- Open Access
Reversine suppresses oral squamous cell carcinoma via cell cycle arrest and concomitantly apoptosis and autophagy
- Ying-Ray Lee†1, 2,
- Wei-Ching Wu†3,
- Wen-Tsai Ji3,
- Jeff Yi-Fu Chen4,
- Ya-Ping Cheng3,
- Ming-Ko Chiang3 and
- Hau-Ren Chen3Email author
© Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 21 December 2011
- Accepted: 27 January 2012
- Published: 27 January 2012
The effective therapies for oral cancer patients of stage III and IV are generally surgical excision and radiation combined with adjuvant chemotherapy using 5-Fu and Cisplatin. However, the five-year survival rate is still less than 30% in Taiwan. Therefore, evaluation of effective drugs for oral cancer treatment is an important issue. Many studies indicated that aurora kinases (A, B and C) were potential targets for cancer therapies. Reversine was proved to be a novel aurora kinases inhibitor with lower toxicity recently. In this study, the potentiality for reversine as an anticancer agent in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) was evaluated.
Effects of reversine on cell growth, cell cycle progress, apoptosis, and autophagy were evaluated mainly by cell counting, flow cytometry, immunoblot, and immunofluorescence.
The results demonstrated that reversine significantly suppressed the proliferation of two OSCC cell lines (OC2 and OCSL) and markedly rendered cell cycle arrest at G2/M stage. Reversine also induced cell death via both caspase-dependent and -independent apoptosis. In addition, reversine could inhibit Akt/mTORC1 signaling pathway, accounting for its ability to induce autophagy.
Taken together, reversine suppresses growth of OSCC via multiple mechanisms, which may be a unique advantage for developing novel therapeutic regimens for treatment of oral cancer in the future.
- cell cycle arrest
- oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)
Oral cancer is listed as the sixth common tumor worldwide . In Taiwan, oral cancer is even the fourth leading cause of cancer death for males . Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common neoplasia and is found frequently in oral cavity such as cheek, gum, and tongue . Although cigarette and alcohol are considered as two major risk factors of oral carcinogenesis , occurrence of oral cancer was proved to be tightly associated with betel quid chewing in Taiwan and in south-east Asia [4, 5]. So far, surgery and radiation treatments in combination with chemicals like 5-Fu or Cisplatin are the major therapeutic strategies for oral cancers [6, 7]. However, surgery and radiation treatments inevitably cause negative impacts on patients' appearance and oral functions like chewing and speaking. In spite of 5-Fu or Cisplatin adjuvant treatments, 5 years survival rate of oral cancer patients is only 30% . A more efficient and safer anticancer drug may be helpful to minimize the surgery area or to delay disease progress.
Aurora kinase, which includes A, B and C members in mammals, is belonged to serine/threonine kinase. Aurora kinase A and B were demonstrated to function at mitosis. Like some cell cycle regulators, expression of aurora kinase A and B oscillates during cell division [8, 9]. Aurora kinase A controls the entrance into mitosis by regulating cyclin B/CDK1 . Aurora kinase B phosphorylates Ser10 on Histone H3 to regulate chromosome condensation and interacts with INCENP, survivin, and borealin to form chromosomal passenger complex for chromosome arrangement during cytokinesis [11–14]. Aurora kinase C is mainly expressed in testis and is involved in spermatogenesis [15, 16]. Several studies had implicated the relationship between aurora kinases and carcinogenesis . Overexpression of aurora kinase A produces several centrosomes in fibroblast, resulting in aneuploidy . Both aurora kinase A (also named as STK15) and B had been suggested to be correlated with oral cancer [18, 19]. Despite its major expression site in testis, aurora kinase C appears occasionally in some cancer tissues .
Currently, aurora kinases inhibitors VX680 and PHA-730358 are clinically tested [21, 22]. In Myc-overexpressed cells, treatment of VX680 was reported to induce apoptosis or the subsequent autophagy-mediated death in residual cells . Autophagy is a mechanism by which cells enhance metabolism of damaged organelles or recycle dispensable materials to survive harsh conditions like starvation. In the initiation of autophagy, LC3 (type I) could be lipidated and became active form (type II), which would interact with cellular lipid to facilitate aggregation of autophagosome . Therefore, VX680 treatment induces both apoptosis and autophagy, leading to increase the chance of oncolysis. Based on the fact that VX680 successfully interferes with growth of various malignant cell lines obtained from different tissues , aurora kinases become valuable targets for cancer therapies. Therefore, it is important to identify effective inhibitors for aurora kinases and understand the mechanisms for the inhibitory effects.
