Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

A new approach to study the sex differences in adipose tissue

Contributed equally
Journal of Biomedical Science201825:89

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-018-0488-3

  • Received: 28 June 2018
  • Accepted: 15 November 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Obesity is one of the most invaliding and preventable diseases in the United States. Growing evidence suggests that there are sex differences in obesity in human and experimental animals. However, the specific mechanisms of this disease are unknown. Consequently, there is any particular treatment according to the sex/gender at this time. During the last decade, we observe a rise in the study of adipocyte and the possible mechanisms involved in the different roles of the fat. Furthermore, the effect of sex steroids on the adipocyte is one of the fields that need elucidation. Supporting evidence suggests that sex steroids play an essential role not only in the fat distribution, but also, in its metabolism, proliferation, and function. Thus, using in vitro and in vivo studies will contribute to our fight against this critical health public problem encompassing both sexes. In the present review, we discuss some of the recent advances in the adipocytes and the effect of the sex steroids on the adipose tissue. Also, we propose a new alternative to study the role of sex steroids on adipocyte biology through human adipose-derived stem cells.

Keywords

  • Adipocytes
  • Obesity
  • Sex differences
  • Stem cells

Introduction

Obesity is one of the most invaliding and preventable diseases in the United States (US). According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES – 2015 – 2016), the prevalence of obesity among adults aged 40–59 (42.8%) was higher than among adults aged 20–39 (35.7%) [1]. The panorama is discouraging since the problematic health is increasing without a possible solution in the meantime. The evidence is showing that in the United States, the obese incidence is growing at an alarming rate and it is expecting that by 2050 the prevalence of obesity in the adult population be approximately 42% [2].

Adipose tissue is accepted as a dynamic organ with a critical role in the physiology and pathophysiology of different diseases. In the past years, we observe an increased interest in the study of the adipose tissue and sex or gender related to the cardiometabolic disease. In this sense, studies in human and animals show that there is a sex difference in the susceptibility to develop obesity [3]. Between 2005 and 2014, the prevalence of overall obesity and extreme obesity increased significantly among women; however, there were no significant increases for men [4]. Women have a higher risk to get obesity than men of different age [57]. Although the evidence supports substantial differences in mechanisms and strategies of obese treatment in men and women, there is not a specific treatment according to the sex or gender [8].

In the present review, we discuss the adipocytes, its structure, function, and distribution, and the role of the sex hormones in the adipose tissue. Also, we propose a new alternative to study adipocyte biology through human adipose-derived stem cells.

Adipocyte: Structure, function, and distribution

Obesity is the increase in body weight, but it is mainly at the expense of fat content. Adipose tissue is considered as an immune-metabolic organ, able to store energy and maintains the metabolic rate [9]. Mainly, adipocytes have different properties according to how the fat is composed. There are three partially accepted types of adipose tissue in the body which are structurally and functionally distinct: white adipose tissue (WAT: color give it to the lipid content), brown adipose tissue (BAT: color provided by the cytochromes in the mitochondria), and beige or bright adipose tissue (BeAT: color is a mix of white and brown adipose tissue).

The WAT is characterized by a spherical shape that represents the mature adipocytes with a diameter size from 10 to 120 um [10]. They also present a significant droplet or inclusion of lipid into the cytoplasm who displaces the nucleus and organelles to the periphery (Fig. 1). Thus, the organelles and the flattened nucleus remain speared in a small space of the cytosol compressed between the lipid droplet and the basal membrane given the appearance of a signet ring [11, 12]. Numerous filaments of mitochondria are distributed in the perinuclear region.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

White and brown adipocytes. White adipocyte presents a significant droplet or inclusion of lipid into the cytoplasm who push the nucleus and organelles to the periphery. Brown adipocyte content multiple droplets of lipids with a high content of mitochondria

WAT tends to form compartmental spaces which are a difference with the BAT [13]. The primary function suggested for WAT is lipid storage thanks to its ability to storage triglycerides in high levels with expansion during overfed. Also, this particular tissue contributes to the functioning of several systems in the body such as glucose homeostasis, inflammatory and immune response, and mechanical role [12]. However, its essential contribution is in the regulation of energy balance, where leptin plays a vital role. Leptin is a hormone secreted principally by the adipocytes and acts on peripheral targets and hypothalamic and extrahypothalamic centers controlling the nutritional state of the individuals [1416]. WAT depot is localized in a different part of the body, but mainly in the abdomen region: the abdominal cavity (visceral fat) and under the skin (abdominal subcutaneous fat). This variety of fat is roughly associated with cardiovascular risk factors and contribute to insulin resistant and metabolic syndrome. It also associates with inflammatory cytokines, such as leptin, IL6, and TNFα [17, 18].

Another type of fat is the brown adipose tissue (BAT), which have structural and functioning differences with WAT. Its size is approximately among 15 to 50 um, and its form is ovoid. The primary function of BAT is thermoregulatory. However, BAT can play autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine roles [19]. Within of its autocrine role, BAT can secrete basement membrane protein such as collagen VI and fibronectin [20, 21]. Also, can synthesize and secrete adipsin (also known as Complement factor D), basic fibroblast growth factor, insulin-like growth factor I, prostaglandins, and adenosine [22, 23].

Regarding its paracrine function, BAT can secrete nerve growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, nitric oxide, and angiotensinogen [24, 25]. Finally, as an endocrine organ, BAT produces fatty acid, and only in special circumstances produces leptin, adiponectin, and resistin [26]. BAT was described as a protector factor from cardiovascular events, since produce cytokines that counterregulates the cytokines from the WAT stores. In human, BAT depot is localized mainly in the interscapulum and supraclavicular regions [27]. The subcutaneous BAT (scBAT) depot is larger than the BAT found in the thick neck embedded in the carotid sheath. Some individuals possess additional BAT depots in the axillary, prevertebral regions and kidneys, but scBAT is the BAT depot most consistently found in humans [2834].

Recently was describe as a third type of fat, the beige or bright adipose tissue, that share almost all features of BAT except for the localization [10, 35]. It was found mixed with WAT in the visceral fat and is associated with the contribution to transform WAT into BAT. However, its function still needs further investigation.

