Skip to main content
Download PDF

Pathophysiology of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome

Journal of Biomedical Science volume 29, Article number: 72 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a complex neurovascular disorder being recognized during the past two decades. It is characterized by multiple abrupt severe headaches and widespread cerebral vasoconstrictions, with potential complications such as ischemic stroke, convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. The clinical features, imaging findings, and dynamic disease course have been delineated. However, the pathophysiology of RCVS remains elusive. Recent studies have had substantial progress in elucidating its pathogenesis. It is now believed that dysfunction of cerebral vascular tone and impairment of blood–brain barrier may play key roles in the pathophysiology of RCVS, which explains some of the clinical and radiological manifestations of RCVS. Some other potentially important elements include genetic predisposition, sympathetic overactivity, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress, although the detailed molecular mechanisms are yet to be identified. In this review, we will summarize what have been revealed in the literature and elaborate how these factors could contribute to the pathophysiology of RCVS.

Introduction

Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a complex neurovascular syndrome characterized by multiple abrupt, severe headaches, namely thunderclap headaches, and diffuse segmental constriction of cerebral arteries [1, 2]. The term RCVS was proposed as a unifying nomenclature in 2007 [3] for varieties of historical libeling’s such as Call–Fleming syndrome [4], thunderclap headache with reversible vasospasm [5, 6], benign angiopathy of the central nervous system (CNS) [7], postpartum angiopathy [8, 9], migrainous vasospasm or migraine angiitis [10], or drug-induced cerebral arteritis or angiopathy [11, 12], depending on whether patients present to specialists in stroke, headache, rheumatology, or obstetrics, etc. Accordingly, RCVS has been seen by physicians across disciplines but only until the past two decades has it been recognized as a distinct clinic-radiological syndrome. Large case series of RCVS have been reported in Asia, Europe and America [2, 13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Yet, the exact epidemiology of RCVS remains unclear. Based on an analysis of the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2016–2017), > 1000 patients with RCVS are hospitalized each year in the entire population of the United States [21]. The survey of hospital-based headache clinics demonstrated that RCVS accounts for nearly 2% of the headache patients in Taiwan [2, 13, 14]. In patients with young stroke (< 45 years), RCVS constitutes up to 13% of the cases in a multicenter Italian study [18]. Hence, RCVS may not be as rare as we thought before. However, whether there is a geographic discrepancy in the prevalence or incidence of RCVS is unclear. Research on this distinct syndrome has accumulated rapidly in an exponential way after the term RCVS being proposed. The clinical features of RCVS have been well delineated; however, the pathogenesis of RCVS remains elusive. Nevertheless, there is substantial breakthrough in understanding the pathogenesis of RCVS during the past few years. In this review, we will briefly outline the clinical features, significance and impact of RCVS and elaborate in detail what has been known on its pathogenic mechanism.

Clinical features, significance and impact

RCVS can be either idiopathic [2, 13] or secondary to various factors [15]. An expanding list of possible etiologies of RCVS has been identified [2, 3, 15, 17, 22]. Comprehensive reviews can be found elsewhere [1, 23, 24]. Overall, vasoactive substances and post-partum state are the most common secondary causes of RCVS. In previously reported large series, RCVS is predominately idiopathic in Asian populations while the opposite is observed in Europeans or Americans [2, 13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Patients with RCVS are predominantly female with age around 40–55, while male patients are 10 years younger than the female patients [2, 15, 17]. The clinical hallmark of RCVS, i.e., recurrent thunderclap headaches, are usually evoked by precipitants that are common in daily lives such as defecation, exertion, sexual activity, urination, or cough, bathing or sudden emotional outbursts. Patients often avoid encountering these common daily activities to prevent themselves from the terrifying headaches. These headaches may last for hours long per attack and recur for multiple times within 2–3 weeks of disease onset [2, 15, 17, 25]. Abrupt blood pressure surges accompanying headache attacks can be seen in more than one-third of patients [2, 14, 15]. The vasoconstrictions, which are usually segmental and involving multiple intracranial arteries, may take 3 months to recover (Fig. 1) [13, 14]. The vasoconstriction may sometimes alternate with vasodilatation, involving distal branches of cerebral arteries or arterioles, and propagate centripetally during the disease course [14, 26, 27].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Typical presentations of A vasoconstriction and B its reversibility in RCVS. Yellow arrow heads indicate segmental vasoconstrictions of major cerebral arteries

Full size image

Not only the severe headache that profoundly interfering quality of life, patients with RCVS may also suffer from potentially devastating complications or comorbid conditions. Nearly one-third of patients with RCVS may experience seizure [2, 3, 15, 17], transient neurological deficits [2, 3, 15, 17], ischemic stroke [13,14,15, 17, 19], convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage (cSAH) and/or intracerebral hemorrhage [28, 29], or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) [13,14,15, 17, 19] during the disease course (Fig. 2). Cervical artery dissection is also a common comorbid condition of RCVS [30]. The severity of vasoconstriction is associated with risks of PRES or ischemic stroke [13, 29] whereas female gender, migraine, history of hypertension, and use of cocaine are risk factors for hemorrhagic complications [16, 29, 31]. Patients may be left with permanent neurological deficits [14, 16, 17, 32]. Death has also been reported in a few cases [17, 33, 34]. Calcium channel blockers, particular nimodipine, may be helpful for aborting headaches [2, 14, 35]. Nearly half of the patients with RCVS may develop post-RCVS headache that could linger for more than 1 year after remission of vasoconstriction [36]. Moreover, 5–10% of the cases may recur during long-term follow-up [37, 38]. Hence, even when the disease has remitted, the long-term risk of RCVS recurrence should not be neglected.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Potential Complications of RCVS. A Convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage. The linear hypointensity demonstrated by gradient echo imaging indicated presence of blood within the cortical sulci. B Intracerebral hemorrhage shown as hypointense lesions on susceptibility weighted imaging. C Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome appearing as hyperintense lesions on fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging. D Ischemic stroke demonstrated by diffusion weighted imaging. All the lesions are indicated by yellow arrow heads. Note that A–C are earlier complications that tend to occur within the first 2 weeks of disease while D occurs later at around 2–3 weeks after onset

Full size image

Pathophysiology

The exact pathophysiology of RCVS remains enigmatic. Because the etiologies of RCVS are heterogeneous, the underlying mechanisms are likely multi-factorial. Observations from clinical features or secondary RCVS have provided important clues to formulate hypotheses. For example, biological effects exerted by the exposed substances [39] or humoral factors associated with puerperium [40, 41] may also contribute to the pathogenesis in idiopathic cases. However, in-depth investigations to validate these hypotheses are relatively scarce. One major limitation is that it is difficult to obtain histopathological samples from the affected vessels or brain. Moreover, in a retrospective study that had 17% of the patients received open brain biopsy or full autopsy [17], extensive histological studies demonstrated no evidence of arterial inflammation or infection. One case report which detailed both histological and electron-microscopical examinations showed that major cerebral arteries were normal except for a patch of subendothelial thickening in the posterior cerebral artery [42]. That is, even with histopathological specimens, no specific pathology has been identified in RCVS. Nevertheless, recent studies have identified some plausible elements that may regulate or reflect the pathogenic alterations of RCVS. Herein we summarized evidence supporting these elements and elaborate how these factors could interact with each other and contribute to the pathogenesis of RCVS.