Reversine (2-(4-morpholinoanilino)-6-cyclohexylaminopurine) was found originally to promote cell dedifferentiation [26, 27]. Recently, aurora kinases were proved to be the targets of reversine . Compared with VX680, reversine is less toxic to cells from healthy donors but is efficient to reduce cell colony formation from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Besides, reversine was also proved to block proliferation or to induce programmed cell death in different malignant cell lines such as HCT-116 . In vivo, reversine restricts tumor growth from xenograft models experiment [29, 30]. These data increase the possibility that reversine may be a potential candidate for treating oral cancers. In this study, we investigate the mechanisms behind the suppressive effects of reversine on OSCC cells and conclude that reversine is a broad-spectrum agent involved in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, caspase-independent cell death and autophagy.
Cell culture and Transfection
Two OSCC cell lines (OCSL and OC2), which were derived from two males with habits of drinking, smoking, and betel quid chewing in Taiwan, were maintained in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were cultured at 37°C supplied with 5% CO2. About 1.5 × 105 cells were seeded in 6-wells plates. Then, cells were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer's instruction.
Reagents and antibodies
Reversine was purchased from Cayman. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 3-methyladenine (3-MA) were from Sigma. Trypan blue was from BioWest. Z-VAD-fmk and wortmannin was from Merck. Antibodies against caspase 3, 8, 9, phospho-aurora A/B/C, Cdc2, mTOR, phospho-mTOR, phospho-p70S6K, and rapamycin were from Cell Signaling. Antibodies against AIF, Bcl-xL and Bid were from Epitomics. Antibodies of total and phosphor-Akt were from Santa Cruz. Antibody against LC3 was from Abgent. Other antibodies were all from GeneTex.
Cells viability analysis
1 × 105 cells were seeded into 6-wells plates. After chemicals treatment for indicated times, cells were collected by trpsinization, centrifuged, resuspended in 500 μl PBS and stained with 0.5% trypan blue. The unstained cells were quantified using a counting chamber.
Cell cycle analysis
1 × 105 cells were seeded in 6-wells plates and serum starved after attachment. After starvation, cells were treated with chemicals, harvested, washed once with 3 ml PBS, centrifuged, resuspended in 1 ml PBS, and finally fixed using 1 ml 100% methanol. The fixed cells were air tightly stored in a 4°C. Before analysis, cells were washed once with 3 ml PBS, resuspended in 400 μl PBS, transferred into a 15 ml tube containing 78 μl 1× PBS, 2.5 μl RNase (10 mg/ml) and 20 μl propidium iodide (PI, 1 mg/ml). After incubation in dark for 30 minutes, treated cells were analyzed by BD CANTO II flow cytometer.
Cell lysates preparation and Western blot
Cells were lysed with M-PER (mammalian protein extraction reagent, Thermo) containing 0.1% protease inhibitor cocktail. Mixture was vortexed and incubated on ice for 5 minutes. After centrifugation at 14,000 g for 15 minutes at 4°C, protein concentration in the supernatant part was quantified using BCA protein assay kit (Thermo). Proper amount of proteins was mixed with 5× Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 10 minutes. Samples were run on SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. Specific targets were detected using proper antibodies, followed by the secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). After incubation with Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore), the results were detected using BioSpectrum Imaging System (UVP).
Dual staing of annexin V and propidium iodide (PI)
1 × 106 cells were seeded into 10 cm plates, treated with indicated chemicals, collected by centrifugation. The pellet cells were stained using Annexin V-FITC detection kit (Strong Biotech) and analyzed by flow cytometer.
DNA fragmentation analysis
The preparation of fragmented DNA was according the method described .
Cultured cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed in ice-cold 4% formaldehyde/PBS for 20 minutes. After washing three times with PBS again, cells were stained with anti-AIF antibodies at 4°C with gentle swirling overnight. Then, cells were incubated with second antibodies conjugated with Alexa 488 at room temperature. After washing, localization of AIF was observed using a fluorescence microscope.
