Sufficient virus-neutralizing antibody in the central nerve system improves the survival of rabid rats
© Pi-Hung et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 April 2012
Accepted: 13 June 2012
Published: 26 June 2012
Rabies is known to be lethal in human. Treatment with passive immunity for the rabies is effective only when the patients have not shown the central nerve system (CNS) signs. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a complex functional barrier that may compromise the therapeutic development in neurological diseases. The goal of this study is to determine the change of BBB integrity and to assess the therapeutic possibility of enhancing BBB permeability combined with passive immunity in the late stage of rabies virus infection.
The integrity of BBB permeability in rats was measured by quantitative ELISA for total IgG and albumin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and by exogenously applying Evans blue as a tracer. Western blotting of occludin and ZO-1, two tight junction proteins, was used to assess the molecular change of BBB structure.
The breakdown of BBB with hypertonic arabinose, recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alpha (rTNF-γ), and focused ultrasound (FUS) were used to compare the extent of BBB disruption with rabies virus infection. Specific humoral immunity was analyzed by immunofluorescent assay and rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. Virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) 8-10E was administered to rats with hypertonic breakdown of BBB as a passive immunotherapy to prevent the death from rabies.
The BBB permeability was altered on day 7 post-infection. Increased BBB permeability induced by rabies virus infection was observed primarily in the cerebellum and spinal cord. Occludin was significantly decreased in both the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. The rabies virus-specific antibody was not strongly elicited even in the presence of clinical signs. Disruption of BBB had no direct association with the lethal outcome of rabies. Passive immunotherapy with virus-neutralizing mAb 8-10E with the hypertonic breakdown of BBB prolonged the survival of rabies virus-infected rats.
We demonstrated that the BBB permeability was altered in a rat model with rabies virus inoculation. Delivery of neutralizing mAb to the infected site in brain combined with effective breakdown of BBB could be an aggressive but feasible therapeutic mode in rabies when the CNS infection has been established.
Rabies is a highly lethal disease caused by a neurotrophic rabies virus. It has been estimated that about 55,000 persons died from rabies each year. In spite of the prevalence occurred primarily in Africa and Asia, the disease exists globally . Vaccines have been well developed for the prophylaxis of the disease. When individuals are infected with rabies, early post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) treatment may avoid death. Unfortunately, the PEP treatment is deemed ineffective once the clinical signs have appeared [2, 3]. The mortality is almost 100% once clinical signs were observed, although few cases can survive successfully after the onset of symptoms [4–8]. Because specialized blood–brain barrier (BBB) can protect the CNS from a variety of injuries, it is reasonable to assume that exclusion of immune cells or mediators from entering the CNS may lead to a lethal outcome.
Recently, it had been reported that the BBB was more permeable in mice infected with laboratory-attenuated CVS-F3 than mice infected with silver-haired bat rabies virus (SHBRV) [9, 10]. The survival of SHBRV infected mice was improved by enhancing the inflammatory response and the delivery of immune effectors into the CNS [9, 10]. These studies suggested that the failure of increasing BBB permeability may promote the disease development in the pathogenic rabies virus-infected mice. Nevertheless, increasing levels of total protein, blood cells count and rabies virus-specific immunoglobulin in the CSF of patients infected with pathogenic rabies virus have been reported [7, 8, 11–13]. Neuroimaging showed abnormality of brainstem, thalamus, hypothalamus, hippocampus and basal ganglia, and subcortical and deep white matter in some patients diagnosed with rabies [12, 14, 15]. These clinical findings implied the possibility of the BBB dysfunction in human rabies. Whether alterations in the BBB permeability could merely exist in attenuated but not pathogenic strain or enhancement of the BBB permeability could prevent disease progression after rabies virus infection is not completely understood.
In the present study, we determined the BBB permeability and assessed the correlation between BBB integrity and fatality in a rat model infected with pathogenic rabies virus isolated from a dog-bite patient. Further, we used passive immunotherapy with virus-neutralizing mAb with BBB disruption to assess the practicability of this therapeutic strategy in the late stage of rabies.
