- Open Access
Excessive Dpp signaling induces cardial apoptosis through dTAK1 and dJNK during late embryogenesis of Drosophila
© Yang and Su; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 21 June 2011
- Accepted: 24 November 2011
- Published: 24 November 2011
To identify genes involved in the heart development of Drosophila, we found that embryos lacking raw function exhibited cardial phenotypes. raw was initially identified as a dorsal open group gene. The dorsal open phenotype was demonstrated to be resulted from the aberrant expression of decapentaplegic (dpp), a member of the tumor growth factor beta (TGF-β), signaling pathway. Despite the role of dpp in pattering cardioblasts during early embryogenesis of Drosophila have been demonstrated, how mutation in raw and/or excessive dpp signaling involves in the differentiating heart of Drosophila has not been fully elaborated at late stages.
We show that raw mutation produced a mild overspecification of cardial cells at stage 14, but these overproduced cells were mostly eliminated in late mutant embryos due to apoptosis. Aberrant dpp signaling is likely to contribute to the cardial phenotype found in raw mutants, because expression of dpp or constitutively activated thickven (tkv CA ), the type I receptor of Dpp, induced a raw-like phenotype. Additionally, we show that dpp induced non-autonomous apoptosis through TGFβ activated kinase 1 (TAK1), because mis-expression of a dominant negative form of Drosophila TAK1 (dTAK1 DN ) was able to suppress cell death in raw mutants or embryos overexpressing dpp. Importantly, we demonstrated that dpp induce its own expression through dTAK1, which also leads to the hyperactivation of Drosophila JNK (DJNK). The hyperactivated DJNK was attributed to be the cause of Dpp/DTAK1-induced apoptosis because overexpression of a dominant negative DJNK, basket (bsk DN ), suppressed cell death induced by Dpp or DTAK1. Moreover, targeted overexpression of the anti-apoptotic P35 protein, or a dominant negative proapoptotic P53 (P53DN) protein blocked Dpp/DTAK1-induced apoptosis, and rescued heart cells under the raw mutation background.
We find that ectopic Dpp led to DJNK-dependent cardial apoptosis through the non-canonical TGF-β pathway during late embryogenesis of Drosophila. This certainly will increase our understanding of the pathogenesis of cardiomyopathy, because haemodynamic overload can up-regulate TGF-β and death of cardiomyocytes is observed in virtually every myocardial disease. Thus, our study may provide possible medical intervention for human cardiomyopathy.
- Heart Cell
- Mutant Embryo
- Dorsal Mesoderm
- Dorsal Ectoderm
- Pericardial Cell
The Drosophila heart is a simple tubular organ located at the dorsal midline beneath the epidermis, and it is therefore alternatively termed the dorsal vessel. The fly heart consists of two major cell types, myocardial cells and pericardial cells, which arise from two bilateral rows of cardiac primordia at the leading edge of the migrating mesoderm. The contractile myocardial cells which form the lumen are arranged in a segmental repeat comprised of six cells per hemisegment in the mature embryonic heart. The pericardial cells, which are essential for normal cardiac function, are aligned alongside the myocardial cells. Despite its simple structure, fly heart has recently emerged as an excellent model system for dissecting the complex pathway that determines cardiogenic cell fate, and for investigating the physiologic function of the adult heart [1, 2].
Extensive study has revealed that a combinatory action of extrinsic signaling and intrinsic transcription network is required for correct specification of cardial precursors and differentiation of mature heart (reviewed in ). Of all external signalings, Dpp, a member of the mammalian Transforming growth factor superfamily (TGF-β), has been shown to play a pivotal role during cardiogenesis of Drosophila . The cardiogenic function of Dpp begins when it is expressed in the dorsal epidermis in a broad band along the anterior-posterior axis during germ band extension in Drosophila . This spatiotemporal pattern of Dpp specifies the underling dorsal mesodermal cell fate by maintaining the expression of the transcription factor, tinman (tin) [4, 6–8]. Dpp also regulates the expression of several other cardiogenic transcription factors, including pannier (pnr) and dorsocross (doc) [9, 10]. For further specification of the cardiogenic mesoderm, Wg signaling together with the combinatorial action of several transcription factors, including tin, pnr, doc and tailup, are required [11–20]. Around stage 10, Dpp expression in the dorsal ectoderm vanishes briefly, but reappears in the leading edge (LE) cells of the dorsal ectoderm at stage 11. This second round of Dpp expression in LE cells persists through stage 17 . Interestingly, pMad, the activated Dpp signal transducer, can be detected in a subset of cardial progenitors in stages 12 to 14 . This indicates that a second round of Dpp activity is required for further differentiation of Drosophila heart. Indeed, dpp mutants with alleles that affect the expression of Dpp in LE cells have impaired embryonic heart development and larval cardiac function [23, 24]. These findings indicate a biphasic requirement for Dpp during cardiogenesis of Drosophila, in which it is required early for dorsal mesoderm patterning and later for differentiating heart cells.
