Skip to main content

Antimicrobial and immunoregulatory effects of Lactobacillus delbrueckii 45E against genitourinary pathogens

Abstract

Background

Lactobacilli are essential microbiota that maintain a healthy, balanced vaginal environment. Vaginitis is a common infection in women during their reproductive years. Many factors are associated with vaginitis; one of them is the imbalance of microbiota in the vaginal environment. This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial properties of Lactobacillus delbrueckii 45E (Ld45E) against several species of bacteria, namely, Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Candida parapsilosis, as well as to determine the concentration of interleukin-17 (IL-17) in the presence of Ld45E.

Methods

The probiotic characteristics of Ld45E were evaluated by examining its morphology, pH tolerance, adhesive ability onto HeLa cells, hemolytic activity, antibiotic susceptibility, and autoaggregation ability. Then, the antimicrobial activity of Ld45E was determined using Ld45E culture, cell-free supernatant, and crude bacteriocin solution. Co-aggregation and competition ability assays against various pathogens were conducted. The immunoregulatory effects of Ld45E were analyzed by measuring the proinflammatory cytokine IL-17. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistical significance.

Results

Ld45E is 3–5 mm in diameter and round with a flat-shaped colony. pH 4 and 4.5 were the most favorable range for Ld45E growth within 12 h of incubation. Ld45E showed a strong adhesion ability onto HeLa cells (86%) and negative hemolytic activities. Ld45E was also sensitive to ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, and doxycycline. We found that it had a good autoaggregation ability of 80%. Regarding antagonistic properties, Ld45E culture showed strong antimicrobial activity against GBS, E. coli, and Klebsiella spp. but only a moderate effect on C. parapsilosis. Cell-free supernatant of Ld45E exerted the most potent inhibitory effects at 40 °C against all genital pathogens, whereas bacteriocin showed a robust inhibition at 37 °C and 40 °C. The highest co-aggregation affinity was observed with GBS (81%) and E. coli (40%). Competition ability against the adhesion of GBS (80%), E. coli (76%), Klebsiella (72%), and C. parapsilosis (58%) was found. Ld45E was able to reduce the induction of the proinflammatory protein IL-17.

Conclusions

Ld45E possessed antimicrobial and immunoregulatory properties, with better cell-on-cell activity than supernatant activity. Thus, Ld45E is a potential probiotic candidate for adjunct therapy to address vaginal infections.

Background

Vaginal lactobacilli (LB) live in a symbiotic relationship modulated by female hormones that induce vaginal epithelium cells to secrete glycogen. Glycogen is metabolized by LB to produce lactic acid and keep the vagina at a constant pH of ≤ 4.5 [1, 2]. Different LB species exert antagonistic effects on several microorganisms, including pathogens, anaerobic microflora, numerous Gram negative Enterobacteriaceae groups, and Gram positive cocci that are not similar to Lactobacilli spp., such as Group B Streptococcus (GBS) [3]. Previous studies have described Lactobacillus delbrueckii spp. as a safe strain for their γ-hemolysis activity and sensitivity to some antibiotics. They also possess antimicrobial properties by secreting organic substances [4, 5] that inhibit the growth of some Gram negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli and Gardnerella biofilm [3, 6]. The abilities of L. delbrueckii spp. to maintain the pH and adhere onto cell lines are conducive to forming biofilms and fending off vaginal pathogens [7].

Modulating innate immune responses can boost health and monitor chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Correspondingly, the application of multistrain probiotic therapy demonstrates a significant regulator for innate immune homeostasis. Li et al. (2019) explained that the administration of L. crispatus and L. delbrueckii spp. could suppress the release of proinflammatory cytokines from the epithelial cells [8]. Furthermore, monitoring the secretion of proteins may reduce the ratio of certain cytokines that are produced by T helper cells, thereby arbitrating the adaptive immunity’s epithelial expressions to elevate IgG and promote antibody-mediated protection. The protective role of T helper 17 (Th17) cells to innate immunity is characterized by the secretion of interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-17F. It helps the host defend against pathogen infection and maintain the mucosal barrier, as well as induce tissue inflammation and autoimmune diseases [9].

Inappropriate antibiotic use can lead to bacteria drug resistance, whereas insufficient doses may result in an imbalanced LB levels, leading to recurrent infections [10]. According to Razzak et al., the predisposing risk factors of vaginitis refer to an inverse relationship between the presence of LB and the atiological agents of vaginal infection, including Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, GBS, and Klebsiella spp. [11]. Furthermore, vaginitis treatment must be selective to avoid vaginal-microbiota disturbance. For these reasons, evaluating new prophylactic strategies is an imperative. Asymptomatic infection and non-infectious vaginitis render unsuitable the application of antimicrobials as treatment because the main problem refers to microbiota imbalance. Accordingly, an adjunct therapy to address vaginitis is required. The present research aimed to evaluate the LB delbrueckii strain 45E (Ld45E) as a potential adjunct-therapy probiotic candidate for vaginal infections pathogens by assessing its antimicrobial effects against GBS, E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and Candida parapsilosis. Hemolytic activity and antibiotic sensitivity tests were conducted to study the safety aspect of the strain. The adhesion capacity of Ld45E onto HeLa cells and autoaggregation, co-aggregation, and competition against pathogens provided potential information on the microorganism colonization of the vaginal tract. This research also explored the ability of Ld45E to suppress the IL-17 induction that controlled the proinflammatory response.

Materials and methods

Materials

Bacteria isolates

Table 1 shows the bacteria isolates used in this study. Previously isolated Lactobacillus delbrueckii strain 45E Ld45E from the anogenital region of a healthy Malaysian woman was maintained on de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) agar [12]. Pathogenic isolates of Group B Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Candida parapsilosis were obtained from Universiti Putra Malaysia’s medical microbiology department. These bacterial collections were previously isolated from clinical samples using vaginal swabs, and ATCC species were commercially provided.

Table 1 Test pathogens utilized in this study

Bacterial-culture maintenance

Inocula of GBS, E. coli, Klebsiella, C. parapsilosis, Ld45E, and L. reuteri RC-14 (108 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL) were cultured overnight for 24–48 h at 37 °C in tryptic soy broth, Luria broth, Sabouraud dextrose broth, and MRS broth (Himedia, India), respectively. The stocks were frozen at − 80 °C in a sterilized mixture of glycerol (v/v). Glycerol stocks’ were maintained every six months by subculturing the frozen stock.

Culture of HeLa cells

HeLa cells were slowly defrosted, added to 5 mL of Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM; Sigma–Aldrich, USA) in a falcon tube, and centrifuged for 4 min at 1200 rpm. The pellet was transferred into a mixture of DMEM solution supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (GenClone, USA) and 1% of penicillin G/streptomycin (10,000 IU/mL to 10,000 μg/mL) (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). About 5 mL of the mixture was seeded into a T-flask 25 cm2 for 24 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The old medium was aspirated, and the cells were washed three times with 2 mL of PBS to remove debris [13, 14]. About 1 mL of 0.25% trypsin–EDTA solution (Sigma–Aldrich, USA) was added to detach HeLa cells from the flask for cell calculation. About 1 × 105 HeLa cells/mL were seeded onto a 24-well tissue-culture plate in a 5% CO2 incubator for 24 h at 37 °C until a monolayer of cells reached (~ 90% confluence) a density of 2 × 105 cells/well [13, 14]. The growth medium was diskharged, and the cells were washed twice with PBS to be used in Ld45E adhesion assays.

Preparation of cell-free supernatant (CFS)

Overnight cultures at exponential-growth phase were incubated anaerobically in MRS broth for 24 h at 37 °C and Ld45E cells were harvested by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was aseptically filtrated through a 22 µm millipore to obtain a sterile CFS. The CFS was dispensed into three vials and labeled as CFS1, CFS2, and CFS 3. Then, CFS 1 was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, CFS 2 at 40 °C, and CSF 3 at 50 °C.

Preparation of crude bacteriocin (CB) solution (CBS)

Similarly, the previous filtrate of the CFS solution was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was adjusted with NaOH to achieve a pH 7.0 concentration. Bovine serum (1 mL) was added to inhibit the active hydrogen peroxide [15]. The supernatant was filtered through 0.45 µm Millipore (Advantec Co., Japan). Precipitation was achieved by adding ammonium sulfate (1:1) concentration, and the resulting pellets were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.0) for CB1 solution [16]. Three heat-stable solutions were obtained at 37 °C, 40 °C, and 50 °C.