Animals, virus and mAb treatment
Eight- to ten-week-old male LEW/SsNNarl (LEW) rats were purchased from National Laboratory Animal Center, Taipei, Taiwan. They were infected via gastrocnemius muscle inoculation with 2 × 106 f.f.u. (focus-forming units) rabies virus (Genotype 1; Accession AY431027, originally from a rabid dog) in 100 μl phosphate buffer saline (PBS); control animals received the same volume of PBS. The animals were monitored twice daily and euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (150 mg/kg). In passive immunity studies, the rats were injected with rabies virus glycoprotein-specific, neutralizing mAb 8-10E (IgG1κ, 1,800 IU/ml, generated at our laboratory) or with normal saline alone at the indicated time. All procedures were carried out according to the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tzu-Chi University.
Serial collection of CSF from rats
The surgery was performed according to pervious studies with minor modifications [16, 17]. Briefly, rats were anaesthetized with ketamine (80–100 mg/kg) and xylazine (5–10 mg/kg) and immobilized on a stereotaxic frame (model 51600, Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL, USA) with self-made swivel mounts (15 cm). The skin overlying the occipital bone was incised and the underlying tissue was prepared as such that the atlanto-occipital membrane in between the occipital bone and the upper cervical vertebral was exposed. The cannula was made of polyethylene tubing (PE-10). A hole was drilled through the occipital bone, and the tube was allowed to enter the cisterna magna. The tubing was occluded with a blunt 27 G needle to prevent the escaping of the CSF. The cannula was further attached to the skull using dental cement (Lang Dental MFG, Chicago, IL, USA). The CSF samples (25–50 μl) were collected and stored at −80°C until analysis.
Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and albumin in the CSF and serum were quantitated by sandwich ELISA using commercial kits (Bethyl Laboratories, Mongomery, TX, USA). Total IgG and albumin concentrations were measured in duplicate.
Evans blue staining
BBB permeability was quantitatively evaluated by measuring the amount of extravasated Evans blue (EB, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). EB (2%, 4 ml/kg body) was injected intravenously and allowed to circulate for 1 h . After washing with normal saline, the brains were removed, weighted, and homogenized in 50% trichloroacetic acid and centrifuged for 20 min at 13,000 rpm (5415R, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The absorption of the supernatant was measured at 620 nm with a spectrophotometer (DU-7400, Beckman Coulter, CA, USA). The concentration of EB dye was calculated using a standard curve.
Western blotting analysis
Conventional Western blotting was used. Briefly, brain samples were homogenized in ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation (RIPA) buffer, supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany). The homogenates were centrifuged and protein concentrations of the supernatants were determined using a Pierce protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Equal amounts of protein (80 μg) were loaded onto 7.5% or 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacylamide gel, transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membrane was then blocked with 5% nonfat milk and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. The primary antibodies and concentrations used were as follows: rabbit polyclonal anti-occludin (Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA, USA, 1:200), rabbit polyclonal anti-ZO-1 (Zymed Laboratories, USA, 1:200), and mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA, 1:5000). Following washing and incubation with the secondary antibody (Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA, 1:2000) for 60 min at room temperature, the membranes were then probed with chemiluminescence reagents using a commercially available kit (ECL Plus Western blotting detection system, Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) to visualize the signals, followed by exposure to X-ray films (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). Intensities of the band were quantified with a densitometric analysis system (GS-800 Calibrated Densitometer, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and calculated as the optical density x area of band.
Disruption of BBB permeability
Three methods were use to disrupt the BBB permeability. Hyperosmotic solution and TNF-α were performed as described previously [19–21]. Briefly, rats were anesthetized with ketamine (80–100 mg/kg) and xylazine (5–10 mg/kg), and infused via carotid artery with 1.6 M arabinose (0.12 ml/sec, constant for 30 sec) or 106 IU human recombinant TNF-α protein (Peprotech Inc, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). FUS treatment was described previously [22, 23]. SonoVue® SF6-coated ultrasound microbubbles (2–5 mm mean diameter, 1.5 mg/kg; Bracco Diagnostics Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA) were administered intravenously by continuous injection with 0.2 ml saline solution containing 0.1 ml heparin by a micropump (0.6 ml/min). Moderate ultrasound power (4.3 W, equivalent to a pressure of 0.4 MPa) was delivered to the brain with the center of the focal zone positioned at a penetration depth of 2–3 mm. In order to increase the BBB permeability of entire half brain, multiple exposures were carried out to completely cover the hemisphere. Animals typically underwent 3 sonications, with the spacing between individual adjacent focal positions set to 3 mm. In each sonication, burst mode ultrasound was delivered with the following parameters: burst length = 10 ms, pulse repetitive frequency = 2 Hz, and sonication duration = 1 min.