According to the anatomical distribution, the fat can be called Visceral Adipose Tissue (VAT) or Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue (SAT) [27]. The VAT contains more adipocytes with characteristics of WAT, while the SAT include more adipocytes with attributes of the BAT. However, recent studies have shown that adipocytes from BAT could be mixed with adipocytes from WAT in the abdominal depot (beige adipose tissue) [36]. Table 1 summarizes the main features of the different types of fat.
Table 1

Main characteristics of white, brown, and beige adipocytes

 

WHITE ADIPOSE TISSUE

Beige adipose tissue

brown adipose tissue

origin

- Myf5-negative cells

- Myf5-negative cells

- White adipose tissue

- Sca-1+ progenitor cells

- Smooth muscle cells progenitors

- PDGFRα+ cells

- Mainly Myf5-positive cells

LIPID DROPLET

Unilocular

Multilocular

Multilocular

NUCLEUS

Periferic

Middle

Middle

MITOCHONDRIA

Low

Low to High

High

function

Lipid/Energy storage

Thermogenesis

(dependent on the stimuli)

Thermogenesis and Autocrine,

Paracrine,

Endocrine roles

human localization

Subcutaneous, intraabdominal

Cervical, parasternal, supraclavicular, para- and prevertebral

Interscapulum, supraclavicular, cervical, parasternal, para- and prevertebral, omental, axillary, kidneys

rodents localization

Inguinal subcutaneous, epididymal,

Intraabdominal, epicardium

Subcutaneous axillar and inguinal,

epicardium

Interscapulum, perivascular

cardiovascular disease

Positive related

Negative related

Negative related

It is necessary to highlight that the human adipose depots not always perfectly correlate in rodents (rats, mice). For example, the omentum contains a large percentage of visceral fat in humans, which is scarcely present in rodents. Conversely, the large epididymal fat pads of male mice, which are frequently sampled as representative of visceral fat, do not exist in men [37, 38].

Adipose tissue: Sex steroids regulation in men and women

Obesity affects both sexes independent of the age, race, or culture. In general, females have more fat stores than men. Also, fat depots are distributed differentially in women and men, especially after the puberty because of the hormonal effect [39]. Before puberty, females have higher amounts of subcutaneous fat that age-matched boys. Women maintain this pattern, with more fat stores in the gluteal-femoral or peripheral regions which determine the typical pear form for women (Peripheral obesity or gynoid type). Some researchers associated this high subcutaneous fat stores in women with less cardiovascular risk compared to men [40]. Men tend to be more likely to have significant amounts of abdominal fat and to be more susceptible to abdominal adiposity (Central obesity or android type or apple form). Also, men are more likely to have higher visceral fat, but some paradoxical observation could be present if the fat stores increase hug amount in which obese men have more significant amounts of subcutaneous fat on their legs [41].

Sex steroids play an essential role in the production and function of fat, but also, in its metabolism, migration, and utilization. In women, estrogens play as a protector factor in preventing the fat accumulation particularly subcutaneous fat depots in postmenopausal women [42, 43]. Furthermore, through these actions, estrogens can reduce inflammatory signaling and improve insulin action [44].

The effect of estrogens through estrogen receptor α (ERα) is more related to WAT since the ovariectomy decreases its expression and adipocytes proprieties [44]. In ERαKO, mice without ERα in the whole body, there is an inhibition of the capacity of the adipocytes to store triglycerides affecting the adipocyte size and the total adiposity [44]. However, the mechanism by which estrogens exert this function is unclear.

Lazzarini and Wade indicated that estrogens could reduce the fat content by increasing the sympathetic nerve activity in the adipose tissue [45]. Nevertheless, it could be independent of ERs since there was no effect of fat denervation on fat pad weight or cytosol ER concentration in white adipose tissue in the animals treated with sesame oil. These data indicate that the sympathetic nerves may play a role in estrogen-induced reductions in fat pad weight but not via changes in adipose tissue cytosol estrogen receptors. Other studies suggested that estradiol could regulate the brown adipose tissue at the central level activating via hypothalamic AMPK [46]. However, the role of the ERs in the adipose tissue regulation needs further investigations.

On the other hand, androgens in premenopausal women have a deleterious effect, increasing the size of abdominal adipocytes and the wait/hip ratio; however, it does not affect the femoral adipocytes [47]. Also, androgens in this population was associated with increased plasma glucose and insulin levels, both basally and in response to oral glucose loading; and diminished in vivo insulin sensitivity, as revealed by increasing steady-state plasma glucose levels at comparable plasma insulin levels, attained by the infusion of somatostatin, insulin, and glucose [47]. Furthermore, in premenopausal female-to-male transsexual, Elbers et al. assessed fat depot by magnetic resonance imaging, and they showed that testosterone slightly increased the visceral fat area [48]. Contrary, in a study by Blouin et al. using omental and subcutaneous adipose tissue samples and adipose tissue explants, found that androgens, testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone, have an anti-adipogenic effect on the adipose tissue [49]. So, further studies are needed to a better comprehension of the role of androgen in the regulation of the adipose tissue in premenopausal women.

Clinical evidence on the literature agrees that androgens have a negative impact on the adiposity in women which can partially explain the higher cardiovascular and metabolic risk in women [50]. Recently, an elegant study by Michos and her group associates high testosterone levels alone with a higher risk of CVD and CHD in postmenopausal women [51]. Also, they reported that at this age, an elevated testosterone/estradiol ratio associate to women with a higher incidence of CVD, CHF, and HF [51]. In women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and with high production of androgens also is associated with a high risk of insulin resistant and cardiovascular disease. The androgens in this particular case are produced by the ovaries and adrenal gland [52, 53]; however, interestingly, elevated levels of androgens are present in non-PCOS obese women. In this regards, Quinkler and colleagues have shown that adipose tissue can synthesize androgens [54], but if those androgens produced by adipose tissue are associated with a higher risk of CVD is unknown.

In males, androgens have the adipogenic capability which increases the insulin sensitivity and improves the insulin resistance. Also, androgens reduce the WAT/VAT content, body weight, and improves the metabolic syndrome [55]. This effect appears to be mediated by the androgen receptors (ARs) which have a high distribution in both visceral and subcutaneous fat [56].

There is a positive correlation between low levels of androgens (hypogonadism) and an increase of abdominal SAT and VAT in human and experimental animals [57, 58]. The testosterone supplements in those hypogonadic patients lead to a decrease in abdominal SAT and VAT [59]. However, new evidence of our laboratory and others showed that chronic treatment with testosterone increases the risk of hypertension and cardiovascular event. In our studies, we used two different strains of animals, the Zucker rats, an experimental obesity model, and the spontaneously hypertensive rats [60, 61]. Interestingly, although we observed in both strain a reduction in body weight and fat mass and improvement in some metabolic parameters with testosterone supplementation, it also induced an increase in blood pressure. In this sense, recently two clinical studies showed that testosterone supplementation increased the mortality rate attributable to cardiovascular disease [62, 63]. Furthermore, men who used anabolic steroids, a synthetic derivative of testosterone, had a higher risk of hypertension, ventricular remodeling, and sudden cardiac death [64]. This evidence suggests that testosterone supplementation act through different mechanisms that contribute to high blood pressure which is independent of upper body weight and fat mass. Also, it indicates that blood pressure needs to be carefully monitored during testosterone supplementation.

