- Open Access
Lipopolysaccharide pretreatment increases protease-activated receptor-2 expression and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 secretion in vascular endothelial cells
Journal of Biomedical Science volume 24, Article number: 85 (2017)
This study investigated whether lipopolysaccharide (LPS) increase protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) expression and enhance the association between PAR-2 expression and chemokine production in human vascular endothelial cells (ECs).
The morphology of ECs was observed through microphotography in cultured human umbilical vein ECs (EA. hy926 cells) treated with various LPS concentrations (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 μg/mL) for 24 h, and cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay. Intracellular calcium imaging was performed to assess agonist (trypsin)-induced PAR-2 activity. Western blotting was used to explore the LPS-mediated signal transduction pathway and the expression of PAR-2 and adhesion molecule monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in ECs.
Trypsin stimulation increased intracellular calcium release in ECs. The calcium influx was augmented in cells pretreated with a high LPS concentration (1 μg/mL). After 24 h treatment of LPS, no changes in ECs viability or morphology were observed. Western blotting revealed that LPS increased PAR-2 expression and enhanced trypsin-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/p38 phosphorylation and MCP-1 secretion. However, pretreatment with selective ERK (PD98059), p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (SB203580) inhibitors, and the selective PAR-2 antagonist (FSLLRY-NH2) blocked the effects of LPS-activated PAR-2 on MCP-1 secretion.
Our findings provide the first evidence that the bacterial endotoxin LPS potentiates calcium mobilization and ERK/p38 MAPK pathway activation and leads to the secretion of the pro-inflammatory chemokine MCP-1 by inducing PAR-2 expression and its associated activity in vascular ECs. Therefore, PAR-2 exerts vascular inflammatory effects and plays an important role in bacterial infection-induced pathological responses.
The important role of bacterial endotoxins in the pathophysiology of sepsis was recognized in the 1960s and 1970s . Lipopolysaccharides (LPS), also called endotoxins, are expressed by most gram-negative bacteria and play an important role in the function and structural integrity of the outer lipid membrane . LPSs are a family of large molecules containing three structural elements: a core oligosaccharide, an O-antigen, and a lipid A component [2,3,4]. High LPS levels have certain toxic effects on cells, whereas low LPS levels promote cell proliferation. Epidemiological studies have indicated that LPS constitute a risk factor for diseases such as atherosclerosis and diabetes .
The endothelium also plays a major role in the pathogenesis of sepsis. Endothelial cells (ECs) line the inner wall of blood vessels, lying at the interface between circulating blood and the surrounding tissue . During infection, LPS bind to the surface of ECs, resulting in the activation of endothelial signaling pathways and the release of inflammatory mediators [3, 5, 6]. These mediators induce the production of reactive oxygen species, secretion of chemokines and adhesion molecules, reduction of anti-inflammatory mediators, and transmigration of leukocytes [5, 7, 8]. The infection-induced inflammatory reaction is further mediated by complex interactions between circulating leukocytes and the vascular endothelium [3, 7, 9, 10]. The adherence of monocytes to the activated endothelium and their subsequent proliferation are critical for atherosclerotic plaque formation [7, 11,12,13,14,15]. Chemokines produced by ECs are vital for promoting the movement of circulating monocytes to atherosclerotic vessels and the infection site [9, 14, 16]. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a potent chemoattractant for monocytes, is closely involved in atherosclerosis development [5, 11, 12, 17, 18]. Studies have observed elevated plasma MCP-1 levels in patients with coronary artery disease, with the highest levels being observed in those with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes [17, 19, 20]. Although LPS-induced MCP-1 secretion from the vascular endothelium has been reported to recruit circulating monocytes, the underlying mechanism remains largely unexplained [9, 21].
Protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR-2) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family with seven transmembrane-spanning domains, and it is mainly activated by trypsin [22,23,24,25]. PAR-2 is a key mediator of innate immunity and inflammatory response propagation . Endothelial PAR-2 is mainly activated by the locally released trypsin that accompanies tissue injury or inflammation. PAR-2 is widely expressed in nearly all cell types in the vascular wall (ECs, myocytes, and fibroblasts) [27,28,29]. Several studies have revealed that PAR-2 is involved in inflammation and endotoxin shock [24, 27]. The expression of PAR-2 was increased 5- to 10-fold in ECs after LPS exposure in vitro, thus suggesting the possible involvement of PAR-2 in endotoxemia . Immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated preferential and localized increases in the expression of PAR-2 in the aorta and jugular vein, and these increases were associated with endotoxin shock [27, 30]. Furthermore, enhanced PAR-2 expression has been observed in human coronary atherosclerotic lesions, suggesting that PAR-2 regulates signaling during vascular injures [27, 31]. Increasing bodies of evidence from cellular and animal studies reveal that PAR-2 activation is associated with increased MCP-1 secretion [32,33,34]. However, the relationship between the PAR-2 signaling pathway and LPS-activated MCP-1 secretion remains unclear .
The present study investigated whether LPS activates PAR-2 expression and consequently enhances trypsin-induced PAR-2 signaling and subsequent MCP-1 secretion in human vascular ECs.
Unless stated otherwise, trypsin, purified LPS (obtained through phenol extraction) from Escherichia coli (serotype O26:B6), salts, buffers, and all other chemicals of reagent grade were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The specific PAR-1 agonist (TRAP6), PAR-2 agonist (AC 55541), PAR-4 agonist (AY-NH2) and the selective PAR-2 antagonist (FSLLRY-NH2) were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). Antibody-directed phosphorylated ERK was purchased from Novus (St. Charles, MO, USA), and anti-ERK was purchased from BD (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Antiphosphorylated p38, anti-p38, and anti-c-JUN N-terminal kinase (JNK) were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). Anti-MCP-1 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Monoclonal antiphosphorylated JNK, anti-PAR-2 (Additional file 1: Figure S1), and anti-β-actin antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).
EA. hy926 cells
The human EC line, EA. hy926, was originally derived from a human umbilical vein obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium/Ham’s Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12; 1:1, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% L-glutamine, and 1% penicillin–streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. During cell culture, the medium was changed every 3 days until the cells reached 90% confluence. To prevent FBS-induced trypsin inactivation, all cells were incubated in a FBS-free DMEM with 1% penicillin–streptomycin solution during trypsin treatment.
Intracellular calcium release measurement
Intracellular calcium release in ECs was assessed through microfluorimetric measurements of the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration by using fura-2 as described previously . In brief, ECs were incubated with 5 μM fura-2 AM (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h at 37 °C and subsequently washed and bathed in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin–streptomycin solution (100 units/mL, 100 μg/mL; Invitrogen) under 5% CO2. The cells were alternately excited at 340 and 380 nm using an optical filter changer (Lambda 10-2, Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, USA). Emission was measured at 500 nm, and images were captured using a charge-coupled device camera (CoolSnap HQ2, Photometrics) attached to an inverted Nikon TE 2000-U microscope. The captured images were analyzed using MAG Biosystems Software. All experiments were performed at room temperature (approximately 25 °C).
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was isolated using RNAzol solution (Biogenesis, Poole, Dorset, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA purity was estimated though optical density measurements at 260/280 nm. The derived total RNA (5 μg) was subjected to first-strand cDNA synthesis in a 10-μL reaction volume containing 250 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3 at 20 °C), 375 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 1 mM 1,4-dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM of each dNTP, and 20 U of an RNase inhibitor in the presence of 1.5 μg of an oligo dT primer and 200 U of Superscriptase (all chemicals were obtained from Life Technologies). After the completion of the first-strand cDNA synthesis process, the reaction was terminated by heat inactivation (5 min, 95 °C) and the derived total RNA was diluted with water to obtain 50 ng/μL of RNA equivalent. cDNA equivalent to 100 ng of the total RNA was subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in a 50-μL reaction volume, containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9 at 25 °C), 50 M KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.01% (w/v) gelatin, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 2 mM DTT, 200 μM of each dNTP, 1 μM of each primer, and 0.2 U of TaqDNA polymerase (AB Biotechnology) under the following conditions: denaturation, 30 s at 94 °C; primer annealing, 1 min at 58 °C; and primer extension, 1 min at 72 °C. The PCR products (10 μL) were electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels and visualized through ultraviolet illumination. The PAR-2 forward and reverse primers were 5′-TGGCACCATCCAAGGAAC-3′ and 5′-GTCAGCCAAGGCCAGATT-3′, respectively. The glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) forward and reverse primers were 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3′ and 5′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3′, respectively.