Characterization of Ld45E

Morphology

Gram staining protocol was followed for the initial screening of Ld45E size and compared with the control group L. reuteri RC14. Ld45E was incubated overnight with different pathogen strains. A thin smear of the bacterial mixture was placed on a glass slide. A primary crystal violet stain was applied to a heat-fixed smear, followed by adding iodine with rapid decolorisation with alcohol. Safranin was finally added, and the slide was screened under a light microscope. The presence of peptidoglycan in the Gram positive bacterial cell wall retained the crystal violet stain and prevented iodine diffusion owing to the closure of pores in the cell wall. Gram positive bacteria appeared purple and Gram negative bacteria were red. The physical shape of Ld45E was compared with that of the control strain L. reuteri RC-14. The results were reported as large, thick (0.5–0.9 µm), and long bacilli (3–9 µm), or tiny, thin (0.2–0.6 µm), and short bacilli (2–5 µm) under optical light microscopy (100 × magnitude) [17, 18].

pH tolerance of Ld45E

The viability of Ld45E within different pH ranges were measured to determine the pH tolerance of Ld45E. Normal female vaginal pH and vaginal candidiasis pH were equivalent to 3.5–4.5, whereas bacterial vaginosis pH was > 4.5. [19]. An overnight culture of Ld45E in MRS broth at pH 6.6 was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C and rinsed twice with PBS. The solution was adjusted to 0.5 OD600 nm, approximately 5 × 107 CFU/mL, to standardize the growth of LB cells [5, 20]. About 1 mL of Ld45E was subcultured into 15 mL of MRS broth. The pH was adjusted to 3.0–7.0 by using 1 M acetic acid and 1 M NaCl (Merck, Germany), analogous to the vaginal secretions indicated by Owen and Katz [21]. Ld45E was incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 24 h at three time intervals to determine the estimated viability time in the vagina and the compared it with that of the control strain L. reuteri RC-14. Ld45E growth was monitored by spectrophotometric absorbance at OD600 nm and serial-dilution plating technique where the strain was incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 48 h.

Adhesion capacity of Ld45E on HeLa cells

Adhesion assay was performed as described by Carmo et al., 2016 with some modifications [22]. An overnight Ld45E culture was centrifuged at 6000 × g for 15 min and washed two times with PBS. The pellet or precipitant was resuspended in 500 µL of DMEM (Sigma–Aldrich, USA). Approximately 100 µL of Ld45E suspension (5 × 107 CFU/mL) were added onto 24-well plates and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Afterwards, each well of the 24-well plate was washed with PBS three times to eliminate the unattached Ld45E. The adhered quantity of Ld45E on HeLa cells was determined by adding 500 µL of 0.25% trypsin–EDTA solution (Sigma–Aldrich) to allow cell detachment. Wells with HeLa cells + Ld45E suspensions were then incubated for 10 min at 37 °C, and the suspension was used for appropriate serial dilutions. About 100 µL was plated out on MRS agar and incubated for 48 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator [22]. L. reuteri RC-14 was used as a positive control, and HeLa cells alone were the negative control. Lastly, a Gram stain technique was used to visualize the adhesion of Ld45E on HeLa cells and viewed under an inverted microscope. Adherence percentage (%) was calculated by comparing the number of adherent bacterial cells onto the total cell number of the added bacterial suspension (5 × 107 CFU/mL) expressed by the following formula:

$${\text{Adherence}}\;{\text{percentage}} \, (\%) = \frac{{{\text{Number}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{adherent}}\;{\text{bacterial}}\;{\text{cells}}\;({\text{CFU}}\;{\text{mL}}^{{{-}{1}}} )}}{{{\text{Total}}\;{\text{bacterial}}\;{\text{cell}}\;{\text{number}}}} \times 100\%$$

Hemolytic activity of Ld45E

Overnight Ld45E was grown in MRS broth at 37 °C and then streaked over a Columbia blood agar plate (CM0331, Oxoid). Incubation was under anaerobic conditions for 48 h at 37 °C. The hemolytic reaction was determined visually and distinguished as either a greenish discoloration around the colony (known as α-hemolysis or partial hemolysis), or a distinct lysed zone around the colony (known as β-hemolysis or complete hemolysis), or no changes could occur in the agar medium (known as γ-hemolysis or no hemolysis). In the hemolytic analysis, GBS (clinical isolates and ATCC 8017) were β-hemolytic strains used as the positive control group. Enterococcus was used as the negative control [23].

Antibiotic susceptibility of Ld45E

Ld45E was subcultured anaerobically on MRS broth for 24 h at 37 °C. The suspensions were adjusted to 0.5 OD600 nm equivalent to 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL. Dissemination of 100 µL of Ld45E was overlaid on the surface of MRS agar plates. Four disks were placed on the agar surface per Petri dish and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in an anaerobic jar. Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed according to the disk-diffusion method described by Barry et al. (1970) for clinical isolates [24]. Antimicrobial sensitivity (in triplicates) was measured following a modified disk-diffusion method of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards [25]. About 20 mL of melted MRS agar was poured into a Petri dish (9 cm). Petri plates were left to solidify at room temperature for 15 min before dispensing LB and antibiotic disks. After anaerobic incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, the inhibition-zone diameter was measured. The outcomes were expressed in terms of inhibition-zone diameter (mm), resistance (R), intermediate (I), and susceptible (S) based on the interpretative standards described by CLSI [26, 27].

L. reuteri RC-14 (as an LB strain) and GBS (as a Gram positive strain) were selected to be the control strains for their susceptibility to the antibiotics of interest and ability to grow anaerobically on the agar.

Autoaggregation assay

Autoaggregation assay was performed according to Aslim et al. 2017 [28]. We centrifuged a 48 h culture of Ld45E in MRS broth at 10,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C and washed twice in PBS (pH 7.5). The harvested LB pellet was adjusted to a density of 0.5 OD600 nm and observed under a spectrophotometer (BioPhotometer plus, Eppendorf, USA). Ld45E was then resuspended in PBS and incubated for 4 h at room temperature. The control tube containing 2 mL of L. reuteri RC-14, at a final concentration of 0.5 OD600 nm, was incubated for 4 h at room temperature. The reproducibility of the obtained results was verified in three independent assays. The percentage of autoaggregation was measured by the formula:

$${\text{Auto-aggregation}} \, (\%) = \left[ {\left( {{\text{OD1}}{-}{\text{OD2}}} \right)/\left( {{\text{OD1}}} \right)} \right] \times 100$$

where OD1 is the first optical density (OD) of Ld45E, and OD2 is the OD of Ld45E after 4 h. The bacterial aggregation score was confirmed after 4 h of incubation under a light microscope. Good autoaggregation of Ld45E was expressed as (+ +) of precipitate forming with no turbidity in the solution, whereas no autoaggregation (−) indicated turbid solution and no precipitate forming. Mixed autoaggregation ( ±) showed both a precipitate and constant turbidity [28, 29].

Antimicrobial activity of Ld45E

Antagonistic effect of Ld45E culture using agar plug-diffusion method

LB strains were cultured in 20 mL of MRS agar and left to grow anaerobically for 48 h at 37 °C before the experiment. Agar plug diffusion was performed according to Balouiri et al. method [30]. Suspensions of Ld45E were adjusted to reach 0.5 OD600 nm equivalents to 1.5 × 108 CFU/mL to standardize the growth. Then, 0.1 mL of Ld45E was inoculated into 500 mL of melted MRS agar at 37 °C [31]. The mixture was poured into a sterile Petri dish. When the inoculated agar solidified, holes about 8 mm in diameter were cut on the agar with a sterile cork borer. Each plug containing Ld45E was deposited on the Mueller–Hinton (MH) agar surface of another plate that was previously spread with the pathogen isolates. Overnight cultured pathogens GBS, E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and C. parapsilosis were standardized to 0.5 OD600 nm by using a spectrophotometer (BioPhotometer plus, Eppendorf, USA) before being cultured into fresh agar. An uncultured MRS agar plate was used as a (blank/negative control) to confirm no contamination with microbial growth, and L. reuteri RC-14 served as a positive control. About 1 mL of each culture was plated and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The assay was performed in triplicate for three independent assays per isolate. The diameters of inhibition zones were measured and recorded in the following days. The inhibition index was calculated by applying the following equation [30]

$${\text{IP = }}\frac{{\Phi \;{\text{Clear}}\;{\text{Zone}} - \Phi \;{\text{Plug}}\;{\text{Size}}}}{{\Phi \;{\text{Plug}}\;{\text{Size}}}}$$

where IP is the inhibition index, and Ф is diameter (mm).

Antagonistic effect of Ld45E CFS and bacteriocin using well-diffusion methods

Determination of the antimicrobial efficacy of Ld45E CFS and bacteriocin solution against genital pathogens was performed through a well-diffusion assay described by Balouiri et al. [30] and the modified protocol by Sharma et al. [32]. An aliquot of each tested pathogen was spread-plated over pre-solidified plates. The inoculated sterile borer was used to equidistant 8 mm wells. About 100 µL of CFS 1 was dispensed into each pre-labeled well and then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C to obtain the 1st heat-stable CFS solution. The second CFS2 vial was kept in an oven for 24 h at 40 °C to obtain the second heat-stable CFS solution. CFS3 was incubated for 24 h at 50 °C for the third heat-stable CFS solution before dispensing into a well-diffusion assay. About 100 μL of MRS broth was used as a negative control and a similar amount of L. reuteri RC-14 as a positive control.