Measurement of serum and CSF antibody titers
Levels of rabies virus-specific total IgG from rats infected with rabies virus as well as uninfected control groups were measured by indirect immunofluorescent assay (IFA). The titer was defined as the reciprocal of the highest dilution factor of test samples in which 50% or more of the fields examined contained specifically fluorescing cells. Virus-neutralizing antibody (VNA) titers were determined by the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) as previously described [24, 25]. The VNA titer was determined as the last dilution of serum that was capable of reducing the number of FFU by 50%.
Passive immunotherapy with BBB opening
Experiments were divided into two parts: (1) for the passive immunotherapy alone, the rabies virus-infected rats were intraperitoneally administrated 10 mg mAb 8-10E, and (2) for the passive immunotherapy combined with BBB opening (BBBO), mAb 8-10E was administered 6 hrs before BBB disruption. The studies were carried out on day 7 and day 9 post-infection (p.i.). The rats were continually observed to day 40 p.i. and then euthanized for analysis.
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis
Total RNA was extracted from the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and spinal cord of rabies virus infected and control rats using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The nucleoprotein (N) gene of rabies virus was amplified by one-step RT-PCR. The nucleotide sequences of the primers used for PCR are forward primer, 5'- CTACAATGGATGCCGAC-3' and reverse primer, 5'-TCATAACGGAGAGATCGCCAC-3'. RT-PCR was performed with 4 μl of RNA (0.2-0.4 μg) and the OneStep RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacture’s instructions. Each reaction mixture was incubated at 50°C for 30 min, followed by 40 cycles at 94°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 10 min. Equal amounts of amplified PCR products were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide. The bands were visualized under UV light and photographed.
All data were expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA was used to compare means between experimental groups. Student’s t-test was used to determine the significance between groups. The survival rate was analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank statistics were used to test the difference between groups. The GraphPad Prism statistical package, version 5.0c (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used for comparison. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Rabies viral antigens were detected in the CNS of LEW rats after challenge
Clinical signs of rabies infection appeared on day 9–10 p.i.. Unsteady gait and hunched back were observed in the beginning, swimming movement, slow motion, and limbs paralysis in the late stage. Rats died from the infection within 2 to 4 days once the neural signs were observed. The viral genome was detected by IFA, RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry on day 5 p.i. in the brain and spread out within the next 2 days (data not shown).
BBB permeability was disrupted after rabies virus challenge
BBB permeability alterations were observed in the cerebellum and spinal cord with EB staining
Tight junction protein occludin was degraded after rabies virus infection
The extent of BBB opening via hypertonic solution, TNF-α or FUS treatment
BBB opening was not the primary determinant for lethality of rabies virus infection
Specific anti-rabies virus antibody of the CNS tissue was not detected in the CSF and was lower in peripheral sera
Rabid rats survived longer when the virus-neutralizing mAb entered the CNS
The BBB is a functional and structural component of the CNS vasculature that serves important protective functions for the CNS. Many clinical symptoms, immune responses, pathological changes and disease outcome in neurodegeneration or infectious diseases have been associated with the BBB permeability . Alterations of BBB permeability have been reported after pathogenic rabies virus infection in human. Elevation of immune cells and leakage of serum components from circulation could be detected in some patients suffered from rabies [7, 8, 11–13]. In the present study, we demonstrated that the BBB permeability was altered after pathogenic rabies virus infection in a rat model, which was not consistent with previous studies in mice [9, 10]. It could be speculated that in some animals, like laboratory rats, the BBB integrity indeed may be changed after pathogenic rabies virus infection.
