Skip to main content

Expedition to the missing link: Long noncoding RNAs in cardiovascular diseases


With the advances in deep sequencing-based transcriptome profiling technology, it is now known that human genome is transcribed more pervasively than previously thought. Up to 90% of the human DNA is transcribed, and a large proportion of the human genome is transcribed as long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), a heterogenous group of non-coding transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides. Emerging evidence suggests that lncRNAs are functional and contribute to the complex regulatory networks involved in cardiovascular development and diseases. In this article, we will review recent evidence on the roles of lncRNAs in the biological processes of cardiovascular development and disorders. The potential applications of lncRNAs as biomarkers and targets for therapeutics are also discussed.


Transcriptional profiling has been utilized extensively to understand complex disease pathways [1], to identify novel biomarkers for diagnosing and prognosing diseases [2], and to examine the efficacy of therapeutic treatments with cardiovascular diseases [3,4,5]. Although intriguing results have been generated, previous transcriptional profiling studies in cardiovascular system targeted largely the expression of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs), which in combination account for only ~ 1% of all transcribed RNA species [6]. It is now known that the transcription of the eukaryotic genome is much more pervasive and complex than previously appreciated [6]. It is estimated that up to 90% of the mammalian genome is transcribed [6], and a large proportion of the mammalian genome is transcribed as long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), a heterogeneous group of non-coding transcripts longer than 200 nucleotides, encoded from genomic loci within or between (long intergenic RNA, lincRNA) coding genes [7, 8]. LncRNAs have been shown to be functional and involved in specific physiological and pathological processes, including chromatin modification [9, 10], cellular responses to DNA damage [11], stem cell pluripotency/differentiation [12], cell cycle control [13], as well as in the pathogenesis of neurologic diseases [14, 15] and human cancers [16,17,18]. Functionally, lncRNAs are known for their roles as modulators of transcription, including epigenetic regulation of chromatin structure [19]. In addition, lncRNAs have been shown to function as regulators of post-transcriptional mechanisms including transcript splicing [20], mRNA decay [21], and protein translation [22]. In this regard lncRNAs are unique, functioning not dependent solely on sequence (as with miRNAs) or structure (as for RNA-binding proteins). Rather, lncRNAs seem to function both by sequence homology/complementarity with other nucleic acids, as well as by structure, forming scaffolds for the assembly of macromolecular complexes that regulate biological processes [23]. In this review, we describe and summarize recent evidence on the contributions of lncRNAs to the development of cardiovascular diseases including heart failure (and its precursors like cardiac hypertrophy, myocardial infarction and cardiac fibrosis), atherosclerosis, and arrhythmias. The roles of lncRNAs in cardiac development and their utilization as biomarkers for diagnosing and prognosing cardiovascular diseases are also discussed.

LncRNAs in the failing heart

The roles of lncRNAs in heart failure (HF) have been investigated extensively using high-throughput RNA sequencing both in human [24,25,26] and animal models [27,28,29,30]. Using deep RNA sequencing on myocardial RNA samples from human HF patients before and after left ventricular assisted device (LVAD) support, we have revealed the dynamic regulation of myocardial transcriptome, including mRNA, miRNA and lncRNA, in advanced HF and after LVAD support. We have also shown that the expression profiles of lncRNA, but not miRNA or mRNAs, can discriminate failing hearts of ischemic vs non-ischemic origins [24], suggesting the importance of lncRNAs in the pathogenesis of HF and reverse remodeling observed with mechanical support.

LncRNAs and cardiac hypertrophy

Cardiac hypertrophy, caused by abnormal hemodynamic stress or myocardial injury, is initially induced as a compensatory response to maintain cardiac output. This pathological hypertrophy, however, is often accompanied with increased cardiomyocyte death, fetal gene re-expression and interstitial/perivascular fibrosis, and will ultimately progress to cardiac dilatation and heart failure [31]. Recently, Han et al. [32] discovered that a group of lncRNAs derived from the Myh7 loci, coined myosin heavy chain associated RNA transcripts (Mhrt), are protective against cardiac hypertrophy. Mhrt is downregulated in the mouse heart with thoracic aortic constriction (TAC)-induced cardiac hypertrophy and was associated with the Myh6/Myh7 isoform switch, a pathognomonic signature of cardiomyopathy. Conversely, restoring Mhrt expression reduced the pathological changes of cardiac hypertrophy. Mechanistically, Mhrt was found to function via regulating the Brg1-Hdac-Parp chromatin repressor complex by competitively binding to Brg1, thereby prohibiting it from initiating the Myh6-to-Myh7 switch. This mechanism appears to be conserved in humans, with the finding that human MHRT expression is suppressed in myopathic hearts. Later on, Luo et al. [33] uncovered an alternative cardioprotective mechanisms of Mhrt, where Mhrt reduces cardiac expression of myocardin, a muscle-specific transcription co-activator that promotes the expression of cardiac hypertrophy related genes, by reducing myocardin acetylation via HDAC5. Myocardin also binds to the CarG box of the Mhrt promoter and increases the transcriptional activity of Mhrt, forming a positive feedback loop. These studies together demonstrate the crucial roles of Mhrt in the pathogenesis of cardiac hypertrophy.