Dysregulation of cerebral vascular tone

Based on the radiological features, dysregulation of cerebral vascular tone has been considered the central element in the pathogenesis of RCVS [1, 23, 24]. An abrupt, unpredictable alteration of central vascular tone associated with excessive sympathetic discharge may explain the cerebral vasoconstriction and, the less mentioned, vasodilatation. As pial cerebral arteries are densely innervated by the superior cervical ganglion (and also sparsely by the sphenopalatine, otic or trigeminal ganglion) [43], the release of norepinephrine or neuropeptide Y from the sympathetic nerve endings may cause vasoconstrictions. However, it is uncertain whether the vasoconstriction is the direct consequence of the suddenly increased sympathetic drive caused by triggers or secondary etiologies, or the passive autoregulatory response of the perivascular sympathetic innervation to protect the brain against the abrupt blood pressure surge accompanying the severe headache. Clinical observations support the possibility of both scenarios.

In contrast to pial cerebral arteries, cerebral microcirculation receives intrinsic innervations from the locus coeruleus, raphe nucleus, basal forebrain, or local cortical interneurons [43]. These perivascular nerves intricately regulate the cerebral microvascular tone and autoregulation via populations of receptors within the different cellular compartments of the neurovascular unit. The vascular response of pial cerebral arteries or parenchymal microvasculature to neurotransmitters may differ depending on the distribution of the postjunctional receptors. For instance, norepinephrine causes contraction in the middle cerebral arteries through activation of the α1-adrenoreceptors [44, 45] but elicits dilation of parenchymal arterioles due to the predominant distribution of β-adrenoreceptors [46]. The vasomotor responses of the cerebral microvasculature may be altered preceding the grossly perceivable caliber change of large cerebral arteries, based on the observations of centripetal propagation of vasoconstriction [26, 27] and the different time course of hemorrhagic and ischemic complications [15]. The hemorrhagic complications or brain edema due to the dysfunction of blood–brain barrier (BBB) or neurovascular unit tend to occur during the first 2 weeks of the disease while ischemic complications tend to occur later, either caused by the hypoperfusion due to severe vasoconstriction of major arterial segments or the transformation of vasogenic edema into cytotoxic edema in patients with PRES [1, 6, 14, 23]. In fact, autoregulation failure has been considered important in the pathogenesis of PRES [47, 48], an overlapping syndrome or complication of RCVS.

Direct evidence supporting dysregulation of cerebral vascular tone derived from studies investigating the cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with RCVS [49, 50]. In a retrospective case series, the Breath Holding Index, which measures cerebral endothelium-dependent vasodilation in response to hypercapnia, was severely impaired in patients with RCVS during the acute stage of disease [49]. Similar findings were also observed in another case-control study, which demonstrated not only impaired cerebrovascular reactivity during the acute stage but recovery of the impaired cerebrovascular reactivity in the remission stage in 70% of the cases who received follow-up [50]. Autonomic dysregulation [51], oxidative stress [52, 53], impaired endothelial repairing capacity [54], and disruption of the BBB [55, 56] might contribute to the altered cerebrovascular reactivity, which are detailed below. Moreover, a recent study identified a panel of microRNAs (miR-130a-3p, miR-130b-3p, let-7a-5p, let-7b-5p and let-7f-5p) that can be used to differentiate patients with RCVS (in acute stage) from controls with nearly 90% accuracy [57]. The common targets of these circulating microRNAs include genes responsible for cerebral vascular tone, such as EDN1 (endothelin-1) or genes involved in the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling pathway [57]. These findings may serve as primers for future studies to investigate potential molecular mechanisms.

Sympathetic overactivity

Aberrant sympathetic response of cerebral vasculature has been long proposed important in the pathogenesis of RCVS [58], which can be partly supported by the fact that RCVS can occur in some patients with pheochromocytoma [59,60,61], after the use of sympathomimetic vasoactive substances [12, 14, 15, 17, 62], or acute hypertensive crises [63]. Besides, clinical features such as abrupt blood pressure surge [2, 15] and/or the Valsalva maneuver-like triggers with elevated sympathetic tone [2, 15] also implicate the role of sympathetic overactivity in the pathogenesis.

In a 24-h heart rate variability study, patients with RCVS were found to have heightened sympathetic activity and attenuated parasympathetic modulations during the acute stage [51]. This autonomic dysregulation only partially recovered at the remission stage, suggesting that patients with RCVS might have some predisposition of sympatho-vagal imbalance that makes them vulnerable to external triggers. Alternative explanation is that, once afflicted by the disease, the autonomic dysfunction could not recover soon even after resolution of vasoconstrictions. An indirect support for the sympatho-vagal imbalance predisposition is the higher occurrence of RCVS in cold weather [64]. The sympathetic nervous system might be more excitable in cold weather and thus aggravate a pre-existing sympatho-vagal imbalance and thus induce cerebral vasoconstriction. It has been shown that cerebrovascular resistance increases during cold face stimulation [65] and sympathetic stimulation during cold pressor testing may produce constriction of large cerebral arteries to protect the brain from arterial pressure elevations [66], which might be related mechanistically to cerebral vasoconstriction in RCVS. Additionally, a genetic polymorphism study showed that the brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) Val66Met functional polymorphism is linked to vasoconstriction in patients with RCVS [67]. Preclinical study identified that BDNF could cause perivascular inflammation and vasoconstriction under circumstances of sympathetic overactivity [68]. BDNF could also upregulate neuropeptide Y, a vasoconstrictor secreted by sympathetic nerve endings [69]. Nevertheless, these links are tangential and require further studies to validate.

Endothelial dysfunction

The cerebrovascular endothelium exerts a profound influence on cerebral vascular tone [70]. It is plausible that the dysregulated cerebral vascular tone in RCVS may in part attributed to endothelium-dependent mechanism. In fact, the impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation to hypercapnia in patients with RCVS [49, 50] supports this notion. In addition, one study identified that patients with RCVS have reduced circulating CD34+KDR+ endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in comparison with controls, especially in those with more severe vasoconstrictions [54]. The number of CD34+KDR+ EPCs was negatively correlated with the severity of vasoconstrictions. Because cells expressing CD34 (an adhesion molecule expressed on hematopoietic stem cells) and KDR (a type 2 vascular endothelial growth factor receptor that indicates early endothelial differentiation) might be the main constituent of the circulating EPCs responsible for re-endothelialization [71], it is plausible that patients with RCVS may have reduce impaired endothelium repairing capacity during the acute stage of the disease, either due to lower baseline level or an accelerated consumption and/or senescence of circulating EPCs under the circumstance of sympathetic overactivity and excessive oxidative stress.