Dpp regulates many developmental processes, including cell fate determination, alteration of cell shape, proliferation, and apoptosis. Morphogenic function of Dpp in cell fate determination has been shown to be mediated through the canonical pathway, in which it interacts with a type I receptor, Tkv, and a type II receptor, Punt. Upon formation of ligand-receptor complex, activated Punt phosphorylates Mad, which subsequently interacts with Medea. The resultant complex containing pMad, and Medea is then translocated into the nucleus where it activates transcription of Dpp target genes . Other than the canonical pathway, it has been found that mammalian Dpp homolog, TGF-β transduce its signaling that is independent of Smad, a homolog of Drosophila pMad. The Smad-independent pathway is designated as the non-canonical TGF-β pathway. In the non-canonical pathway, TGF-β activated kinase 1 (TAK1) forms a multiple protein complex protein complex with TRAF6, TAB2, and TAB3. Upon binding of TGF-β to its receptor, TRAF6 exerts its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity together with ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes to catalyze Lys63-linked polyubiquitination. Subsequently, the Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chain associates with TAB2 which leads to autophosphorylation and activation of TAK1 [26, 27]. Despite it is less clear in Drosophila, many functionally-conserved non-canonical signaling transducers, including DTAK1 and TAB2, have been identified in Drosophila [28, 29]. Moreover, Dpp signaling has also been shown to control the viability of cells. A lack of Dpp signaling activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-dependent apoptosis in wing discs . Interestingly, Dpp is also likely to function as a pro-apoptotic signal because increased Dpp activity leads to both non-autonomous JNK activation and cell death . However, the link between Dpp signaling and JNK-mediated apoptosis is currently unclear in Drosophila.
Dpp is a downstream target of the JNK pathway, a conserved and pleiotropic signaling system whose function governs many different biological activities, including morphogenesis, differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis. Components of the DJNK pathway, including Djun and Raw, have been shown to participate in Drosophila heart development by modulating the expression of Dpp [14, 16]. In Djun mutant embryos, the expression of dpp is not maintained at dorsal edge, which leads to down-regulation of cardiac tin at later stages . By contrast, pericardial cells are overspecified in raw loss-of-function mutant embryos . The excessive differentiation of cardial cells has been attributed to the ectopic Dpp activity induced by dysregulated DJNK signaling.
In our effort to identify genes involved in the heart development of Drosophila, we observed that embryos lacking raw function exhibited cardial phenotypes, in which heart cells were overspecified in moderately degree during mid-embryogenesis, and that the overproduced heart cells had disappeared at late stages. We show here that the elimination of heart cells in late raw mutant embryos was a result of excessive apoptosis, and ectopic Dpp signaling was responsible for the cardial apoptosis phenotypes of raw mutant embryos. We also found that elevated Dpp can function as a pro-apoptotic signal to promote non-autonomous apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. Importantly, ectopic Dpp auto-regulate its own expression through DTAK1. The autocrine Dpp further enhanced the expression of DJNK and consequently led to P53-dependent cell death. Our study defined a novel pathway which linked ectopic Dpp signaling and DJNK-dependent apoptosis during late cardiogenesis of Drosophila.
Fly stocks and genetics
Fly stocks were raised and crossed at 25°C. Gal4 drivers: Act5C-gal4 (constitutive), 24B-gal4 (mesodermal), and 69B-gal4 (ectodermal) were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center. The svp specific enhancer trap line E2-3-9 has been described . him- GFP, a reporter in which a 2.2 kb genomic fragment spanning the promoter region and 5' untranslated region of him was placed upstream of nuclear green fluorescent protein encoded gene reporter, was used to mark the muscle, cardial and pericardial cells , The dpp- LacZ BS3.0 reporter reflects the transcription of dpp in embryos . raw 1 has been described . UAS-dpp, UAS-bsk, UAS-bsk DN , UAS-p35 ; UAS-p53, UAS-p53 DN , UAS-brk, tkv 7 and tkv CA were also obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center. UAS-tkv-RNAi (102319, obtained from the Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center, VDRC); UAS-dTAK1 and UAS-dTAK1 DN  were gifts from T. Adachi-Yamada. The isogenic w 1118 flies were used as wild-type (WT) controls.
Plasmid construction and generation of transgenic flies
The UAS/Gal4 binary expression system was used to drive the expression of transgenic constructs . For generation of the UAS-raw transgenic construct, the full-length raw cDNA was amplified using pNB3301 (obtained from A. Letsou) as template with a pair of primers (5'-CACCATGAAAACTGAAAGCAGCAGT-3' and 5'-GCAGCGGTCGCGGTTGTTGT-3') by PCR. The amplified DNA fragment was first cloned into a pENTR/D-TOPO vector (Invitrogen), and subsequently into a pTWF vector (The Drosophila Genomics Resource Center). The plasmid construct was confirmed by sequencing before germ-line transformation. The raw-RNA interference construct, UAS-raw-RNAi, was generated by amplification of a 693 bp DNA fragment using the following primers, 5'-GCTCTAGACCTGGAGCGCCAGAGTCTC-3' and 5'-GCTCTAGATGACGAAGAGCAACACTCG-3'. The amplified DNA fragment was digested with Xba I and cloned into the Avr II site of a pWIZ vector. The correct clone was used to clone the same Xba I-digested DNA fragment into the Nhe I site, as described elsewhere . The orientation of the inverted DNA fragment was confirmed by restriction enzyme digestion. Flies carrying transgenic constructs were generated by P- element-mediated germ-line transformation procedure using w 1118 as the parental line .
Total RNA was purified from embryos carrying raw-RNAi transgene driven by Act5C-gal4 driver using Trizol (Invitrogen). 10 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using oligo(dT) primers and SuperScript reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). PCR was performed using raw specific primers (5'-TACCATAAGCACCGCCAGCA-3' and 5'-ATGCGAACTGGCCGAGGATC-3') and rps17 primers (5'-CGAACCAAGACGGTGAAGAAG-3' and 5'-CC TGCAACTTGATGGAGATACC-3'). PCR condition: at 94°C for 2 min, 30 cycles (at 94°C for 30 sec, at 46°C for 30 sec, at 72°C for 1 min), and at 72°C for 7 min.