Today, although there is progress in the study of adipocytes biology and the sex steroids hormones as central regulators, one limitation in this field is the lack of an experimental model that could contribute to improving our understanding on the regulatory mechanisms that occur in different types of adipose tissue.

Alternatives to study adipocytes biology

The human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs)

Stem cells have been used for several medical applications over the last few years, and in everything from basic science research to clinical applications. While the stem cells can come from several sources, the more common source is from a patient’s mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [65, 66]. The reasons for using the patient’s cells include the simplicity of obtaining these cells regarding availability, as well as to avoid the controversy surrounding embryonic stem cells. When the patient’s cells are used for clinical applications, there is a much lower risk of rejection or failure due to immune responses, and when used in basic or applied sciences, MSCs have excellent differentiation potential, providing an excellent source of study into the mechanics of stem cell differentiation. MSCs can be derived from several different sources, such as bone marrow, skin dermis, and adipose tissue, though some methods of collection are more advantageous than others [67]. Human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) has been a relatively new source for stem cells. They are abundantly found within adipose tissue, with approximately 1% of the tissue cells being stem cells in comparison to the meager 0.001–0.002% of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) found in bone marrow, and are easily procured during a minimally invasive surgery, including liposuction [65, 66]. Adipose tissue is also much less invasive and less painful procedure than the procedures used in obtaining the same amount of stem cells from bone marrow. Thus, the process for obtaining adipose tissue and the stem cells therein is much more feasible than obtaining the stem cells from the skin dermis or bone marrow. It is due to the size of the tissue, availability of the stem cells, and routine extraction of adipose tissue, making it overall the better option for retrieval by comparison. Because MSCs, and more specifically hASCs, have excellent differentiation potential, and they are readily available for isolation after any liposuction procedure provided informed consent, and IRB protocols are approved, stem cells derived from adipose tissue could be said to be the ideal and superior source for stem cell isolation and future stem cell research.

Unfortunately, hASCs have been shown to lose their ability to proliferate and to have decreased expression of pluripotent markers over time in vitro [68, 69]. It has been shown that they can maintain the expression of pluripotent markers, along with differentiation potential, for more extended periods of time if they are cultured under 3D culture format in vitro, instead of the conventional method of monolayer cultures [65]. Multicellular spheroids are widely used as a simple and effective 3D culture to mimic intracellular in vivo like conditions [7072]. Later on, we describe the various methods available for stem culture for adipogenic differentiation.

Advantages of new alternatives of three-dimensional cultures to study sex hormones in adipocytes

Traditionally, the characterization of adipocyte biology was performed on culturing pre-adipocytes using a two-dimensional (2D) cells culture model. Whereas such 2D approaches have been successful in elucidating the biology of subcutaneous adipocytes, these approaches have been suboptimal for recapitulating the biology of adipocytes from less robust sources such as visceral adipose tissue [73]. Also, planar 2D monolayer adipocytes cultures do not represent the complex architecture of adipose tissue in vivo, which is an advantage for the engineered three-dimensional (3D) adipose tissue model [74]. As a new alternative of in vitro model of adipose tissue, the 3D in vitro model of adipose tissue can be engineered as spheroids of adipocytes, which exhibit morphology similar to the native adipose tissue [75]. 3D adipocyte spheroids exhibit higher expression of adipogenic biomarkers, including triglycerides, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ), tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin (IL)-1, IL- 6, and adiponectin, compared to the 2D planner model [74]. Recently, our group established a 3D spheroid model using human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) and their subsequent adipogenic differentiation [74].

Different studies have used isolated adipocytes to explain the role of sex steroids in adipogenesis which still is poorly understood. In isolated human adipocytes, 17 beta-estradiol can modulate the adipogenesis by increasing preadipocyte replication [76]. Also, high concentrations of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and other androgen-related steroids were shown to block the adipose conversion process, as followed by measurement of glycerol-3 phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH) activity, a late marker of differentiation. On these studies, the authors used the 3 T3-L1 and 3 T3-F442A preadipocyte cell lines and pig preadipocytes respectively [77, 78]. Furthermore, Nishizawa et al. demonstrated that androgens could decrease adiponectin secretion in the 3 T3-L1 adipocytes. They suggested that in men, androgens could induce hypoadiponectinemia which may be associated with the insulin resistance and atherosclerosis in men [79]. Also, a growing body of evidence has shown that testosterone and DHT inhibit 3 T3 L1 adipocytes differentiation [79, 80]. However, to our knowledge, there is no evidence about the effect of androgen or estrogen using patient-derived hASC spheroids model.

New alternatives to three-dimensional cultures

Spheroid formation methods

a) 3D printed scaffolds

Bioprinting is used to include cells within a three-dimensionally printed scaffold as a means of forming cellular aggregates, making it essentially the biological equivalent of the computer-assisted design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) systems. The general method is that a matrix containing cells, often a hydrogel, is extruded onto a surface in a preprogrammed pattern to form a 3D structure. Encapsulated cells then form spheroids within this hydrogel matrix, which can be as stiff or gel-like as required based upon the matrix and filler chosen in the design.

Type 1 collagen is most commonly used to act as the matrix for a printed hydrogel and can be printed in the form of a sphere to form “spheroids” in conjunction with an adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) [81]. It is of this cell type, and the stem cells derived from this, we draw our focus. These particular spheroids were made using extrusion techniques onto superhydrophobic surfaces coated before printing. After polymerization, they were placed in a suspension bioreactor for incubation to allow the spheroids to mature into adipocytes [81]. Unfortunately, this method is highly sophisticated, and there are much simpler methods available to create a similar construct. The three-dimensional scaffold can also be achieved by using gelatin and sodium alginate as a matrix and filler. It is used in combination with a fibrinogen/cell mixture is used to create spheroids within the printed hydrogel, which is printed into a grid format to allow for oxygen and media to flow through freely ensuring that the spheroids receive greater nutrition in comparison to other scaffolds [8184].