Serial sampling of CSF from rabies virus-infected rats presents a dynamic change of the BBB permeability. We found that serum proteins, albumin and total IgG, were elevated on day 7 p.i. and increased further afterwards. Our preliminary study showed that the rabies virus could retrogradely replicate in the brain tissues on day 5 p.i. and clinical symptoms were observed on day 9 p.i.. We postulate that the initiation of the BBB opening was behind the replication of rabies virus in the CNS but prior to the appearance of clinical signs. Further, we also demonstrated that the disruption of BBB could allow macromolecular markers, e.g., albumin and IgG, to leak into the CNS. This result was substantiated by the Evans blue staining. The greater permeability was seen in the spinal cord and cerebellum compared with the cerebral cortex on day 10 to 11 p.i.. This similar regional difference was reported also in the attenuated CVS-F3 study in mice . Together, these observations indicate that pathogenic rabies virus infection in the nervous tissues could allow the serum proteins passing through the BBB and loss of BBB integrity was more extensive to molecules from 66 to 150 kDa in the cerebellum and spinal cord than the cerebral cortex in rats.
Tight junction proteins, the essential components of the BBB, are the primary barrier to maintain the brain homeostasis . Alterations of tight junction protein expression and discontinuous cell junctions have been demonstrated in several CNS diseases, including trauma, cerebral infarction, multiple sclerosis, viral infection, and neurodegeneration [28–31]. Our analysis of major tight junction proteins revealed a unique susceptibility of occludin but not ZO-1 after rabies virus infection in both the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. Decreased expression of occludin leads to increased BBB permeability [32–34]. These findings are consistent with our present study demonstrating that the decreased expression of occludin is accompanied by BBB hyperpermeability in rabies virus-infected rats. Our findings indicate that rabies virus infection could trigger the BBB disruption. Nevertheless, other tight junction proteins, such as claudins and junctional adhesion molecule also contribute structurally to the formation of BBB [34, 35]. These proteins may participate in the rabies mediated changes of BBB permeability. However, more investigations are needed to clarify its role.
According to the results of quantitative ELISA and Evans blue study, the rabies virus infection induced BBB leakage of macromolecules was restricted to the cerebellum and spinal cord. We compared hypertonic arabinose, TNF-α, and FUS to find out which method could enhance greater BBB disruption and allow more macromolecules, such as IgG, to enter the brain. Intracarotid infusion of a hypertonic solution caused a transient and reversible shrinkage of the endothelial cells and opening of the endothelial tight junctions and increasing the delivery of antineoplastic agents, neutralizing antibodies, mAbs, nanoparticles and viral vectors into the CNS [36–40]. Intracarotid and intracerebral rTNF-α administration could result in BBB opening for different tracers, such as sodium fluorescein, horseradish peroxidase, albumin, and endogenous IgG [41, 42]. FUS combined with microbubbles has been shown to be capable of BBB opening, and it improved the delivery of anti-tumor compounds and antibodies into the brain [43, 44]. We found that FUS and hypertonic arabinose could effectively open the BBB and raise the concentrations of macromolecules detected in the CSF. In contrast, exogenous rTNF-α injection did not induce BBB leakage for large molecules and even inhibited BBB permeability. However, we could not exclude the possibility that small molecules may pass through the BBB.
Although BBB permeability was changed after rabies virus infection, the mortality was not altered. This is mainly resulted from the insufficient titer of neutralization antibody for rabies virus, which was substantiated by the finding of lower levels of virus-specific and neutralizating antibody in the sera and the CSF. This result is similar to human naturally infected with rabies virus. They do not receive PEP and generally do not mount a strong immune response to rabies relatively late in the disease [7, 45]. VNA can be detected in the sera and CSF, but the titers are usually relatively low [7, 12]. Insufficient antibodies could not provide appropriate protection in peripheral and central nervous tissues. It is surmised that enhancing the BBB permeability without a concomitant increase of antibodies in the CNS would be futile to protect against the lethality after rabies virus infection. In this regard, it is important to note that delivery of high levels of virus-neutralizing mAb to the CNS tissues should diminish lethality and clear rabies virus.
It has also been reported that exogenous neutralizing antibodies accompanied with the enhancement of BBB permeability can raise the survival more than the administration of monoclonal antibodies alone [46, 47]. In our study, PEP treatment using virus-neutralizing mAb 8-10E combined with BBB disruption elevated the survival in LEW rats inoculated with rabies virus on day 7 p.i., however; the effect was diminished on day 9 p.i.. One possible explanation may be that the adverse effects of osmotic infusion, such as seizures, reinforce damage to the brain already exhibiting neuronal dysfunction . It is surprising to note that neutralizing mAb 8-10E treatment alone increased the survival rate by 33.3% and 28.6%. respectively, on day 7 and 9 p.i. We hypothesize that administration of sufficient neutralizing mAbs into the CNS could rescue the rats from rabies-induced lethality and early treatment with mAb also increase survival rate.