1.5 × 105 cells were seeded in 6-wells plates preloaded with sterilized glass cover slips. After transfection and/or chemicals treatment, cells on cover slips were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes at room temperature. After washing three times with PBS, cover glasses were carefully mounted onto microscope glasses containing a drop of ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen). Finally, the slides were sealed and analyzed using Olympus confocal microscope.
Reversine suppresses the growth of OSCC cells
Reversine interferes with the progress of cell cycle
Reversine induces cell death through canonical and non-canonical apoptosis pathways
Treatment of reversine obviously resulted in accumulation of cleaved caspase 3 (Figure 3C). This result further confirmed that reversine could suppress cell growth through type I programmed cell death. Both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways are involved in type I programmed cell death. We showed that the cleaved caspase 8 was increased after reversine treatment, indicating the activation of extrinsic pathway . On the other hand, accumulation of processed caspase 9 and decrease of Bcl family members (Bcl-xL and Bid) demonstrated that reversine also enhanced intrinsic pathway. Taken together, these results confirmed that reversine could suppress the oral cell growth through the canonical caspase-dependent pathway.
Reversine also induces autophagy
Reversine inhibits Akt/mTOR signaling pathway
Our previous studies have characterized two OSCC cell lines, OC2 and OCSL, which were established from buccal specimens of two Taiwanese male patients with habit of betel-quid chewing. The OCSL cells showed greater proliferation, horizontal and vertical migration, and transwell invasion abilities in comparison with OC2 cells . In this study, we demonstrated that reversine suppressed the growth of these two OSCC cells. One of the mechanisms for such suppression is that reversine retards cell cycle at G2/M stage, which was evidenced by the prolonged expression of cyclin B1. This was also observed in the treatment of another aurora kinase inhibitor VX680 in HeLa cells [25, 45]. However, we found that cyclin B1 decreased later in the treatment concurrently with an increased level of cyclin D (Figure 2C). This allows the cells to re-enter G1 phase, subsequently leading to 4N or even 8N chromosome content in OCSL cells (Figure 2B). Increase of polyploidy cells indicated the continuous DNA synthesis with unsuccessful cytokinesis. Consistent with this are growth arrest and polyploidy observed in HeLa, CWR22Rv 1, DU-145 and HCT-116 cells after reversine treatment [25, 30, 46].
We also demonstrated that reversine can trigger apoptosis, especially in the malignant OCSL cells (Figure 3A). The detail mechanism by which reversine triggers apoptosis remains unclear. However, we noticed that the amount of phosphorylated aurora kinases was slightly higher in OC2 than that in OCSL (Additional File 1, Figure S1). Previous study showed that aurora kinase A overexpression can override the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint and induce resistance to taxol . This study may explain why OC2 is more resistant to reversine. Moreover, VX680 selectively kills cells that overexpress c-myc. In other words, VX680 is more efficient to induce apoptosis in cells in a c-myc dependent but p53 independent manner . In OSCC, p53 mutation and c-myc amplification were observed . In OC2 and OCSL cells, both have mutated p53 but have the similar level of c-myc [49 and our unpublished date]. However, we did not rule out the possibility that these two OSCC cells potentially have mutated c-myc with different activity. Furthermore, inhibitor of aurora kinase B, ZM447439, suppresses the growth of cervical cancer SiHa cells and enhances the chemosensitivity to Cisplatin . These studies provided the hint why OCSL was more sensitive to reversine.
Aurora kinases had been reported to participate in several signaling pathways like PI3K-Akt . Here we show that reversine may inhibit the activity of Akt, which is frequently over-activated in many cancers [42, 43]. Besides, mTORC1, the downstream factor of Akt, is also critical for cell proliferation and correlated to carcinogenesis . Actually, mTORC1 phosphorylates 4E-BP1 to release eIF4E and affects the phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 through p70S6K . Therefore, mTORC1 functions as a regulator for protein synthesis . Interestingly, although reversine affects the activities of mTORC1 pathway, its final influence on translation machinery is not global based on the constant expression of Beclin 1 (Figure 6A). How the specificity was regulated still remains unclear.