Cells were lysed in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 5 mM ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid, 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 20 mM sodium pyrophosphate, and Roche complete protease inhibitor mixture (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The protein in the medium was precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid and 0.1% sodium deoxycholate. The precipitates were redissolved in the SDS sample buffer. The extracted protein was separated through SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was blocked with 2%–3% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.05% Tween20; subsequently, the membrane was probed with the anti-PAR-2, anti-phospho-ERK (p-ERK), anti-total ERK or anti-phospho-p38 MAPK (p-p38), anti-total p38 MAPK, anti-phospho-JNK (p-JNK), anti-total JNK, anti-MCP-1, and anti-β-actin antibodies. After overnight incubation with different antibodies at 4 °C, the membrane was washed three times with TBS and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, the immunoblots were quantified using Image J densitometry analysis software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Cell adhesion assay
EA. hy926 monolayers, grown as described previously, were established in culture dishes and subsequently treated with LPS (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 μg/mL). After a 24 h of incubation, the EA. hy926 cells in each well were treated with trypsin (5 μg/mL) and cultured for 12 h, followed by incubation with 2 × 105 peripheral blood mononuclear cells for 30 min in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C . After incubation, non-adherent cells were removed by washing two times with PBS. Six random high-power microscopic fields (100×) were photographed, and the number of adhered cells was directly calculated.
All experiments were performed at least in triplicate. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test or analysis of variance, followed by the Dunnett multiple comparison test by using Prism software (version 3.00 for Windows GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Analysis of PAR-2 expression in LPS-treated ECs
PAR-2 is highly expressed in ECs and plays an important role in inflammation . In this study, PAR-2 expression after LPS treatment was examined in vitro. Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and Western blotting revealed increased PAR-2 mRNA and protein expression levels in EA. hy926 cells (Fig. 1). Notably, LPS increased PAR-2 expression in EA. hy926 cells. The PAR-2 mRNA levels in EA. hy926 cells were significantly elevated after LPS treatment (1 μg/mL, 5 min; P < 0.01 compared with the control group; Fig. 1a and b). However, the stimulating effects of LPS pretreatment on PAR-2 protein levels were not apparent after short-term LPS treatment (<12 h). By contrast, 1 μg/mL of LPS resulted in increased PAR-2 protein levels, with a peak at 20 h of treatment (Fig. 1c and d).
LPS pretreatment enhances trypsin-induced intracellular calcium release in ECs
Trypsin is an endogenous PAR-2 activator . We examined the effects of LPS pretreatment on trypsin-induced intracellular calcium release in ECs. The relative changes in intracellular calcium release were determined using the fura-2 F340/F380 nm ratio. Basal intracellular calcium release (prior to trypsin exposure) did not differ between the control and LPS-pretreatment groups. In addition, treatment with LPS alone (1 μg/mL, 24 h) did not alter EC viability (data not shown). In the absence of LPS pretreatment, trypsin (2 μg/mL) induced a rapid and transient increase in intracellular Ca2+ release in ECs (Fig. 2a). However, after LPS pretreatment (1 μg/mL, 24 h), the trypsin-induced intracellular Ca2+ release increased to 40% (Fig. 2c). Figure 2b presents a typical example of the averaged maximal intracellular Ca2+ levels induced by trypsin in the absence or presence of LPS pretreatment. The maximal increase in the trypsin-induced intracellular Ca2+ release was higher in the LPS-pretreatment group than in the control group (Fig. 2d). The concentration–response curve for the trypsin-induced Ca2+ release in the absence or presence of LPS pretreatment (1 μg/mL, 24 h) is shown in Fig. 2e. In the concentration-response curve for the trypsin-induced Ca2+ release after LPS pretreatment, a left shift with changing maximum response suggests the stimulating effects of LPS pretreatment on PAR-2.
LPS pretreatment enhances trypsin-induced ERK/p38 phosphorylation in ECs
A study demonstrated that PAR-2 activation can influence cellular functions through several signal transduction pathways . We thus investigated the trypsin-induced phosphorylation of ERK and observed that p-ERK levels were significantly higher in EA. hy926 cells stimulated with trypsin (5 μg/mL, 10 min) than in untreated cells (Fig. 3). Subsequently, the observed ERK phosphorylation subsided gradually. However, after a 24 h of LPS pretreatment, trypsin enhanced the phosphorylation of ERK and p38 (Fig. 4a). The p-ERK and p-p38 levels were significantly enhanced in the LPS-pretreatment group supplemented with trypsin (Fig. 4b and c). However, compared with trypsin alone, the combined treatment of trypsin and LPS did not significantly enhance JNK phosphorylation (Fig. 4d).