Until now, besides the success of the Wisconsin’s patient treated with the Milwaukee Protocol, several others have employed similar treatment regimens with minimal beneficial outcomes [6, 49–51]. Although a fraction of rabies virus-infected rats could be saved with passive neutralizing mAb treatment, whether greater improvement could be achieved with immune therapy needs more studies. In future development, a passively administrated mAb or such a humanized mAb combined with effective and global BBB breakdown may provide an alternative therapy for rescuing patients who have been diagnosed with rabies.
The present study revealed that BBB permeability was altered after pathogenic rabies virus infection in rats. Sufficient virus-neutralizing antibody plays a major role in determining the survival from rabies virus infection. Our study indicates that enhancing BBB opening combined with delivering sufficient virus-neutralizing mAb to the brain may provide an effective treatment when the CNS infection has been established.
This work was supported by Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital grants TCRD97-12, TCRD98-03, TCSP-9803, and TCSP-9903.
- WHO: Expert Consultation on rabies. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2005, 931: 1-88. back coverGoogle Scholar
- Jackson AC: Therapy of rabies encephalitis. Biomedica. 2009, 29: 169-176.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nigg AJ, Walker PL: Overview, prevention, and treatment of rabies. Pharmacotherapy. 2009, 29: 1182-1195. 10.1592/phco.29.10.1182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDermid RC, Saxinger L, Lee B, Johnstone J, Gibney RT, Johnson M, Bagshaw SM: Human rabies encephalitis following bat exposure: failure of therapeutic coma. CMAJ. 2008, 178: 557-561. 10.1503/cmaj.071326.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmiedel S, Panning M, Lohse A, Kreymann KG, Gerloff C, Burchard G, Drosten C, Schmiedel S, Panning M, Lohse A, Kreymann KG, Gerloff C, Burchard G, Drosten C: Case report on fatal human rabies infection in Hamburg, Germany, March 2007. Euro Surveill. 2007, 12: E070531-E070535.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hemachudha T, Sunsaneewitayakul B, Desudchit T, Suankratay C, Sittipunt C, Wacharapluesadee S, Khawplod P, Wilde H, Jackson AC: Failure of therapeutic coma and ketamine for therapy of human rabies. J Neurovirol. 2006, 12: 407-409. 10.1080/13550280600902295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Human rabies--Indiana and California. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007, 56: 361-365.Google Scholar
- Willoughby RE, Tieves KS, Hoffman GM, Ghanayem NS, Amlie-Lefond CM, Schwabe MJ, Chusid MJ, Rupprecht CE: Survival after treatment of rabies with induction of coma. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 2508-2514. 10.1056/NEJMoa050382.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roy A, Hooper DC: Lethal silver-haired bat rabies virus infection can be prevented by opening the blood–brain barrier. J Virol. 2007, 81: 7993-7998. 10.1128/JVI.00710-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roy A, Phares TW, Koprowski H, Hooper DC: Failure to open the blood–brain barrier and deliver immune effectors to central nervous system tissues leads to the lethal outcome of silver-haired bat rabies virus infection. J Virol. 2007, 81: 1110-1118. 10.1128/JVI.01964-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Human rabies--Tennessee. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002, 51: 828-829.Google Scholar
- Human rabies--Minnesota. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008, 57: 460-462.Google Scholar
- Despond O, Tucci M, Decaluwe H, Gregoire MC, S Teitelbaum J, Turgeon N: Rabies in a nine-year-old child: The myth of the bite. Can J Infect Dis. 2002, 13: 121-125.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laothamatas J, Hemachudha T, Mitrabhakdi E, Wannakrairot P, Tulayadaechanont S: MR imaging in human rabies. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003, 24: 1102-1109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Awasthi M, Parmar H, Patankar T, Castillo M: Imaging findings in rabies encephalitis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001, 22: 677-680.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang YL, Saljo A, Suneson A, Hansson HA: A new approach for multiple sampling of cisternal cerebrospinal fluid in rodents with minimal trauma and inflammation. J Neurosci Methods. 1995, 63: 13-22. 10.1016/0165-0270(95)00080-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van den Berg MP, Romeijn SG, Verhoef JC, Merkus FW: Serial cerebrospinal fluid sampling in a rat model to study drug uptake from the nasal cavity. J Neurosci Methods. 