Studies from overlapping syndromes or spectral disorders of RCVS also support the existence of endothelial dysfunction at least in selected cases. PRES, a well-recognized cerebral endotheliopathy [72], can be found in a substantial proportion of patients with RCVS [6, 13, 14, 16, 17], and with similar characteristics of RCVS including dysregulated vascular tone, acute severe headaches, blood pressure surge, and secondary etiologies such as immunosuppressive or cytotoxic agents [24, 47, 48]. Post-partum angiopathy, one of the secondary RCVS, exhibits overlapping clinical, laboratory and radiographical features with the obstetric emergencies eclampsia and preeclampsia [22, 73, 74]. Previous studies demonstrated that placental growth factor (PlGF), soluble PlGF receptor (sFlt-1) [40, 41], and soluble TGF-β1 receptor (soluble endoglin) [75] correlate with the presence of eclampsia and the ratio of sFlt-1 to PIGF could also be used to predict the occurrence of pre-eclampsia [41]. The balance of these antiangiogenic and proangiogenic factors could also play a role in the pathogenesis of post-partum angiopathy [42]. Whether patients who are not pregnant or in the puerperium could exhibit similar mechanisms associated with the imbalance of certain humoral factors regulating endothelial function requires further studies.

It has been questioned whether the endothelial dysfunction is restricted to the brain or could be systemic. In a study in which 18 patients with RCVS received transthoracic echocardiography during the acute stage, three (17%) had transient wall motion abnormalities [76]. Another two case reports also demonstrated transient myocardial ischemia [77] or coronary vasospasm [78] responsive to calcium channel blockers. Because of the rarity of these cases, whether RCVS has extracranial vascular involvement remains inconclusive.

Excessive oxidative stress

Oxidative stress has complex interactions with endothelial dysfunction or sympathetic overactivity to regulate vascular tone [79,80,81,82]. Although the idea that excessive oxidative stress may take parts in the pathogenesis of RCVS is intuitive, relevant studies are scarce. A prospective study using liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) identified that the urine level of 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (8-iso-PGF2α), one of the most reliable oxidative stress markers [83], was elevated in patients with RCVS during the acute stage and normalized during the remission stage [52]. Moreover, 8-iso-PGF2α, as a non-enzymatic free radical peroxidation product of arachidonic acid, is also a potent vasoconstrictor [84]. The urine level of 8-iso-PGF2α was found to correlate with the severity of vasoconstriction, especially during the first week of disease course [52]. Consistent with the findings from urine samples, a recent study also demonstrated higher 8-iso-PGF2α in the plasma in patients with RCVS during the acute stage [53].

Beyond hypothesis-driven approach, a study combined 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance and LC-MS/MS to discover potential urine metabolomic signatures in patients with RCVS [53]. Six metabolites, hippurate, citrate, 1,3,7-trimethyluric acid, ascorbic acid, d-glucurono-6,3-lactone, and d-threo-isocitric acid, were identified as the most discriminative metabolites for RCVS. Of them, hippurate, citrate, ascorbic acid, and d-glucurono-6,3-lactone were significantly lower, and 1,3,7-trimethyluric acid and d-threo-isocitric acid were higher in RCVS patients. These metabolites are related to two metabolic networks including free radical scavenging and vitamin/mineral metabolism, further validating the potential role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of RCVS. Moreover, the hub molecules within the metabolic networks are also associated with endothelial dysfunction or sympathetic overactivity, supporting the complex interaction of these elements in the disease pathogenesis [53].

Blood–brain barrier disruption

BBB is the main anatomical barrier that separates blood from the microenvironment of brain, regulating the exchange of ions, nutrients, and energy metabolites [85, 86]. The core element of the BBB, the endothelial cells, limits the paracellular and transcellular transport by continuous inter-endothelial tight junctions and the extremely low transcytotic activity. The endothelial cells, pericytes and smooth muscle cells of the vessel, glia cells, and neurons collectively form the neurovascular unit which is responsible for the highly coordinated neurovascular coupling. As vascular tone is delicately regulated by neurovascular unit, it is rational to speculate that a dysfunctional BBB may participate in the pathogenesis of RCVS. When the cerebral autoregulation is profoundly overwhelmed, the integrity of BBB might be breached, and ischemic or hemorrhagic complication might ensue [23, 87]. In fact, reactive oxygen species have been found to contribute to BBB disruption by oxidative damage to cellular molecules, activation of matrix metalloproteinases, reorganization of cytoskeleton, modulation of tight junction proteins, and upregulation of inflammatory mediators [88]. A recent study on the white matter hyperintensity lesions (WMHs) in RCVS also implicates that transmission of excessive central pulsatile flow to cerebral microcirculation upon episodic blood pressure surge may lead to increased microvascular damage, increased vascular permeability, and impaired solute clearance, contributing to WMH formation [89]. With severe breakdown of BBB, hemorrhagic complications or brain edema may ensue.

In 2017, a study using contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging (CE-FLAIR) for the first time demonstrated evidence of BBB breakdown in RCVS [55]. This study revealed that nearly 70% of patients with definite RCVS and one-fourth of patients with probable RCVS had BBB breakdown. In addition, BBB breakdown was found to be an independent risk factor for neurological complications, in particular convexity SAH and PRES [55]. A subsequent international collaborative study demonstrates that the BBB breakdown was worse during the first 1–2 weeks and with a temporal course similar to but earlier than that of vasoconstrictions which peaked at the 3rd week [56]. This finding may provide a pathophysiologic background of the temporal course of neurological complications of RCVS, i.e., the hemorrhagic complications or PRES tend to occur early in the disease course whereas ischemic stroke occurs later. In addition, blood pressure surge was found to be a risk factor of BBB breakdown, supporting the speculation of the injurious effect of excessive central pulsatile flow on the brain [89].

Because the presence of macroscopic BBB disruption in patients with RCVS using CE-T2-FLAIR imaging (Fig. 3) could only be identified in half of the patients with RCVS [56, 90], a recent study interrogated whether the brain permeability in patients without discernible macroscopic BBB disruption is altered using a technique called dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). The microscopic BBB permeability in the whole brain and WMHs was determined using an index Ktrans [91]. It was found that patients with RCVS presented increased microscopic permeability of the whole brain and WMHs during acute stage, even without discernible macroscopic BBB disruption on CE-FLAIR. In addition, a dynamic change in BBB permeability was noted, which was correlated with impaired cerebral microvascular compliance assessed with hemodynamic studies and may thus contribute to WMH formation [91].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Typical imaging finding of blood–brain barrier breakdown demonstrated by contrast-enhanced FLAIR imaging. The gadolinium-based contrast medium extravasated from the cerebral vessels to the cortical sulci appears hyperintense on FLAIR imaging (yellow arrow heads), providing macroscopic imaging evidence of BBB breakdown

Full size image

A recent study identified a panel of circulating microRNAs that may serve as potential disease signature of RCVS [57]. These microRNAs are functionally associated with acute headache, vasomotor control or BBB regulation. Remarkably, miR-130a-3p was associated with imaging-proven BBB disruption in patients with RCVS and its overexpression led to reduced transendothelial electrical resistance (i.e., increased permeability) in in vitro human BBB model [57]. Consistent with this finding, two previous studies have disclosed that miR-130a could increase BBB permeability under ischemic [92] or hemorrhagic conditions [93]. Interestingly, the abundance of miR-130a and miR-130b was associated with blood pressure surge during the acute stage of RCVS. This might be compatible with the mechanosensitive nature of the miR-130/301 family [94], i.e., the expression of miR-130 was upregulated in response to the shearing stress induced by abrupt hemodynamic change upon blood pressure surge. Future studies are needed to explore the mechanism how the upregulated miR-130a interferes BBB permeability.