LPS pretreatment enhances trypsin-induced MCP-1 secretion and cell adhesion in ECs
PAR-2 activation is associated with the adhesion of leukocytes to the vascular endothelium . However, whether LPS pretreatment regulates trypsin-induced cell adhesion molecule expression and cell adhesion functions remains unclear. Our results revealed that compared with trypsin alone, the combined treatment of LPS (0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 μg/mL; 24 h) and trypsin (5 μg/mL) enhanced MCP-1 protein secretion (Fig. 5a). To assess the effects of LPS pretreatment on trypsin-induced mononuclear cell adhesion, EA. hy926 cells were treated with different LPS concentrations (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 μg/mL) for 24 h, followed by treatment with trypsin (5 μg/mL) for 12 h. Mononuclear cells were added to the EC culture to assess cell adhesion functions. When trypsin stimulation was not applied very few mononuclear cells adhered to the ECs; however, trypsin clearly increased mononuclear cell–EC adhesion. In addition, LPS pretreatment enhanced trypsin-induced mononuclear cell–EC adhesion in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5b). Notably, the combined treatment of LPS and trypsin exerted more significant regulatory effects on cell adhesion functions than did trypsin alone. Furthermore, to investigate the role of trypsin-induced ERK and p38 phosphorylation, LPS-pretreated EA. hy926 cells were pre-incubated with PD98059 (25 μM), SB203580 (10 μM), or PD98059 (25 μM) and SB203580 (10 μM) for 30 min (Fig. 6a), which significantly inhibited the enhancement effects of LPS pretreatment on trypsin-induced MCP-1 secretion. Similarly, pre-incubation with PD98059 (25 μM) or SB203580 (10 μM) inhibited the promotive effects of LPS pretreatment on trypsin-induced cell adhesion functions (Fig. 6b and c). PD98059 and SB203580 also influenced the regulatory effects of LPS pretreatment on MCP-1 secretion and cell adhesion functions in trypsin-treated EA. hy926 cells.
The relationship of PAR-2 activity and the levels of MCP-1 production in response to the combined treatment of trypsin and LPS
There are four known protease-activated receptors (PAR 1-4). PAR-1, PAR-3, and PAR-4 can be activated by thrombin, and PAR-2 can be mainly activated by trypsin and numerous studies have demonstrated that PAR-2 is highly expressed in ECs [23,24,25, 27, 39]. To further rule out the possibility of the signaling coming from either PAR-1 or PAR-4 activation in ECs since trypsin can also activate both of these receptors, selective peptide agonists were used. PAR-1 agonist (TRAP6, 100 nM) or PAR-4 agonist (AY-NH2, 50 μM) was used to examine its effect on ERK/p38 phosphorylation and MCP-1 secretion in ECs (Fig. 7). TRAP6 failed to show increased ERK/p38 phosphorylation and MCP-1 secretion. However, the addition of AY-NH2 mildly increased MCP-1 secretion (Fig. 7d). The underlying mechanism of PAR-4 activation in the modulation of MCP-1 secretion is unknown, which should be validated in future study. In the same time, we also used a specific PAR-2 agonist (AC 55541, 10 μM) to compare with the effect of LPS plus trypsin on the stimulation of ERK/p38 phosphorylation and MCP-1 secretion in ECs. The result showed a similar pattern of stimulatory effect between PAR-2 agonist treated group and the LPS plus trypsin treated group. In addition, we also examined the effect of the selective PAR-2 antagonist (FSLLRY-NH2, 50 μM) on the induction of MCP-1 secretion by LPS plus trypsin treatment. As shown in Fig. 7d, the application of the PAR-2 antagonist specifically inhibited the induction of MCP-1 secretion by LPS plus trypsin treatment. These findings suggest that LPS plus trypsin treatment regulated the related signaling pathway mainly through PAR-2 activation.