2002, 116: 99-107. 10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00033-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Esen F, Erdem T, Aktan D, Orhan M, Kaya M, Eraksoy H, Cakar N, Telci L: Effect of magnesium sulfate administration on blood–brain barrier in a rat model of intraperitoneal sepsis: a randomized controlled experimental study. Crit Care. 2005, 9: R18-R23. 10.1186/cc3004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rapoport SI, Fredericks WR, Ohno K, Pettigrew KD: Quantitative aspects of reversible osmotic opening of the blood–brain barrier. Am J Physiol. 1980, 238: R421-R431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson PJ, Rapoport SI: Size selectivity of blood–brain barrier permeability at various times after osmotic opening. Am J Physiol. 1987, 253: R459-R466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rapoport SI: Osmotic opening of the blood–brain barrier: principles, mechanism, and therapeutic applications. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2000, 20: 217-230. 10.1023/A:1007049806660.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu HL, Wai YY, Hsu PH, Lyu LA, Wu JS, Shen CR, Chen JC, Yen TC, Wang JJ: In vivo assessment of macrophage CNS infiltration during disruption of the blood–brain barrier with focused ultrasound: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Cerebral Blood Flow Metab. 2010, 30: 674-10.1038/jcbfm.2009.251.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu HL, Hua MY, Yang HW, Huang CY, Chu PC, Wu JS, Tseng IC, Wang JJ, Yen TC, Chen PY, Wei KC: Magnetic resonance monitoring of focused ultrasound/magnetic nanoparticle targeting delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 15205-15210. 10.1073/pnas.1003388107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zalan E, Wilson C, Pukitis D: A microtest for the quantitation of rabies virus neutralizing antibodies. J Biol Stand. 1979, 7: 213-220. 10.1016/S0092-1157(79)80024-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith JS, Yager PA, Baer GM: A rapid reproducible test for determining rabies neutralizing antibody. Bull World Health Organ. 1973, 48: 535-541.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hawkins BT, Davis TP: The blood–brain barrier/neurovascular unit in health and disease. Pharmacol Rev. 2005, 57: 173-185. 10.1124/pr.57.2.4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phares TW, Kean RB, Mikheeva T, Hooper DC: Regional differences in blood–brain barrier permeability changes and inflammation in the apathogenic clearance of virus from the central nervous system. J Immunol. 2006, 176: 7666-7675.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dallasta LM, Pisarov LA, Esplen JE, Werley JV, Moses AV, Nelson JA, Achim CL: Blood–brain barrier tight junction disruption in human immunodeficiency virus-1 encephalitis. Am J Pathoy. 1999, 155: 1915-1927. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65511-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ng I, Yap E, Tan WL, Kong NY: Blood–brain barrier disruption following traumatic brain injury: roles of tight junction proteins. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2003, 32 (Suppl 5): S63-S66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirk J, Plumb J, Mirakhur M, McQuaid S: Tight junctional abnormality in multiple sclerosis white matter affects all calibres of vessel and is associated with blood–brain barrier leakage and active demyelination. J Pathog. 2003, 201: 319-327.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mark KS, Davis TP: Cerebral microvascular changes in permeability and tight junctions induced by hypoxia-reoxygenation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002, 282: H1485-H1494.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brooks TA, Hawkins BT, Huber JD, Egleton RD, Davis TP: Chronic inflammatory pain leads to increased blood–brain barrier permeability and tight junction protein alterations. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005, 289: H738-H743. 10.1152/ajpheart.01288.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishioku T, Yamauchi A, Takata F, Watanabe T, Furusho K, Shuto H, Dohgu S, Kataoka Y: Disruption of the blood–brain barrier in collagen-induced arthritic mice. Neurosci Lett. 2010, 482: 208-211. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nusrat A, Turner JR, Madara JL: Molecular physiology and pathophysiology of tight junctions. IV. Regulation of tight junctions by extracellular stimuli: nutrients, cytokines, and immune cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000, 279: G851-G857.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huber JD, Egleton RD, Davis TP: Molecular physiology and pathophysiology of tight junctions in the blood–brain barrier. Trends Neurosci. 