Altered trigeminovascular nociception

The cause of thunderclap headache may be the most enigmatic part in the pathogenesis of RCVS. Because the headaches usually recur for multiple times during the first 2 weeks after disease onset while the constriction of major cerebral arterial segments peaked at the 3rd week [13, 14, 56], vasoconstriction of the large or medium-sized cerebral arteries is unlikely to be the cause of the headache. Previously, intracranial pain-sensitive structures are believed to be the dura mater and its feeding vessels. However, a recent study based on the mapping in awake craniotomies in patients suggests that the pia and small cerebral vessels are also pain-sensitive [95]. Based on this updated neuroanatomical knowledge as well as the disease temporal course, the involvement of distal arterioles is more likely the primary trigger activating the trigeminovascular nociceptive pathway in RCVS [95]. Physiologically, the trigeminovascular pathway, which provides the unique sensory innervation to brain vessel, acts as a “protective” system that restores vessel tone after vasocontractile stimuli, probably via the potent vasodilatory neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) released from trigeminal nociceptors [43]. In RCVS, this reflex could be exaggerated but yet to be proved. Increased BBB permeability during the early stage of disease course could also be an important contributor to the headache by activating the trigeminal nociceptors via the leaked intravascular components; however, in-depth studies are still needed.

A recent study found that circulating microRNAs including let-7a-5p, let-7b-5p and let-7f-5p were upregulated both in acute stage of RCVS and ictal stage of migraine and returned to normal in the remission stage of RCVS or interictal stage of migraine [57]. Hence, these microRNAs might be associated with acute pain or certain mechanism shared by RCVS and migraine, such as CGRP-dependent trigeminovascular reflex. Previous studies showed that let-7b is highly expressed in and can be released from dorsal root ganglion (DRG) [96]. Inhibition of let-7b attenuated formalin-induced TRPA1 currents in the DRG neurons and spontaneous pain [96], while TRPA1 activation could trigger CGRP release from the trigeminal ganglion and mediate trigeminovascular reflex [97]. In addition, injecting anti-let-7 into the brain reduces opioid antinociceptive tolerance in mice [98]. Whether these mechanisms could explain the pain in RCVS require further investigations.

Genetic predisposition

Because of the potential of recurrence [37, 38] and the partially-persistent dysfunctional traits during the remission stage [51], it is reasonable to speculate that patients with RCVS might have some genetic predisposition that makes them vulnerable to the disease. However, no obvious inheritance pattern has been identified. As there are multiple environmental factors that could lead to RCVS, it is likely RCVS is a complex disease modulated by multiple genes with small or moderate effect sizes. Yet, no definite susceptible gene for RCVS has been identified. Only two genetic association studies have been conducted in patients with RCVS. One study found that patients carrying the Val allele of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism were more likely to have more severe vasoconstrictions than Met homozygotes [67]; however, the genotype frequencies in RCVS patients were not different from that in normal controls. Another study investigated Ring Finger Protein 213 (RNF213), a susceptibility gene of moyamoya disease and intracranial artery stenosis and dissection, in patients with RCVS found no association between the gene and disease [99].

In a case report, a 9-year-old boy with Loeys–Dietz Syndrome caused by a heterozygous TGFBR2 (encoding for type II TGF-β receptor) mutation was diagnosed with RCVS with PRES [100], suggesting the potential role of TGF-β signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of RCVS. Interestingly, TGF-β signaling pathway is also the most significant pathway identified by pathway enrichment analysis for the predicted target genes of the RCVS-selective circulating microRNAs [57]. TGF-β has been known to induce the vascular endothelial expression of endothelin-1, a predicted common target of all five RCVS-selective microRNAs. In in vitro study, the expression of EDN1 expression as well as predicted genes within the TGF-β signaling, including the TGFBR2, was inhibited by the patients’ cerebrospinal fluid, validating in silico findings. Although it is likely most RCVS patients would not have monogenic mutations involving TGFBR2 or EDN1 genes, it would be interestingly to investigate potential functional polymorphisms of these genes in these patients. Considering the complex nature of the disease, non-hypothesis driven genome-wide based approach might be even helpful to identify possible susceptible genes although this would require a large number of patients via international collaborations.

Sex hormones

Patients with RCVS are predominantly female of middle age, particularly around perimenopause. Postpartum angiopathy also occurs at the stage when hormones fluctuate dramatically. As cerebral vascular tone and BBB permeability are heavily influenced by the effects of estrogen and progesterone mediated signaling pathways [101], it has long been proposed that sex hormones play important roles in the pathogenesis of RCVS. However, direct evidence is lacking. In a few case reports, the occurrence of RCVS was associated with an acute withdrawal or administration of hormones, such as bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy [102], hormonal ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination [103], oral contraceptive pills [104], or levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system [105]. However, it is difficult to establish causality based on selected case reports. In a large retrospective study that investigated the potential hormonal influences on RCVS, no significant differences between pre- and post-menopausal women, or those with and without hysterectomy were observed [106]. Hence, it remains inconclusive whether hormonal imbalance could trigger or modify the disease course of RCVS.

Inflammation

Previously, RCVS was considered a benign angiopathy of the CNS, which should be differentiated from primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS) [107,108,109]. Limited histopathological data also do not support the presence of arterial wall inflammation in patients with RCVS [32, 109, 110]. However, marked vascular wall enhancement has been noted in a patient with cocaine vasculitis [111], and cocaine has been considered to be an important etiology of RCVS [1, 17, 109]. A study used high-resolution vascular wall imaging demonstrated enhancement of the diseased vessels in almost half patients with idiopathic RCVS, suggesting that there might be subclinical perivascular inflammation in some patients [112]. Furthermore, a study demonstrated five patients with hemorrhagic PACNS were exclusively associated with sympathomimetic drug exposure and presented as thunderclap headache and self-limited clinical course, which substantially overlapped with the clinical presentations of RCVS [113]. Hence, it is possible that RCVS shared certain pathogenic mechanisms of PACNS, and inflammation could contribute to the vasoconstrictions at least in certain patients. Some other case reports also suggested a potential link between inflammation and RCVS. For example, some patients with systemic lupus erythematosus have been reported to have RCVS [114,115,116]. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) following COVID-19, both with remarkable endothelial inflammation, were also recently linked to RCVS [117,118,119,120,121,122]. Further studies are needed to elucidate the potential causality and mechanisms between these inflammatory disorders and RCVS.