Coaggregation and competition assays

Co-aggregation assay

The assessment of the co-aggregation ability of the Ld45E strain with clinically isolated pathogens was determined as described by Aslim et al. [28]. Similarly, as in autoaggregation preparation, 1:1 mL of Ld45E suspension was mixed in a vortex for 10 s and incubated for 4 h at room temperature in pairs with the bacterial pathogens. The concentration of the suspension was equivalent to 0.5 OD600 nm at a spectrophotometer. The control tube contained 2 mL of the suspension mixture of L. reuteri RC-14: pathogen (1:1) mL, with a density of 0.5 at OD600 nm after 4 h of incubation at room temperature. The results were verified by carrying out triplicates of each suspension in three independent assays. The following formula was used to express the co-aggregation:

$${\text{Co-aggregation}}\;(\%) = \frac{{[({\text{A}}_{{{\text{Lac}}}} + {\text{ A}}_{{{\text{path}}}} )/{2}{-}{\text{A}}_{{{\text{mix}}}} ]}}{{\left( {{\text{A}}_{{{\text{LAB}}}} + {\text{A}}_{{{\text{path}}}} } \right)/{2}}}$$

where ODPath is the OD of pathogens, represented by GBS, E. coli, Klebsiella, and C. parapsilosis; ODLact is the OD of the LB strains; ODmix is the OD of the co-cultured mixture of LB strains and pathogen strains after 4 h of incubation.

Competition assay

A suspension of Ld45E and pathogens cultured overnight of approximately 1 mL (5 × 107 CFU/mL) of Ld45E + pathogens was added to each well of a previously seeded 24-well plate with HeLa cells and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Non-adhered bacterial cells were washed out three times with PBS (pH 7.5). HeLa cells and the bacterial cells were detached by adding 500 µL of 0.25% trypsin–EDTA solution (Sigma–Aldrich) into (HeLa–LB–pathogen) wells, and the plate was incubated for 5 min at 37 °C. The numbers of viable Ld45E and the pathogenic that remained on HeLa cells were determined by plating the bacteria on MRS agar and selective media after serial dilutions. Serial dilution factors were varied according to the Ld45E concentration that competed with other pathogens on HeLa cells. The results were expressed according to the LB that adhered onto the inhibited rate of pathogenic bacteria per well by following the competition formulation [33]. Three independent assays were conducted to confirm the reproducibility of the results.

$${\text{Inhibition}}\;{\text{rate}}\;{\text{of}}\;{\text{pathogen}}\;{\text{incubated}}\;{\text{with}}\;{\text{lactobacilli}} = \left[ {{1} - \left( {N_{1} /N_{0} } \right)} \right] \times {1}00$$

where N1 is the number of pathogens adhered onto HeLa cells, and N0 is the number of initial pathogens added into the wells of a 12-well plate.

Effect of Ld45E on IL-17 secretion

LB Ld45E and the control strain L. reuteri RC-14 were incubated with HeLa cells for 24 h. The overnight solution served as a control, and the solution of overnight HeLa cells alone served as a blank. Similarly, the overnight solutions of pathogens incubated with Ld45E were transferred to a 96-well plate, respectively, for ELISA reading. A microplate reader read the absorbance under a spectrophotometer at OD450 nm. The density of the yellow-colored product was proportional to the target amount of sample captured in the plate. The standard curve was plotted as the relative absorbance OD450 nm of the target concentrations (X) vs. the standard solution (Y) of the value provided by the company protocol.

Data analysis

SPSS statistical analysis package (version 21.0 for Windows) was used to analyze the significance of the results. An independent t-test was used to compare two means, and ANOVA was used to compare more than two means. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistical significance.

Results

Characteristics of Ld45E probiotic profile

Morphology

LB strains were subcultured on MRS agar at pH 6.5. Ld45E had relatively bigger creamy white colonies 3–5 mm in diameter, dry and rounded flat shape compared with the control L. reuteri RC-14. The control strain had smaller colonies of 2–4 mm in diameter with a shiny white appearance and smooth mucoid round shape. Ld45E was categorized under the large LB strains, and L. reuteri RC-14 was relatively small bacilli, as shown in Fig. 1. Interestingly, the cell size was the primer for Ld45E that promoted the strong aggregation properties of the strain.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Gram stain of Ld45E shows large long purple bacilli mostly in clusters under light microscope magnification 100 ×. B Gram stain of L. reuteri RC-14 shows tiny short purple bacilli in a single form under light microscopy (magnification 100 ×)

pH tolerance of Ld45E

The stability of LB at a pH medium allows them to live longer and stand different pH changes in the host body. The control of bacterial growth was adequate to 0.5 ± at OD600 nm, equivalent to 5 × 107 CFU/mL. The growth of Ld45E decreased slightly than the initial solution (4.6 × 107 and 4.9 × 107) at low pH ranges (3 and 3.5), and the mean at the acidic pH (3 and 3.5) indicated the lowest proliferation rate at 6 h of incubation, whereas Ld45E showed good proliferation at pH ranges (4–7). Incubation of Ld45E for 12 h showed constant proliferation at all pH ranges, estimating that the strain adapted to the medium and was able to withstand the acidic pH (3 and 3.5) within 12 h. Prolonged incubation of Ld45E for 24 h indicated the tolerance for pH 4 and 4.5 only, and growth was slightly reduced at pH 3 (4.5 × 107) and pH 3.5 (4.5 × 107). Ld45E was unable to tolerate other pH ranges (5–7) within 24 h and showed a noticeable growth reduction, as shown in Fig. 2A. Thus, Ld45E could tolerate different pH ranges better than the control strain L. reuteri RC-14 (Fig. 2B), in accordance with the time rather than the concentration, and pH 4 and 4.5 were the favorable values to grow within 12 h of incubation.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Stability of A Ld45E under pH conditions simulating those in the human vagina at three time intervals (6, 12, and 24 h), compared with B L. reuteri RC-14 (control)

Adhesion ability of Ld45E onto HeLa cells

LB adhesion is an intrinsic property that allows them to adhere onto the cell surface, reducing the multiplication and excluding the attachment of pathogens. The adhesion feature is essential in selecting probiotic candidates because it facilitates the proliferation of LB. It also maintains a balanced flora in the organs by preventing their instant elimination of the membrane peristalsis or wave-like contractions of the epithelial. In this research, HeLa cells were used to mimic the vaginal medium, and Ld45E demonstrated a strong adhesion onto HeLa cells 4.3 × 107 CFU/mL. Almost 86% of Ld45E were capable of attaching to HeLa cells out of the original concentration of 5 × 107 CFU /mL. The control group L. reuteri RC-14 showed a low adhesion capacity with a recovery of 3.2 × 107 CFU/mL equivalent to (64%) within 3 h of the incubation period, as shown in (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Inverted microscopy was used to visualize the adhesion of LB on HeLa cells. A shows Ld45E (purple bacilli) on HeLa cells. The yellow arrows indicate a high quantity of Ld45E adhered onto HeLa cells. B Shows the control group HeLa cells incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The black arrows indicate (purple cells) stained with crystal violate. C shows L. reuteri RC-14 (purple bacilli) on HeLa cells. The yellow arrows indicate a few L. reuteri RC-14 adhered onto HeLa cells (purple stain), magnification 40 × 

Hemolytic activity

The Ld45E assessment results showed a safety feature of the strain and revealed no positive hemolysis on blood agar. Ld45E was a γ-hemolytic strain and did not cause blood lysis. GBS was used as a positive control (β-hemolytic), and Enterococcus spp. showed no hemolysis activity (γ-hemolysis) on blood agar (negative control), as shown in (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Exhibition of hemolysis activity. A the anterior and posterior appearance of Ld45E shows no hemolysis activity (γ-hemolysis) on blood agar. B the anterior and posterior appearance of Group B Streptococcus, the yellow brackets show β-hemolysis activity on blood agar (positive control). C the anterior and posterior appearance of Enterococcus spp. shows no hemolysis activity (γ-hemolysis) on blood agar (negative control)

Antibiotic-susceptibility tests

The result of the antibiotic-susceptibility test of Ld45E to various antibiotics are shown in Table 2. The inhibition zone was interpreted based on the breakpoints proposed by Charteris et al. [26] and CLSI (2019) guidelines. Ld45E was compared with the inhibition-zone reference [26]. The strain exhibited different inhibition zones according to the antibiotic group. (R) indicated resistance susceptibility, whereas (S) showed sensitive susceptibility to the antibiotics. Ld45E with (I) had intermediate sensitivity to the antibiotics. Indication of antibiotic-susceptibility test was performed on MRS agar to ensure Ld45E proper growth. Ld45E was sensitive to the β-lactam-group antibiotics ceftriaxone (30 µg) and cefuroxime (30 µg), the antibiotic of protein inhibitor–mRNA synthesis group doxycycline (30 µg), and the non-β-Lactam ciprofloxacin (30 µg). However, intermediate sensitivity was noticed to levofloxacin (30 µg).

Table 2 Antibiotic susceptibility test of L. delbrueckii 45E with disk-diffusion method

Autoaggregation capacity

Table 3 shows the percentage of autoaggregation of Ld45E. Autoaggregation is generally mediated by the self-recognizing surface structures of the bacteria, such as proteins and exopolysaccharides. Autoaggregation was the first step for biofilm formation, which provides survival sites for LB and pathogenic bacteria. This feature allows the aggregated bacteria to protect themselves from environmental stress and withstand the aggregation, proliferation and colonization of pathogens on the mucus membrane of the host. Ld45E in our study showed better autoaggregation affinity than the control group L. reuteri RC-14. In a short time, (80 ± 4.02) of Ld45E formed precipitate agglutinations under a light microscope expressed as (+ + good aggregation) with a clear solution. By comparison, the control group L. reuteri RC-14 exhibited (60 ± 5.07) mixed autoaggregation (± aggregation) with constant turbidity and formed precipitate agglutinations under the light microscope.