Cell death detection
Apoptosis was detected by acridine orange (AO) staining or terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL). For AO staining, the same protocol was followed as used elsewhere . Briefly, dechorionated embryos were stained by placing in an equal volume of n-heptane and 1 × PBS containing 5 mg/ml of acridine orange (Sigma) for 5 minutes on a shaking platform. For TUNEL analysis, an in situ cell death kit was used according to the manufacturer's instructions (Roche Applied Science). To detect cardiac apoptosis in embryos, a TUNEL and immunoflourescence double-labeling protocol was followed as described . Stained embryos were mounted either with mineral oil (Sigma) or series 700 Halocarbon oil (Halocarbon Products, Hackensack, NJ). Samples were viewed either with a fluorescence or TCS SP2 confocol microscope (Leica Microsystems).
Immunohiscytochemistry, X-gal staining and cuticle preparation
Immunohistochemical staining was performed as described . Antibodies and dilutions were as follows: Anti-Eve, anti-Wg 4D4 and anti-EC11 (1:10; obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), anti-Tin (1:2000, provided by M. Frasch), anti-LacZ, anti-GFP (1:200, Molecular Probes), and anti-pMad (1:20, Cell Signaling) . Appropriate anti-mouse or anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:200 (Jackson ImmunoResearch). The staining pattern was visualized using the Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories). X-gal staining was performed as described previously with slight modifications . Briefly, collected embryos were dechorionated in 50% bleach for 90 s and fixed in 4% formaldehyde buffered with 1× PBS for 20 min. Fixed embryos were washed briefly and incubated with X-gal staining solution (10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 3 mM K4[Fe(CN)6], 3 mM K3[Fe(CN)6], 0.3% Triton X-100, 0.2% X-gal) at 25°C. Immuno- and X-gal stained embryos were mounted in 50% glycerol. For preparation of cuticle, embryos were fixed in glycerol-acetic acid (1:4) and cleared in Hoyer's medium overnight at 60°C . Stained embryos and cuticle were visualized with a light microscope (Leica DMR A2).
Image acquisition and processing
Epifluorescence images were acquired using a digital camera (CoolSnap 5.0, Photometrics) steered by the Northern Eclipse 6.0 software (EMPIX Imaging, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). When necessary, Z-series of optical or fluorescent images were acquired at 2 μm increments with a piezo-electric motor (LVDT, Physik Instruments). The Helicon Focus program was applied to combine the focused images (Helicon Soft Ltd. Kharkov, Ukraine). All the figures were arranged in Adobe Illustrator CS3 (Adobe Co.).
Loss of raw function impairs heart and muscle development
To further confirm our findings, we used a him-GFP reporter in which a cardial-specific enhancer of him was placed upstream of nuclear GFP . The GFP reporter was expressed in the precursors of both muscle and heart cells at stage 12 and its cardiac expression persisted till late embryogenesis in the differentiated heart cells under the control of tin, while its muscle expression was greatly reduced at stage 14 (Figure 1M and 1N; and M-T. Su unpublished results). We found that the expression of him- GFP was increased in both heart and musculature at stage 14 under the raw mutation background (Figure 1P). Consistent with the above data, cardiac expression of him- GFP decreased significantly in mutant embryos at stage 16 (Figure 1O and 1Q). Taken together, these data show that heart precursors are overspecified during mid-embryogenesis, but are missing in late mutant embryos.
Down-regulation of raw causes cardial apoptosis
Since the embryonic heart of Drosophila is located in the dorsal mesoderm, which was also the region where cell death was present in the raw mutants, we suspected that PCD is the cause of eliminating cardial cell types in the raw mutant. To test this, we double-labeled raw mutant embryos with TUNEL and heart-specific him-GFP reporter (Figure 2I-L). By confocal microscopy analysis, the results showed that many him- GFP expressing cells were co-labeled with TUNEL, indicating that mesodermally-derived tissues did undergo apoptosis (Figure 2I, yellow nuclei surrounded with green cytoplasma). Since the expression of him- GFP was mainly in cardial and muscle cells under raw mutation background at late stages (Figure 1Q), these results indicate that raw mutation does induce death of heart cells. Apart from the him- GFP-expressing cardial and muscle cells, we noticed few unidentified TUNEL-positive cells (Figure 2I, red, arrowheads). Since heart is the major defective tissue in the mesoderm of raw mutant, we have focused our attention on how loss of raw function leads to cardial apoptosis in Drosophila during late embryogenesis.
Function of raw is required in ectoderm
Rescue experiments were also conducted to determine whether raw functions cell-autonomously for the survival of mesodermally-derived tissues. We found that epidermal expression of raw suppressed cardial apoptosis under raw mutant background (Figure 3H). However, mesodermally-overexpressed raw was unable to completely inhibit cardial apoptosis in the raw mutant (Figure 3I, brackets). Additionally, transgenic raw-RNAi construct driven by 69B-gal4, but not 24B-gal4, produced a cardial apoptosis phenotype (Figures 2H, 3J vs. Figure 3K, brackets). These results strongly suggest that ectodermal Raw is sufficient for the proper development of Drosophila.
Raw affects Dpp and Wg signalings
Immunostaining was also used to investigate if Wg signaling is affected by the raw mutation. We found that Wg was expressed in transverse striped domains of the ectoderm along the anteroposterior axis in wild type embryos at stages 13 (Additional File 2, Fig. S2). The expression pattern of Wg was not altered in raw mutants by stage 13. However, the expression level of Wg had significantly decreased in raw mutants at stage 14 (Additional File 2, Fig. S2). At stage 16, residual Wg was detected in the ectoderm of wild-type embryos, but was completely absent in raw mutant embryos (Additional File 2, Fig. S2).
Ectopic Dpp signaling promotes cell death
To investigate if down-regulation of Wg signaling causes cardial apoptosis, we conducted a temperature shift experiment using a temperature-sensitive wg IL114 allele. Inactivation of Wg at 9-15 hr, the time window during which Wg expression is missing in raw mutant embryos, did not cause the cardial apoptosis seen in raw mutant embryos, and overexpression of wg did not suppress the apoptosis phenotype under raw mutation background (Additional File 2, Fig. S2). We thus concluded that defective Wg signaling is not the cause of cardial apoptosis.