In addition to proteins translation pathway, the role of mTORC1 is correlated to autophagy control . Like double-edged sword, autophagy could have opposite effects on tumor cells . Modest autophagy may help neoplasia cells survive under harsh environments [56, 57]. Autophagy could play the protective role that impedes the cell death by reducing the occurrence of intrinsic apoptosis through mitochondria consumption [58, 59]. On the contrary, autophagy was also reported to be disadvantageous for cancer cells [55–57]. Therefore, several autophagy-based chemicals are being tested for cancer therapy . Our results showed that reversine enhances autophagy significantly in malignant OCSL cells, but weakly in less-malignant OC2 (Figure 5B). Figure 3A also suggested that reversine triggered apoptosis more effectively in OCSL cells. These discrepancies may be also suitable for differentiation between normal cells and cancer cells, which will be a tremendous advantage for the clinical application. Even under normal culture condition, we noticed that OC2 cells have high level of endogenous autophagy based on the constitutive expression of LC3-II (Figure 5B). Since OC2 cells is a less malignant cell line with the characteristics of squamous cells, it is highly possible that original OC2 cells may take advantage of high basal autophagy to survive before sufficient nutrients supply by angiogenesis in early carcinogenesis stage in vivo. Interestingly, inhibition of mTORC1 by rapamycin induces no significant increase of LC3-II in OCSL cells (data not shown), suggesting other unknown pathways involved in this reversine-induced autophagy in OCSL cells. The exact mechanism for reversine-induced autophagy in OCSL cells deserved to be verified.
Because several cancer cells were reported to have mutations such as p53 and caspases to enhance resistance against apoptotic stress, a multi-targeting strategy against tumor cells may increase the chance to treat cancers [61–65]. Here, we demonstrated that reversine is a broad-spectrum antitumor agent that induces cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, caspase-independent death and autophagy, suggesting that either reversine itself or reversine in combination with other drugs is a novel therapeutic regimen for OSCC patients.
Oral cancer is one of the leading cancers in Taiwan due to betel quid chewing. However, current chemotherapy using Cisplatin and 5-Fu against OSCC remains inefficient to improve survival rate. Reversine suppresses OSCC cells via multiple mechanisms, which may provide a new way advantageous for treating oral cancer. Based on this study, evaluations of cellular sensitivity/resistance to reversine itself or reversine in combination with the current drugs Cisplatin and 5-Fu in cell culture and in animal xenografts model deserve to be further tested in the future.
The authors would like to thank Mr. Chun-Jen Wang for technical assistance and Dr. N. Mizushima and Dr. T. Yoshimori for providing the GFP-LC3 plasmid. This work was supported by National Science Council (97-2311-B-194-001-MY3) and (NSC-99-2314-B-705-002-MY2).
- Ng SH, Yen TC, Liao CT, Chang JT, Chan SC, Ko SF, Wang HM, Wong HF: 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation. J Nucl Med. 2005, 46: 1136-1143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chung TT, Pan MS, Kuo CL, Wong RH, Lin CW, Chen MK, Yang SF: Impact of RECK gene polymorphisms and environmental factors on oral cancer susceptibility and clinicopathologic characteristics in Taiwan. Carcinogenesis. 2011, 32: 1063-1068. 10.1093/carcin/bgr083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen YK, Huang HC, Lin LM, Lin CC: Primary oral squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of 703 cases in southern Taiwan. Oral Oncology. 1999, 35: 173-179. 10.1016/S1368-8375(98)00101-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D: Global Cancer Statistics. Ca-a Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2011, 61: 69-90. 10.3322/caac.20107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trivedy CR, Craig G, Warnakulasuriya S: The oral health consequences of chewing areca nut. Addiction Biology. 2002, 7: 115-125. 10.1080/13556210120091482.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andreadis C, Vahtsevanos K, Sidiras T, Thomaidis I, Antoniadis K, Mouratidou D: 5-Fluorouracil and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced oral cancer. Oral Oncology. 2003, 39: 380-385. 10.1016/S1368-8375(02)00141-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okamura M, Kobayashi M, Suzuki F, Shimada J, Sakagami H: Induction of cell death by combination treatment with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in a human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line. Anticancer Research. 2007, 27: 3331-3337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fu J, Bian M, Jiang Q, Zhang C: Roles of Aurora kinases in mitosis and tumorigenesis. Mol Cancer Res. 2007, 5: 1-10. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-06-0208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seki A, Coppinger JA, Jang CY, Yates JR, Fang G: Bora and the kinase Aurora a cooperatively activate the kinase Plk1 and control mitotic entry. Science. 