Table 3 Percentage of autoaggregation exhibited by Ld45E after 4 h of incubation

Antimicrobial activity of Ld45E

Antagonistic effect of Ld45E culture using agar plug diffusion method

As shown in Table 4, Ld45E exhibited the highest mean of growth-inhibition effect (GIE) against GBS clinical isolate (50.2 ± 1.9 mm) and GBS ATCC 8017 (50.1 ± 2.0*) within 48 h. Incubation of Ld45E with the clinical isolate E. coli and E. coli ATCC 25,922 had GIE a mean equivalent to (30.2 ± 0.4 mm), followed by the clinical isolate of Klebsiella spp. and Klebsiella spp. ATCC3566 (25 ± 0.2 mm, 24.1 ± 0.2 mm). The minimum inhibitory effects were observed among the clinical isolate C. parapsilosis and C. parapsilosis ATCC 3434 (19 ± 0.1 and 18.3 ± 0.1 mm). Statistical analysis of the results showed that the inhibitory effects demonstrated by Ld45E were significant (P < 0.001) and the control group L. reuteri RC-14 P < 0.01 when both strains encountered GBS.

Table 4 Mean diameter of inhibition zones (mm) of Ld45E against selected test pathogens

Antagonistic effect of Ld45E CFS and CBS using well-diffusion methods

Table 5 indicates the diameter of the inhibition zone on different pathogens at different temperatures by using CFS and CBS. CFS results showed the highest inhibitory effect of Ld45E for GBS (42.1 ± 0.2). CFS was active at the temperature of 40 °C and showed the highest GIE at 48 h of incubation among the three CFS (37 °C, 40 °C, 50 °C). These inhibition effects could indicate that the organic material and proteins in the CFS were activated and stable at 40 °C. Moreover, the antimicrobial activity of the bacteriocin produced by Ld45E showed a stable inhibitory effect at 37 °C and 40 °C. The highest GIE mean was indicated for GBS (35.3 mm), followed by E. coli (33.5 mm), Klebsiella spp. (32 mm), and C. parapsilosis (26.4 mm).

Table 5 Inhibitory effect of cell-free supernatant solution and crude bacteriocin of L. delbrueckii 45E at different temperatures on selected pathogens

Co-aggregation and competition assays

Co-aggregation ability of Ld45E with genitourinary tract pathogens

Table 6 shows the percentage of Ld45E co-aggregation against several pathogens. The affinity of Ld45E to aggregate with a similar LB strain L. reuteri RC-14 (control) expressed the highest co-aggregation percentage (87.5 ± 5.2). Ld45E was also co-aggregated firmly with Gram positive GBS (81.2 ± 9.6). However, co-aggregation with Gram negative E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and the yeast C. parapsilosis was relatively low (42.2 ± 20.6, 38.4 ± 24.4, and 12.6 ± 1.3, respectively). Statistical analysis of three readings indicated a significant co-aggregation (p < 0.05) with GBS compared with the control group L. reuteri RC-14. The co-aggregation capacity of Ld45E could be associated with cell-surface proteins.

Table 6 Percentage of Ld45E co-aggregation against several pathogens after 4 h of incubation

Competition ability of Ld45E with genitourinary tract pathogens

Table 7 indicates the competition ability of Ld45E with pathogens on HeLa cells. The competitive property of LB inhibited the pathogenic attachment onto the cell surface, either by occupying the cell surface receptor or interfering with the microorganism’s nutritional source. Our LB strain Ld45E and pathogens were incubated simultaneously in a 1:1 ratio of approximately (5 × 107 CFU/mL) for each bacteria. Table 7 summarizes two comparable results. The ability of Ld45E to adhere onto HeLa cells in the presence of GBS was 1.5 × 107 CFU/mL of the total incubated Ld45E (5 × 107 CFU/mL). Similarly, Ld45E adherence onto HeLa cells was relatively low in the presence of E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and C. parapsilosis (1.3 × 107, 1.1 × 107, and 0.4 × 107 CFU/mL), respectively. However, Ld45E showed a competitive ability over similar Gram positive GBS, where 80% GBS was eliminated from adhesion onto HeLa cells as shown in Fig. 5. Additionally, the affinity of Ld45E to compete with E. coli was (76%) and Klebsiella spp. (72%). Conversely, C. parapsilosis debarred the attachment of Ld45E with a relatively low competitive ability equivalent to 58% on HeLa cells.

Table 7 Competition of Ld45E with several pathogens on HeLa cells
Fig. 5
figure 5

Competition assay of Ld45E with GBS on HeLa cells. The black arrows in (A) show the (blank) HeLa cells (purple stain) after incubation for 24 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The red arrows in (B) illustrate the (control group) GBS (pinkish stain) aggregation on HeLa cells after incubation for 4 h at 37 °C. The yellow arrows in (C) indicate the (Bacilli strain) Ld45E (purple stain) reduces the aggregation of GBS (pinkish stain) indicated by the red arrows, on HeLa cells indicated by the black arrow stained purple with crystal violet. Viewed under inverted microscopy magnification 40 × 

Effect of Ld45E on IL-17 secretion

The current study evaluated proinflammatory proteins in response to genitourinary tract pathogens. To better understand the role of Ld45E with IL-17 production, pathogens were incubated alone with HeLa cells prior to Ld45E application. IL-17 production was measured and compared with the pretreated pathogens with Ld45E. HeLa cells were stimulated to produce IL-17 incubated with several pathogens for 24 h. E. coli induced (0.218 OD450 nm) absorption under a spectrophotometer, equivalent to the concentration of 500 pg/mL, compared with the absorbance of GBS (0.256 pg/mL), Klebsiella spp. (0.393 pg/mL), and C. parapsilosis (0.271 pg/mL), equivalent to the highest IL-17 concentration of 1000 pg/mL, provided in the protocol. The pre-incubation of HeLa cells with Ld45E alone before incubation with pathogens induced a low production of IL-17 (0.198 OD450 nm), equivalent to the concentration of 250 pg/mL. In separate cultures, pretreating HeLa cells with Ld45 significantly suppressed IL-17 production in response to E. coli (0.149 OD450 nm) equivalent to (62.5 pg/mL), Klebsiella spp. (0.193 OD450 nm) equivalent to (250 pg/mL), and C. parapsilosis (0.114 OD450 nm) equivalent to (31.25 pg/mL). No significant reduction in IL-17 production was observed with GBS (0.257 OD450 nm) equivalent to (1000 pg/mL), as illustrated in (Fig. 6A). In our study, Ld45E cannot regulate IL-17 production when incubated with GBS. Conversely, Ld45E downregulated IL-17 production with E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and C. parapsilosis.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Induction of interleukine-17 with the application of Ld45E in the presence of different pathogens (left–right columns). (*) indicates the significant reduction of IL-17 production. Column (1): expresses the supernatant of HeLa cells cultured alone (0.289 pg/mL). Column (2): shows the supernatant of Ld45E alone on HeLa cells (0.198 pg/mL). A Column (3): shows the supernatant of GBS (control) incubated alone on HeLa (0.256 pg/mL), column (4): shows the supernatant of Ld45E incubated with Group B Streptococcus (0.257 pg/mL). Ld45E does not reduce IL-17 production. B Column (3): shows the supernatant of E. coli (control) incubated alone on HeLa cells (0.218 pg/mL), column (4): shows the supernatant of Ld45E significantly reduces IL-17 production when incubated with E. coli on HeLa cells (0.149 pg/mL). C Column (3): shows the supernatant of Klebsiella spp. incubated alone on HeLa cells (0.393 pg/mL), column (4): shows the supernatant of Ld45E significantly reduces IL-17 production when incubated with Klebsiella spp. on HeLa cells (0.193 pg/mL). D Column (3): shows the supernatant of C. parapsilosis incubated alone on HeLa cells (0.271 pg/mL), column (4): shows the supernatant of Ld45E significantly reduces IL-17 production when incubated with C. parapsilosis on HeLa cells (0.114 pg/mL)

Discussion

Characteristics of Ld45E probiotic profile

Morphology of Ld45E

The study of cell morphology highlights some points of interest, which premise the mechanism of action of LB strains [17]. In this study, Ld45E was large bacilli, as shown in (Fig. 1), which reflected the ability of the strain to withstand different pH values and adhere firmly onto HeLa cells. Nwamaioha and Ibrahim explored the possibility of growth media affecting the colonies and size of L. delbrueckii spp., and MRS was the optimum medium in providing the essential elements to enhance the species’ growth [34]. Furthermore, the size and morphologies of Ld45E changed with the incubation with other pathogens; According to Rajab et al., the large size (long and thick) of the LB strain can justify the slow growth of its colonies, which was noticed among Ld45E compared with the control L. reuteri RC-14 [17]. Inevitably, the morphology features of Ld45E clarified the strong adhesion capacity of the species onto HeLa cells when incubated with the pathogens. The findings of this study agreed with those of Nwamaioha and Ibrahim, who found that the large size of L. delbrueckii spp. is significantly correlated with aggregation activity compared with L. reuteri and other small-size Lactobacilli spp. [34]. Previous studies have indicated that LB are highly sensitive to physical changes such as freezing, UV radiation, drying, X-rays, heat, and storage, which directly influence their morphologies and size. Their characteristics to lose their shape and viability quickly are also affected [31].