Dpp is a secretory protein which can be transduced to the underlying mesoderm. If the apoptotic phenotype is associated with the ectopic Dpp activity, it would expect that mesodermal overexpression of Dpp should replicate the apoptosis phenotypes seen in 69B>dpp embryos. Indeed, mis-expression of dpp in mesoderm using a pan mesodermal driver, 24B-gal4, induced excessive cell death accompanied with elimination of him-GFP-expressing cells during late developmental stages (Additional File 3, Fig. S3). These results suggest that excessive dpp in ectoderm or mesoderm can cause apoptosis and removal of cardial cells.
Dpp transduces its signaling by binding to a heteromeric type I/type II transmembrane serine/threonine kinase receptor complex, encoded by tkv and punt. To further demonstrate that ectopic Dpp signaling is the cause of apoptosis in raw mutants, we targeted overexpression of a constitutively-active form of tkv, tkv CA , using a 24B-gal4 driver (24B> tkv CA ). We found that 24B>tkv CA embryos exhibited the same phenotype as 69B>dpp or 24B> dpp embryos, in which him-GFP-expressing cardial cells were increased in 24B> tkv CA embryos at stage 14 (Figure 5G), while him-GFP-expressing heart and muscle cells were eliminated at stage 16 (Figure 5H). Extensive cell death was also detected throughout 24B> tkv CA embryos (Figure 5L).
In a complementary experiment, we depleted the expression of tkv by RNAi using a transgenic fly carrying inverted repeats corresponding to tkv, under the control of a UAS sequence inducible by 24B-gal4 (24B>tkv-RNAi, Additional file 4, Fig. S4). Down-regulation of mesodermal tkv induced a moderate degree of apoptosis in which the AO-positive cells were randomly distributed in the entire 24B>tkv-RNAi embryos (Figure 5I vs. 5K). A similar pattern of scattered cell death was also detected in loss-of-function of tkv mutant embryos (Figure 5J). These data suggest that Dpp is required for cell survival during embryogenesis in Drosophila. To test whether inhibiting Tkv activity can block excessive Dpp-induced apoptosis, we compared the AO staining pattern in raw, tkv and raw;tkv double mutant embryos. Both tkv and raw;tkv double mutant embryos exhibited the same scattered AO staining pattern, unlike the cardial apoptosis phenotype observed in raw mutant (Figure 2E vs. 5J and 5M). Moreover, mesodermal knockdown of the expression of tkv was able to suppress cardial apoptosis under the raw mutant background (Figure 5N). These results indicate that ectopic Dpp induced apoptosis is tranduced through Tkv.
As above-mentioned, ectopic tkv expression promoted apoptosis in 24B>tkv CA embryos, indicating that Dpp can function as a pro-apoptotic signaling. To directly test this hypothesis, Dpp was constitutively overexpressed under the control of the ubiquitous Act5C-gal4 driver (Act5C>dpp). In control Act5C-gal4 embryos, AO staining revealed that apoptotic cells were mainly present in the ventral nerve cord and head regions at stage 16 (Figure 5P-R). Raising the temperature slightly increased the amount of cell death in the central nervous system of late Act5C-gal4 embryos (Figure 5O-R). Constitutive overexpression of Dpp caused a remarkable degree of apoptosis in Act5C>dpp embryos (Figure 5S-U). Notably, increasing the dpp expression level by raising the temperature significantly increased the number of dying cells (Figure 5O-U). This result suggests that Dpp can function as a pro-apoptotic signaling in a dose-dependent manner.
Dpp induced apoptosis is mediated through DTAK1
A previous study showed that TGF-β activated kinase 1 (TAK1), a member of the JNKK kinase superfamily that activates the JNK cascade, can transduce TGF-β signaling and induce apoptosis in vertebrates . To determine if TAK1 induces apoptosis in response to Dpp signaling, a Drosophila TAK1 homolog, DTAK1, was mis-expressed using either Act5C- or 24B-gal4. Ectopic DTAK1 activity was sufficient to induce apoptosis in embryos (Figure 6C and 6D). In contrast, ectodermal or mesodermal overexpression of a dominant negative form of dTAK1 (dTAk1 DN ) was capable of suppressing developmental programmed cell death (Figure 6E and 6F). Constitutive overexpression of dTAK1 DN also effectively inhibited ectopic Dpp-induced apoptosis (Figure 6G). Moreover, mesodermally overexpressed dTAK1 DN suppressed cardial apoptosis under the raw mutation background (Figure 6H). Taken together, our results clearly demonstrate that DTAK1 is a downstream effector of Dpp-mediated cardial apoptosis.
DTAK1 induces JNK dependent apoptosis
The JNK cascade is a well-known pro-apoptotic signaling that participates in stress-related apoptosis in Drosophila. Together with the fact that TAK1 can activate the JNK cascade, the autocrine Dpp is expected to enhance the activity of DTAK1 and thereby hyperactivitates the DJNK pathway. In other words, the ectopic dpp-induced cell death could be a consequence of hyperactivated JNK signaling. To test this hypothesis, bsk was overexpressed in the entire embryo or specifically in mesoderm using either Act5C- or 24B-gal4 driver (Act5C>bsk; 24B>bsk). Ectopic bsk activity dramatically increased levels of apoptosis in the embryos (Figure 7F and 7G). Conversely, overexpression of a dominant negative bsk, bsk DN , again using either Act5C- or 24B-gal4 driver, was able to suppress ectopic Dpp/DTAK1-induced apoptosis (Figure 7H and 7I). These results demonstrate that Dpp exerts its pro-apoptotic functions through DTAK1 as well as through DJNK.