Proposed model of the pathophysiology of RCVS

Based on the potential elements elaborated above, we propose a model for the pathophysiology of RCVS (Fig. 4) and summarize the main mechanism and strength of evidence for each proposed element of pathophysiology (Table 1). Patients with certain predisposition (possibly related to some susceptible genes) may be more vulnerable to triggers with heightened sympathetic drive, secondary causes (such as the use of vasoactive substances or postpartum), systemic inflammation, or adverse environments such as cold weather. When the central or systemic sympathetic system is ignited and overacted, a sudden release of vasoconstrictors such as catecholamines, neuropeptide Y or endothelin-1 may cause an abrupt dysregulation of cerebral vascular tone. The impaired autoregulation may initially manifest as dilatations of distal arterioles, partly due to an exaggerated trigeminovascular reflex. The dilatation of distal arterioles, capillaries or meningeal collaterals may abruptly stretch the perivascular nociceptive nerve fibers to cause thunderclap headaches. In addition, excessive central pulsatile flow related to blood pressure surge may cause the dysfunction of neurovascular unit and increased BBB permeability, which may also contribute to impaired cerebral vascular tone and headache. Furthermore, to counteract the excessive pulsatile flow and distal arteriole dilation, the large or medium-size cerebral arteries constrict subsequently, manifesting as centripetal propagation of vasoconstrictions during the disease course.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Proposed model of the pathophysiology of RCVS. Development of RCVS is sequential, which may require both predisposition and precipitating factors to initiate and perpetuate a vicious cycle of pathogenic mechanisms that result in the clinical and radiological manifestations (as indicated by the gradient arrow on the left of the figure). Dysregulation of cerebral vascular tone and disruption of blood–brain barrier (BBB) (i.e., dysfunctional neurovascular unit) might play the key roles in the pathophysiology of RCVS, which could be mediated by the mechanical and biochemical consequences of heightened sympathetic drive, endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress. This could particularly occur in vulnerable subjects with certain predisposition when they encounter secondary causes (e.g., vasoactive substances, post-partum state, etc.), triggers (e.g., exertion, defecation, sexual activity, cough or bathing), or adverse environment (e.g., cold weather). When the dysfunctional autoregulation and BBB disruption exacerbate and the endogenous protective mechanisms fail, headache, vasoconstrictions, and complications may ensue. The thunderclap headache could be attributed either to the dilatation of distal arterioles or meningeal arteries, that activate the trigeminovascular nociceptive fibers. Hemorrhagic complications (cSAH and ICH) or PRES may be attributed to the breakdown of BBB, while the ischemic stroke is related to hypoperfusion caused by vasoconstriction of major cerebral arteries. White matter hyperintensity lesions could be attributed to either increased BBB permeability or partial ischemia due to cerebral hypoperfusion. BDNF brain-derived neurotrophic factor, cSAH convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage, ET-1 endothelin-1, ICH intracerebral hemorrhage, NPY neuropeptide Y, PRES posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, TCH thunderclap headache, TGFBR2 transforming growth factor-beta receptor 2, WMH white matter hyperintensity lesion

Full size image
Table 1 Summary of potential pathophysiology of RCVS
Full size table

With persistently heightened sympathetic drive, endothelial dysfunction and excessive production of oxidative stress ensue, leading to a vicious cycle that further perpetuates the dysregulation of cerebral vascular tone. The endogenous endothelial repairing capacity may thus be partially exhausted. The vasoactive metabolites produced in response to free radicals such as 8-iso-PGF2α or the intravascular plasma components leaked to the paravascular CSF space due to BBB disruption may further aggravate vasoconstriction. Inflammation of vascular wall may develop in selected cases along with prolonged vasoconstrictions. In addition, in response to the shearing stress of excessive blood flow and deranged vascular tone, the expression of some microRNAs including miR-130a-3p, miR-130b-3p, let-7a-5p, let-7b-5p and let-7f-5p is upregulated. While countering the effect of vasoconstrictive genes such as EDN1 or those within the TGF-β signaling pathway, these microRNAs may also differentially participate in the genesis of the acute headache or BBB disruption.

The breakdown of BBB and excessive central pulsatile flow may lead to WMHs as well as the early complications such as PRES, convexity SAH or intracerebral hemorrhage. In contrast, vasoconstrictions of major arteries may lead to hypoperfusion, which might aggravate WMHs or when profound, lead to ischemic complications or aggravate the vasogenic edema of PRES lesions to cytotoxic edema.

Of note, because of the limitation of available studies, only some of the aforementioned mechanisms such as sympathetic overactivity or endothelial dysfunction can be applicable to both idiopathic RCVS and RCVS with secondary causes. As most of the mechanisms with better supporting evidence were derived from studies involving predominantly idiopathic cases, whether these mechanisms could be extrapolated to RCVS with secondary causes require further studies.

Conclusion

RCVS is a complex neurovascular disorder with dramatic clinical presentation, dynamic disease course, and potentially devastating complications. Recent research has provided substantial progress in understanding its pathophysiology, particularly on the dysregulation of cerebral vascular tone and disruption of BBB, although vast areas of unknowns remain to be explored. By unraveling the complex neurobiology of RCVS, we may be able to subclassify the syndrome with pathophysiology-specific perspectives and formulate potential disease-targeting management in the future.

Availability of data and materials

All data are available in the manuscript and figures.