The pH tolerance of the Ld45E

A condition simulating the vaginal medium was achieved to evaluate the stability of Ld45E in different pH ranges. The human vaginal fluid was affected by several factors, including interactions of the vaginal medium with topical contraceptives, prophylactic, or therapeutic drugs [21]. Besides, the pH changes during the menstrual period, causing an alteration in vaginal microbiota [35] and leading to the growth of pathogens and increased pH [36]. Accordingly, Ld45E was tested at different pH values to assess its ability to withstand different vaginal pH values under the previous conditions. Linhares et al. illustrated that LB could maintain the vagina medium at a constant pH < 4.5. The ability of LB to tolerate different pH ranges nominates them to be a probiotic candidate [2].

In the current study, Ld45E grew in a medium simulating the vaginal pH (4.0–4.5). The species tolerated the higher pH (6–7) and showed good growth within 6 h of incubation. Ld45E could constantly grow within pH 3–7, which was considered a good sign for LB to withstand the alteration of the vaginal pH in different health conditions during 12 h of incubation. After 24 h of incubation, Ld45E at pH 4 and 4.5 could survive compared with other pH ranges, wherein the growth of Ld45E was visibly decreased. This reduction could be referred to lack of nutrients in the medium. According to Pan et al., interference of the incubated medium (MRS) could decrease the efficacy of Ld45E growth compared with simulated vaginal fluid for a long incubation time [37]. Incubation of Ld45E in pH (3 and 3.5) showed decreased growth within the first 6 and 24 h of incubation, and constant growth was observed within 12 h of incubation, compared with the control group L. reuteri RC-14, which showed no effects. The interpretation of this could be due to the enormous cell size of Ld45E may develop acid shock in the early growth phase until it slowly adapts to the medium [17].

Acid tolerance is essentially related to strain-specific properties, where they can maintain a constant pH gradient between the medium pH and the cytoplasm of the surrounding environment [38]. Nemska et al. indicated that the relatively low percentage of Lactobacilli (LB) survival under acid conditions (pH 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0) is likely attributable to the incubation period, which is eight times longer than a normal passage through the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) in-vivo study [39]. Our methodologies showed a substantial difference in the growth parameters optical density OD and the number of vital cell colony-forming units (CFU) recorded in the investigated strains. This study finding was in contrast to previous research findings because we measured the pH tolerance within multiple ranges [5, 39, 40].

Adhesion ability of Ld45E onto HeLa cells

The adhesion of LB onto the epithelial cells is one of the most critical parameters that identify the probiotic features of a microorganism [22]. In healthy genitourinary tract, LB species are believed to exhibit a defense mechanism against pathogen colonization either by occupying the bacteria-binding site on the epithelial cells or challenging the nutrition source [41]. During an infection, the environment of the LB depletes, making it impossible for the LB to displace or compete with the pathogens for the same receptors. Thus, LB strains that block the adherence of genitourinary pathogens possess sound antimicrobial effects either by excluding, displacing, or competing with the receptor-binding sites of the adhered pathogens [22, 41]. In the current research, our LB strain Ld45E showed strong adhesion properties onto HeLa cells when incubated alone on the HeLa cell line. This finding agreed with that of Carmo et al., who demonstrated the ability of Lactobacillus spp. to adhere onto the vaginal epithelial cells [22], which in turn form a biological barrier against the colonization of the pathogenic bacteria [42]. The adherence ability of LB onto epithelial cells reportedly refers to the presence of multiple components in the bacterial cell surface, such as glycoproteins and carbohydrates [43]. Large LB species also display better adherence onto the cell line than small-size species [17]. Adhesion onto the cellular surface is also multifactorial, involving different interaction mechanisms between LB and cell-surface components. For instance, specific mechanisms occur in the surface molecules of the outer membrane proteins such as exopolysaccharides (EPPs) [44], lipoteichoic acids, peptidoglycans [45], glycosaminoglycans that can lead to species-specific adhesion [46]. Conversely, nonspecific mechanisms are displayed by electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions [22]. Hence, the ideal LB for probiotic nomination were those exhibiting a high binding affinity to the vaginal mucus membrane that facilitates their permanent growth in the female genital tract.

Hemolytic activity

The long history of using LB strains with rare side effects made them safe for use. Seldomly clinical conditions such as bacteraemia and endocarditis can be caused by some strains of LB, which can directly refer to the patient’s health status; for instant, vancomycin-resistant L. rhamnosus was reported in a 14-year-old girl with leukemia [47]. Therefore, the hemolytic activity and antibiotics resistance test were performed for the safety assessment of Ld45E. The prerequisite test indicated that the tested LB did not cause lysis to the erythrocytes (RBCs) on the incubated blood media. Conversely, complete lysis (β-hemolysis) was registered in the positive controls GBS. According to a previous study, most of the isolated LB from the human vagina showed no hemolytic activity [23]. In the present study, the hemolytic activity of Ld45E showed slight discoloration on the blood agar, indicating the strain had γ- hemolytic activity and considered safe. This result supported the finding of Estifanos that L. delbrueckii spp. are safe as they do not exhibit (α or β) hemolytic activity [5]. Conversely, Casarotti et al. reported that L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus SJRP50, SJRP76, and SJRP149 and L. casei SJRP141. show partial hemolysis, meaning hemolytic activity was a strain-specific trait [48].

Antibiotic susceptibility

The antibiotic-susceptibility test was used to ensure the beneficial effects of probiotics, which could be used as a medical treatment that, in turn, may exhibit side effects on their hosts. The antibiotics were selected according to the most prescribed treatment for vaginitis. In other words, these medications can be safely used if an overgrowth of the probiotic candidate occurs during the treatment of vaginal pathogens. Based on the current results as presented in Table 4, Ld45E was resistant to five antibiotics of different inhibitory mechanisms, including ampicillin (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), kanamycin (10 µg), erythromycin (30 µg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole STD (30 µg). Previous studies have suggested that susceptibility and resistance to different antibiotics may differ among LB strains. LB become resistant to some antibiotics such as kanamycin, amikacin, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin owing to intrinsic resistance of the strain [49]. Moreover, resistance to chloramphenicol, erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline was due to the presence of transferable resistance genes [50].

Autoaggregation capacity of Ld45E

Autoaggregation of L. delbrueckii and LB reuteri was previously studied for their cell-surface proteins that promote aggregation effects [51]. Our result showed a significant autoaggregation (+ +) property of Ld45E compared with the control group L. reuteri RC-14. This finding was in agreement with Collado et al., who indicated that most lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have high adhesion properties and expressed good autoaggregation between the same strains [52]. Moreover, a study by Choo et al. compiled that autoaggregation was not only strain-dependent but also time-dependent [12].

Antimicrobial Activity of Ld45E

Antagonistic effect of Ld45E culture using agar plug diffusion method

The results of the current study illustrated the inhibitory effects of Ld45E against tested pathogens. The highest inhibitory effect was identified among similar Gram positive GBS, followed by Gram negative E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and the yeast C. parapsilosis. The control L. reuteri RC-14 showed a lower inhibition effect than Ld45E. The GIE may vary depending on the bacterial strains, species-dependence and strain origin [53]. Based on Abedi et al. results, L. delbrueckii spp. showed highly inhibitory effects against E. coli by secreting metabolites that reduce the pH, making the surrounding environment unfavorable for pathogenic colonization [54]. Conversely, a study by Lopes et al. stated that L. delbrueckii spp. exhibited no antimicrobial effect on pathogens because the strain lacked organic acid production [55]. The findings of Li et al. indicated the antifungal activity of L. crispatus and L. delbrueckii against vaginal candidiasis [8]. Both Lactobacilli spp. were able to compete for colonisation of the vaginal epithelial cells and control the overgrowth of yeast on the vaginal epithelial cells [8]. Another study by Santos et al. demonstrated that LB generally are origin-dependent organisms [14].

Antagonistic effect of Ld45E CFS and CBS using well-diffusion method

CFS and CBSs were not identified for their active components; however, the solutions were tested for their thermo-sensitivity at three different temperatures (30 °C, 40 °C and 50 °C) to determine the temperature of heat-stable activity. Heat-labile substances produced by LB could be resistant to proteinase K cleavage, affecting LB’s biofilm matrix [56].

The diffused CFS solution exhibited a variable degree of antimicrobial activity on various tested pathogens on well-diffusion agar. CFS of Ld45E showed a good inhibitory effect among GBS, whereas Gram negative bacteria (E. coli and Klebsiella spp.) and C. parapsilosis produced the lowest inhibitory rate. Previous researchers have found the high activity of probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) supernatant on pathogenic bacteria and attribute them usually to the production of organic compounds [16]. According to Lim et al., CFS contains more than 19 substances known for their antimicrobial activities as high-intensity spot proteins [57]. Our results agreed with Muhsin et al. findings that related the activity of the LB supernatant to the classification of Gram bacteria, which showed the highest antimicrobial effect on similar Gram stain bacteria [16].