Overexpression of anti-apoptotic P35 or dominant negative P53 blocks Dpp induced apoptosis
Function of Raw in DJNK signaling pathway
Analysis of the amino acid sequence of Raw revealed that it does not comprise any specific functional domain or motifs. Despite the fact that the C-terminus of Raw protein is rich in glutamine residues, a characteristic feature of some transcription factors, Raw protein was mainly detected in cytoplasma, suggesting that it may not play a role in transcriptional regulation. The most prominent feature of Raw protein is that it contains two duplicated domains with a 32 amino acid core repeat (designated as Raw repeats) that is highly conserved in invertebrates . The structure of Raw is currently unavailable, so no further information regarding the function of Raw can be deduced through sequence analysis.
Epistasis analysis has demonstrated that raw negatively regulates jra activity in parallel to DJNK signaling in the epidermis of Drosophila [35, 50]. As demonstrated above, Dpp-induced apoptosis is mediated through activation of DJNK signaling (Figure 7H). If raw can negatively regulate DJNK, it would be expected that forced expression of raw would inhibit the DJNK cascade and reverse the apoptotic phenotype in the raw mutant. Ectodermal overexpression of raw did rescue the cardial apoptosis in raw mutants (Figure 3H). Nevertheless, targeted expression of raw in the mesoderm was unable to prevent cell death under the raw mutation background (Figure 3I). Why is the effect of mesodermal Raw so different from that of ectodermal Raw? As demonstrated above, Dpp can trigger its own expression in the mesoderm through DTAK1 and DJNK (Figure 7A-E). This auto-regulated Dpp is expected to further enhance DJNK activity, which may out-compete the suppressive activity of Raw. This might explain why mesodermal expression of raw was unable to suppress raw mutation-induced apoptosis. However, if the initial Dpp signaling in ectoderm is suppressed then it will not initiate the autocrinal Dpp signaling in mesoderm and result in cell death. Consistent with our notion, we found that ectodermally-overexpressed raw suppressed the expression of pMad in raw mutants. In contrast, targeted expression of raw in mesoderm did not inhibit the expression of pMad under the raw mutation background (Additional File 5, Fig. S5).
Dpp functions as survival and pro-apoptotic signals
The morphogenetic function of Dpp patterns cell fates across the developing field by forming a gradient which provides position identity for the receiving cells. Similarly, it seems that Dpp controls the viability of cells in the same concentration-dependent manner. Mutant cells deprived of Dpp signaling are lost from wing disc epithelium due to DJNK activation and apoptosis [30, 53]. These observations have suggested that Dpp functions as a survival factor by preventing activation of the DJNK-dependent apoptotic pathway. Additionally, down-regulation of mad activated JNK and caspase-3, indicating that Dpp functions as a survival factor mediated through Mad . Consistent with these findings, we found that down-regulation of tkv or overexpression of brk induced moderate cell death in embryos (Figure 5J, K and 6A). Nevertheless, Dpp seems to act as a double-edged sword because increased Dpp signaling induces DJNK-mediated apoptosis in the proximal wing . Similarly, in this study, we show that ectopic dpp or tkv CA expression promotes DJNK-mediated apoptosis in embryos (Figure 5F and 5L). Moreover, the apoptotic propensity of Dpp is proportional to its own expression level (Figure 5O and 5S-U). Taken together, these results suggest that Dpp can act as both survival and death signals and thus, an appropriate expression level of Dpp is indispensible for the survival of cells during development.
TAK1 is a key transducer that mediates ectopic Dpp induced apoptosis
TAK1 is also a member of the MAPKKK family, which was originally identified as a mediator of TGF-β signaling pathway . It has also shown to regulate a great variety of cellular processes through activating many down-stream kinase cascades, including I-kappa B kinase complex (IKK), p38 MAPK, JNK, and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (reviewed in ). Unlike the canonical pathway in which members of TGF-β family elicit phosphorylation of Smad proteins, activation of TAK1 was found to function in a receptor kinase-independent manner . The existence of the non-canonical pathway may explain why mesodermal overexpression of brk was unable to block cardial apoptosis in raw mutants (Figure 6B), because it seems that brk only suppresses Dpp target genes containing Mad consensus binding sites . Interestingly, mesodermal pMad was increased in raw mutant or in embryos overexpressing dTAK1 (Figure 4K, and 7E), indicating that both canonical and non-canonical pathways were activated simultaneously in response to ectopic Dpp signaling. The fact that apoptotic cell numbers increased dramatically in raw mutants or in embryos overexpressing dTAK1 (Figure 2E, F, 6C and 6D) suggests that the non-canonical pathway suppresses the canonical pathway when cells are exposed to excessive Dpp levels. Together with the fact that the apoptotic propensity of Dpp is dose-dependent (Figure 5O), these data imply that higher levels of Dpp elicit stronger DTAK1 activity and result in apoptosis. In support of this argument, homozygous raw mutant animals had significant apoptosis in the dorsal-most tissues, such as the heart, where Dpp activity is at its peak (Figure 2E and 2F), and global overexpression of Dpp signaling led to ubiquitous cell death (Figure 5F, L and 5S-U).