References

  1. Ducros A. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(10):906–17.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen SP, Fuh JL, Lirng JF, Chang FC, Wang SJ. Recurrent primary thunderclap headache and benign CNS angiopathy: spectra of the same disorder? Neurology. 2006;67(12):2164–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Calabrese LH, Dodick DW, Schwedt TJ, Singhal AB. Narrative review: reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(1):34–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Call GK, Fleming MC, Sealfon S, Levine H, Kistler JP, Fisher CM. Reversible cerebral segmental vasoconstriction. Stroke. 1988;19(9):1159–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dodick DW, Brown RD Jr, Britton JW, Huston J 3rd. Nonaneurysmal thunderclap headache with diffuse, multifocal, segmental, and reversible vasospasm. Cephalalgia. 1999;19(2):118–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen SP, Fuh JL, Lirng JF, Wang SJ. Is vasospasm requisite for posterior leukoencephalopathy in patients with primary thunderclap headaches? Cephalalgia. 2006;26(5):530–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Calabrese LH, Gragg LA, Furlan AJ. Benign angiopathy: a distinct subset of angiographically defined primary angiitis of the central nervous system. J Rheumatol. 1993;20(12):2046–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bogousslavsky J, Despland PA, Regli F, Dubuis PY. Postpartum cerebral angiopathy: reversible vasoconstriction assessed by transcranial Doppler ultrasounds. Eur Neurol. 1989;29(2):102–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dodick DW, Eross EJ. A not so uncommon cause of thunderclap headache. Headache. 2002;42(6):555.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson M, Lennox G, Jaspan T, Jefferson D. Migraine angiitis precipitated by sex headache and leading to watershed infarction. Cephalalgia. 1993;13(6):427–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singhal AB, Caviness VS, Begleiter AF, Mark EJ, Rordorf G, Koroshetz WJ. Cerebral vasoconstriction and stroke after use of serotonergic drugs. Neurology. 2002;58(1):130–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaye BR, Fainstat M. Cerebral vasculitis associated with cocaine abuse. JAMA. 1987;258(15):2104–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen SP, Fuh JL, Chang FC, Lirng JF, Shia BC, Wang SJ. Transcranial color Doppler study for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(6):751–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen SP, Fuh JL, Wang SJ, Chang FC, Lirng JF, Fang YC, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. Ann Neurol. 2010;67(5):648–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ducros A, Boukobza M, Porcher R, Sarov M, Valade D, Bousser MG. The clinical and radiological spectrum of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. A prospective series of 67 patients. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 12):3091–101.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ducros A, Fiedler U, Porcher R, Boukobza M, Stapf C, Bousser M. Hemorrhagic manifestations of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: frequency, features, and risk factors. Stroke. 2010;41(11):2050–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Singhal AB, Hajj-Ali RA, Topcuoglu MA, Fok J, Bena J, Yang D, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes: analysis of 139 cases. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(8):1005–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Caria F, Zedde M, Gamba M, Bersano A, Rasura M, Adami A, et al. The clinical spectrum of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: the Italian project on stroke at young age (IPSYS). Cephalalgia. 2019;39(10):1267–76.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi HA, Lee MJ, Choi H, Chung CS. Characteristics and demographics of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a large prospective series of Korean patients. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(4):765–75.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lange KS, Forster O, Mawet J, Tuloup G, Burcin C, Corti L, et al. Type of headache at onset and risk for complications in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Eur J Neurol. 2022;29(1):130–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel SD, Topiwala K, Otite Oliver F, Saber H, Panza G, Mui G, et al. Outcomes among patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a nationwide United States analysis. Stroke. 2021;52(12):3970–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singhal AB, Bernstein RA. Postpartum angiopathy and other cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. Neurocrit Care. 2005;3(1):91–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen SP, Fuh JL, Wang SJ. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: current and future perspectives. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11(9):1265–76.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Singhal AB. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome as syndromes of cerebrovascular dysregulation. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2021;27(5):1301–20.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lin PT, Wang YF, Fuh JL, Lirng JF, Ling YH, Chen SP, et al. Diagnosis and classification of headache associated with sexual activity using a composite algorithm: a cohort study. Cephalalgia. 2021;41(14):1447–57.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shimoda M, Oda S, Hirayama A, Imai M, Komatsu F, Hoshikawa K, et al. Centripetal propagation of vasoconstriction at the time of headache resolution in patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(9):1594–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shimoda M, Oda S, Shigematsu H, Hoshikawa K, Imai M, Komatsu F, et al. Clinical significance of centripetal propagation of vasoconstriction in patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a retrospective case–control study. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(12):1864–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ducros A, Fiedler U, Porcher R, Boukobza M, Stapf C, Bousser MG. Hemorrhagic manifestations of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: frequency, features, and risk factors. Stroke. 2010;41(11):2505–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Topcuoglu MA, Singhal AB. Hemorrhagic reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: features and mechanisms. Stroke. 2016;47(7):1742–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mawet J, Boukobza M, Franc J, Sarov M, Arnold M, Bousser MG, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and cervical artery dissection in 20 patients. Neurology. 2013;81(9):821–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Garg A, Rocha M, Starr M, Ortega-Gutierrez S. Predictors and outcomes of hemorrhagic stroke in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. J Neurol Sci. 2021;421:117312.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hajj-Ali RA, Furlan A, Abou-Chebel A, Calabrese LH. Benign angiopathy of the central nervous system: cohort of 16 patients with clinical course and long-term followup. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;47(6):662–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ray S, Kamath VV, Raju PA, Kn R. Fulminant reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in breakthrough COVID 19 infection. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022;31(2):106238.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Valencia-Mendoza M, Ramírez-Rodríguez N, Vargas-Avila N, Peña-Ortiz A, Corzo-Villamizar M, Serna-Ramírez L, et al. Fatal reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a systematic review of case series and case reports. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;70:183–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cho S, Lee MJ, Chung CS. Effect of nimodipine treatment on the clinical course of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Front Neurol. 2019;10:644.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ling YH, Chen SP. Narrative review: headaches after reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020;24(12):74.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen SP, Fuh JL, Lirng JF, Wang YF, Wang SJ. Recurrence of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a long-term follow-up study. Neurology. 2015;84(15):1552–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Boitet R, de Gaalon S, Duflos C, Marin G, Mawet J, Burcin C, et al. Long-term outcomes after reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Stroke. 2020;51(2):670–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Buttner A, Review. The neuropathology of drug abuse. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2011;37(2):118–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, Lim KH, England LJ, Yu KF, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(7):672–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rana S, Karumanchi SA, Levine RJ, Venkatesha S, Rauh-Hain JA, Tamez H, et al. Sequential changes in antiangiogenic factors in early pregnancy and risk of developing preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2007;50(1):137–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Singhal AB, Kimberly WT, Schaefer PW, Hedley-Whyte ET. Case records of the Massachusetts general hospital. Case 8-2009. A 36-year-old woman with headache, hypertension, and seizure 2 weeks post partum. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(11):1126–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hamel E. Perivascular nerves and the regulation of cerebrovascular tone. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;100(3):1059–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Duckworth JW, Wellman GC, Walters CL, Bevan JA. Aminergic histofluorescence and contractile responses to transmural electrical field stimulation and norepinephrine of human middle cerebral arteries obtained promptly after death. Circ Res. 1989;65(2):316–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Högestätt ED, Andersson KE. On the postjunctional alpha-adrenoreceptors in rat cerebral and mesenteric arteries. J Auton Pharmacol. 1984;4(3):161–73.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mayhan WG. Responses of cerebral arterioles to activation of beta-adrenergic receptors during diabetes mellitus. Stroke. 1994;25(1):141–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bartynski WS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, part 2: controversies surrounding pathophysiology of vasogenic edema. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(6):1043–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bartynski WS, Boardman JF. Catheter angiography, MR angiography, and MR perfusion in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(3):447–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Topcuoglu MA, Chan ST, Silva GS, Smith EE, Kwong KK, Singhal AB. Cerebral vasomotor reactivity in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(6):541–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Choi HA, Lee MJ, Chung CS. Cerebral endothelial dysfunction in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: a case–control study. J Headache Pain. 2017;18(1):29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Chen SP, Yang AC, Fuh JL, Wang SJ. Autonomic dysfunction in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. J Headache Pain. 2013;14:94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen SP, Chung YT, Liu TY, Wang YF, Fuh JL, Wang SJ. Oxidative stress and increased formation of vasoconstricting F2-isoprostanes in patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;61:243–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hsu WH, Wang SJ, Chao YM, Chen CJ, Wang YF, Fuh JL, et al. Urine metabolomics signatures in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Cephalalgia. 2020;40(7):735–47.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chen SP, Wang YF, Huang PH, Chi CW, Fuh JL, Wang SJ. Reduced circulating endothelial progenitor cells in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. J Headache Pain. 2014;15:82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lee MJ, Cha J, Choi HA, Woo SY, Kim S, Wang SJ, et al. Blood–brain barrier breakdown in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: implications for pathophysiology and diagnosis. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(3):454–66.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Cho S, Ling YH, Lee MJ, Chen SP, Fuh JL, Lirng JF, et al. Temporal profile of blood–brain barrier breakdown in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Stroke. 2020;51(5):1451–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen SP, Chang YA, Chou CH, Juan CC, Lee HC, Chen LK, et al. Circulating microRNAs associated with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(3):459–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Dodick DW. Thunderclap headache. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(1):6–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Armstrong FS, Hayes GJ. Segmental cerebral arterial constriction associated with pheochromocytoma: report of a case with arteriograms. J Neurosurg. 1961;18:843–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Im SH, Kim NH. Thunderclap headache after micturition in bladder pheochromocytoma. Headache. 2008;48(6):965–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Heo YE, Kwon HM, Nam HW. Thunderclap headache as an initial manifestation of phaeochromocytoma. Cephalalgia. 2009;29(3):388–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Margolis MT, Newton TH. Methamphetamine (“speed”) arteritis. Neuroradiology. 1971;2(3):179–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tang-Wai DF, Phan TG, Wijdicks EF. Hypertensive encephalopathy presenting with thunderclap headache. Headache. 2001;41(2):198–200.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Shih YC, Chen SP, Fuh JL, Wang YF, Wang SJ. Influence of climate on the incidence of RCVS—a retrospective study from Taiwan. Headache. 2019;59(4):567–75.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Brown CM, Sanya EO, Hilz MJ. Effect of cold face stimulation on cerebral blood flow in humans. Brain Res Bull. 2003;61(1):81–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Roatta S, Micieli G, Bosone D, Losano G, Bini R, Cavallini A, et al. Effect of generalised sympathetic activation by cold pressor test on cerebral haemodynamics in healthy humans. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1998;71(2–3):159–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Chen SP, Fuh JL, Wang SJ, Tsai SJ, Hong CJ, Yang AC. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene Val66Met polymorphism modulates reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(3):e18024.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Kasselman LJ, Sideris A, Bruno C, Perez WR, Cai N, Nicoletti JN, et al. BDNF: a missing link between sympathetic dysfunction and inflammatory disease? J Neuroimmunol. 2006;175(1–2):118–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zukowska Z, Pons J, Lee EW, Li L. Neuropeptide Y. a new mediator linking sympathetic nerves, blood vessels and immune system? Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2003;81(2):89–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Andresen J, Shafi NI, Bryan RM Jr. Endothelial influences on cerebrovascular tone. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;100(1):318–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Urbich C, Dimmeler S. Endothelial progenitor cells: characterization and role in vascular biology. Circ Res. 2004;95(4):343–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Liman TG, Siebert E, Endres M. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Curr Opin Neurol. 2019;32(1):25–35.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Fletcher JJ, Kramer AH, Bleck TP, Solenski NJ. Overlapping features of eclampsia and postpartum angiopathy. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11(2):199–209.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Donaldson JO. Eclampsia and postpartum cerebral angiopathy. J Neurol Sci. 2000;178(1):1.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Levine RJ, Lam C, Qian C, Yu KF, Maynard SE, Sachs BP, et al. Soluble endoglin and other circulating antiangiogenic factors in preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(10):992–1005.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. John S, Hajj-Ali RA, Min D, Calabrese LH, Cerejo R, Uchino K. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: is it more than just cerebral vasoconstriction? Cephalalgia. 2015;35(7):631–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Oguchi K, Fukushima K, Nakamura A, Takei YI. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome with cardiac involvement during treatment for iron deficiency anemia: case report. BMC Neurol. 2021;21(1):479.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Laeeq R, Berman JS, Khalid U, Lakkis NM, Tabbaa R. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome associated with coronary artery vasospasm. Tex Heart Inst J. 2019;46(2):139–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Faraci FM. Reactive oxygen species: influence on cerebral vascular tone. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;100(2):739–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Schulz E, Gori T, Münzel T. Oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2011;34(6):665–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Conti V, Russomanno G, Corbi G, Izzo V, Vecchione C, Filippelli A. Adrenoreceptors and nitric oxide in the cardiovascular system. Front Physiol. 2013;4:321.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Yan JQ, Huang F, Hao F, Su XL, Meng Q, Xu MJ. Oxidative stress in the rostral ventrolateral medulla contributes to cardiovascular regulation in preeclampsia. Front Physiol. 2017;8:772.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Milne GL, Sanchez SC, Musiek ES, Morrow JD. Quantification of F2-isoprostanes as a biomarker of oxidative stress. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(1):221–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Cracowski JL, Devillier P, Durand T, Stanke-Labesque F, Bessard G. Vascular biology of the isoprostanes. J Vasc Res. 2001;38(2):93–103.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Abbott NJ, Patabendige AA, Dolman DE, Yusof SR, Begley DJ. Structure and function of the blood–brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37(1):13–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Keaney J, Campbell M. The dynamic blood–brain barrier. FEBS J. 2015;282(21):4067–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Chen SP, Fuh JL, Wang SJ. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: an under-recognized clinical emergency. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2010;3(3):161–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Pun PB, Lu J, Moochhala S. Involvement of ROS in BBB dysfunction. Free Radic Res. 2009;43(4):348–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Chen SP, Chou KH, Fuh JL, Huang YH, Huang CC, Lirng JF, et al. Dynamic changes in white matter hyperintensities in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(9):1106–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Wu CH, Lirng JF, Ling YH, Wang YF, Wu HM, Fuh JL, et al. Noninvasive characterization of human glymphatics and meningeal lymphatics in an in vivo model of blood–brain barrier leakage. Ann Neurol. 