The present study provides the first evidence that LPS pretreatment potentiates calcium mobilization and ERK/p38 MAPK pathway activation and subsequently leads to MCP-1 secretion by inducing PAR-2 gene expression in vascular ECs. In addition, pretreatment with selective inhibitors of ERK (PD98059), p38 (SB203580), or both suppressed LPS-induced MCP-1 secretion and cell adhesion functions in ECs (Fig. 8).
According to the previous studies, LPS has potent pro-inflammatory properties, which can activate recognition receptors on ECs, leading to the release of inflammatory mediators [7, 21]. Inflammatory mediators function in autocrine and paracrine loops to further activate the monocyte and local endothelium . The combined effects of LPS and inflammatory mediators on the endothelium may engender significant pathological changes. The Bruneck study provided the first epidemiological evidence that circulating LPS constitute strong risk factor for carotid atherosclerosis . Moreover, LPS accelerated the development of atherosclerotic plaques in rabbits on hypercholesterolemic diets and in mice with apolipoprotein E-deficient . In healthy humans, an LPS dose of 1 ng/kg is sufficient to induce symptoms including fever and nausea . In a clinical observational study, the median endotoxin level in patients with sepsis was 300 pg/mL . In in vitro studies on ECs, the LPS concentration range used in the basic experiments was 0.1–10 μg/mL [21, 41, 42]. Therefore, the use of different LPS concentrations in our experiment is reasonable. However, the data presented in the present in vitro study of an LPS-induced inflammatory model do not fully represent the in vivo action of LPS; hence, the results of this study warrant further validation in additional animal models.
PAR-2 was originally cloned in 1994 and plays major pathophysiological roles in angiogenesis, tissue regeneration, and inflammation . Several studies have reported that PAR-2 exerts extensive effects on inflammatory responses in vascular tissues, and that LPS exposure results in increased PAR-2 levels, both in vitro and in vivo, thus suggesting the possible role of PAR-2 in endotoxemia [10, 24, 43]. We demonstrated that LPS increases PAR-2 mRNA and protein expression in ECs. Moreover, trypsin is a potent PAR-2 activator that cleaves and triggers PAR-2 activation . Trypsin-induced PAR-2 activation increases intracellular calcium release through the activation of phospholipase C isoforms by using several Gq/G11-coupled receptor-modulated intracellular targets [27, 29]. Furthermore, Ca2+ signaling activates tyrosine kinases, which contribute to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation in ECs [44, 45]. Previous studies have demonstrated that PAR-2 can activate multiple kinase pathways, including the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/p38 MAPK pathway, in a cell type-specific manner [29, 46]. In the present study, we analyzed the combined effects of LPS and trypsin on PAR-2 activation in ECs. LPS pretreatment enhances trypsin-induced intracellular Ca2+ release, ERK/p38 phosphorylation, and MCP-1 secretion. To elucidate the role of cytosolic calcium in the signaling pathway, we added BAPTA-AM, an intracellular calcium chelator, to identify it. The addition of BAPTA-AM slightly suppressed the LPS-induced ERK/p38 phosphorylation and significantly inhibited MCP-1 synthesis (Additional file 2: Figure S2), implying that calcium signaling is involved in the pathway. The inhibition of PAR-2 activity by a selective PAR-2 peptide antagonist (FSLLRY-NH2) also blocked the induction of MCP-1 secretion by LPS plus trypsin treatment, supporting our hypothesis that PAR-2 plays an important role in the process. Therefore, we concluded that LPS and trypsin can synergistically stimulate the PAR-2 signaling pathway.
Previous studies have demonstrated that PAR-2 activation in vascular ECs significantly increases monocyte recruitment, possibly through chemokine induction [32,33,34]. The transmigration of monocytes to sub-endothelial lesions is the initial step of atherosclerotic plaque formation [12, 31, 47]. MCP-1, a glycoprotein with an apparent molecular mass of 14 kDa, is produced by smooth muscle cells, ECs, and macrophages; MCP-1 is thus a highly potent chemoattractant for monocytes . MCP-1 is highly expressed in human atherosclerotic plaques and is crucial in monocyte recruitment into sub-endothelial lesions [5, 18, 19]. Some studies have reported that LPS induces MCP-1 secretion from the vascular endothelium; however, the underlying mechanism is not yet clearly understood [9, 21]. According to our study results, we speculate that LPS and trypsin-activated PAR-2 can induce MCP-1 secretion.