2008, 320: 1655-1658. 10.1126/science.1157425.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gautschi O, Heighway J, Mack PC, Purnell PR, Lara PN, Gandara DR: Aurora kinases as anticancer drug targets. Clinical Cancer Research. 2008, 14: 1639-1648. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-2179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lens SMA, Voest EE, Medema RH: Shared and separate functions of polo-like kinases and aurora kinases in cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2010, 10: 825-841. 10.1038/nrc2964.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vader G, Lens SM: The Aurora kinase family in cell division and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008, 1786: 60-72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steigemann P, Wurzenberger C, Schmitz MH, Held M, Guizetti J, Maar S, Gerlich DW: Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint protects against tetraploidization. Cell. 2009, 136: 473-484. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qi G, Kudo Y, Ando T, Tsunematsu T, Shimizu N, Siriwardena SB, Yoshida M, Keikhaee MR, Ogawa I, Takata T: Nuclear Survivin expression is correlated with malignant behaviors of head and neck cancer together with Aurora-B. Oral Oncol. 2010, 46: 263-270. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.01.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ben Khelifa M, Zouari R, Harbuz R, Halouani L, Arnoult C, Lunardi J, Ray PF: A new AURKC mutation causing macrozoospermia: implications for human spermatogenesis and clinical diagnosis. Mol Hum Reprod. 2011, 17: 762-768. 10.1093/molehr/gar050.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kimmins S, Crosio C, Kotaja N, Hirayama J, Monaco L, Hoog C, van Duin M, Gossen JA, Sassone-Corsi P: Differential functions of the Aurora-B and Aurora-C kinases in mammalian spermatogenesis. Mol Endocrinol. 2007, 21: 726-739.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meraldi P, Honda R, Nigg EA: Aurora kinases link chromosome segregation and cell division to cancer susceptibility. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004, 14: 29-36. 10.1016/j.gde.2003.11.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qi GY, Ogawa I, Kudo Y, Miyauchi M, Siriwardena BSMS, Shimamoto F, Tatsuka M, Takata T: Aurora-B expression and its correlation with cell proliferation and metastasis in oral cancer. Virchows Archiv. 2007, 450: 297-302. 10.1007/s00428-006-0360-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kao SY, Chen YP, Tu HF, Liu CJ, Yu AH, Wu CH, Chang KW: Nuclear STK15 expression is associated with aggressive behaviour of oral carcinoma cells in vivo and in vitro. J Pathol. 2010, 222: 99-109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dutertre S, Hamard-Peron E, Cremet JY, Thomas Y, Prigent C: The absence of p53 aggravates polyploidy and centrosome number abnormality induced by Aurora-C overexpression. Cell Cycle. 2005, 4: 1783-1787. 10.4161/cc.4.12.2172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gizatullin F, Yao Y, Kung V, Harding MW, Loda M, Shapiro GI: The Aurora kinase inhibitor VX-680 induces endoreduplication and apoptosis preferentially in cells with compromised p53-dependent postmitotic checkpoint function. Cancer Research. 2006, 66: 7668-7677. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3353.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carpinelli P, Ceruti R, Giorgini ML, Cappella P, Gianellini L, Croci V, Degrassi A, Texido G, Rocchetti M, Vianello P: PHA-739358, a potent inhibitor of Aurora kinases with a selective target inhibition profile relevant to cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6: 3158-3168. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0444.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang D, Liu H, Goga A, Kim S, Yuneva M, Bishop JM: Therapeutic potential of a synthetic lethal interaction between the MYC proto-oncogene and inhibition of aurora-B kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 13836-13841. 10.1073/pnas.1008366107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mizushima N: Autophagy: process and function. Genes Dev. 2007, 21: 2861-2873. 10.1101/gad.1599207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harrington EA, Bebbington D, Moore J, Rasmussen RK, Ajose-Adeogun AO, Nakayama T, Graham JA, Demur C, Hercend T, Diu-Hercend A: VX-680, a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of the Aurora kinases, suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Nat Med. 2004, 10: 262-267. 10.1038/nm1003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amabile G, D'Alise AM, Iovino M, Jones P, Santaguida S, Musacchio A, Taylor S, Cortese R: The Aurora B kinase activity is required for the maintenance of the differentiated state of murine myoblasts. Cell Death and Differentiation. 2009, 16: 321-330. 10.1038/cdd.2008.156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee EK, Bae GU, You JS, Lee JC, Jeon YJ, Park JW, Park JH, Ahn SH, Kim YK, Choi WS: Reversine Increases the Plasticity of Lineage-committed Cells toward Neuroectodermal Lineage. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009, 284: 2891-2901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mountzios G, Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA: Aurora kinases as targets for cancer therapy. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2008, 34: 175-182. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.09.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- D'Alise AM, Amabile G, Iovino M, Di Giorgio FP, Bartiromo M, Sessa F, Villa F, Musacchio A, Cortese R: Reversine, a novel Aurora kinases inhibitor, inhibits colony formation of human acute myeloid leukemia cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008, 7: 1140-1149. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-2051.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hsieh TC, Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z, Wu JM: The 2,6-disubstituted purine reversine induces growth arrest and polyploidy in human cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2007, 31: 1293-1300.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Labrada L, Bodelon G, Vinuela J, Benavente J: Avian reoviruses cause apoptosis in cultured cells: viral uncoating, but not viral gene expression, is required for apoptosis induction. J Virol. 2002, 76: 7932-7941. 10.1128/JVI.76.16.7932-7941.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang TT, Chen JY, Tseng CE, Su YC, Ho HC, Lee MS, Chang CT, Wong YK, Chen HR: Decreased GRP78 protein expression is a potential prognostic marker of oral squamous cell carcinoma in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2010, 109: 326-337. 10.1016/S0929-6646(10)60060-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crosio C, Fimia GM, Loury R, Kimura M, Okano Y, Zhou H, Sen S, Allis CD, Sassone-Corsi P: Mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3: spatio-temporal regulation by mammalian Aurora kinases. Mol Cell Biol. 2002, 22: 874-885. 10.1128/MCB.22.3.874-885.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chefetz I, Holmberg JC, Alvero AB, Visintin I, Mor G: Inhibition of Aurora-A kinase induces cell cycle arrest in epithelial ovarian cancer stem cells by affecting NFkB pathway. Cell Cycle. 2011, 10: 2206-2214. 10.4161/cc.10.13.16348.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Zhang ZF, Chen J, Huang D, Ding Y, Tan MH, Qian CN, Resau JH, Kim H, Teh BT: VX680/MK-0457, a potent and selective Aurora kinase inhibitor, targets both tumor and endothelial cells in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Am J Transl Res. 2010, 2: 296-308.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin ZZ, Hsu HC, Hsu CH, Yeh PY, Huang CY, Huang YF, Chen TJ, Kuo SH, Hsu C, Hu FC: The Aurora kinase inhibitor VE-465 has anticancer effects in pre-clinical studies of human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2009, 50: 518-527.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elmore S: Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007, 35: 495-516. 10.1080/01926230701320337.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joza N, Susin SA, Daugas E, Stanford WL, Cho SK, Li CY, Sasaki T, Elia AJ, Cheng HY, Ravagnan L: Essential role of the mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor in programmed cell death. Nature. 2001, 410: 549-554. 10.1038/35069004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Susin SA, Zamzami N, Castedo M, Hirsch T, Marchetti P, Macho A, Daugas E, Geuskens M, Kroemer G: Bcl-2 inhibits the mitochondrial release of an apoptogenic protease. J Exp Med. 1996, 184: 1331-1341. 10.1084/jem.184.4.1331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miramar MD, Costantini P, Ravagnan L, Saraiva LM, Haouzi D, Brothers G, Penninger JM, Peleato ML, Kroemer G, Susin SA: NADH oxidase activity of mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 16391-16398. 10.1074/jbc.M010498200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cande C, Cecconi F, Dessen P, Kroemer G: Apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF): key to the conserved caspase-independent pathways of cell death?. J Cell Sci. 2002, 115: 4727-4734. 10.1242/jcs.00210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fresno Vara JA, Casado E, de Castro J, Cejas P, Belda-Iniesta C, Gonzalez-Baron M: PI3K/Akt signalling pathway and cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004, 30: 193-204. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2003.07.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luo J, Manning BD, Cantley LC: Targeting the PI3K-Akt pathway in human cancer: rationale and promise. Cancer Cell. 2003, 4: 257-262. 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00248-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu DR, Huang S, Long ZJ, Chen JJ, Zou ZZ, Li J, Lin DJ, Liu Q: Inhibition of mitotic kinase Aurora suppresses Akt-1 activation and induces apoptotic cell death in all-trans retinoid acid-resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2011, 9:Google Scholar
