- Open Access
Rapid detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations with multiplex PCR and primer extension in lung cancer
© Lin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 18 March 2010
- Accepted: 12 May 2010
- Published: 12 May 2010
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase domain mutations hyperactivate the kinase and confer kinase addiction of the non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumor cells. Almost all of these mutations are located within exons 18-21. The -216 single nucleotide polymorphism in the promoter region is associated with increased EGFR production. We present a method for detecting these common mutations in 81 cases of NSCLC. The protocol is based on the multiplex amplification of promoter region and exons 18-21 of the EGFR genes in a single tube, followed by primer extension of the PCR products using various sizes of primers to detect base changes at -216 promoter region and codons 719, 746-750, 790, 858 of the EGFR gene. We compared the results with that from direct sequencing for detecting EGFR mutations in 81 cases of NSCLC. The two methods identified the same 26 mutations, but our method is superior to direct sequencing in terms of the amount of work and time required. We presented a simple and fast method to detect mutations of EGFR genes in NSCLC.
- Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
- Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
- Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation
- Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene
Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world and is responsible for one third of all cancer-related death. Treatment of lung cancer mainly depends on the type of the cells that make up the cancer. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) which comprises about 20% of lung cancers originates from neuroendocrine cells in the bronchus. SCLC responds well to chemotherapy initially, but resistance occurs commonly. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), comprising 80% of lung cancers, arises from lung epithelial cells, and comprises diverse histological subtypes that includes adenocarcinoma, bronchioloalveolar, squamous, anaplastic and large-cell carcinomas . NSCLC is often treated with combination cytotoxic chemotherapy, but the treatment only results in a modest increase in survival. The receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) serve as cell signalling mediators by receptor-specific ligands. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a member of the ErbB family of RTKs expressed in many cases of NSCLC, and its expression is correlated with a poor prognosis [2–5]. Two EGFR small molecule inhibitors, gefitinib and erlotinib, which target the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR have been approved for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Females, Asians, nonsmokers, and those with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma appear to derive the most benefit from gefitinib or erlotinib [6–10]. Molecular analysis showed that the majority of responders harbored specific mutations in the gene that encodes EGFR [8, 10–12]. EGFR kinase domain mutations occur primarily in exons 18-21 which encode part of the tyrosine kinase (TK) domain [13–15]. Besides these EGFR kinase domain mutations, a common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) located -216 bp upstream from the initiator ATG in the promoter region also has been identified. The SNP occurs at an important binding site for the transcription factor SP1 that is necessary for activation of EGFR promoter activity and correlates with increased promoter activity and expression of EGFR mRNA .
In this study, we performed multiplex amplification of exons 18-21 and promoter of EGFR using five pair of primers followed by primer extension to detect base changes or deletions in codons 719, 746-750, 790, 858, and -216 promoter to analyze the mutational frequency in 81 cases of lung cancer, and compared the results to that obtained by direct sequencing.
Tumor specimens, obtained from patients on protocols approved by the Institutional Review Board of Changhua Christian Hospital, were collected from eighty-one patients with NSCLC at the time of surgical resection before systemic treatment. All specimens were frozen immediately and stored in liquid nitrogen until DNA was extracted.
DNA extraction, PCR and direct sequencing of the EGFR gene
PCR Primers used to amplify promoter region and exons 18, 19, 20, and 21 of the EGFR genes
Multiplex PCR and primer extension analysis of mutations in EGFR-216 promoter region and exons 18, 19, 20, and 21
Primer extension mutation analysis probes for -216 promoter region and codons 719, 746-750, 790, and 858 of the EGFR genes
Nucleotide number and sequence
Amino acid change
2155 G>T, 2155 G>A
The primer extension reaction products were resolved by automated capillary electrophoresis on a capillary electrophoresis platform. Briefly, 14 μl of Hi-Di™ Formamide (Applied Biosystems) and 0.28 μl of GeneScan™ -120LIZ® Size Standard (Applied Biosystems) were added to 6 μl of primer extension products. All samples were loaded and run on an ABI Prism 310 DNA Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) following the manufacturer's recommendations. Following the run, samples were analyzed using GeneScan™ 3.1 application software (Applied Biosystems).
Multiplex PCR and primer extension
For mutation analysis of codons 719 in exon 18, we used different-sized primers to recognize the change of the first and second base separately. In-frame deletion between codon 746 and 752 in codon 19 was analyzed with primers made to be different in size either by adding different lengths of poly(dT) tails to the 5'-end or extending the primer sequence to allow separation based on the differences in size. SNP at -216 promoter region and missense mutations which result in L858R change in exon 21 and T790M in exon 20 were each analyzed with a single probe.
The overall mutation (in EGFR TK domain and -216 promoter) rate was 32% (26 of 81).
Mutation analysis of the EGFR gene by multiplex PCR and primer extension.
Case(s) with EGFR mutation(s)
Adenocarcinoma (n = 26)
Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (n = 6)
Squamous cell carcinoma (n = 33)
Adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 5)
Others (n = 11)
Total (n = 81)
We also used direct sequencing to analyze the -216 promoter region and exons 18-21 of the EGFR gene. The results of sequencing analysis were identical to the results of multiplex PCR with primer extension analysis. No other mutation was identified by direct sequencing. We can therefore conclude that our method was very accurate in profiling the most common EGFR mutations in NSCLC.
EGFR proteins control essential signaling pathways that regulate cell proliferation . Increased levels of EGFR gene expression are observed in many cancers, including NSCLC, and its expression is correlated with an adverse prognosis [2–4, 19]. Clinical responsiveness to gefitinib and erlotinib in NSCLC have been shown to correlate with somatic mutations in the EGFR gene, which result in increased sensitivity to inhibition of growth by the drugs [8, 10–12]. EGFR mutations have been found more frequently in non-smoking East Asian women with adenocarcinoma with bronchioalvelar features [14, 20–26].
A protocol based on mutant-enriched PCR followed by primer extension of the PCR products was used to detect EGFR T790M mutation in NSCLC . We recently demonstrated a simple and fast way to identify K-RAS mutation . In this study, we extend the application to detect -216 promoter region and exons 18-21 mutations of EGFR gene simultaneously and apply this method to investigate the mutation status in 81 cases of NSCLC. We compared the results with that from direct sequencing for detecting EGFR mutations in 81 cases of NSCLC. The two protocols identified the same 26 mutations, but the new method is superior to direct sequencing in terms of the amount of work and time required. With this method, -216 promoter region and exons 18-21 of the EGFR gene were amplified with multiplex PCR in a single tube and the detection of mutations in the EGFR promoter and four key exons can be combined into one assay. This allows a sample to be screened for all common EGFR mutations simultaneously. We previously reported that that as little as 10 ng of DNA was enough for the multiplex PCR reaction and we also showed that this method can detect mutations against a background of up to at least 23 wild-type alleles . Moreover, because the technique is a sequencing-based approach, additional sequencing is not necessary.
Distinguishing sequence variants with primer extension is based on the high accuracy of nucleotide incorporation catalyzed by a DNA polymerase. Current products of the thermostable enzymes used in primer extension have very low error rates and are specific for ddNTPs . These characteristics provide negligible primer misincorporation and excellent discrimination between wild, heterozygous and homozygous genotypes. Another advantage of the primer extension reaction is its multiplexing capability, with several mutations being detected in a single reaction tube. Multiplex PCR-SSCP- or PCR-ARMS-based methods can also simultaneously detect several mutations. However, PCR-SSCP require further confirmation by direct sequencing, and PCR-ARMS require more primers than are possible in a single reaction to detect all mutations at -216 promoter region and exons 18-21 of the EGFR gene. The primer extension reaction is a less time-consuming assay because automated fluorescent capillary electrophoresis of the products requires only 25 minutes in comparison with capillary electrophoresis required for standard sequencing that takes more than an hour.
The method that we demonstrated in this report provides a rapid way to identify common EGFR mutations for the purpose of clinical evaluation in NSCLC. The method can also be applied in the detection of other mutations in the EGFR gene.
This study was supported by Changhua Christian Hospital and Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Taiwan.
- Brambilla E, Travis WD, Colby TV, Corrin B, Shimosato Y: The new World Health Organization classification of lung tumours. Eur Respir J. 2001, 18 (6): 1059-1068. 10.1183/09031936.01.00275301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirsch FR, Varella-Garcia M, Bunn PA, Di Maria MV, Veve R, Bremmes RM, Baron AE, Zeng C, Franklin WA: Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2003, 21 (20): 3798-3807. 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nicholson RI, Gee JM, Harper ME: EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer. 2001, 37 (Suppl 4): S9-15. 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00231-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohsaki Y, Tanno S, Fujita Y, Toyoshima E, Fujiuchi S, Nishigaki Y, Ishida S, Nagase A, Miyokawa N, Hirata S, Kikuchi K: Epidermal growth factor receptor expression correlates with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with p53 overexpression. Oncol Rep. 2000, 7 (3): 603-607.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veale D, Ashcroft T, Marsh C, Gibson GJ, Harris AL: Epidermal growth factor receptors in non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 1987, 55 (5): 513-516.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller VA, Kris MG, Shah N, Patel J, Azzoli C, Gomez J, Krug LM, Pao W, Rizvi N, Pizzo B, Tyson L, Venkatraman E, Ben-Porat L, Memoli N, Zakowski M, Rusch V, Heelan RT: Bronchioloalveolar pathologic subtype and smoking history predict sensitivity to gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22 (6): 1103-1109. 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.158.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang CH, Shih JY, Chen KC, Yu CJ, Yang TY, Lin CP, Su WP, Gow CH, Hsu C, Chang GC, Yang PC: Survival outcome and predictors of gefitinib antitumor activity in East Asian chemonaive patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2006, 107 (8): 1873-1882. 10.1002/cncr.22220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Byrne BJ, Garst J: Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and their role in non-small-cell lung cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2005, 7 (4): 241-247. 10.1007/s11912-005-0045-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sequist LV, Joshi VA, Janne PA, Bell DW, Fidias P, Lindeman NI, Louis DN, Lee JC, Mark EJ, Longtine J, Verlander P, Kucherlapati R, Meyerson M, Haber DA, Johnson BE, Lynch TJ: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing in the care of lung cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12 (14 Pt 2): 4403s-4408s. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0099.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, Doherty J, Politi K, Sarkaria I, Singh B, Heelan R, Rusch V, Fulton L, Mardis E, Kupfer D, Wilson R, Kris M, Varmus H: EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (36): 13306-13311. 10.1073/pnas.0405220101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, Herman P, Kaye FJ, Lindeman N, Boggon TJ, Naoki K, Sasaki H, Fujii Y, Eck MJ, Sellers WR, Johnson BE, Meyerson M: EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science. 2004, 304 (5676): 1497-1500. 10.1126/science.1099314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, Harris PL, Haserlat SM, Supko JG, Haluska FG, Louis DN, Christiani DC, Settleman J, Haber DA: Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004, 350 (21): 2129-2139. 10.1056/NEJMoa040938.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kobayashi S, Boggon TJ, Dayaram T, Janne PA, Kocher O, Meyerson M, Johnson BE, Eck MJ, Tenen DG, Halmos B: EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352 (8): 786-792. 10.1056/NEJMoa044238.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endoh H, Kuwano H, Takahashi T, Mitsudomi T: Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer: biological and clinical implications. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (24): 8919-8923. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2818.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pao W, Miller VA, Politi KA, Riely GJ, Somwar R, Zakowski MF, Kris MG, Varmus H: Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain. PLoS Med. 2005, 2 (3): e73-10.1371/journal.pmed.0020073.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu W, Innocenti F, Wu MH, Desai AA, Dolan ME, Cook EH, Ratain MJ: A functional common polymorphism in a Sp1 recognition site of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene promoter. Cancer Res. 2005, 65 (1): 46-53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang YS, Yeh KT, Chang TJ, Chai C, Lu HC, Hsu NC, Chang JG: Fast simultaneous detection of K-RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 179-10.1186/1471-2407-9-179.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oda K, Matsuoka Y, Funahashi A, Kitano H: A comprehensive pathway map of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. Mol Syst Biol. 2005, 1: 2005-0010. 10.1038/msb4100014.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krause DS, Van Etten RA: Tyrosine kinases as targets for cancer therapy. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353 (2): 172-187. 10.1056/NEJMra044389.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Janne PA, Engelman JA, Johnson BE: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for treatment and tumor biology. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (14): 3227-3234. 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.985.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, Nomura M, Suzuki M, Wistuba II, Fong KM, Lee H, Toyooka S, Shimizu N, Fujisawa T, Feng Z, Roth JA, Herz J, Minna JD, Gazdar AF: Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005, 97 (5): 339-346. 10.1093/jnci/dji055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Han SW, Kim TY, Hwang PG, Jeong S, Kim J, Choi IS, Oh DY, Kim JH, Kim DW, Chung DH, Im SA, Kim YT, Lee JS, Heo DS, Bang YJ, Kim NK: Predictive and prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (11): 2493-2501. 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.388.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marchetti A, Martella C, Felicioni L, Barassi F, Salvatore S, Chella A, Camplese PP, Iarussi T, Mucilli F, Mezzetti A, Cuccurullo F, Sacco R, Buttitta F: EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of a large series of cases and development of a rapid and sensitive method for diagnostic screening with potential implications on pharmacologic treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (4): 857-865. 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitsudomi T, Kosaka T, Endoh H, Horio Y, Hida T, Mori S, Hatooka S, Shinoda M, Takahashi T, Yatabe Y: Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene predict prolonged survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (11): 2513-2520. 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.992.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsao MS, Sakurada A, Cutz JC, Zhu CQ, Kamel-Reid S, Squire J, Lorimer I, Zhang T, Liu N, Daneshmand M, Marrano P, da Cunha Santos G, Lagarde A, Richardson F, Seymour L, Whitehead M, Ding K, Pater J, Shepherd FA: Erlotinib in lung cancer - molecular and clinical predictors of outcome. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353 (2): 133-144. 10.1056/NEJMoa050736.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, Haber DA: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007, 7 (3): 169-181. 10.1038/nrc2088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inukai M, Toyooka S, Ito S, Asano H, Ichihara S, Soh J, Suehisa H, Ouchida M, Aoe K, Aoe M, Kiura K, Shimizu N, Date H: Presence of epidermal growth factor receptor gene T790M mutation as a minor clone in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2006, 66 (16): 7854-7858. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1951.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Syvanen AC: From gels to chips: "minisequencing" primer extension for analysis of point mutations and single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum Mutat. 1999, 13 (1): 1-10. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1999)13:1<1::AID-HUMU1>3.0.CO;2-I.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.