The extrusion method is just as important as the extrusion matrix used. There are multiple extrusion techniques, including direct-write and ink-jet printing [81]. Ink-jet printing uses the “bottom-up” approach to create a three-dimensional scaffold as designed by a computer. This method prints a “skeleton” of the object created by printing droplets of the material through a custom-made needle of a commercial printer into the shape of the designed scaffold. Direct-write bioprinting, on the other hand, prints layer by layer the design created by the computer using a pneumatic or mechanical power through a syringe [81]. A schematic comparing the two are shown in Fig. 2. Both are used, though the direct-write method seems to be the one that is gaining popularity [82]. The direct-write method can also be used to print spherical shapes in the form of droplets within a solution. In one such instance, a cell/alginate mixture is added dropwise to a solution of calcium chloride, which forms the three-dimensional structure needed for these cells to form spheroids within the alginate gel [82]. This precision is useful, though one is unable to remove the cells for any quantitative assays that may be required.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

A schematic comparing the ink-jet and direct-write 3D printing methods. Ink-jet printing uses the “bottom-up” approach to create a three-dimensional scaffold and prints a “skeleton” of the object created by printing droplets of the material. Direct-write method prints the design layer by layer using pneumatic or mechanical power. (Reprinted with permission from [81])

b) Microfluidic devices

Microchips, also known as microfluidic devices, allow researchers to analyze cells by culturing them in restricted spaces, often only a few micrometers in size. Though there are many cell types that this method could be used for, our focus remains on stem cell proliferation and differentiation. The generalized way is that cells are forced into a three-dimensional formation by seeding them within a limited space and flowing media across them. This process allows for a three-dimensional culture on a micro scale and gives researchers control over the microenvironment surrounding the cells. Such culture systems can be directly purchased or can be custom printed based on a microfabricated template using a traditional 3D printer [85], and can be made by some biocompatible polymers, such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The use of these polymers has been variable in creating stable spheroids for long-term cultures, though their ability to provide a more in vivo like structure by having dynamic media flow has proven useful in cell-cell interactions studies [85].

In order to improve upon these devices, the culture conditions were altered rather than the materials. Some methods use micropatterning within their devices, while other ways use droplet-based microfluidic devices to create their own, controlled microenvironments, as shown in Fig. 3 [8688]. This method uses droplets made of gel-based substances such as agarose, alginate, gelatin, or polyethylene glycol to encapsulate cells and allow them to form spheroids. These droplets can either be used within the microfluidic device or created using the device and act as a stand-alone device [85, 86]. Many reasons justify why one would want to culture cells in using microfluidic devices, including the small number of cells needed for each chip or condition, and the procedure can be conducted directly on a microscope for easy viewing. However, the cells cannot be removed from the microchip once they have been seeded.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Schematic of the double-emulsion method of forming a microenvironment using microfluidic devices. The orange represents a water-based media, the blue represents an oil-based substance for first layer emulsion, and the white represents a water-based solution. (Reprinted with permission from [87])

c) Hanging drop

Hanging drop plates and trays can be bought from a manufacturer or created within the lab and exploits surface tension and gravity to form spheroids [89, 90]. The generalized method is that cells are seeded into a small amount of media within a micro-well plate. When inverted, the droplet creates an environment that allows for the cells to repel from the surface [89]. The cells come together at the air-liquid interface and form a single spheroid. The gas exchange here is relatively high, allowing the cells to maintain nutrition and oxygen for more extended periods than traditional cell cultures, though the resultant spheroids would need to be moved to another plate for long-term experiments, including those involving stem cell differentiation [91]. One main advantage of the hanging drop method is that it has a high throughput capability in that this method creates a uniform, reproducible spheroids, making them convenient for experiments with pharmaceutical applications [90, 91]. The fact that the spheroids take only a couple of days to form is advantageous. However, only one spheroid can be made within each well of a hanging drop plate/tray, thus requiring a more significant quantity of plates in comparison to other methods. There are also issues with the inversion process itself, though this is overcome by adding the cell suspension `through the access holes created in Fig. 4 [91].
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

A cartoon depicting an example of cell seeding using the hanging drop method within the well of a specialized hanging drop plate that uses surface tension and gravity to form spheroids. The cells come together at the air-liquid interface and form a single spheroid. (Reprinted with permission from [91])

d) Hydrogels

Hydrogels are widely used as a three-dimensional cell culture model to develop spheroids (Fig. 5) [92]. The common gel-forming materials have been hyaluronic acid, polyethylene glycol, or different kinds of collagen, which could be obtained from human, rat, bovine, or goat [67, 9295]. Optionally, additives can be incorporated as a way to “lock down” cells, provide therapeutic drug release, or to increase specific properties within the material. The intended change in property depends upon the additive, such as a crosslinker, which improves properties such as stiffness, modulus, and longevity [67, 9295].
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Schematic of the formation of spheroids within a hydrogel matrix. Cells are typically suspended in the precursor solution that sets to form the hydrogel. Mechanically stiff or chemically crosslinked hydrogels can “lock down” the encapsulated cells and lead to spheroid formation. (Reprinted with permission from [92])

An important note to consider when using hydrogels in an experiment is the impact it may have on the cell type that is being used. This impact is especially significant in stem cell research, as it is not only important to consider the restraints placed upon the stem cells themselves, but also upon the differentiated lineage, the cells will follow. For example, osteogenic stem cell differentiation may require different mechanical properties within the hydrogel than stem cells differentiated as a chondrogenic lineage, just as they do in vivo [92]. Though hydrogels can be used for longer-term cultures, depending upon the materials that make up the hydrogel, another point to consider is if one can dissolve the hydrogel once the experiment is done without damaging the spheroids within the hydrogel. This fact also depends highly upon the components of the hydrogel itself and is usually digested by an enzyme such as collagenase, or diluted with media and separated by centrifugation [67, 92]. When cells are seeded within a hydrogel, especially one that is cross-linked, the ultimate proliferative capability of the cells will be less than in a monolayer, two dimensional culture, just because once the cells are “locked down” by the constraints of the hydrogel, they tend to form spheroids with the cells that are already available. This is especially true with hASCs, as their signal to stop proliferation is controlled by confluence [67, 9295].

There are many advantages to using hydrogels for spheroid formation, in that the methods used in creating hydrogels is highly diverse and yet each is reasonably straightforward, and spheroid formation is highly reproducible. The type of cell, the cellular concentration at seed time, size of the spheroid intended, and removal of spheroids at end time are all points to consider in designing a hydrogel experiment.

e) Ultra-low attachment plates

Ultra-low attachment plates (ULA), have been used for many years and have helped expand the research of spheroid formation with their use on their own and as modified methods to create new ways of forming spheroids. The primary method is that the ULA plates are, at their surface, uninhabitable by cells [96]. Thus, the cells repel from the surface to form spheroids, creating a free-floating and three-dimensional culture within the media itself [67, 89]. The main attraction of this method is the simplicity of its design. However, the main drawback to using this method is to maintain the spheroids without losing them. When new media is exchanged for old, it is highly likely that some of the spheroids within the media will be aspirated with the older media and lost. This fact is highly disconcerting, as the more massive spheroids tend to be most easily moved by media exchange, thus losing the more physiologically relevant spheroids with each media exchange. One way to counteract this is to use the media itself as a way to gather data about the spheroids that were lost [96]. Media can contain the excretions of the cells within it, thus creating a kind of metric for how well the spheroids are doing based on their metabolic systems, which will be slightly different for each cell type. Amaral et al. used this method to determine the concentrations of lactate, glucose, and glutamine to track the cells’ metabolic activity [89]. Another way to accomplish this would be to centrifuge the aspirated media and re-suspend the separated spheroids with a small amount of fresh media and replaced into the well. However, this may interfere with the spheroid interaction and concentration within the well. This method, though highly straightforward, should consider the stem cell differentiation lineage when designing experiments with stem cells. When differentiating stem cells into an adipogenic lineage, for example, this method would not be recommended, only because adipocytes become more buoyant over time, and are more likely to be lost during media exchange.