On the other hand, LB produce bacteriocin within 24–30 h of their exponential phase and reach its maximum level during the stationary phase of the strain growth curve [58]. Bacteriocin production highly depends on the growth-medium composition [15]. According to the current results, the bacteriocin from Ld45E was extracted within 30 h of incubation and exposed to different temperature ranges to minimize the antimicrobial activity of enzymes such as protease [59]. Bacteriocin exhibited similar growth of inhibition effect (35.2–30 mm) in different temperature ranges (37–50 °C) among Gram positive GBS and Gram negative E. coli, Klebsiella spp., but a low GIE on C. parapsilosis (26.4 mm). These could be referred to the CB mechanism in similar Gram positive [60] or owing to the antibacterial peptides and proteins that were released extracellularly [56]. Our findings paralleled those of the literature [58], where CB affected Gram positive bacteria and displayed a low effect on the Gram negative bacteria except for Pseudomonas aeruginosa [16]. Our findings manifested the properties of Ld45E in the medical field, where stable effects of bacteriocins at 40 °C indicated its ability to withstand the feverish condition of the patients. Storage of CB at 4 °C remained stable and showed similar GIE for a few days. Stability at low temperatures may be the most suitable preservation and storage technique in the future. Consistently, bacteriocin stability at high temperatures is a significant factor that determines its potential use as a food preservative.

Co-aggregation and competition assays

Co-aggregation ability of Ld45E with genitourinary tract pathogens

Co-aggregation of genetically different bacterial strains was critical for several ecological niches, and only some Lactobacilli spp. possess this feature. Thus, non-aggregating Lactobacilli spp. cannot induce self-or co-aggregation even with the presence of aggregation factors, such as peptide on the host surface and bacteria or carbohydrate receptors on the yeast [22].

LB expressed different co-aggregation activities based on several factors. Previous studies indicated that co-aggregation depends on the origin of the tested LB and the source of pathogenic strains [61, 62]. The present research disagreed with the findings of Kowalska et al. and Zawistowska-Rojek et al. [63, 64], whose clinical studies on the LB L. casei LOCK 1132 show low co-aggregation ability (10%) compared with ATCC LB rhamnosus LOCK 1131 and exhibit relatively higher co-aggregation rate (80%) to ATCC pathogen S. typhimurium ATCC 13,311. This finding could be due to a strain-specific adhesion, which was in accordance with previous studies by Pino et al. [19] and Younes et al. [62]. Other factors that promoted co-aggregation include the time of incubation with the pathogens, as well as LB’s length, where longer LB have higher co-aggregation ability than those with short length [17, 64].

Competition ability of Ld45E with genitourinary tract pathogens

L. delbrueckii 45E was able to reduce around (80%) of GBS, E. coli (76%) and Klebsiella spp. (72%) at the same time, approximately 30%, 26%, and 22% of Ld45E were able to adhere onto HeLa cells, respectively, with each pathogen. Conversely, only 8% of Ld45E were able to attach to HeLa cells in the presence of C. parapsilosis and eliminate 58% of them only. Our study was in agreement with Abedi et al. [54], L. delbrueckii spp. were able to reduce more than 50% of E. coli, and 28.6% were able to adhere onto Caco cells. The possible mechanisms of competing with these species could be competition for common adhesion receptors on the host cells, as revealed by Meng et al. [65], or the excretion of substances that suppress the adherence of pathogens, as described by Barzegari et al. [66]. Another study has shown that LB species were able to significantly inhibit the colonization and biofilm formation of Gram positive Staphylococcus aureus and uropathogenic E. coli on a rubber tube, indicating that probiotics can prevent bacterial adhesion onto uroepithelial cells and displace adherent uropathogens from urinary devices materials [67]. From another perspective, nutritional balance in human organs is considered a second type of immunity trigger, known as nutritional immunity [68]. Some LB species express a specific gene, e.g., “mntH gene,” that displays a distinct phylogenetic pattern within a LB genus and causes nutritional depletion in the respective parts of the human body. Iron, zinc, and manganese are some nutritional minerals that affect the growth of yeast and bacteria in the human body. According to Siedler et al., LB can inhibit the growth of pathogenic fungi expressing the gene depletion that reduces the amount of iron and manganese in the host [69].

Effect of Ld45E on IL-17 secretion

T helper cells are the main producer of IL-17 in addition to other T cells subsets, such as γδT and natural killer T. IL-17 can modulate the immunological function against infections by inducing the proinflammatory cytokine, anti-pathogenic peptide, and chemokine secretion by the responder cells or enhance the disease severity, playing a protective role in genital innate immunity to intracellular pathogens such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses [9]. The concentrations of genital IL-17 or 17A are closely associated with other inflammatory cytokines and growth factors. The T-helper type 17 cells produce this cytokine in response to the proinflammatory with the stimulation of IL-23. Bacterial vaginosis, primarily chlamydia and N. gonorrhea, induce increased IL-17 concentrations compared with the healthy vagina. A previous study has indicated decreased IL-17 concentration among women with candidiasis, whereas IL-17 concentration shows no significant association with a genital viral infection such as herpes simplex virus II and HIV [70].

Our recent research explored the antimicrobial activity and the safety properties of Ld45E. It also focused on understanding the beneficial effects of the strain as a potential probiotic candidate to regulate the immune-related functions of host cells, by measuring the induced IL-17 that represents the tolerogenic response of T helper cells. In this study, incubation of HeLa cells with the pathogens alone induced proinflammatory protein (IL-17) production. Ld45E incubation showed significant downregulation of IL-17 in response to the presence of pathogens, including E. coli, Klebsiella spp. and C. parapsilosis and no difference in IL-17 production was marked for GBS.

Earlier studies have addressed the immunoregulatory ability of L. delbrueckii spp. bulgaricus strain to reduce the production of different inflammatory proteins such as IL-10, IL-4, IFNγ, and TNF-α in an animal model [71]. Other studies have demonstrated the immunomodulation properties of L. delbrueckii species, which could be related to the numerous characteristics of a rapidly evolving genome. The most efficient strains can lower NF-kB activity to a close to the background level recorded in the absence of TNF-a or bacteria. Almost all tested L. delbrueckii strains exhibited a stronger anti-inflammatory impact than the commensal strains L. gasseri ATCC 33,323, L. acidophilus NCFM, and L. salivarius 33 [72,73,74].

Our findings were similar to previous ones suggesting that L. delbrueckii spp. could regulate the release of inflammatory cytokines [8]. This observation agreed with previous ones on probiotic strains that counteract the molecular events leading to T-cell activation [75].

Feasibly the effect of Ld45E on IL-17 induction depended on the exposed proteins to the transcription factor. Santos Rocha et al. studied 20 strains of L. delbrueckii spp. for their strain-dependent anti-inflammatory features [72]. The result proved that the immunomodulation effects of L. delbrueckii spp. bulgaricus depended on the exposed-proteins of the bacterial surface that influence the center of the NF-kB activation pathway. L. delbrueckii spp. bulgaricus herein were compared with the other tested probiotic strains L. salivarius, L. acidophilus, and L. gasseri to assess their potential anti-inflammatory traits. However, the mechanism of action of IL-17 was suggested for future study.

Ld45E were unable to downregulate IL-17 production in the presence of GBS. The reason could be the microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) in bacteria, which were recognized by the host cell’s pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs). Host cells that express a specific class of PRRs known as toll‑like receptors (TLRs) can activate the mechanism of microbe-specific innate and adaptive immune responses [76]. This interaction was responsible for distinguishing between commensal and pathogenic bacteria, where Gram positive bacteria usually share similar (TLRs). Shibata et al. found that high production of IL-17A in response to bacterial infection was related to early infection of E. coli [77]. C. albicans has also been found to trigger inflammatory reactions in in vitro and in vivomodels, and several LB strains downregulated cytokine levels [75]. Furthermore, during Klebsiella pneumonia infection, cytokine-like IL-23 triggered the induction of IL-17 [78]. According to Yan and Polk, LB-derived proteins and acidification of lactic acid could be suppressive agents that modulate the immune cells’ signaling pathway and mediate innate immunity by inhibiting cytokine production [79, 80].

Strength and limitation

To our knowledge, our study was the first to investigate the immunoregulation ability of a particular LB in the presence of different genital pathogenic bacteria, such as GBS, E. coli, Klebsiella spp., and C. parapsilosis. However, the immunomodulatory mechanisms of LB are more complicated and multifactorial depending on strain-specific and host-associated factors such as estrogen status. Certainly, the pathogen’s invasion induces inflammatory responses, which are triggered when a damaged tissue releases molecules that activate pattern-recognition receptors. For instance, Gardnerella vaginalis toxin (vaginolysin) is reportedly cytolytic to host cells, which activates the p38 mitogen-activated-protein kinase pathway that elevates IL-8 production [81].

This study also had some limitations. Based on the current result, the LB strain showed different outcomes based on time of incubation, temperature and pH changes. The investigated properties of Ld45E could be sufficient for an in vitro study, but for the selection as a probiotic candidate, an animal model should be performed for different time interval incubation, temperature, and pH changes as the species exhibited different characteristics accordingly. The antimicrobial components of the isolated CFS and CB need to be analyzed to reveal the enzymatic mechanism of action. This analysis will illustrate the nature of Ld45E to challenge different pathogens based on their proteolytic and non-proteolytic enzymes.