Previous studies have showed that PAR-2 activates ERK and p38 MAPK in non-ECs [25, 29, 33, 46]. In the present study, incubation with trypsin or LPS resulted in significant ERK and p38 MAPK phosphorylation and activation in EA. hy926 cells. However, pretreatment with selective ERK and p38 MAPK inhibitors blocked the promotive effects of trypsin and/or LPS-activated PAR-2 on MCP-1 secretion. The p38 MAPK signaling pathway plays an important role in mediating pro-inflammatory responses in ECs [7, 49]. Additionally, previous studies have demonstrated that the oral administration of a specific p38 MAPK inhibitor reduces cytokine production, leukocyte responses, and inflammation in a human endotoxemia model [7, 49]. Taken together, these data suggest that PAR-2 signaling through the MAPK pathways results in increased MCP-1 secretion in ECs.
The present in vitro model of LPS-induced MCP-1 secretion through the PAR-2 signaling pathway may not be directly translatable to clinical investigations of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nevertheless, the presented preliminary results may encourage further research on identifying the molecular mechanisms underlying PAR-2-mediated MCP-1 secretion and vascular inflammation.
In summary, our results reveal that PAR-2 plays an important role in regulating MCP-1 secretion through the ERK/p38 MAPK signaling pathway, thus demonstrating that PAR-2 directly modulates endothelial functions and EC–monocyte interactions by regulating MCP-1 protein release. Our findings also provide evidence that the PAR-2 signaling pathway exerts inflammatory effects on vascular ECs, leading to the initiation of infection-induced pro-atherogenic inflammatory responses. This information can be used to develop new strategies for preventing the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium
Extracellular signal-regulated kinase
Fetal bovine serum
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
c-Jun N-terminal kinase
Mitogen-activated protein kinase
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
Polymerase chain reaction
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
Standard errors of the means
Cross AS, Opal S, Cook P, Drabick J, Bhattacharjee A. Development of an anti-core lipopolysaccharide vaccine for the prevention and treatment of sepsis. Vaccine. 2004;22(7):812–7.
Auer GK, Weibel DB. Bacterial cell mechanics. Biochemistry. 2017;56(29):3710–24.
Dauphinee SM, Karsan A. Lipopolysaccharide signaling in endothelial cells. Lab Investig. 2006;86(1):9–22.
Jiang D, Yang Y, Li D. Lipopolysaccharide induced vascular smooth muscle cells proliferation: a new potential therapeutic target for proliferative vascular diseases. Cell Prolif. 2017;
Stoll LL, Denning GM, Weintraub NL. Potential role of endotoxin as a proinflammatory mediator of atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(12):2227–36.
Opal SM, Scannon PJ, Vincent JL, White M, Carroll SF, Palardy JE, et al. Relationship between plasma levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS-binding protein in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. J Infect Dis. 1999;180(5):1584–9.
Aird WC. The role of the endothelium in severe sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Blood. 2003;101(10):3765–77.
Rauchhaus M, Coats AJS, Anker SD. The endotoxin-lipoprotein hypothesis. Lancet. 2000;356(9233):930–3.
Li X, Li X, Zheng Z, Liu Y, Ma X. Unfractionated heparin suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression in human microvascular endothelial cells by blocking Kruppel-like factor 5 and nuclear factor-kappaB pathway. Immunobiology. 2014;219(10):778–85.
Pan SL, Tao KY, Guh JH, Sun HL, Huang DY, Chang YL, et al. The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway plays a critical role in PAR2-induced endothelial IL-8 production and leukocyte adhesion. Shock. 2008;30(5):496–502.
Lo IC, Shih JM, Jiang MJ. Reactive oxygen species and ERK 1/2 mediate monocyte chemotactic protein-1-stimulated smooth muscle cell migration. J Biomed Sci. 2005;12(2):377–88.
Lemaire M, Negro Silva LF, Lemarie CA, Bolt AM, Flores Molina M, Krohn RM, et al. Arsenic exposure increases Monocyte adhesion to the vascular endothelium, a pro-Atherogenic mechanism. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0136592.
Cines DB, Pollak ES, Buck CA, Loscalzo J, Zimmerman GA, McEver RP, et al. Endothelial cells in physiology and in the pathophysiology of vascular disorders. Blood. 1998;91(10):3527–61.