Late Dpp signaling in heart development
Compared to the early function of Dpp in patterning cardiogenic mesoderm, the function of Dpp during late cardiogenesis is less explored. Previously, studies had showed that numbers of various pericardial cell types, but not cardial cells, were increased in fly embryos with the dpp d6 mutant allele, whose expression was not maintained in the dorsal ectoderm during germ-band retraction [23, 24]. The expression of the mitosis marker phospho-histone 3 was concomitantly increased in the dpp d6 mutant, suggesting that Dpp restricts the proliferation of pericardial cells specifically during late cardiogenesis . As shown above, dpp signaling is ectopically-activated at stages 14-15 in raw mutants (Figure 4D, E and 4K, see also ); this also gives us a good opportunity to decipher late Dpp function in the developing heart of Drosophila. As demonstrated above, ectopic Dpp signaling leads to both overproliferation of cardial cells during mid-embryogenesis and cardial apoptosis during late embryogenesis because overexpression of dpp or tkv CA replicated the raw mutant phenotypes (Figure 5A-H). Interestingly, both cardial and pericardial cells were eliminated in either raw mutant, 69B>dpp or 24B>tkv CA embryos (Figure 1D-F, L, O, Q, 5E and Figure 5H). Our data contradict the observation that targeted overexpression of tkv CA under the control of cardioblast-specific tinCΔ4-gal4 did not reduce the number of cardial cells significantly . The disparate results may be due to differences in the temporospatial expression of the transgene driven by different gal4 drivers. Alternately, if the pro-apoptotic propensity of Dpp is concentration-dependent (Figure 5O and 5S-U), as discussed above, it is also possible that the expression of tkv CA driven by tinCΔ4-gal4 is not strong enough to trigger the apoptosis response in cardioblasts.
Model for raw mutation mediated apoptosis
In support of our model, it has been found that TGF-β/SMAD signaling exerts its apoptotic function in an autocrine loop manner in rat cardiomyocytes . Induction of cardiomyocyte apoptosis by caspase overexpression has been shown to cause lethality and dilated cardiomyopathy in mice . In contrast, inhibition of cardiomyocyte apoptosis by treating with a caspase inhibitor reduced apoptosis, improved cardiac function, and delayed progression of heart failure in a cardiomyopathy animal model . Prolong haemodynamic overload can up-regulate TGF-β [62, 63], and death of cardiomyocytes is observed in virtually every myocardial disease (reviewed in . The pathway unraveled in this study is the first report that links ectopic Dpp and DJNK-dependent cardial apoptosis through the non-canonical pathway and dTAK1 activation. Our findings may thus suggest possible medical interventions for human cardiomyopathy.
By analyzing the heart defect phenotype of raw mutant embryos, we demonstrate that overexpression of dpp lead to cardial apoptosis during late embryogenesis of Drosophila. We also demonstrate that Dpp induces its own expression through dTAK1. The activation of dTAK1 causes the hyperactivation of Drosophila JNK (DJNK) thereby cardial apoptosis. This is the first report that links ectopic Dpp and DJNK-dependent cardial apoptosis through the non-canonical Dpp signaling pathway and dTAK1 activation. Since haemodynamic overload usually up-regulates TGF-β, a mammalian homolog of Dpp, and death of cardiomyocytes, the pathway delineated in this study may suggest possible medical interventions for human cardiomyopathy.
We are grateful to A. Letsou, J. Posakony, L. Marsh, T. Adachi-Yamada, M. Frasch, H. Sun, the Bloomington Stock Center, the Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center, the Drosophila Genomics Resource Center, Fly core of Taiwan and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for cDNA, fly stocks, antibodies and reagents. This work was supported by grants from the National Health Research Institute (NHRI-EX91-9109SC) and the National Science Council (97-2311-B-003-003) of the Republic of China.
- Bier E, Bodmer R: Drosophila, an emerging model for cardiac disease. Gene. 2004, 342: 1-11. 10.1016/j.gene.2004.07.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ocorr K, Perrin L, Lim HY, Qian L, Wu X, Bodmer R: Genetic control of heart function and aging in Drosophila. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2007, 17: 177-182. 10.1016/j.tcm.2007.04.001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qian L, Liu J, Bodmer R: Heart development in Drosophila. Bodmer, R. (ed.), Advances in Developmental Biology. 2007, Elsevier, New York, 18: 1-29.Google Scholar
- Frasch M: Induction of visceral and cardiac mesoderm by ectodermal Dpp in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature. 1995, 374: 464-467. 10.1038/374464a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ray RP, Arora K, Nusslein-Volhard C, Gelbart WM: The control of cell fate along the dorsal-ventral axis of the Drosophila embryo. Development. 1991, 113: 35-54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu X, Yin Z, Hudson JB, Ferguson EL, Frasch M: Smad proteins act in combination with synergistic and antagonistic regulators to target Dpp responses to the Drosophila mesoderm. Genes Dev. 1998, 12: 2354-2370. 10.1101/gad.12.15.2354.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yin Z, Frasch M: Regulation and function of tinman during dorsal mesoderm induction and heart specification in Drosophila. Dev Genet. 1998, 22: 187-200. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1998)22:3<187::AID-DVG2>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yin Z, Xu XL, Frasch M: Regulation of the twist target gene tinman by modular cis-regulatory elements during early mesoderm development. Development. 1997, 124: 4971-4982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gajewski K, Zhang Q, Choi CY, Fossett N, Dang A, Kim YH, Kim Y, Schulz RA: Pannier is a transcriptional target and partner of Tinman during Drosophila cardiogenesis. Dev Biol. 2001, 233: 425-436. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reim I, Frasch M: The Dorsocross T-box genes are key components of the regulatory network controlling early cardiogenesis in Drosophila. Development. 2005, 132: 4911-4925. 10.1242/dev.02077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alvarez AD, Shi W, Wilson BA, Skeath JB: pannier and pointedP2 act sequentially to regulate Drosophila heart development. Development. 2003, 130: 3015-3026. 10.1242/dev.00488.