More details are required for the antibiotic-susceptibility test, which can help prescribe the probiotic candidate with the resistance drug of choice to avoid destroying the vaginal ecosystem. Studies on resistance genes and genes encoding adhesion and colonization factors are desirable for LB adherence onto the cells’ layers.

Conclusions

Vaginal probiotics could be a recommended alternative therapy to antibiotics owing to their antimicrobial effects and strong elimination properties of the pathogens’ attachment onto the epithelial cells. Therefore, LB that can colonize the vaginal epithelium are crucial to preventing the invasion of pathogens and maintaining healthy genital ecological balance. This study focused more on the nature of the species and its isolated solutions rather than the compounds. Another interesting feature of Ld45E is its ability to withstand pH similar to the vaginal acid range of 4.5–5.5. This feature could be due to the strain’s natural presence in a woman’s vagina. Infection with pathogens such as GBS may not stimulate inflammation in the host cells, which could induce ultrastructural changes in cells and inhibit the desmosome-specialized structure of the cell membrane that facilitates cell–cell adhesion. This procedure may eventually reduce the adhesive strength of the cell–cell and the bacteria–cell over time. To summarize, Ld45E exerted strong antimicrobial effects against genital pathogens and induced good immunoregulation, thereby supporting our hypothesis of the strain’s potential as a probiotic candidate for adjunct therapy for vaginal infection.

The outcomes of this research are relevant to adjunct therapeutic development, highlighting the value of LB isolates of the exact microbiota origin to evaluate different aspects of probiotic selection. Hence, studying the characteristics and the inflammatory properties provided a better understanding of the potential vaginal LB. However, further investigation is required on the mechanism of action such as LB’s role in the immuno-modulatory response to the triggering mechanism, as well as the inverse and reverse association of the cell-wall peptidoglycan, cell-wall proteins, and cell-membrane receptors. In this regard, molecular studies are indeed crucial.

Availability of data and materials

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

References

  1. Hay P. Life in the littoral zone: lactobacilli losing the plot. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81(2):100–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Faintuch J, Faintuch S. The human vaginal microbiome. In Microbiome and metabolome in diagnosis, therapy, and other strategic applications. Massachusetts: Academic Press; 2019, pp 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815249-2.00011-7.

  3. Dover S, Aroutcheva A, Faro S, Chikindas M. Natural antimicrobials and their role in vaginal health: a short review. Int J Probiot Prebiot. 2008;3(4):219.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Matu MN, Orinda GO, Njagi EN, Cohen CR, Bukusi EA. In vitro inhibitory activity of human vaginal lactobacilli against pathogenic bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis in Kenyan women. Anaerobe. 2010;16(3):210–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Estifanos H. Isolation and identification of probiotic lactic acid bacteria from curd and in vitro evaluation of its growth inhibition activities against pathogenic bacteria. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2014;8(13):1419–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saunders S, Bocking A, Challis J, Reid G. Effect of Lactobacillus challenge on Gardnerella vaginalis biofilms. Colloids Surf, B. 2007;55(2):138–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aroutcheva A, Gariti D, Simon M, Shott S, Faro J, Simoes JA, et al. Defense factors of vaginal lactobacilli. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185(2):375–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li T, Liu Z, Zhang X, Chen X, Wang S. Local probiotic Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii exhibit strong antifungal effects against vulvovaginal candidiasis in a rat model. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pathakumari B, Liang G, Liu W. Immune defence to invasive fungal infections: a comprehensive review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;130: 110550.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwenger EM, Tejani AM, Loewen PS. Probiotics for preventing urinary tract infections in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008772.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Razzak MSA, Al-Charrakh AH, Al-Greitty BH. Relationship between lactobacilli and opportunistic bacterial pathogens associated with vaginitis. N Am J Med Sci. 2011;3(4):185.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Choo S, Chew BH, Jamil AAM, Chew SY, Meleh HU, Than LTL. Characterisation of the probiotic qualities exhibited by Lactobacilli strains isolated from the anogenital tract. Malay J Med Health Sci. 2019;15:37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Castro JIR. Adhesion of vaginal microorganisms to epithelial cells and its association with bacterial vaginosis. Universidade do Minho (Portugal); 2012.

  14. Santos CM, Pires MC, Leao TL, Hernández ZP, Rodriguez ML, Martins AK, et al. Selection of Lactobacillus strains as potential probiotics for vaginitis treatment. Microbiology. 2016;162(7):1195–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang E, Fan L, Yan J, Jiang Y, Doucette C, Fillmore S, et al. Influence of culture media, pH and temperature on growth and bacteriocin production of bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria. AMB Express. 2018;8(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muhsin YM, Majeed HZ, Shawkat DS. CFS and crude bacteriocin of Lactococcus against growth and biofilm formation for some pathogenic bacteria. Int J Curr Microbiol. 2015;4:35–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajab S, Tabandeh F, Shahraky MK, Alahyaribeik S. The effect of lactobacillus cell size on its probiotic characteristics. Anaerobe. 2020;62: 102103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Calasso M, Gobbetti M. Lactic acid bacteria | Lactobacillus spp.: other species. In: Fuquay JW, editor. Encyclopedia of dairy sciences. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2011. p. 125–31.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Pino A, Bartolo E, Caggia C, Cianci A, Randazzo CL. Detection of vaginal lactobacilli as probiotic candidates. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Horáčková Š, Žaludová K, Plocková M. Stability of selected lactobacilli in the conditions simulating those in the gastrointestinal tract. Czech J Food Sci. 2012;29(Special Issue):S30–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Owen DH, Katz DF. A vaginal fluid simulant. Contraception. 1999;59(2):91–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carmo MSD, Noronha FM, Arruda MO, Costa EPDS, Bomfim MR, Monteiro AS, et al. Lactobacillus fermentum ATCC 23271 displays in vitro inhibitory activities against Candida spp. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1722.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hütt P, Lapp E, Štšepetova J, Smidt I, Taelma H, Borovkova N, et al. Characterisation of probiotic properties in human vaginal lactobacilli strains. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2016;27(1):30484.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Barry A, Garcia F, Thrupp L. An improved single-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of rapidly-growing pathogens. Am J Clin Pathol. 1970;53(2):149–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Charteris WP, Kelly PM, Morelli L, Collins JK. Gradient diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing of potentially probiotic lactobacilli. J Food Prot. 2001;64(12):2007–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Charteris WP, Kelly PM, Morelli L, Collins JK. Antibiotic susceptibility of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus species. J Food Prot. 1998;61(12):1636–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 32nd edition: USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2022.