f) Magnetic plates

Magnetic plates, or using magnetism to manipulate cells to form spheroids, is a relatively new method of three-dimensional cell culture. These plates are commercially available or can be made within the lab, by creating a hydrogel containing magnetic nanoparticles [97, 98]. One method employees a microfluidic device to generate gel beads, using oil/water emulsion, within each was a high concentration of cells and magnetic nanoparticles. These beads were then separated from the oil into a media buffer using a magnet to attract the cell beads, which were then transferred to a 96-well plate and cultured as normal [97]. Another method uses magnetic nanoparticles within a high cell concentrated well. When a magnet is passed beneath the wells, the cells are forced into a spheroid formation by the magnetic nanoparticles within the media [98]. Using magnetism to create a three-dimensional culture has many advantages, mainly because the method is incredibly easy to use. However, the cost of the nanoparticles in comparison to other methods may prove to be a hindrance for this method in the future.

g) Surface-tethered spheroid formation

Surface-tethered spheroids are created by changing the surface chemistry of the growth substrate. Elastin-like polypeptides (ELP) conjugated to polyelectrolytes (PE) have been used in coatings as a three-dimensional culture method for many different cell types. Here, the biocompatible ELP encourages cells to adhere to the surface, and the polyelectrolyte repels the cells from the coated surface. This process causes the cells to prefer one another to the surface, forming cell aggregates in the form of spheroids, while at the same time tethering to the surface (Fig. 6) [74]. The polyelectrolyte proven to be the most effective for these coatings within the past research is polyethyleneimine (PEI) [93, 99]. PEI has been shown to be cytotoxic on its own, but when conjugated to ELP, becomes biocompatible and induces spheroid formation. ELP-PEI coated surfaces are highly beneficial for culturing hASCs into the spheroid formation and subsequent differentiation of hASCs. The advantages of surface-tethered spheroids lie in the cells longevity, in that hASCs have been cultured using this method up to 21 days [99]. However, during their differentiation and maturation into adipocytes in vitro, stem cells differentiated along the adipogenic lineage begin to absorb fats during maturation and start to become more buoyant over time. Such fat-laden cells eventually lift off of the culture surface and are lost during the next media change. Because of the loss of physiologically relevant spheroids, elastin-like polypeptide-polyelectrolyte coated surfaces are used to form spheroids as a long-term culture method for mature adipocytes in vitro, in an attempt to tether the spheroids until the cell’s buoyant properties overcome the surface’s ability to keep the spheroid fastened to the surface [7072, 93, 99].
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Schematic of differentiation of surface-tethered spheroids of hASCs atop a surface coated with elastin-like polypeptide-polyethyleneimine (ELP-PEI). The PEI repels the cells from the coated surface and induces spheroid formation, while the biocompatible ELP encourages the formed spheroids to adhere to the surface. Such surface-tethered spheroids can then be differentiated to the desired lineage (e.g., adipogenic lineage) by their differentiation and maturation under a suitable, physiologically-relevant microenvironment. (Reprinted with permission from [74])

Conclusions

Adipose tissue is accepted as a dynamic organ with a critical role in the physiology and pathophysiology of different diseases. In this regards, the role of the sex hormones on adipocytes established sex differences in the distribution and regulation of adipose tissue in men and women. Both, androgen and estrogens hormones are present in both sexes; however, their specific role in the adipocytes need further investigations. In the current review, we discussed the recent advances of the adipocyte and the differences between white, brown, and beige adipose tissue. Also, we are proposing new alternatives for three-dimensional cultures to study the adipocytes biology and considering them as a possible tool to investigate the effect of sex hormones on the adipocyte. Finally, with a better understanding of the adipocyte biology and the role of the estrogens and androgen on them, we will be able to address sex-specific treatment alternatives for the obesity.

Notes

Abbreviations

2D: 

Two-dimensional cells

3D: 

Three-dimensional cells

AMPK: 

5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase

ARs: 

Androgen receptors

BAT: 

Brown adipose tissue

BeAT: 

Beige adipose tissue

CAD-CAM: 

Computer-assisted design and manufacturing systems

CHD: 

Coronary heart disease

CHF: 

Congestive heart failure

CVD: 

Cardiovascular disease

DHEA: 

Dehydroepiandrosterone

ELP: 

Elastin-like polypeptides

ERs: 

Estrogen receptors

ERα: 

Estrogen receptor α

ERαKO: 

Mice without estrogen receptor alpha in the whole body

GPDH: 

Glycerol-3 phosphate dehydrogenase

hASCs: 

The human adipose-derived stem cells

HF: 

Heart failure

IL1: 

Interleukin 1

IL6: 

Interleukin 6

IRB: 

Institutional Review Board

MSCs: 

Mesenchymal stem cells

NHANES: 

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

PCOS: 

Polycystic ovary syndrome

PDMS: 

polydimethylsiloxane

PE: 

Polyelectrolytes

PEI: 

Polyethyleneimine

PPAR-γ: 

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ

SAT: 

Subcutaneous adipose tissue

scBAT: 

Subcutaneous brown adipose tissue

SVF: 

Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction

TNFα: 

Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha

ULA: 

Ultra-low attachment plates

VAT: 

Visceral adipose tissue

WAT: 

White adipose tissue

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P20GM121334 (ROM) and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01EB20006 (AVJ). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P20GM121334 (ROM). National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01EB20006 (AVJ).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

SJF, AVJ, AB, and ROM: Drafted the manuscript and final approval of the final version. AVJ and ROM: Revising it critically for important intellectual content. ROM: Conception and design of the review.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomedical Materials Science, School of Dentistry, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
(2)
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
(3)
Department of Medicine/Nephrology, School of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
(4)
Mississippi Center for Excellence in Perinatal Research, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
(5)
Cardio Renal Research Center, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
(6)
The Women’s Health Research Center, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA

References

  1. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db288.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2018.
  2. Hill AL, Rand DG, Nowak MA, Christakis NA. Infectious disease modeling of social contagion in networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;4(6):e1000968.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Link JC, Reue K. Genetic Basis for Sex Differences in Obesity and Lipid Metabolism. Annu Rev Nutr. 2017;37(1):225–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. J Am Med Assoc. 2016;315:2284–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG, Fryar CD, Kruszon-Moran D, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 through 2013-2014. JAMA. 2016;315(21):2292–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Childhood Obesity Facts. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/obesity/facts.htm. Accessed 18 Jan 2018.
  7. Flegal KM, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll MD, et al. Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA. 2016;315:2284–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wyatt HR. Update on treatment strategies for obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(4):1299–306. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3115.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Alia AT, Hochfeldb WE, Myburghc R, Pepper MS. Adipocyte and adipogenesis. Eur J Cell Biol. 2013;92:229–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Cinti S. The adipose organ: morphological perspectives of adipose tissues. Proc Nutr Soc. 2001;60:319–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gema F, Gomez-Ambrosi J, Muruzabal FJ, Burrell MA. The adipocyte: a model for integration of endocrine and metabolic signaling in energy metabolism regulation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;280:827–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Cinti S. The adipose organ. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2005;73:9–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cannon B, Nedergaard J. Brown adipose tissue: function and physiological significance. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:277–359.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Auwerx J, Staels B. Leptin. Lancet. 1998;351:737–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. De Matteis R, Cinti S. Ultrastructural immunolocalization of leptin receptor in mouse brain. Neuroendocrinology. 1998;68:412–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. De Matteis R, Dashtipour K, Ognibene A, Cinti S. Localization of leptin receptor splice variants in mouse peripheral tissues by immunohistochemistry. Proc Nutr Soc. 1998;57:441–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim S, Moustaid-Moussa N. Secretory, endocrine and autocrine/paracrine function of the adipocyte. J Nutr. 2000;130:3110–3115.17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM. Adipocytes as regulators of energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Nature. 2006;444(7121):847–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Ailhaud G. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Int J Obes Related Metab Disord. 2000;24(Suppl 2):S1–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Haraida S, Nerlich AG, Wiest I, Schleicher E, Lohrs U. Distribution of basement membrane components in normal adipose tissue and in benign and malignant tumors of lipomatous origin. Mod Pathol. 1996;9:137–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee SH, Park HS, Lee JA, Song YS, Jang YJ, Kim JH, Lee YJ, Heo Y. Fibronectin gene expression in human adipose tissue and its associations with obesity-related genes and metabolic parameters. Obes Surg. 2013;23:554–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. White RT, Damm D, Hancock N, Rosen BS, Lowell BB, Usher P, Flier JS, Spiegelman BM. Human adipsin is identical to complement factor D and is expressed at high levels in adipose tissue. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:9210–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yamashita H, Kizaki T, Ookawara T, Sato Y, Yamamoto M, Ohira Y, Ohno H. Is insulin-like growth factor I involved in brown adipose tissue enlargement? Life Sci. 1994;55:141–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gómez-Hernández A, Beneit N, Díaz-Castroverde S, Escribano Ó. Differential role of adipose tissues in obesity and related metabolic and vascular complications. Int J Endocrinol. 2016;1216783:2016.Google Scholar
  25. Villarroya J, Cereijo R, Villarroya F. An endocrine role for brown adipose tissue? Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;305:567–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Puerta M, Abelenda M, Rocha M, Trayhurn P. Effect of acute cold exposure on the expression of the adiponectin, resistin and leptin genes in rat white and brown adipose tissues. Horm Metab Res. 2002;34:629–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kajimura S, Spiegelman BM, Seale P. Brown and Beige Fat: Physiological Roles beyond Heat Generation. Cell Metab. 2015;22:546–59.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Saito M, Okamatsu-Ogura Y, Matsushita M, Watanabe K, Yoneshiro T, Nio-Kobayashi J, Iwanaga T, Miyagawa M, Kameya T, Nakada K, Kawai Y, Tsujisaki M. High incidence of metabolically active brown adipose tissue in healthy adult humans: effects of cold exposure and adiposity. Diabetes. 2009;58:1526–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lidell ME, Betz MJ, Leinhard OD, Heglind M, Elander L, Slawik M, Mussack T, Nilsson D, Romu T, Nuutila P, Virtanen KA, Beuschlein F, Persson A, Borga M, Enerbäck S. Evidence for two types of brown adipose tissue in humans. Nat Med. 2013;19:631–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zingaretti MC, Crosta F, Vitali A, Guerrieri M, Frontini A, Cannon B, Nedergaard J, Cinti S. The presence of UCP1 demonstrates that metabolically active adipose tissue in the neck of adult humans truly represents brown adipose tissue. FASEB J. 2009;23:3113–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cypess AM, White AP, Vernochet C, Schulz TJ, Xue R, Sass CA, Huang TL, Roberts-Toler C, Weiner LS, Sze C, Chacko AT, Deschamps LN, Herder LM, Truchan N, Glasgow AL, Holman AR, Gavrila A, Hasselgren PO, Mori MA, Molla M, Tseng YH. Anatomical localization, gene expression profiling and functional characterization of adult human neck brown fat. Nat Med. 2013;19:635–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Xue R, Lynes MD, Dreyfuss JM, Shamsi F, Schulz TJ, Zhang H, Huang TL, Townsend KL, Li Y, Takahashi H, Weiner LS, White AP, Lynes MS, Rubin LL, Goodyear LJ, Cypess AM, Tseng YH. Clonal analyses and gene profiling identify genetic biomarkers of the thermogenic potential of human brown and white preadipocytes. Nat Med. 2015;21:760–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Chondronikola M, Annamalai P, Chao T, Porter C, Saraf MK, Cesani F, Sidossis LS. A percutaneous needle biopsy technique for sampling the supraclavicular brown adipose tissue depot of humans. Int J Obes. 2015;39:1561–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Jespersen NZ, Larsen TJ, Peijs L, Daugaard S, Homøe P, Loft A, de Jong J, Mathur N, Cannon B, Nedergaard J, Pedersen BK, Møller K, Scheele C. A classical brown adipose tissue mRNA signature partly overlaps with brite in the supraclavicular region of adult humans. Cell Metab. 2013;17:798–805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM. What we talk about when we talk about fat. Cell. 2014;156:20–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Harms M, Seale P. Brown and beige fat: development, function and therapeutic potential. Nat Med. 2013;19:1252–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ibrahim MM. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: structural and functional differences. Obes Rev. 2010;11:11–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00623.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sarjeant K, Stephens JM. Adipogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4:a008417.