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gajewski K, Fossett N, Molkentin JD, Schulz RA: The zinc finger proteins Pannier and GATA4 function as cardiogenic factors in Drosophila. Development. 1999, 126: 5679-5688.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jagla T, Bidet Y, Da Ponte JP, Dastugue B, Jagla K: Cross-repressive interactions of identity genes are essential for proper specification of cardiac and muscular fates in Drosophila. Development. 2002, 129: 1037-1047.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klinedinst SL, Bodmer R: Gata factor Pannier is required to establish competence for heart progenitor formation. Development. 2003, 130: 3027-3038. 10.1242/dev.00517.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee HH, Frasch M: Wingless effects mesoderm patterning and ectoderm segmentation events via induction of its downstream target sloppy paired. Development. 2000, 127: 5497-5508.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lockwood WK, Bodmer R: The patterns of wingless, decapentaplegic, and tinman position the Drosophila heart. Mech Dev. 2002, 114: 13-26. 10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00044-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mann T, Bodmer R, Pandur P: The Drosophila homolog of vertebrate Islet1 is a key component in early cardiogenesis. Development. 2009, 136: 317-326. 10.1242/dev.022533.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park M, Wu X, Golden K, Axelrod JD, Bodmer R: The wingless signaling pathway is directly involved in Drosophila heart development. Dev Biol. 1996, 177: 104-116. 10.1006/dbio.1996.0149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riechmann V, Irion U, Wilson R, Grosskortenhaus R, Leptin M: Control of cell fates and segmentation in the Drosophila mesoderm. Development. 1997, 124: 2915-2922.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu X, Golden K, Bodmer R: Heart development in Drosophila requires the segment polarity gene wingless. Dev Biol. 1995, 169: 619-628. 10.1006/dbio.1995.1174.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Newfeld SJ, Takaesu NT: An analysis using the hobo genetic system reveals that combinatorial signaling by the Dpp and Wg pathways regulates dpp expression in leading edge cells of the dorsal ectoderm in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2002, 161: 685-692.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Knirr S, Frasch M: Molecular integration of inductive and mesoderm-intrinsic inputs governs even-skipped enhancer activity in a subset of pericardial and dorsal muscle progenitors. Dev Biol. 2001, 238: 13-26. 10.1006/dbio.2001.0397.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson AN, Bergman CM, Kreitman M, Newfeld SJ: Embryonic enhancers in the dpp disk region regulate a second round of Dpp signaling from the dorsal ectoderm to the mesoderm that represses Zfh-1 expression in a subset of pericardial cells. Dev Biol. 2003, 262: 137-151. 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00350-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnson AN, Burnett LA, Sellin J, Paululat A, Newfeld SJ: Defective decapentaplegic signaling results in heart overgrowth and reduced cardiac output in Drosophila. Genetics. 2007, 176: 1609-1624. 10.1534/genetics.107.073569.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Affolter M, Basler K: The Decapentaplegic morphogen gradient: from pattern formation to growth regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 2007, 8: 663-674.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sorrentino A, Thakur N, Grimsby S, Marcusson A, von Bulow V, Schuster N, Zhang S, Heldin CH, Landstrom M: The type I TGF-beta receptor engages TRAF6 to activate TAK1 in a receptor kinase-independent manner. Nature cell biology. 2008, 10: 1199-1207. 10.1038/ncb1780.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xia ZP, Sun L, Chen X, Pineda G, Jiang X, Adhikari A, Zeng W, Chen ZJ: Direct activation of protein kinases by unanchored polyubiquitin chains. Nature. 2009, 461: 114-119. 10.1038/nature08247.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geuking P, Narasimamurthy R, Basler K: A genetic screen targeting the tumor necrosis factor/Eiger signaling pathway: identification of Drosophila TAB2 as a functionally conserved component. Genetics. 2005, 171: 1683-1694. 10.1534/genetics.105.045534.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takatsu Y, Nakamura M, Stapleton M, Danos MC, Matsumoto K, O'Connor MB, Shibuya H, Ueno N: TAK1 participates in c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling during Drosophila development. Mol Cell Biol. 2000, 20: 3015-3026. 10.1128/MCB.20.9.3015-3026.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adachi-Yamada T, Fujimura-Kamada K, Nishida Y, Matsumoto K: Distortion of proximodistal information causes JNK-dependent apoptosis in Drosophila wing. Nature. 1999, 400: 166-169. 10.1038/22112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adachi-Yamada T, O'Connor MB: Morphogenetic apoptosis: a mechanism for correcting discontinuities in morphogen gradients. Dev Biol. 2002, 251: 74-90. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bier E, Vaessin H, Shepherd S, Lee K, McCall K, Barbel S, Ackerman L, Carretto R, Uemura T, Grell E: Searching for pattern and mutation in the Drosophila genome with a P-lacZ vector. Genes Dev. 1989, 3: 1273-1287. 10.1101/gad.3.9.1273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rebeiz M, Reeves NL, Posakony JW: SCORE: a computational approach to the identification of cis-regulatory modules and target genes in whole-genome sequence data. Site clustering over random expectation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 9888-9893. 10.1073/pnas.152320899.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blackman RK, Sanicola M, Raftery LA, Gillevet T, Gelbart WM: An extensive 3' cis-regulatory region directs the imaginal disk expression of decapentaplegic, a member of the TGF-beta family in Drosophila. Development. 1991, 111: 657-666.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Byars CL, Bates KL, Letsou A: The dorsal-open group gene raw is required for restricted DJNK signaling during closure. Development. 1999, 126: 4913-4923.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hay BA, Wolff T, Rubin GM: Expression of baculovirus P35 prevents cell death in Drosophila. Development. 1994, 120: 2121-2129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brand AH, Perrimon N: Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development. 