2001, 24: 719-725. 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)02004-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blanchette M, Fortin D: Blood–brain barrier disruption in the treatment of brain tumors. Methods Mol Biol. 2011, 686: 447-463. 10.1007/978-1-60761-938-3_23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rapoport SI: Advances in osmotic opening of the blood–brain barrier to enhance CNS chemotherapy. Expert opin investigat drugs. 2001, 10: 1809-1818. 10.1517/135437188.8.131.529.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rousseau V, Denizot B, Pouliquen D, Jallet P, Le Jeune JJ: Investigation of blood–brain barrier permeability to magnetite-dextran nanoparticles (MD3) after osmotic disruption in rats. MAGMA. 1997, 5: 213-222. 10.1007/BF02594584.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nilaver G, Muldoon LL, Kroll RA, Pagel MA, Breakefield XO, Davidson BL, Neuwelt EA: Delivery of herpesvirus and adenovirus to nude rat intracerebral tumors after osmotic blood–brain barrier disruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92: 9829-9833. 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9829.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hicks JT, Albrecht P, Rapoport SI: Entry of neutralizing antibody to measles into brain and cerebrospinal fluid of immunized monkeys after osmotic opening of the blood–brain barrier. Exp Neurol. 1976, 53: 768-779. 10.1016/0014-4886(76)90154-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abraham CS, Deli MA, Joo F, Megyeri P, Torpier G: Intracarotid tumor necrosis factor-alpha administration increases the blood–brain barrier permeability in cerebral cortex of the newborn pig: quantitative aspects of double-labelling studies and confocal laser scanning analysis. Neurosci Lett. 1996, 208: 85-88. 10.1016/0304-3940(96)12546-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wright JL, Merchant RE: Blood–brain barrier changes following intracerebral injection of human recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the rat. J Neuro-oncol. 1994, 20: 17-25. 10.1007/BF01057957.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kinoshita M, McDannold N, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K: Targeted delivery of antibodies through the blood–brain barrier by MRI-guided focused ultrasound. Bioche Biophys Res Comm. 2006, 340: 1085-1090. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.12.112.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kinoshita M, McDannold N, Jolesz FA, Hynynen K: Noninvasive localized delivery of Herceptin to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood–brain barrier disruption. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 11719-11723. 10.1073/pnas.0604318103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Human rabies--Mississippi, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006, 55: 207-208.Google Scholar
- Neuwelt EA, Barnett PA, Hellstrom I, Hellstrom KE, Beaumier P, McCormick CI, Weigel RM: Delivery of melanoma-associated immunoglobulin monoclonal antibody and Fab fragments to normal brain utilizing osmotic blood–brain barrier disruption. Cancer Res. 1988, 48: 4725-4729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boockvar JA, Tsiouris AJ, Hofstetter CP, Kovanlikaya I, Fralin S, Kesavabhotla K, Seedial SM, Pannullo SC, Schwartz TH, Stieg P, Zimmerman RD, Knopman J, Scheff RJ, Christos P, Vallabhajosula S, Riina HA: Safety and maximum tolerated dose of superselective intraarterial cerebral infusion of bevacizumab after osmotic blood–brain barrier disruption for recurrent malignant glioma. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011, 114: 624-632.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bellavance MA, Blanchette M, Fortin D: Recent advances in blood–brain barrier disruption as a CNS delivery strategy. AAPS J. 2008, 10: 166-177. 10.1208/s12248-008-9018-7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jackson AC: Rabies in the critical care unit: diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Can J Neurol Sci. 2011, 38: 689-695.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hunter M, Johnson N, Hedderwick S, McCaughey C, Lowry K, McConville J, Herron B, McQuaid S, Marston D, Goddard T, Harkess G, Goharriz H, Voller K, Solomon T, Willoughby RE, Fooks AR: Immunovirological correlates in human rabies treated with therapeutic coma. J Med Virol. 2010, 82: 1255-1265. 10.1002/jmv.21785.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Badillo R, Mantilla JC, Pradilla G: Human rabies encephalitis by a vampire bat bite in an urban area of Colombia. Biomedica. 2009, 29: 191-203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.