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Bjorntorp P. Adipose tissue distribution and function. Int J Obes. 1991;15:67–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Valencaka TG, Osterrieder A, Schulzc TJ. Sex matters: the effects of biological sex on adipose tissue biology and energy metabolism. Redox Biol. 2017;12:806–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Zerradi M, Dereumetz J, Boulet M-M, Tchernof A. Androgens, body fat distribution and Adipogenesis. Curr Obes Rep. 2014;3:396–403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Brussaard HE, Gevers Leuven JA, Frölich M, Kluft C, Krans HM. Short-term oestrogen replacement therapy improves insulin resistance, lipids and fibrinolysis in postmenopausal women with NIDDM. Diabetologia. 1997;40:843–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee CC, Kasa-Vubu JZ, Supiano MA. Differential effects of raloxifene and estrogen on insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:683–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ribas V, Nguyen MTA, Henstridge DC, Nguyen AK, Beaven SW, Watt MJ, et al. Impaired oxidative metabolism and inflammation are associated with insulin resistance in ERalpha-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010;298:E304–19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lazzarini SJ, Wade GN. Role of sympathetic nerves in effects of estradiol on rat white adipose tissue. Am J Phys. 1991;260:47–51.Google Scholar
  46. Martínez de Morentin PB, González-García I, Martins L, et al. Estradiol regulates Brown adipose tissue thermogenesis via hypothalamic AMPK. Cell Metab. 2014;20:41–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Evans DJ, Hoffmann RG, Kalkhoff RK, Kissebah AH. Relationship of androgenic activity to body fat topography, fat cell morphology, and metabolic aberrations in premenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;57:304–10. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-57-2-304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Elbers JM, Asscheman H, Seidell JC, Gooren LJ. Effects of sex steroid hormones on regional fat depots as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in transsexuals. Am J Phys. 1999;276(2 Pt 1):E317–25 PMID: 9950792.Google Scholar
  49. Blouin K, Nadeau M, Perreault M, Veilleux A, Drolet R, Marceau P, Mailloux J, Luu-The V, Tchernof A. Effects of androgens on adipocyte differentiation and adipose tissue explant metabolism in men and women. Clin Endocrinol. 2010;72:176–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03645.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Tchernof A, Després JP. Sex steroid hormones, sex hormone-binding globulin, and obesity in men and women. Horm Metab Res. 2000;32:526–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhao D, Guallar E, Ouyang P, Subramanya V, Vaidya D, Ndumele CE, Lima JA, Allison MA, Shah SJ, Bertoni AG, Budoff MJ, Post WS, Michos ED. Endogenous sex hormones and incident cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(22):2555–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Escobar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, et al. Positions statement: criteria for defining polycystic ovary syndrome as a predominantly hyperandrogenic syndrome: an androgen excess society guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:4237–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Maneschi E, Morelli A, Filippi S, Cellai I, Comeglio P, Mazzanti B, Mello T, Calcagno A, Sarchielli E, Vignozzi L, Saad F, Vettor R, Vannelli GB, Maggi M. Testosterone treatment improves metabolic syndrome-induced adipose tissue derangements. J Endocrinol. 2012;215:347–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Quinkler M, Sinha B, Tomlinson JW, Bujalska IJ, Stewart PM, Arlt W. Androgen generation in adipose tissue in women with simple obesity--a site-specific role for 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 5. J Endocrinol. 2004;183:331–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Dieudonne MN, Pecquery R, Boumediene A, Leneveu MC, Giudicelli Y. Androgen receptors in human preadipocytes and adipocytes: regional specificities and regulation by sex steroids. Am J Phys. 1998;274:1645–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Blouin K, Després JP, Couillard C, Tremblay A, Prud'homme D, Bouchard C, et al. Contribution of age and declining androgen levels to features of the metabolic syndrome in men. Metabolism. 2005;54:1034–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tchernof A, Labrie F. Dehydroepiandrosterone, obesity and cardiovascular disease risk: a review of human studies. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;151:1–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Traish AM, Haider A, Doros G, Saad F. Long-term testosterone therapy in hypogonadal men ameliorates elements of the metabolic syndrome: an observational, long-term registry study. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68:314–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Mårin P, Holmäng S, Jönsson L, Sjöström L, Kvist H, Holm G, et al. The effects of testosterone treatment on body composition and metabolism in middle-aged and obese men. Int J Obesity. 1992;16:991–7.Google Scholar
  60. Dalmasso C, Patil CN, Yanes Cardozo LL, Romero DG, Maranon RO. Cardiovascular and Metabolic Consequences of Testosterone Supplements in Young and Old Male Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats: Implications for Testosterone Supplements in Men. J Am Heart Assoc. 6(10):2017. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007074.
  61. Davis DD, Ruiz AL, Yanes LL, Iliescu R, Yuan K, Moulana M, Racusen LC, Reckelhoff JF. Testosterone supplementation in male obese Zucker rats reduces body weight and improves insulin sensitivity but increases blood pressure. Hypertension. 2012;59:726–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Vigen R, O’Donnell CI, Barón AE, Grunwald GK, et al. Association of Testosterone Therapy with Mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke in men with low testosterone levels. JAMA. 2013;310:1829–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Towfighi A, Zheng L, Ovbiagele B. Sex-specific trends in midlife coronary heart disease risk and prevalence. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1762–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Frati P, Busardò FP, Cipolloni L, Dominicis ED, Fineschi V. Anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) related deaths: autoptic, histopathological and toxicological findings. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015;13:146–59.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Overweight & Obesity. In: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/prevalence-maps.html. Accessed 3 Nov 2017.
  66. Fraser JK, Wulur I, Alfonso Z, Hedrick MH. Fat tissue: an underappreciated source of stem cells for biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2006;24:150–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Cheng N-C, Chen S-Y, Li J-R, Young T-H. Short-Term Spheroid Formation Enhances the Regenerative Capacity of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells by Promoting Stemness, Angiogenesis, and Chemotaxis. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2013;2:584–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Tsai CC, Su PF, Huang YF, Yew TL, Hung SC. Oct4 and Nanog directly regulate Dnmt1 to maintain self-renewal and undifferentiated state in mesenchymal stem cells. Mol Cell. 2012;47:169–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Yew T-L, Hung YT, Li HY, Chen HW, Chen LL, Tsai KS, Chiou SH, Chao KC, Huang TF, Chen HL, Hung SC. Enhancement of wound healing by human multipotent stromal cell conditioned medium: the paracrine factors and p38 MAPK activation. Cell Transplant. 