissues [31]. Overexpression of miR-92a decreased the expression of the transcription factor Krüppel-like factor 2 (KLF2), which is crucial for maintaining endothelial function, and the KLF2-regulated endothelial nitric oxide synthase and thrombomodulin [31]. In a maternal and fetal liver of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transgenic mouse model, expression of miR-92a increased by more than 6-fold in the fetal livers and implicated in HBV intrauterine infection [32]. The miR-103 and miR-107 in the circulation have a crucial role in regulating insulin and glucose homeostasis [33]. High expression of miR-103 and miR-107 (miR-103/107) was found in the presence of hypoxia, thereby potentiating metastasis suppressors death-associated protein kinase (DAPK) and Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) downregulation and hypoxia-induced motility and invasiveness of colorectal cancer cell lines [34]. Serum miR-103 can also serve as a potential diagnostic marker for breast cancer [35]. Recently, TLR4 has been shown to increase cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) expression by down-regulating miR-107 in macrophages [28], that observation seemed to be different from our study showing an up-regulated miR-107 via TLR4 upon LPS treatment. We speculated that the expression of miR-107 may be contributed by other cells. However, the source of circulating miRNAs is far from understood and yet to be clarified. In addition, following exposure to LPS, expression of 3 miRNAs (miR-15b, miR-16, and miR-451) was not significantly lower in TLR4 receptor knockout mice. Notably, the levels of miR-16 and miR-451, both present in significant levels in red blood cells, were the major source of variation in miR-16 and miR-451 levels measured in the circulation [36]. Although a few articles have suggested a TLR4-independent upon LPS stimulation in the interleukin 1 (IL-1) signaling [37, 38], given the multiple systemic responses following in vivo administration of LPS, so far it is unclear whether this observed up-regulation of miRNA expression is the direct result of TLR4 signaling or events secondary to systemic TLR4 activation. Whether there is a direct TLR4-independent signal pathway in the induction of miRNA expression upon LPS stimulation required further investigation and validation.

Normalization of circulating miRNAs is critical for objectively evaluating their expression levels; however, there are currently no known standard extracellular housekeeping miRNAs that can be used for normalization [21]. Although previous studies have reported the use of miR-16 and miR-142-3p, which show relatively stable expression in the serum, as endogenous controls [39, 40], it is unknown whether they are stable in the circulation. In our study, miR-16 expression was upregulated by approximately 5-fold following LPS treatment, preventing its use as an internal control. Genes typically used for reference, such as RNU6B and 5S ribosomal RNA, were found to have less stable expression in serum samples. In contrast, expression of whole blood–derived miRNAs was more stable and consistent. Profiles of miRNAs from whole blood have been examined previously [41–43]. Addition of synthetic miRNAs from other organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans in serum may be a useful approach for endogenous control during qRT-PCR. However, additional studies are necessary to develop an accurate normalization protocol and empirical validation method for stable endogenous control of miRNAs for each type of body fluid [25].

Early diagnosis of bacterial infection is critical for preventing further complications. Although microbiological culture is the standard method for identifying infective bacterial species, this technique is time-consuming, which can delay treatment. Potential biomarkers include acute phase protein, cytokines, and chemokines, which are not sufficiently specific to differentiate between gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial infection, which is compounded by overlap with other inflammatory diseases [44]. We identified whole blood–derived miRNAs following LPS exposure as promising biomarkers; however, future studies should be performed to clarify the origin and physiological role of circulating miRNAs. Further investigation is required to understand the expression of miRNAs in gram-negative or gram-positive bacterial infection. Additionally, studies examining miRNA expression levels at different stages of infection and intervention using antibiotic treatments are also necessary.

Conclusion

We identified a specific whole blood–derived miRNA signature in mice exposed to LPS, but not to LTA, from different gram-negative bacteria.With a dose- and time-dependentupregulated expression of the miRNA targets (let-7d, miR-15b, miR-16, miR-25, miR-92a, miR-103, miR-107 and miR-451) following LPS injection, these whole blood-derived miRNAs are promising as biomarkers for LPS exposure.

References

  1. Bryant CE, Spring DR, Gangloff M, Gay NJ: The molecular basis of the host response to lipopolysaccharide. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010, 8 (1): 8-14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vandewalle A: Toll-like receptors and renal bacterial infections. Chang Gung Med J. 2008, 31 (6): 525-537.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Warren HS: Strategies for the treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med. 1997, 336 (13): 952-953. 10.1056/NEJM199703273361311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kloosterman WP, Plasterk RH: The diverse functions of microRNAs in animal development and disease. Dev Cell. 2006, 11 (4): 441-450. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.09.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stefani G, Slack FJ: Small non-coding RNAs in animal development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008, 9 (3): 219-230. 10.1038/nrm2347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perron MP, Boissonneault V, Gobeil LA, Ouellet DL, Provost P: Regulatory RNAs: future perspectives in diagnosis, prognosis, and individualized therapy. Methods Mol Biol. 2007, 361: 311-326.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Androulidaki A, Iliopoulos D, Arranz A, Doxaki C, Schworer S, Zacharioudaki V, Margioris AN, Tsichlis PN, Tsatsanis C: The kinase Akt1 controls macrophage response to lipopolysaccharide by regulating microRNAs. Immunity. 2009, 31 (2): 220-231. 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.06.024.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baltimore D, Boldin MP, O'Connell RM, Rao DS, Taganov KD: MicroRNAs: new regulators of immune cell development and function. Nat Immunol. 2008, 9 (8): 839-845. 10.1038/ni.f.209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu LF, Thai TH, Calado DP, Chaudhry A, Kubo M, Tanaka K, Loeb GB, Lee H, Yoshimura A, Rajewsky K, Rudensky AY: Foxp3-dependent microRNA155 confers competitive fitness to regulatory T cells by targeting SOCS1 protein. Immunity. 2009, 30 (1): 80-91. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.11.010.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiao C, Rajewsky K: MicroRNA control in the immune system: basic principles. Cell. 2009, 136 (1): 26-36. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O'Neill LA, Sheedy FJ, McCoy CE: MicroRNAs: the fine-tuners of Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011, 11 (3): 163-175. 10.1038/nri2957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheedy FJ, O'Neill LA: Adding fuel to fire: microRNAs as a new class of mediators of inflammation. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008, 67 (Suppl 3): iii50-iii55. 10.1136/ard.2008.100289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taganov KD, Boldin MP, Chang KJ, Baltimore D: NF-kappaB-dependent induction of microRNA miR-146, an inhibitor targeted to signaling proteins of innate immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103 (33): 12481-12486. 10.1073/pnas.0605298103.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kosaka N, Iguchi H, Ochiya T: Circulating microRNA in body fluid: a new potential biomarker for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101 (10): 2087-2092. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01650.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L, Cai X, Yin Y, Wang K, Guo J, Zhang Y, Chen J, Guo X, Li Q, Li X, Wang W, Wang J, Jiang X, Xiang Y, Xu C, Zheng P, Zhang J, Li R, Zhang H, Shang X, Gong T, Ning G, Zen K, Zhang CY: Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res. 2008, 18 (10): 997-1006. 10.1038/cr.2008.282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, Peterson A, Noteboom J, O'Briant KC, Allen A, Lin DW, Urban N, Drescher CW, Knudsen BS, Stirewalt DL, Gentleman R, Vessella RL, Nelson PS, Martin DB, Tewari M: Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105 (30): 10513-10518. 10.1073/pnas.0804549105.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilad S, Meiri E, Yogev Y, Benjamin S, Lebanony D, Yerushalmi N, Benjamin H, Kushnir M, Cholakh H, Melamed N, Bentwich Z, Hod M, Goren Y, Chajut A: Serum microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (9): e3148-10.1371/journal.pone.0003148.