2021;89(1):111–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Wu CH, Lirng JF, Wu HM, Ling YH, Wang YF, Fuh JL, et al. Blood–brain barrier permeability in patients with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome assessed with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Neurology. 2021;97(18):e1847–59.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Wang Y, Wang MD, Xia YP, Gao Y, Zhu YY, Chen SC, et al. MicroRNA-130a regulates cerebral ischemia-induced blood–brain barrier permeability by targeting Homeobox A5. Faseb J. 2018;32(2):935–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Wang MD, Wang Y, Xia YP, Dai JW, Gao L, Wang SQ, et al. High serum MiR-130a levels are associated with severe perihematomal edema and predict adverse outcome in acute ICH. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53(2):1310–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Bertero T, Cottrill KA, Annis S, Bhat B, Gochuico BR, Osorio JC, et al. A YAP/TAZ-miR-130/301 molecular circuit exerts systems-level control of fibrosis in a network of human diseases and physiologic conditions. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18277.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Fontaine D, Almairac F, Santucci S, Fernandez C, Dallel R, Pallud J, et al. Dural and pial pain-sensitive structures in humans: new inputs from awake craniotomies. Brain. 2018;141(4):1040–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Park CK, Xu ZZ, Berta T, Han Q, Chen G, Liu XJ, et al. Extracellular microRNAs activate nociceptor neurons to elicit pain via TLR7 and TRPA1. Neuron. 2014;82(1):47–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Kunkler PE, Ballard CJ, Oxford GS, Hurley JH. TRPA1 receptors mediate environmental irritant-induced meningeal vasodilatation. Pain. 2011;152(1):38–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. He Y, Yang C, Kirkmire CM, Wang ZJ. Regulation of opioid tolerance by let-7 family microRNA targeting the mu opioid receptor. J Neurosci. 2010;30(30):10251–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Song J, Cho YH, Oh MJ, Cho S, Bang OY, Lee MJ, et al. No association of RNF213 polymorphism with reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. J Clin Neurol. 2020;16(2):330–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Akazawa Y, Inaba Y, Hachiya A, Motoki N, Matsuzaki S, Minatoya K, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a boy with Loeys–Dietz syndrome. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2015;167a(10):2435–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Krause DN, Duckles SP, Pelligrino DA. Influence of sex steroid hormones on cerebrovascular function. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006;101(4):1252–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Moussavi M, Korya D, Panezai S, Peeraully T, Gizzi M, Kirmani JF. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in a 35-year-old woman following hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;4(6):e35.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Freilinger T, Schmidt C, Duering M, Linn J, Straube A, Peters N. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome associated with hormone therapy for intrauterine insemination. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(9):1127–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Soo Y, Singhal AB, Leung T, Yu S, Mak H, Hao Q, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome with posterior leucoencephalopathy after oral contraceptive pills. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(1):42–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Choi S, Lee JY, Bae JS, Song HK, Lee JH, Kim Y. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome associated with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Brain Sci. 2021;11(5):601.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Topcuoglu MA, McKee KE, Singhal AB. Gender and hormonal influences in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Eur Stroke J. 2016;1(3):199–204.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Hammad TA, Hajj-Ali RA. Primary angiitis of the central nervous system and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2013;15(8):346.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Rocha EA, Topcuoglu MA, Silva GS, Singhal AB. RCVS(2) score and diagnostic approach for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Neurology. 2019;92(7):e639–47.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Singhal AB, Topcuoglu MA, Fok JW, Kursun O, Nogueira RG, Frosch MP, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndromes and primary angiitis of the central nervous system: clinical, imaging, and angiographic comparison. Ann Neurol. 2016;79(6):882–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Serdaru M, Chiras J, Cujas M, Lhermitte F. Isolated benign cerebral vasculitis or migrainous vasospasm? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47(1):73–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Han JS, Mandell DM, Poublanc J, Mardimae A, Slessarev M, Jaigobin C, et al. BOLD-MRI cerebrovascular reactivity findings in cocaine-induced cerebral vasculitis. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4(11):628–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Chen CY, Chen SP, Fuh JL, Lirng JF, Chang FC, Wang YF, et al. Vascular wall imaging in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome—a 3-T contrast-enhanced MRI study. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Topcuoglu MA, Jha RM, George J, Frosch MP, Singhal AB. Hemorrhagic primary CNS angiitis and vasoconstrictive drug exposure. Neurol Clin Pract. 2017;7(1):26–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Ashraf VV, Bhasi R, Ramakrishnan KG, Praveenkumar R, Girija AS. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Neurol India. 2012;60(6):635–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Chung SW, Lee KM, Heo SH, Ra R, Hong SJ, Yang HI, et al. A systemic lupus erythematosus patient with thunderclap headache: reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. Lupus. 2019;28(7):898–902.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Durrleman C, Naggara O, Grevent D, Belot A, Desgranges M, Boyer O, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in paediatric patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: implications for management. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(6):725–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Sadeghizadeh A, Pourmoghaddas Z, Zandifar A, Tara SZ, Rahimi H, Saleh R, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children with COVID-19. Pediatr Neurol. 2022;129:1–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Arandela K, Samudrala S, Abdalkader M, Anand P, Daneshmand A, Dasenbrock H, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in patients with coronavirus disease: a multicenter case series. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(12):106118.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Scheer M, Harder A, Wagner S, Ibe R, Prell J, Scheller C, et al. Case report of a fulminant non-aneurysmal convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage after COVID-19. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2022;27:101437.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Finsterer J. First reported case of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome after a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Cureus. 2021;13(11):e19987.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Mansoor T, Alsarah AA, Mousavi H, Khader Eliyas J, Girotra T, Hussein O. COVID-19 associated reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome successfully treated with nimodipine and aspirin. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(7):105822.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Dakay K, Kaur G, Gulko E, Santarelli J, Bowers C, Mayer SA, et al. Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and dissection in the setting of COVID-19 infection. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(9):105011.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan (to SJW & SPC); the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST-107-2314-B-010-021, 108-2314-B-010-022-MY3 & 110-2326-B-A49A-501-MY3 (to SPC) and MOST 108-2321-B-010-014-MY2, 108-2321-B-010-001-, 108-2314-B-010-023-MY3, 110-2321-B-010-005- & 111-2321-B-A49-004- (to SJW) ], Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan [MOHW107-TDU-B-211-123001 and MOHW 108-TDU-B-211-133001] (to SJW), and Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan [VGH-106-D9-001-MY2-2 (to SJW) & V111C-158, V109D52-001-MY3-3, VGHUST110-G1-3-1 (to SPC)]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Shih-Pin Chen and Shuu-Jiun Wang contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, 11217, Taiwan

    Shih-Pin Chen & Shuu-Jiun Wang

  2. Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Shih-Pin Chen

  3. Division of Translational Research, Department of Medical Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

    Shih-Pin Chen

  4. Brain Research Center & School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Shih-Pin Chen & Shuu-Jiun Wang

Authors
  1. Shih-Pin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuu-Jiun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SPC and SJW are responsible for the conception and writing of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shih-Pin Chen or Shuu-Jiun Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, SP., Wang, SJ. Pathophysiology of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. J Biomed Sci 29, 72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-022-00857-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-022-00857-4

Keywords

  • Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome
  • Thunderclap headache
  • Blood–brain barrier
  • Neurovascular unit

Journal of Biomedical Science

ISSN: 1423-0127