Galkina E, Ley K. Immune and inflammatory mechanisms of atherosclerosis (*). Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:165–97.
Hansson GK. Atherosclerosis--an immune disease: the Anitschkov lecture 2007. Atherosclerosis. 2009;202(1):2–10.
Luster AD. Chemokines--chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(7):436–45.
Dworacka M, Krzyzagorska E, Wesolowska A, Zharmakhanova G, Iskakova S, Dworacki G. Circulating monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) and angiogenin in type 2 diabetic patients treated with statins in low doses. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014;740:474–9.
Deshmane SL, Kremlev S, Amini S, Sawaya BE. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): an overview. J Interf Cytokine Res. 2009;29(6):313–26.
Panee J. Monocyte Chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) in obesity and diabetes. Cytokine. 2012;60(1):1–12.
Aukrust P, Berge RK, Ueland T, Aaser E, Damås JK, Wikeby L, et al. Interaction between chemokines and oxidative stress: possible pathogenic role in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(2):485–91.
Anand AR, Bradley R, Ganju RK. LPS-induced MCP-1 expression in human microvascular endothelial cells is mediated by the tyrosine kinase, Pyk2 via the p38 MAPK/NF-kappaB-dependent pathway. Mol Immunol. 2009;46(5):962–8.
Bohm SK, Kong W, Bromme D, Smeekens SP, Anderson DC, Connolly A, et al. Molecular cloning, expression and potential functions of the human proteinase-activated receptor-2. Biochem J. 1996;314(Pt 3):1009–16.
Antoniak S, Pawlinski R, Mackman N. Protease-activated receptors and myocardial infarction. IUBMB Life. 2011;63(6):383–9.
Jesmin S, Shimojo N, Yamaguchi N, Mowa CN, Oki M, Zaedi S, et al. Effects of protease activated receptor (PAR)2 blocking peptide on endothelin-1 levels in kidney tissues in endotoxemic rat mode. Life Sci. 2014;102(2):127–33.
Zhang C, Gao GR, Lv CG, Zhang BL, Zhang ZL, Zhang XF. Protease-activated receptor-2 induces expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and cyclooxygenase-2 via the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in gastric cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2012;28(5):1917–23.
Rothmeier AS, Ruf W. Protease-activated receptor 2 signaling in inflammation. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34(1):133–49.
Bucci M, Roviezzo F, Cirino G. Protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR2) in cardiovascular system. Vasc Pharmacol. 2005;43(4):247–53.
Wojtukiewicz MZ, Hempel D, Sierko E, Tucker SC, Honn KV. Protease-activated receptors (PARs)--biology and role in cancer invasion and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015;34(4):775–96.
Kanke T, Takizawa T, Kabeya M, Kawabata A. Physiology and pathophysiology of proteinase-activated receptors (PARs): PAR-2 as a potential therapeutic target. J Pharmacol Sci. 2005;97(1):38–42.
Cicala C, Pinto A, Bucci M, Sorrentino R, Walker B, Harriot P, et al. Protease-activated receptor-2 involvement in hypotension in normal and endotoxemic rats in vivo. Circulation. 1999;99(19):2590–7.
Napoli C, de Nigris F, Wallace JL, Hollenberg MD, Tajana G, De Rosa G, et al. Evidence that protease activated receptor 2 expression is enhanced in human coronary atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57(5):513–6.
Vesey DA, Suen JY, Seow V, Lohman RJ, Liu L, Gobe GC, et al. PAR2-induced inflammatory responses in human kidney tubular epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;304(6):F737–50.
Li M, Yang X, Zhang Y, Chen L, Lu H, Li X, et al. Activation of proteaseactivated receptor2 is associated with increased expression of inflammatory factors in the adipose tissues of obese mice. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12(4):6227–34.
Wang H, Yi T, Zheng Y, He S. Induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 release from A549 cells by agonists of protease-activated receptor-1 and -2. Eur J Cell Biol. 2007;86(4):233–42.
Ostrowska E, Sokolova E, Reiser G. PAR-2 activation and LPS synergistically enhance inflammatory signaling in airway epithelial cells by raising PAR expression level and interleukin-8 release. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007;293(5):L1208–18.