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zampetaki A, Willeit P, Drozdov I, Kiechl S, Mayr M: Profiling of circulating microRNAs: from single biomarkers to re-wired networks. Cardiovasc Res. 2012, 93 (4): 555-562. 10.1093/cvr/cvr266.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell JA, Paul-Clark MJ, Clarke GW, McMaster SK, Cartwright N: Critical role of toll-like receptors and nucleotide oligomerisation domain in the regulation of health and disease. J Endocrinol. 2007, 193 (3): 323-330. 10.1677/JOE-07-0067.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Raetz CR, Whitfield C: Lipopolysaccharide endotoxins. Annu Rev Biochem. 2002, 71: 635-700. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135414.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Etheridge A, Lee I, Hood L, Galas D, Wang K: Extracellular microRNA: A new source of biomarkers. Mutat Res. 2011, 717 (1–2): 85-90.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cortez MA, Calin GA: MicroRNA identification in plasma and serum: a new tool to diagnose and monitor diseases. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009, 9 (6): 703-711. 10.1517/14712590902932889.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iguchi H, Kosaka N, Ochiya T: Secretory microRNAs as a versatile communication tool. Commun Integr Biol. 2010, 3 (5): 478-481. 10.4161/cib.3.5.12693.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang K, Zhang S, Weber J, Baxter D, Galas DJ: Export of microRNAs and microRNA-protective protein by mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38 (20): 7248-7259. 10.1093/nar/gkq601.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cortez MA, Bueso-Ramos C, Ferdin J, Lopez-Berestein G, Sood AK, Calin GA: MicroRNAs in body fluids–the mix of hormones and biomarkers. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011, 8 (8): 467-477. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.76.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu F, Guo NJ, Tian H, Marohn M, Gearhart S, Bayless TM, Brant SR, Kwon JH: Peripheral blood microRNAs distinguish active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011, 17 (1): 241-250. 10.1002/ibd.21450.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pigati L, Yaddanapudi SC, Iyengar R, Kim DJ, Hearn SA, Danforth D, Hastings ML, Duelli DM: Selective release of microRNA species from normal and malignant mammary epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (10): e13515-10.1371/journal.pone.0013515.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hennessy EJ, Sheedy FJ, Santamaria D, Barbacid M, O'Neill LA: Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) down-regulates microRNA-107, increasing macrophage adhesion via cyclin-dependent kinase 6. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286 (29): 25531-25539. 10.1074/jbc.M111.256206.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chang CJ, Hsu CC, Chang CH, Tsai LL, Chang YC, Lu SW, Yu CH, Huang HS, Wang JJ, Tsai CH, Chou MY, Yu CC, Hu FW: Let-7d functions as novel regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and chemoresistant property in oral cancer. Oncol Rep. 2011, 26 (4): 1003-1010.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li LM, Hu ZB, Zhou ZX, Chen X, Liu FY, Zhang JF, Shen HB, Zhang CY, Zen K: Serum microRNA profiles serve as novel biomarkers for HBV infection and diagnosis of HBV-positive hepatocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2010, 70 (23): 9798-9807. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bonauer A, Carmona G, Iwasaki M, Mione M, Koyanagi M, Fischer A, Burchfield J, Fox H, Doebele C, Ohtani K, Chavakis E, Potente M, Tjwa M, Urbich C, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S: MicroRNA-92a controls angiogenesis and functional recovery of ischemic tissues in mice. Science. 2009, 324 (5935): 1710-1713. 10.1126/science.1174381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guo L, Yang X, Duan T: Altered microRNA expression profile in maternal and fetal liver of HBV transgenic mouse model. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012, 21: 21-

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rottiers V, Naar AM: MicroRNAs in metabolism and metabolic disorders. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012, 13 (4): 239-250. 10.1038/nrm3313.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen HY, Lin YM, Chung HC, Lang YD, Lin CJ, Huang J, Wang WC, Lin FM, Chen Z, Huang HD, Shyy JY, Liang JT, Chen RH: miR-103/107 Promote Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer by Targeting the Metastasis Suppressors DAPK and KLF4. Cancer Res. 2012, 6: 6-

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang XP, Wu XP, Yan LX, Shao JY: Serum miR-103 as a potential diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2012, 32 (5): 631-634.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kirschner MB, Kao SC, Edelman JJ, Armstrong NJ, Vallely MP, van Zandwijk N, Reid G: Haemolysis during sample preparation alters microRNA content of plasma. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (9): 1-

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chassin C, Goujon JM, Darche S, du Merle L, Bens M, Cluzeaud F, Werts C, Ogier-Denis E, Le Bouguenec C, Buzoni-Gatel D, Vandewalle A: Renal collecting duct epithelial cells react to pyelonephritis-associated Escherichia coli by activating distinct TLR4-dependent and -independent inflammatory pathways. J Immunol. 2006, 177 (7): 4773-4784.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Na HY, Mazumdar K, Moon HJ, Chang S, Seong SY: TLR4-independent and PKR-dependent interleukin 1 receptor antagonist expression upon LPS stimulation. Cell Immunol. 2009, 259 (1): 33-40. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2009.05.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Resnick KE, Alder H, Hagan JP, Richardson DL, Croce CM, Cohn DE: The detection of differentially expressed microRNAs from the serum of ovarian cancer patients using a novel real-time PCR platform. Gynecol Oncol. 2009, 112 (1): 55-59. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao H, Shen J, Medico L, Wang D, Ambrosone CB, Liu S: A pilot study of circulating miRNAs as potential biomarkers of early stage breast cancer. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (10): e13735-10.1371/journal.pone.0013735.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hausler SF, Keller A, Chandran PA, Ziegler K, Zipp K, Heuer S, Krockenberger M, Engel JB, Honig A, Scheffler M, Dietl J, Wischhusen J: Whole blood-derived miRNA profiles as potential new tools for ovarian cancer screening. Br J Cancer. 2010, 103 (5): 693-700. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605833.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Keck-Wherley J, Grover D, Bhattacharyya S, Xu X, Holman D, Lombardini ED, Verma R, Biswas R, Galdzicki Z: Abnormal microRNA expression in Ts65Dn hippocampus and whole blood: contributions to Down syndrome phenotypes. Dev Neurosci. 2011, 33 (5): 451-467. 10.1159/000330884.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Templin T, Amundson SA, Brenner DJ, Smilenov LB: Whole mouse blood microRNA as biomarkers for exposure to gamma-rays and (56)Fe ion. Int J Radiat Biol. 2011, 87 (7): 653-662. 10.3109/09553002.2010.549537.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pugin J: Biomarkers of sepsis: is procalcitonin ready for prime time?. Intensive Care Med. 2002, 28 (9): 1203-1204. 10.1007/s00134-002-1397-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (grant CMRPG 891041 to Ching-Hua Hsieh), Taiwan.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

      Ching-Hua Hsieh, Yi-Chun Chen, Tsu-Hsiang Lu, Chia-Jung Wu, Yi-Chan Wu, Siou-Ling Tzeng & Johnson Chia-Shen Yang

    2. Department of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

      Cheng-Shyuan Rau

    3. Business BA at University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W Campbell Road, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA

      Jonathan Chris Jeng

    Authors
    1. Ching-Hua Hsieh
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Cheng-Shyuan Rau
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Jonathan Chris Jeng
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Yi-Chun Chen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Tsu-Hsiang Lu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Chia-Jung Wu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Yi-Chan Wu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Siou-Ling Tzeng
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Johnson Chia-Shen Yang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Johnson Chia-Shen Yang.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare no potential conflict of interests.

    Authors’ contributions

    CHH was responsible for the writing of the manuscript. CSR participated in the analysis and interpretation of the data.JCJ and THL participated in the animal surgery and acquisition of the study specimens. YCC and CJW participated in the real-time RT-PCR experiment. YCWwere involved in the acquisition of the miRNA array and whole genome expression data.SLTparticipated by providing and coordinating the resources.YCCcontributed tothe design and coordination of the data acquisition and analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Ching-Hua Hsieh, Cheng-Shyuan Rau contributed equally to this work.

    Authors’ original submitted files for images

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Cite this article

    Hsieh, CH., Rau, CS., Jeng, J.C. et al. Whole blood-derived microRNA signatures in mice exposed to lipopolysaccharides. J Biomed Sci 19, 69 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-19-69

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-19-69

    Keywords

    Journal of Biomedical Science

    ISSN: 1423-0127