2011;20:693–706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Gurumurthy B, Bierdeman PC, Janorkar AV. Spheroid model for functional osteogenic evaluation of human adipose-derived stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105:1230–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Turner PA, Tang Y, Weiss SJ, Janorkar AV. Three-dimensional spheroid cell model of in vitro adipocyte inflammation. Tissue Eng A. 2015;21:1837–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Weeks CA, Aden B, Zhang J, Singh A, Hickey RD, Kilbey SM 2nd, Nyberg SL, Janorkar AV. Effect of amine content and chemistry on long-term, three-dimensional hepatocyte spheroid culture atop aminated elastin-like polypeptide coatings. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105:377–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Kokai LE, Marra KG, Kershaw EE. Three-dimensional adipocyte culture: the next frontier for adipocyte biology discovery. Endocrinology. 2015;(12):4375–6. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1880.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Turner PA, Gurumurthy B, Bailey JL, Elks CM, Janorkar AV. Adipogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells grown as spheroids. Process Biochem. 2017;59:312–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.02.003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Miyagawa Y, Okita H, Hiroyama M, Sakamoto R, Kobayashi M, Nakajima H, Katagiri YU, Fujimoto J, Hata J, Umezawa A, et al. A microfabricatedscaffold induces the spheroid formation of human bone marrow-derivedmesenchymal progenitor cells and promotes efficient adipogenicdifferentiation. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:513–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Roncari DAK, Van RLR. Promotion of human adipocyte precursor replication by 17-beta estradiol in culture. J Clin Invest. 1978;62:503–8. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI109153.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Lea-Currie YR, Wen P, MK MI. Dehydroepiandrosterone reduces proliferation and differentiation of 3T3L1 preadipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;248:497–504. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI109153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Gordon GB, Newitt JA, Shantz LM, Weng Deand Talalay P. Inhibition of the conversion of 3T3 fibroblast clones to adipocytes by dehydroepiandrosterone and related anti-carcinogenic steroids. Cancer Res. 1986;46:3389–95 PMID: 2939944.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Nishizawa H, Shimomura I, Kishida K, Maeda N, Kuriyama H, Nagaretani H, Matsuda M, Kondo H, Furuyama N, Kihara S, Nakamura T, Tochino Y, Funahashi T, Matsuzawa Y. Androgens decrease plasma adiponectin, an insulin-sensitizing adipocyte-derived protein. Diabetes. 2002;51(9):2734–41 PMID: 12196466.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Singh R, Artaza JN, Taylor WE, Braga M, Yuan X, Gonzalez-Cadavid NF, Bhasin S. Testosterone Inhibits Adipogenic Differentiation in 3T3-L1 Cells: Nuclear Translocation of Androgen Receptor Complex with β-Catenin and T-Cell Factor 4 May Bypass Canonical Wnt Signaling to Down-Regulate Adipogenic Transcription FactorsRef. Endocrinology. 2006;147:141–54 10.1210/en.2004-1649.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Chang CC, Boland ED, Williams SK, Hoying JB. Direct-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid systems for future regenerative therapies. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2011;98:160–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Gettler BC, Zakhari JS, Gandhi PS, Williams SK. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017;23:516–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhao Y, Yao R, Ouyang L, Ding H, Zhang T, Zhang K, Cheng S, Sun W. Three-dimensional printing of Hela cells for cervical tumor model in vitro. Biofabrication. 2014;6:035001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Williams SK, Touroo JS, Church KH, Hoying JB. Encapsulation of adipose stromal vascular fraction cells in alginate hydrogel spheroids using a direct-write three-dimensional printing system. BioResearch Open Access. 2013:448–54. https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2013.0046.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Ong LJY, Islam AB, DasGupta R, Iyer NG, Leo HL, Toh YC. A 3D printed microfluidic perfusion device for multicellular spheroid cultures. Biofabrication. 2017;11(9):045005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Sart S, Tomasi RFX, Amselem G, Baroud CN. Multiscale cytometry and regulation of 3D cell cultures on a chip. Nat Commun. 2017;8:469.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Chan HF, Chan HF, Zhang Y, Ho Y-P, Chiu Y-L, Jung Y, Leong KW. Rapid formation of multicellular spheroids in double-emulsion droplets with controllable microenvironment. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3462.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Sabhachandani P, Cohen N, Sarkar S, Torchilin V, Konry T. Generation and functional assessment of 3D multicellular spheroids in droplet-based microfluidics platform. Lab Chip. 2016;16:497–505.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Amaral RLF, Miranda M, Marcato PD, Swiech K. Comparative analysis of 3D bladder tumor spheroids obtained by forced floating and hanging drop methods for drug screening. Front Physiol. 2017;8:605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00605.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Kelm JM, Timmins NE, Brown CJ, Fussenegger M, Nielsen LK. Method for generation of homogeneous multicellular tumor spheroids applicable to a wide variety of cell types. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003;83:173–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Tung YC, Hsiao AY, Allen SG, Torisawa YS, Ho M, Takayama S. High-throughput 3D spheroid culture and drug testing using a 384 hanging drop array. Analyst. 2011;136:473–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Mineda K, Feng J, Ishimine H, Takada H, Doi K, Kuno S, Kinoshita K, Kanayama K, Kato H, Mashiko T, Hashimoto I, Nakanishi H, Kurisaki A, Yoshimura K. Therapeutic potential of human adipose-derived stem/stromal cell microspheroids prepared by three-dimensional culture in non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2015;4:1511–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Gurumurthy B, Bierdeman PC, Janorkar AV. Composition of elastin like polypeptide-collagen composite scaffold influences in vitro osteogenic activity of human adipose derived stem cells. Dent Mater. 2016;32:1270–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  94. Yang F, Williams CG, Wang DA, Lee H, Manson PN, Elisseeff J. The effect of incorporating RGD adhesive peptide in polyethylene glycol diacrylate hydrogel on osteogenesis of bone marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials. 2005;26:5991–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Narayan R, Agarwal T, Mishra D, Maiti TK, Mohanty S. Goat tendon collagen-human fibrin hydrogel for comprehensive parametric evaluation of HUVEC microtissue-based angiogenesis. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018;163:291–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Tong JG, Valdes YR, Barrett JW, et al. Evidence for differential viral oncolytic efficacy in an in vitro model of epithelial ovarian cancer metastasis. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2015;2:15013.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Yoon S, Kim JA, Lee SH, Kim M, Park TH. Droplet-based microfluidic system to form and separate multicellular spheroids using magnetic nanoparticles. Lab Chip. 2013;13:1522–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 3D Cell Culture With Products from Greiner Bio-One and Nano3D Biosciences. From:https://www.gbo.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Brochures/Brochures_BioScience/F071076_Brochure_Nano3D_E.pdf?_ga=2.135715313.1932248807.1510081513-452552995.1510081513. Accessed 7 Feb 2018.
  99. Turner PA, Weeks CA, McMurphy AJ, Janorkar AV. Spheroid organization kinetics of H35 rat hepatoma model cell system on elastin-like polypeptide-polyethyleneimine copolymer substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102:852–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement