Skip to content

Advertisement

Journal of Biomedical Science

Volume 17 Supplement 1

Taurine – a wonder molecule. Proceedings of the 17th International Taurine Conference

Research
Open Access

A case-control study on the dietary taurine intake, nutrient status and life stress of functional constipation patients in Korean male college students

†Contributed equally
Journal of Biomedical Science201017(Suppl 1):S41

https://doi.org/10.1186/1423-0127-17-S1-S41

©  Chang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

Published: 24 August 2010

Abstract

Background

Constipation is a common gastrointestinal symptom in Korea as well as in Western countries. This study was performed to investigate the dietary taurine intake, nutrient status, and life stress of functional constipation (FC) patients in Korean male college students.

Methods

Research data were collected in 2008 and a total of 104 male students (52 with FC patients and 52 healthy controls without FC) were included. FC patients were defined by the codes for the Rome Modular Questionnaire and healthy controls without FC were matched for age, height, weight and BMI. A self-administered life stress score and 3-day recall method were used to assess life stress level and dietary intake, respectively.

Results

The averages of age, height, weight, body fat percentage and body mass index (BMI) of male students were 23.4 years, 174.1 cm, 71.9 kg, 19.0 % and 23.7 kg/m2, respectively. Average intake of dietary taurine was 126.8 mg/day in FC patients and 105.1 mg/day in control group. The average intake of total calorie (p<0.05), plant protein (p<0.01), plant fat (p<0.001), carbohydrate (p<0.05), plant calcium (p<0.05) of FC patients were significantly higher compared to control group. The average total life stress score (p<0.01), economy problem score (p<0.05), future problem score (p<0.05) and value problem score (p<0.05) of FC patients were significantly higher compared to control group.

Conclusions

These results may suggest that FC patients show a higher life stress score and intake of some nutrient such as total calorie, plant protein, plant fat, carbohydrate and plant calcium in Korean male college students. Therefore, a further large-scale study is needed about correlation between life stress and nutrients intake including dietary taurine.

Keywords

TaurineIrritable Bowel SyndromeLife StressFiber IntakeFunctional Constipation

Background

Functional constipation is a common gastrointestinal functional disorder and occurs in 12~27%[1–3] of people depending on demographic factors and definition. Functional constipation(FC) is a “functional bowel disorder that presents as persistently difficult, infrequent, or seemingly incomplete defecation, which do not meet irritable bowel syndrome criteria.” [4] The definite cause of functional constipation is unclear, but it is influenced by socioeconomic level, gender, lifestyle, physical activity and dietary pattern [5, 6]. In addition, psychological abnormalities are also a contributory factor. It has been reported that constipation is associated with stress in children, adolescents [7] and female adults [8].

Dietary intake of taurine may play a significant role in physical and psychological well-being. It has been shown that dietary taurine intake reduced life stress level [9]. There are many previous reports about the relationship between constipation and nutrient intake [10–12]. Insufficient fiber intake and water intake, low calorie intake, or food sensitivities may contribute to the pathogenesis of constipation. However, there exists only a limited amount of the studies on dietary taurine intake and the relationship between nutrient intake and life stress in FC patients. Therefore, we investigated the dietary taurine intake and the nutrient status of FC patients and the correlation between nutrients intake including dietary taurine and life stress scores through a case-control study in Korean male college students.

Methods

Subjects

The subjects were male college students residing in the Incheon area and attending a nutrition-related non-major class via the internet. A case-control study was carried out using a self-administered questionnaire. The FC patients group consisted of 52 male college students that were diagnosed with functional constipation and self-reportedly claimed constipation. The control group was made up of 52 male college students who were not diagnosed with functional constipation and did not self-reportedly claim constipation. The healthy controls were matched with FC patients for age, height, weight and BMI. FC was diagnosed by the Rome criteria [13]. Rome criteria included 12 weeks or more of symptoms in the preceding 12 months, including hard or lumpy stools, straining, a sense of incomplete evacuation, the need to use manual maneuvers to pass stool, or a sense of anorectal obstruction with ≥25% of bowel movements, and/or <3 bowel movements/week, with no evidence of organic disease. At least two symptoms should be present to make the diagnosis of functional constipation.

General characteristics and anthropometric measurement

Questions for general characteristics included 3 items such as age, type of residence and pocket money. The height of subjects was measured with a stadiometer. Body weight, body fat percentage and body mass index (BMI) were determined with an InBody 3.0 Body Composition Analyzer (InBody 3.0, Biospace, Korea).

Dietary taurine and nutrients intake assessment

Dietary intake was assessed by a 3-day recall method (2 weekdays and 1 weekend day). Dietary taurine and nutrients intakes were estimated using the computer-aided nutrition program (CAN-pro 3.0, The Korean Nutrition Society, Korea) inputted with a taurine content database for 17 food groups and 321 commonly used food items [14, 15].

Life stress score

A self-administered life stress questionnaire was used to assess life stress level, which contained fifty questions about the frequency of stress experienced and the importance of the stress for the past year. The scores were based on a 4-point rating scale of 0 to 3 [16]. Life stress scores for college students consisted of eight life stress categories: (interpersonal relationship; faculty, lover, friend, family), (task-related stress; school grade, future, economy, value). The total life stress score was calculated by multiplying the frequency of stress experienced by the importance of stress. The higher stress scores meant the more frequency of stress experienced and the higher importance of stress.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with the SPSS 17.0 program. The frequency and percentage, and the mean and standard error for each survey question were calculated. We used the chi-square test and Student’s t-test to compare differences between FC patients and control group. The correlation between life stress scores and nutrients intake was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results and discussion

General characteristics

General characteristic data of the subjects are shown in Table 1. The averages of age, height, weight, percent body fat and BMI of the subjects were 23.4 years, 174.1 cm, 71.9 kg, 19.0% and 23.7 kg/m2, respectively. Thirty-three FC patients (66.0%) and 28 controls (54.9%) lived with their families, and 36 FC patients (70.6%) and 28 controls (54.9%) spent 200,000 ~ 400,000 Korean won (approximately $175.00 ~ $350.00 US) per month for pocket money.
Table 1

General characteristics and anthropometric measurements of the subjects

Variables

FC patients (n=52)

Control (n=52)

Age (years)

23.3 ± 0.3NS

23.4 ± 0.3

Height (cm)

173.8 ± 0.7

174.6 ± 0.8

Weight (kg)

71.7 ± 1.4

72.1 ± 1.4

Body fat percentage (%)

18.9 ± 0.7

19.2 ± 0.7

BMI (kg/m2)

23.7 ± 0.4

23.6 ± 0.4

Type of residence

   Living with family

28(54.9)

33(66.0)

   Preparation of own meals

15(29.4)

16(32.0)

   Dormitory

5(9.8)

0(0)

   Boarding or relatives home

3(5.9)

1(2.0)

Pocket money (1,000 Korean won/month)

   < 200

13(25.5)

6(11.8)

   200 - 400

28(54.9)

36(70.6)

   ≥ 400

10(19.6)

9(17.6)

Values are mean ± SE and number (%); NS: not significant; BMI: body mass index

Intakes of dietary taurine and nutrients

Average intake of dietary taurine is shown in Table 2. Average intake of dietary taurine in FC patients and control group were 126.8 and 105.1 mg/day, respectively. There was no significant difference in dietary taurine intake between FC patients and control group. The dietary taurine intake of the Korean male college student in 2006 was 124.1 mg/day in same area where this study was conducted [9] and that of Japanese male adults was 222.5 mg/day in Hokuriky District where fish and shellfish intake was the third highest among the 9 districts of Japan [17].
Table 2

Dietary taurine intake of the subjects

Variables

FC patients (n=52)

Control (n=52)

Taurine (mg/day)

126.8 ± 12.6NS

105.1 ± 7.6

Values are mean ± SE, NS: not significant

Average energy intake in FC patients and control group were 1876.2 and 1695.2 kcal/day, respectively (Table 3). There were significant differences between FC patients and control group in total calorie (p<0.05), plant protein (p<0.01), plant fat (p<0.001), carbohydrate (p<0.05) and plant calcium (p<0.05). Since eating activates colon motor function by gastrocolic reflex [18], it has been reported that constipated persons had a lower calorie and nutrient intake than non-constipated persons [19], and that dietary fiber increased fecal bulk and improved bowel habits [20]. However, in a large cross-sectional study conducted on Japanese women [21, 22], calorie and dietary fiber intake was not significantly different between subjects with FC and without FC. In addition, it has been reviewed that deficient fiber intake is not the main cause of constipation [11]. This is because there has not been a decrease in the prevalence of constipation in the United States over the last decades despite the increasing availability and ingestion of fiber-rich foods. Nevertheless, additional fiber intake improves constipation and its associated symptoms in some patients [23, 24]. Thus the relationship between nutrients and FC need to be explored further.
Table 3

Nutrients intakes of the subjects

Variables

FC patients (n=52)

Control (n=52)

Total Calorie (kcal/day)

1876.2 ± 67.6*

1695.2 ± 51.9

Total protein (g/day)

74.3 ± 2.8

67.6 ± 2.3

   Animal protein(g/day)

42.0 ± 2.3

39.9 ± 2.2

   Plant protein (g/day)

32.3 ± 1.4**

27.8 ± 1.0

Total fat (g/day)

56.8 ± 2.2

52.4 ± 2.2

   Animal fat(g/day)

30.0 ± 1.7

31.9 ± 1.8

   Plant fat (g/day)

26.8 ± 1.4***

20.5 ± 1.0

Carbohydrate (g/day)

250.9 ± 10.0

226.1 ± 7.5

Dietary fiber (g/day)

15.9 ± 0.7

14.3 ± 0.5

Total calcium (mg/day)

434.7 ± 24.9

413.3 ± 22.4

   Animal calcium (mg/day)

183.0 ± 15.4

198.0 ± 17.0

   Plant calcium (mg/day)

243.2 ± 13.2*

199.5 ± 7.9

Phosphorous (mg/day)

955.8 ± 37.8

880.9 ± 31.9

Total iron(mg/day)

12.1 ± 0.7

10.9 ± 0.4

   Animal iron (mg/day)

3.7 ± 0.2

3.7 ± 0.2

   Plant iron (mg/day)

8.3 ± 0.7

7.2 ± 0.3

Sodium (mg/day)

3862.8 ± 188.1

3656.1 ± 141.1

Zinc (mg/day)

8.6 ± 0.4

8.1 ± 0.4

Vitamin A (μg RE/day)

663.4 ± 41.9

625.2 ± 28.6

Vitamin B1 (mg/day)

1.3 ± 0.1

1.3 ± 0.1

Vitamin B2 (mg/day)

1.2 ± 0.1

1.1 ± 0.1

Vitamin B6 (mg/day)

1.9 ± 0.1

1.8 ± 0.1

Niacin (mg NE/day)

16.9 ± 0.9

16.1 ± 0.8

Vitamin C (mg/day)

63.2 ± 4.3

60.6 ± 3.4

Folic acid (μg/day)

190.6 ± 9.7

180.5 ± 7.1

Cholesterol (mg/day)

366.8 ± 23.0

338.1 ± 18.2

Values are mean ± SE; *; p<0.05, **:p<0.01, ***:p<0.001 (by Student’s t-test)

Life stress scores

Average total life stress scores of FC patients and control group were 37.5 and 20.5, respectively (Table 4). Task-related stress scores were higher compared to interpersonal relationship stress scores in all of the subjects. There were significant differences between FC patients and control group not only in total life stress scores (p<0.01) but also in future problem (p<0.05), economy (p<0.05), problem (p<0.05) and value problem (p<0.05). These scores of FC patients were significantly higher compared to control group.
Table 4

Life stress scores of the subjects

Variables

FC patients (n=52)

Control (n=52)

Interpersonal relationship stress

   Faculty problem

4.3 ± 2.0

1.9 ± 0.7

   Lover problem

4.2 ± 1.6

3.9 ± 1.6

   Friend problem

0.6 ± 0.2

0.2 ± 0.1

   Family problem

3.0 ± 1.0

1.1 ± 0.4

Task-related stress

   School grade problem

16.5 ± 3.0

10.1 ± 1.9

   Future problem

16.7± 2.6*

9.4 ± 1.7

   Economy problem

10.1 ± 2.7*

4.0 ± 1.2

   Value problem

11.6 ± 2.4*

5.8 ± 1.4

Total score

37.5 ± 5.5**

20.5 ± 3.3

Values are mean ± SE; *; p<0.05, **:p<0.01, ***:p<0.001 (by Student’s t-test)

Although the definite cause of FC is unclear, psychological stress may affect FC through the brain-gut axis. Previous studies have reported an association between FC and psychological symptoms such as anxiety and depression in adults [25, 26].

According to a survey of Korean college students [9], the stress scores of future problem, value problem and economy problem were higher compared to other stress categories. In this study, the above three noted problem scores of FC patients were significantly higher compared to control group. Therefore, it was required special concern about stress in college students in order to reduce constipation as well as psychological problems.

Correlation between nutrients intakes including dietary taurine and life stress scores

Average total correlation coefficients between nutrients intake including dietary taurine and life stress scores are presented in Additional File 1. Significantly positive correlations were observed between school grade problems and intake of animal iron (p<0.05) and cholesterol (p<0.05), and between future problems and intake of total protein (p<0.05), phosphorous (p<0.01), animal iron (p<0.05) and cholesterol (p<0.05). There were significantly negative correlations between faculty problems and intake of animal iron (p<0.05), and between lover problems and intake of total iron (p<0.05), sodium (p<0.05), vitamin A (p<0.05), vitamin B6 (p<0.05) and vitamin C (p<0.05), and between family problems and intake of dietary fiber (p<0.05), plant calcium (p<0.05), vitamin B6 (p<0.05) and folic acid (p<0.05). There were no significant correlations between all stress scores and taurine. In the previous survey of Korean college students [9], there were no significant correlations between taurine and scores of life stress in male subjects which was consistent with our present results.

It has been reported that conflicting association exists between stress and food intake [27–29]. Chronic life stress seemed to be related with a greater preference for energy and nutrient-dense foods [30], and stress reduced food intake [31]. In this study, stress was positively or negatively related to various nutrients. Thus a further investigation is needed about the relationship between categories of stress and various nutrients.

Conclusions

Life stress scores and intake of total calorie, plant protein, plant fat, carbohydrate and plant calcium of FC patients were significantly higher compared to control group. In addition, there were significantly positive correlations between future problems in life stress and intake of total protein, phosphorous, animal iron and cholesterol. However, there were significantly negative correlations between some categories of life stress such as faculty, lover and family problems and some micronutrients such as iron, sodium, vitamin A, vitamin B6, vitamin C and folic acid. Therefore, a further large-scale study or dietary supplement study is needed to obtain direct evidence about the correlation between life stress and nutrients intake including dietary taurine in FC patients.

Notes

Abbreviations

FC: 

functional constipation

BMI: 

body mass index.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This article has been published as part of Journal of Biomedical Science Volume 17 Supplement 1, 2010: Proceedings of the 17th International Meeting of Taurine. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.jbiomedsci.com/supplements/17/S1.

This work was supported by INHA UNIVERSITY Research Grant.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dept. of Food and Nutrition, Inha University, Incheon, Korea

References

  1. Peppas G, Alexiou V, Mourtzoukou E, Falagas M: Epidemiology of constipation in Europe and Oceania: a systematic review. BMC gastroenterology. 2008, 8 (1): 5-10.1186/1471-230X-8-5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Higgins P, Johanson J: Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004, 99 (4): 750-759. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04114.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jun D, Park H, Lee O, Lee H, Yoon B, Choi H, Hahm J, Lee M, Lee D, Kee C: A population-based study on bowel habits in a Korean community: prevalence of functional constipation and self-reported constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 2006, 51 (8): 1471-1477. 10.1007/s10620-006-9087-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Longstreth G, Thompson W, Chey W, Houghton L, Mearin F, Spiller R: Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006, 130 (5): 1480-1491. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee J, O J: A Study on the Defecation Pattern and Lifestyle Factors of Female High School and College Students in Gyeonggi Province. Korean J Community Nutr. 2005, 10 (1): 36-45.Google Scholar
  6. Sonnenberg A, Koch T: Epidemiology of constipation in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989, 32 (1): 1-8. 10.1007/BF02554713.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Devanarayana N, Rajindrajith S: Association between Constipation and Stressful Life Events in a Cohort of Sri Lankan Children and Adolescents. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 2009, 1-5.Google Scholar
  8. Kil SY, Oh WO, Suk MH: A study on health promotion behavior, perceived stress and constipation of female university students. J Korean Community Nursing. 2004, 15 (4): 600-607.Google Scholar
  9. Sung MJ, Chang KJ: Correlations Between Dietary Taurine Intake and Life Stress in Korean College Students. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009, 643: 423-428. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Arya LA, Novi JM, Shaunik A, Morgan MA, Bradley CS: Pelvic organ prolapse, constipation, and dietary fiber intake in women: A case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 192 (5): 1687-1691. 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.032.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schiller L: Nutrients and Constipation: Cause or Cure?. PRACTICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY. 2008, 32 (4): 43-49.Google Scholar
  12. Shariati A, Maceda J, Hale D: High-fiber diet for treatment of constipation in women with pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 111 (4): 908-913. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000308660.48204.7f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Thompson W, Longstreth G, Drossman D, Heaton K, Irvine E, Muller-Lissner S: Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut. 1999, 45 (Suppl 2): II43-II47. 10.1136/gut.45.2008.ii43.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim E, Kim J, Moon H: Taurine contents in commercial milk meats and seafoods. J Kor Soc Food Sci Nutr. 1999, 28: 16-21.Google Scholar
  15. Park T: Studies on novel activities of taurine and the development of taurine content database of foods. Final Reports of Korean Health Research and Development Project. 2000, 99-106.Google Scholar
  16. Chon KK, Kim KH, Yi J: Development of the revised life stress scale for college students. Korean J Health Psychology. 2000, 5 (2): 316-335.Google Scholar
  17. Kibayashi E, Yokogoshi H, Mizue H, Miura K, Yoshita K, Nakagawa H, Naruse Y, Sokejima S, Kagamimori S: Daily dietary taurine intake in Japan. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2000, 483: 137-142. full_text.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bouchoucha M, Devroede G, Faye A, Le Toumelin P, Arhan P, Arsac M: Colonic response to food in constipation. International journal of colorectal disease. 2006, 21 (8): 826-833. 10.1007/s00384-005-0787-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Roma E, Adamidis D, Nikolara R, Constantopoulos A, Messaritakis J: Diet and chronic constipation in children: the role of fiber. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999, 28 (2): 169-174. 10.1097/00005176-199902000-00015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cummings J: Dietary fibre. British Medical Journal. 1973, 14 (1): 69-Google Scholar
  21. Murakami K, Sasaki S, Okubo H, Takahasi Y, Hoso Y, Itabishi M: Food intake and functional constipation: A cross-sectional study of 3,835 Japanese women aged 18-20 years. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2007, 53 (1): 30-36. 10.3177/jnsv.53.30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Murakami K, Sasaki S, Okubo H, Takahashi Y, Hosoi Y, Itabashi M: Association between dietary fiber, water and magnesium intake and functional constipation among young Japanese women. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2006, 61 (5): 616-622.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shariati A, Maceda J, Hale D: High-fiber diet for treatment of constipation in women with pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 111 (4): 908-913. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000308660.48204.7f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chan A, Leung G, Tong T, Wong N: Increasing dietary fiber intake in terms of kiwifruit improves constipation in Chinese patients. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2007, 13 (35): 4771-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chan A, Cheng C, Hui W, Hu W, Wong N, Lam K, Wong W, Lai K, Lam S, Wong B: Differing coping mechanisms, stress level and anorectal physiology in patients with functional constipation. World J Gastroenterol. 2005, 11 (034): 5362-5366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cheng C, Chan A, Hui W, Lam S: Coping strategies, illness perception, anxiety, and depression of patients with idiopathic constipation: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2003, 124 (4): A528-10.1016/S0016-5085(03)82673-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Oliver G, Wardle J, Gibson E: Stress and food choice: a laboratory study. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2000, 62 (6): 853-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sims R, Gordon S, Garcia W, Clark E, Monye D, Callender C, Campbell A: Perceived stress and eating behaviors in a community-based sample of African Americans. Eating behaviors. 2008, 9 (2): 137-142. 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2007.06.006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Oliver G, Wardle J: Perceived effects of stress on food choice. Physiol Behav. 1999, 66 (3): 511-515. 10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00322-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Torres S, Nowson C: Relationship between stress, eating behavior, and obesity. Nutrition. 2007, 23 (11-12): 887-894. 10.1016/j.nut.2007.08.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Santos J, Benjamin M, Yang P, Prior T, Perdue M: Chronic stress impairs rat growth and jejunal epithelial barrier function: role of mast cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000, 278 (6): G847-G854.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

Journal of Biomedical Science

ISSN: 1423-0127