1993, 118: 401-415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee YS, Carthew RW: Making a better RNAi vector for Drosophila: use of intron spacers. Methods (San Diego, Calif). 2003, 30: 322-329.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Spradling AC, Rubin GM: Transposition of cloned P elements into Drosophila germ line chromosomes. Science. 1982, 218: 341-347. 10.1126/science.6289435.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abrams JM, White K, Fessler LI, Steller H: Programmed cell death during Drosophila embryogenesis. Development. 1993, 117: 29-43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Booth GE, Kinrade EF, Hidalgo A: Glia maintain follower neuron survival during Drosophila CNS development. Development. 2000, 127: 237-244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Su MT, Fujioka M, Goto T, Bodmer R: The Drosophila homeobox genes zfh-1 and even-skipped are required for cardiac-specific differentiation of a numb-dependent lineage decision. Development. 1999, 126: 3241-3251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cao J, Pellock BJ, White K, Raftery LA: A commercial phospho-Smad antibody detects endogenous BMP signaling in Drosophila tissues. Drosophila Information Services. 2006, 89: 131-135.Google Scholar
- Su MT, Golden K, Bodmer R: X-gal staining of Drosophila embryos compatible with antibody staining or in situ hybridization. Biotechniques. 1998, 24: 918-920. 922PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van der Meer J: Optical clean and permanent whole mount preparation for phase-contrast microscopy of cuticular structures of insect larvae. Drosophila Information Services. 1977, 52: 160-161.Google Scholar
- Bodmer R: The gene tinman is required for specification of the heart and visceral muscles in Drosophila. Development. 1993, 118: 719-729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Han Z, Fujioka M, Su M, Liu M, Jaynes JB, Bodmer R: Transcriptional integration of competence modulated by mutual repression generates cell-type specificity within the cardiogenic mesoderm. Dev Biol. 2002, 252: 225-240. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0846.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jagla K, Frasch M, Jagla T, Dretzen G, Bellard F, Bellard M: ladybird, a new component of the cardiogenic pathway in Drosophila required for diversification of heart precursors. Development. 1997, 124: 3471-3479.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ward EJ, Skeath JB: Characterization of a novel subset of cardiac cells and their progenitors in the Drosophila embryo. Development. 2000, 127: 4959-4969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bates KL, Higley M, Letsou A: Raw mediates antagonism of AP-1 activity in Drosophila. Genetics. 2008, 178: 1989-2002. 10.1534/genetics.107.086298.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shibuya H, Iwata H, Masuyama N, Gotoh Y, Yamaguchi K, Irie K, Matsumoto K, Nishida E, Ueno N: Role of TAK1 and TAB1 in BMP signaling in early Xenopus development. Embo J. 1998, 17: 1019-1028. 10.1093/emboj/17.4.1019.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu GS: The functional interactions between the p53 and MAPK signaling pathways. Cancer biology & therapy. 2004, 3: 156-161.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bryant PJ: Localized cell death caused by mutations in a Drosophila gene coding for a transforming growth factor-beta homolog. Dev Biol. 1988, 128: 386-395. 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90300-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Umemori M, Habara O, Iwata T, Maeda K, Nishinoue K, Okabe A, Takemura M, Takahashi K, Saigo K, Ueda R, Adachi-Yamada T: RNAi-Mediated Knockdown Showing Impaired Cell Survival in Drosophila Wing Imaginal Disc. Gene regulation and systems biology. 2009, 3: 11-20.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamaguchi K, Shirakabe K, Shibuya H, Irie K, Oishi I, Ueno N, Taniguchi T, Nishida E, Matsumoto K: Identification of a member of the MAPKKK family as a potential mediator of TGF-beta signal transduction. Science. 1995, 270: 2008-2011. 10.1126/science.270.5244.2008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thakur N, Sorrentino A, Heldin CH, Landstrom M: TGF-beta uses the E3-ligase TRAF6 to turn on the kinase TAK1 to kill prostate cancer cells. Future oncology (London, England). 2009, 5: 1-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kirkpatrick H, Johnson K, Laughon A: Repression of dpp targets by binding of brinker to mad sites. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 18216-18222. 10.1074/jbc.M101365200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker JD, McNabb SL, Truman JW: The hormonal coordination of behavior and physiology at adult ecdysis in Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol. 1999, 202 (Pt 21): 3037-3048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schroder D, Heger J, Piper HM, Euler G: Angiotensin II stimulates apoptosis via TGF-beta1 signaling in ventricular cardiomyocytes of rat. J Mol Med. 2006, 84: 975-983. 10.1007/s00109-006-0090-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wencker D, Chandra M, Nguyen K, Miao W, Garantziotis S, Factor SM, Shirani J, Armstrong RC, Kitsis RN: A mechanistic role for cardiac myocyte apoptosis in heart failure. J Clin Invest. 2003, 111: 1497-1504.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayakawa Y, Chandra M, Miao W, Shirani J, Brown JH, Dorn GW, Armstrong RC, Kitsis RN: Inhibition of cardiac myocyte apoptosis improves cardiac function and abolishes mortality in the peripartum cardiomyopathy of Galpha(q) transgenic mice. Circulation. 2003, 108: 3036-3041. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000101920.72665.58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dai RP, Dheen ST, He BP, Tay SS: Differential expression of cytokines in the rat heart in response to sustained volume overload. Eur J Heart Fail. 2004, 6: 693-703. 10.1016/j.ejheart.2003.11.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi N, Calderone A, Izzo NJ, Maki TM, Marsh JD, Colucci WS: Hypertrophic stimuli induce transforming growth factor-beta 1 expression in rat ventricular myocytes. J Clin Invest. 1994, 94: 1470-1476. 10.1172/JCI117485.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dorn GW: Apoptotic and non-apoptotic programmed cardiomyocyte death in ventricular remodelling. Cardiovascular research. 2009, 81: 465-473.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.