  28. Aslim B, Onal D, Beyatli Y. Factors influencing autoaggregation and aggregation of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus isolated from handmade yogurt. J Food Protect. 2007;70(1):223–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Balakrishna A. In vitro evaluation of adhesion and aggregation abilities of four potential probiotic strains isolated from guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2013;56:793–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: a review. J Pharm Anal. 2016;6(2):71–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cousin FJ, Lynch SM, Harris HM, McCann A, Lynch DB, Neville BA, et al. Detection and genomic characterization of motility in Lactobacillus curvatus: confirmation of motility in a species outside the Lactobacillus salivarius clade. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(4):1297–308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharma C, Singh BP, Thakur N, Gulati S, Gupta S, Mishra SK, et al. Antibacterial effects of Lactobacillus isolates of curd and human milk origin against food-borne and human pathogens. 3 Biotech. 2017;7(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. de Llano DG, Arroyo A, Cárdenas N, Rodríguez JM, Moreno-Arribas MV, Bartolomé B. Strain-specific inhibition of the adherence of uropathogenic bacteria to bladder cells by probiotic Lactobacillus spp. Pathog Dis. 2017;75(4):ftx43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nwamaioha NO, Ibrahim SA. A selective medium for the enumeration and differentiation of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(6):4953–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Charlier C, Cretenet M, Even S, Le Loir Y. Interactions between Staphylococcus aureus and lactic acid bacteria: an old story with new perspectives. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;131(1):30–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Farage MA, Miller KW, Sobel JD. Dynamics of the vaginal ecosystem—hormonal influences. Infect Dis Res Treat. 2010;3: IDRT. S3903.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pan M, Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Goh YJ, Sanozky-Dawes R, Barrangou R. Comparative analysis of Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus crispatus isolated from human urogenital and gastrointestinal tracts. Front Microbiol. 2020;10:3146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Fontana L, Bermudez-Brito M, Plaza-Diaz J, Munoz-Quezada S, Gil A. Sources, isolation, characterisation and evaluation of probiotics. Br J Nutr. 2013;109(S2):S35–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nemska V, Logar P, Rasheva T, Sholeva Z, Georgieva N, Danova S. Functional characteristics of lactobacilli from traditional Bulgarian fermented milk products. Turk J Biol. 2019;43(2):148–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Biesta-Peters EG, Reij MW, Joosten H, Gorris LG, Zwietering MH. Comparison of two optical-density-based methods and a plate count method for estimation of growth parameters of Bacillus cereus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(5):1399–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Borges S, Silva J, Teixeira P. The role of lactobacilli and probiotics in maintaining vaginal health. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(3):479–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zárate G, Nader-Macias M. Influence of probiotic vaginal lactobacilli on in vitro adhesion of urogenital pathogens to vaginal epithelial cells. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006;43(2):174–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Boris S, Jiménez-Díaz R, Caso J, Barbes C. Partial characterization of a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis UO004, an intestinal isolate with probiotic potential. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91(2):328–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lebeer S, Claes IJ, Verhoeven TL, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SC. Exopolysaccharides of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG form a protective shield against innate immune factors in the intestine. Microb Biotechnol. 2011;4(3):368–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tassell MLV, Miller MJ. Lactobacillus adhesion to mucus. Nutrients. 2011;3(5):613–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Verdenelli M, Coman M, Cecchini C, Silvi S, Orpianesi C, Cresci A. Evaluation of antipathogenic activity and adherence properties of human L actobacillus strains for vaginal formulations. J Appl Microbiol. 2014;116(5):1297–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Felten A, Barreau C, Bizet C, Lagrange PH, Philippon A. Lactobacillus species identification, H2O2 production, and antibiotic resistance and correlation with human clinical status. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(3):729–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Casarotti SN, Carneiro BM, Todorov SD, Nero LA, Rahal P, Penna ALB. In vitro assessment of safety and probiotic potential characteristics of Lactobacillus strains isolated from water buffalo mozzarella cheese. Ann Microbiol. 2017;67(4):289–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Argyri AA, Zoumpopoulou G, Karatzas K-AG, Tsakalidou E, Nychas G-JE, Panagou EZ, et al. Selection of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria from fermented olives by in vitro tests. Food Microbiol. 2013;33(2):282–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Danielsen M, Wind A. Susceptibility of Lactobacillus spp. to antimicrobial agents. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;82(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Grigoryan S, Bazukyan I, Trchounian A. Aggregation and adhesion activity of lactobacilli isolated from fermented products in vitro and in vivo: a potential probiotic strain. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2018;10(2):269–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S. Measurement of aggregation properties between probiotics and pathogens: in vitro evaluation of different methods. J Microbiol Methods. 2007;71(1):71–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Liévin-Le Moal V, Servin AL. Anti-infective activities of lactobacillus strains in the human intestinal microbiota: from probiotics to gastrointestinal anti-infectious biotherapeutic agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(2):167–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Abedi D, Feizizadeh S, Akbari V, Jafarian-Dehkordi A. In vitro anti-bacterial and anti-adherence effects of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus on Escherichia coli. Res Pharm Sci. 2013;8(4):261–8.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Lopes EG, Moreira DA, Gullón P, Gullón B, Cardelle-Cobas A, Tavaria FK. Topical application of probiotics in skin: adhesion, antimicrobial and antibiofilm in vitro assays. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;122(2):450–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bilkova A, Sepova HK, Bukovsky M, Bezakova L. Antibacterial potential of lactobacilli isolated from a lamb. Vet Med. 2011;56(56):319–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Lim KB, Balolong MP, Kim SH, Oh JK, Lee JY, Kang D-K. Isolation and characterization of a broad spectrum bacteriocin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RX7. BioMed Res Int. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8521476.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Gaspar C, Donders G, Palmeira-de-Oliveira R, Queiroz J, Tomaz C, Martinez-de-Oliveira J, et al. Bacteriocin production of the probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus KS400. AMB Express. 2018;8(1):1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Kabadjova-Hristova P, Bakalova S, Gocheva B, Moncheva P. Evidence for proteolytic activity of lactobacilli isolated from kefir grains. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2006;20(2):89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Karpiński TM, Szkaradkiewicz AK. Characteristic of bacteriocines and their application. Pol J Microbiol. 2013;62(3):223–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mastromarino P, Brigidi P, Macchia S, Maggi L, Pirovano F, Trinchieri V, et al. Characterization and selection of vaginal Lactobacillus strains for the preparation of vaginal tablets. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;93(5):884–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Younes JA, van der Mei HC, van den Heuvel E, Busscher HJ, Reid G. Adhesion forces and coaggregation between vaginal staphylococci and lactobacilli. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5): e36917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Kowalska JD, Nowak A, Śliżewska K, Stańczyk M, Łukasiak M, Dastych J. Anti-salmonella potential of new strains with the application in the poultry industry. Pol J Microbiol. 2020;69(1):5–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Zawistowska-Rojek A, Kośmider A, Stępień K, Tyski S. Adhesion and aggregation properties of Lactobacillaceae strains as protection ways against enteropathogenic bacteria. Arch Microbiol. 2022;204(5):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Meng F, Zhao M, Lu Z. The LuxS/AI-2 system regulates the probiotic activities of lactic acid bacteria. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.05.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Barzegari A, Kheyrolahzadeh K, Hosseiniyan Khatibi SM, Sharifi S, Memar MY, Zununi Vahed S. The battle of probiotics and their derivatives against biofilms. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:659–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Carvalho FM, Teixeira-Santos R, Mergulhão FJ, Gomes LC. Effect of lactobacillus plantarum biofilms on the adhesion of Escherichia coli to urinary tract devices. Antibiotics. 2021;10(8):966.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Gerwien F, Skrahina V, Kasper L, Hube B, Brunke S. Metals in fungal virulence. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2018;42(1):050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Siedler S, Rau MH, Bidstrup S, Vento JM, Aunsbjerg SD, Bosma EF, et al. Competitive exclusion is a major bioprotective mechanism of lactobacilli against fungal spoilage in fermented milk products. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86(7):e02312-e2319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Masson L, Salkinder AL, Olivier AJ, McKinnon LR, Gamieldien H, Mlisana K, et al. Relationship between female genital tract infections, mucosal interleukin-17 production and local T helper type 17 cells. Immunology. 2015;146(4):557–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Galdeano CM, De Moreno De Leblanc A, Vinderola G, Bonet MB, Perdigón G. Proposed model: mechanisms of immunomodulation induced by probiotic bacteria. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007;14(5):485–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Santos Rocha C, Lakhdari O, Blottière HM, Blugeon S, Sokol H, Bermu’Dez-Humara’N LG, et al. Anti-inflammatory properties of dairy lactobacilli. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(4):657–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. García Fernández B, Merayo Lloves J, Martín Cueto CI, Alcalde I, Quirós Fernández LM, Vázque Valdés F. Surface proteoglycans as mediators in bacterial pathogens infections. Front Microbiol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Manhanzva MT, Abrahams AG, Gamieldien H, Froissart R, Jaspan H, Jaumdally SZ, et al. Inflammatory and antimicrobial properties differ between vaginal Lactobacillus isolates from South African women with non-optimal versus optimal microbiota. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Bäuerl C, Llopis M, Antolín M, Monedero V, Mata M, Zúñiga M, et al. Lactobacillus paracasei and Lactobacillus plantarum strains downregulate proinflammatory genes in an ex vivo system of cultured human colonic mucosa. Genes Nutr. 2013;8(2):165–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Udayan S, Buttó LF, Rossini V, Velmurugan J, Martinez-Lopez M, Sancho D, et al. Macrophage cytokine responses to commensal Gram-positive Lactobacillus salivarius strains are TLR2-independent and Myd88-dependent. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5896.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Shibata K, Yamada H, Hara H, Kishihara K, Yoshikai Y. Resident Vδ1+ γδ T cells control early infiltration of neutrophils after Escherichia coli infection via IL-17 production. J Immunol. 2007;178(7):4466–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Happel KI, Dubin PJ, Zheng M, Ghilardi N, Lockhart C, Quinton LJ, et al. Divergent roles of IL-23 and IL-12 in host defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Exp Med. 2005;202(6):761–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Yan F, Polk DB. Characterization of a probiotic-derived soluble protein which reveals a mechanism of preventive and treatment effects of probiotics on intestinal inflammatory diseases. Gut Microbes. 2012;3(1):25–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Fischer K, Hoffmann P, Voelkl S, Meidenbauer N, Ammer J, Edinger M, et al. Inhibitory effect of tumor cell–derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood. 2007;109(9):3812–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Gelber SE, Aguilar JL, Lewis KL, Ratner AJ. Functional and phylogenetic characterization of Vaginolysin, the human-specific cytolysin from Gardnerella vaginalis. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(11):3896–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences of Universiti Putra Malaysia (Malaysia) and the Faculty of Medicine of Aden University, Yemen for their assistance in the completion of this study.

Funding

The study was funded by the Universiti Putra Malaysia (Reference number: UPM/800-3/3/1/GPB/2020/9683800).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SAN and LTLT designed this project. AAB performed experiments, analyzed data and drafted the manuscript. SAN, LTLT, AAB and KWL coordinated the data interpretation. SAN, LTLT, AAB, and KWL revised this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syafinaz Amin-Nordin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by both the Malaysian Medical Research and Ethics Committee) and the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bnfaga, A.A., Lee, K.W., Than, L.T.L. et al. Antimicrobial and immunoregulatory effects of Lactobacillus delbrueckii 45E against genitourinary pathogens. J Biomed Sci 30, 19 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-023-00913-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-023-00913-7

Keywords