Leung YM, Wong KL, Cheng KS, Kuo CS, Su TH, Chen YW, et al. Inhibition of voltage-gated K+ channels and Ca2+ channels by diphenidol. Pharmacol Rep. 2012;64(3):739–44.
Boyum A. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Isolation of monuclear cells by one centrifugation, and of granulocytes by combining centrifugation and sedimentation at 1 g. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 1968;97:77–89.
Hamilton JR, Nguyen PB, Cocks TM. Atypical protease-activated receptor mediates endothelium-dependent relaxation of human coronary arteries. Circ Res. 1998;82(12):1306–11.
Zhang H, Zeng X, He S. Evaluation on potential contributions of protease activated receptors related mediators in allergic inflammation. Mediat Inflamm. 2014;2014:829068.
Sivapalaratnam S, Farrugia R, Nieuwdorp M, Langford CF, van Beem RT, Maiwald S, et al. Identification of candidate genes linking systemic inflammation to atherosclerosis; results of a human in vivo LPS infusion study. BMC Med Genet. 2011;4:64–4.
Li C, Zhang WJ, Frei B. Quercetin inhibits LPS-induced adhesion molecule expression and oxidant production in human aortic endothelial cells by p38-mediated Nrf2 activation and antioxidant enzyme induction. Redox Biol. 2016;9:104–13.
Nemeth ZH, Deitch EA, Lu Q, Szabo C, Hasko G. NHE blockade inhibits chemokine production and NF-kappaB activation in immunostimulated endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;283(2):C396–403.
Bucci M, Vellecco V, Harrington L, Brancaleone V, Roviezzo F, Mattace Raso G, et al. Cross-talk between toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and proteinase-activated receptor 2 (PAR(2)) is involved in vascular function. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;168(2):411–20.
Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, Busse R. Calcium signaling in endothelial cells involves activation of tyrosine kinases and leads to activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases. Circ res. 1995;76(4):522-9.
White CD, Sacks DB. Regulation of MAP kinase signaling by calcium. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;661:151–65.
Park GH, Jeon SJ, Ryu JR, Choi MS, Han SH, Yang SI, et al. Essential role of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in protease activated receptor 2-mediated nitric-oxide production from rat primary astrocytes. Nitric Oxide. 2009;21(2):110–9.
Ashida N, Arai H, Yamasaki M, Kita T. Distinct signaling pathways for MCP-1-dependent integrin activation and chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(19):16555–60.
Valente AJ, Graves DT, Vialle-Valentin CE, Delgado R, Schwartz CJ. Purification of a monocyte chemotactic factor secreted by nonhuman primate vascular cells in culture. Biochemistry. 1988;27(11):4162–8.
Branger J, van den Blink B, Weijer S, Madwed J, Bos CL, Gupta A, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of a p38 Mitogen-activated protein Kinase inhibitor during human Endotoxemia. J Immunol. 2002;168(8):4070–7.
This study was supported in part by research grants from Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital (SKH-TMU-101-07; SKH-8302-99-DR-15) and Taipei Medical University (TMU105-AE1-B21), Taipei, Taiwan.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
All the authors have read and approved the paper for publication.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Western blot – Anti-PAR-2 antibody. Lane A: Control cell lysate at 10 μg. Lane B: PAR-2 agonist (AC 55541, 10 μM)-treated cell lysate at 10 μg. Predicted band size: 43~55 kDa. (TIFF 823 kb)
The effect of calcium chelator (BAPTA-AM) on the LPS-plus-trypsin-induced ERK/p38 MAPK phosphorylation and MCP-1 synthesis. EA. hy926 cells (1 × 106/mL) were pretreated with BAPTA-AM (50 nM) for 30 min, after which they were stimulated with LPS (2 μg/mL) for 24 h and with trypsin (5 μg/mL) for 10 min. Control cells were treated with 0.1% DMSO. a Representative data of the p-ERK, ERK, p38, pp38 and MCP-1 protein levels, and β-actin was used as the loading control. b Normalization of the p-ERK and total ERK levels. c Normalization of the p-p38 and total p38 levels. d Normalization of the MCP-1 and total β-actin levels. Bar graphs represent means ± SEM from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 compared with the control group; #p < 0.05 compared with the LPS-plus-trypsin treatment group. (TIFF 4147 kb)
About this article
- Protease-activated receptor-2
- Endothelial cells
- Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
- Mitogen-activated protein kinases