- Benten D, Keller G, Quaas A, Schrader J, Gontarewicz A, Balabanov S, Braig M, Wege H, Moll J, Lohse AW: Aurora kinase inhibitor PHA-739358 suppresses growth of hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in a xenograft mouse model. Neoplasia. 2009, 11: 934-944.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perreira M, Jiang JK, Klutz AM, Gao ZG, Shainberg A, Lu C, Thomas CJ, Jacobson KA: "Reversine" and its 2-substituted adenine derivatives as potent and selective A3 adenosine receptor antagonists. J Med Chem. 2005, 48: 4910-4918. 10.1021/jm050221l.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anand S, Penrhyn-Lowe S, Venkitaraman AR: AURORA-A amplification overrides the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint, inducing resistance to Taxol. Cancer Cell. 2003, 3: 51-62. 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00235-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin-Ezquerra G, Salgado R, Toll A, Gilaberte M, Baro T, Alameda Quitllet F, Yebenes M, Sole F, Garcia-Muret M, Espinet B: Multiple genetic copy number alterations in oral squamous cell carcinoma: study of MYC, TP53, CCDN1, EGFR and ERBB2 status in primary and metastatic tumours. Br J Dermatol. 2010, 163: 1028-1035. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09947.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fan LC, Chiang WF, Liang CH, Tsai YT, Wong TY, Chen KC, Hong TM, Chen YL: alpha-Catulin knockdown induces senescence in cancer cells. Oncogene. 2011, 30: 2610-2621. 10.1038/onc.2010.637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Zhang S: ZM447439, the Aurora kinase B inhibitor, suppresses the growth of cervical cancer SiHa cells and enhances the chemosensitivity to cisplatin. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011, 37: 591-600. 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01414.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mamane Y, Petroulakis E, LeBacquer O, Sonenberg N: mTOR, translation initiation and cancer. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 6416-6422. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, Sabatini DM: Growing roles for the mTOR pathway. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005, 17: 596-603. 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.09.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Proud CG: The mTOR pathway in the control of protein synthesis. Physiology (Bethesda). 2006, 21: 362-369. 10.1152/physiol.00024.2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jung CH, Ro SH, Cao J, Otto NM, Kim DH: mTOR regulation of autophagy. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584: 1287-1295. 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.01.017.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hippert MM, O'Toole PS, Thorburn A: Autophagy in cancer: Good, bad, or both?. Cancer Research. 2006, 66: 9349-9351. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1597.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thorburn A: Studying autophagy's relationship to cell death. Autophagy. 2008, 4: 391-394.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gump JM, Thorburn A: Autophagy and apoptosis: what is the connection?. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21: 387-392. 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.03.007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang Y, Xing D, Zhou FF, Chen Q: Mitochondrial autophagy protects against heat shock-induced apoptosis through reducing cytosolic cytochrome c release and downstream caspase-3 activation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2010, 395: 190-195. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.03.155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kondo Y, Kondo S: Autophagy and cancer therapy. Autophagy. 2006, 2: 85-90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Notte A, Leclere L, Michiels C: Autophagy as a mediator of chemotherapy-induced cell death in cancer. Biochemical Pharmacology. 2011, 82: 427-434. 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.06.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soussi T, Lozano G: p53 mutation heterogeneity in cancer. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2005, 331: 834-842. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park WS, Lee JH, Shin MS, Park JY, Kim HS, Lee JH, Kim YS, Lee SN, Xiao WH, Park CH: Inactivating mutations of the caspase-10 gene in gastric cancer. Oncogene. 2002, 21: 2919-2925. 10.1038/sj.onc.1205394.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soung YH, Lee JW, Kim SY, Jang J, Park YG, Park WS, Nam SW, Lee JY, Yoo NJ, Lee SH: CASPASE-8 gene is inactivated by somatic mutations in gastric carcinomas. Cancer Research. 2005, 65: 815-821.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soung YH, Lee JW, Kim SY, Sung YJ, Park WS, Nam SW, Kim SH, Lee JY, Yoo NJ, Lee SH: Caspase-8 gene is frequently inactivated by the frameshift somatic mutation 1225_1226delTG in hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 141-147. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- You J, He Z, Chen L, Deng G, Liu W, Qin L, Qiu F, Chen X: CH05-10, a novel indinavir analog, is a broad-spectrum antitumor agent that induces cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101: 2644-2651. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01724.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.