Exploiting transcriptome analysis in TAC-induced hypertrophic mouse hearts, Viereck et al. [29] identified a hypertrophy-associated, cardiomyocyte-specific lncRNA cardiac hypertrophy-associated transcript (Chast). In vitro and in vivo cardiac hypertrophy was observed upon overexpression of Chast, whilst attenuation of hypertrophic response was observed when Chast was silenced using anti-sense GapmeRs, single-stranded antisense oligonucleotides that allows RNase-H-mediated cleavage of target RNA. The transcription of Chast was activated by prohypertrophic nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) signaling. Chast downregulates Pleckstrin homology domain-containing protein family M member 1 (Plekhm1), a regulator of normal cardiac autophagy, leading to maladaptive cardiac remodeling and hypertrophy. A human analog of Chast was also identified and shares similar functions with its mouse counterpart.

Another lncRNA identified via transcriptome analysis on pressure-overload-induced mouse hypertrophic hearts, cardiac-hypertrophy-associated epigenetic regulator (Chaer), was reported to contribute to cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis [30]. Mechanistically, Chaer interacts with the catalytic subunit of polycomb repressor complex 2 (PRC2) via an EZH2 binding motif, interfering with the targeting and repressive action of PRC2 on the promoter regions of genes involved in cardiac hypertrophy. The mTOR-dependent Chaer-PRC2 interaction thus releases pathological gene suppression by H3K27 tri-methylation in cardiomyocytes, resulting in the upregulation of pro-hypertrophic genes including Anf, Myh7, and Acta1 in response to hypertrophic stimulation. Furthermore, knockdown of Chaer reduced pathologic cardiac remodeling only within a narrow timeframe before TAC surgery, suggesting a critical window immediately following the onset of hypertrophic stress during which epigenetic regulation by the Chaer-PRC2 complex occurs. This also suggests an epigenetic checkpoint of PRC2 present in the progression of cardiac hypertrophy.

Recently, studies have shown that one class of lncRNAs modulates physiological and pathological processes through regulation of miRNAs by acting as an endogenous sponge of the target miRNA to prevent miRNAs from reducing the stability or interfering the translation of their target transcripts. These competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) ultimately derepresses its downstream molecular pathways, a mechanism that could either salvage inhibited cellular/physiological processes or reactivate/ magnify responses to pathological stresses.

One of the first ceRNAs to be recognized as a key component in cardiac hypertrophy is cardiac hypertrophy-related factor (CHRF) [34], which was shown to exert its pro-hypertrophic effects by targeting the anti-hypertrophic miR-489/Myd88 axis. More recently, another study revealed that CHRF also regulates the cardiac miR-93/Akt3 axis [35]. In this case, CHRF attenuated the repressive effects of miR-93 on Akt3, a protein kinase of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway critical for the regulation of cardiac contractile function and stress response.

Another ceRNA that has been extensively studied is myocardial infarction-related transcripts (MIAT). Zhu et al. [36] found that MIAT regulates cardiac hypertrophy via sponging miR-150, a miRNA exhibiting anti-hypertrophic effects on cardiomyocyte. P300 was then determined to be the downstream effector of this MIAT-miR150 axis in promoting cardiac hypertrophy [37]. Additional studies by Li et al. [38] showed that MIAT contributes to cardiac hypertrophy also by influencing the miR-93/TLR4 axis. MIAT-mediated sponging of miR-93 led to upregulation of TLR4 and activation of hypertrophic PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling, thereby leading to AngII-induced cardiac hypertrophy.

Other examples of lncRNAs that regulate cardiac hypertrophy-related miRNA as ceRNAs include H19 [39], HOTAIR [40], lncRNA-ROR [41], MAGI1-IT1 [42], Meg3 [43], Plscr4 [44], SYNE1-AS1 [45], and XIST [46, 47]. Table 1 summarizes lncRNAs that are implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure.

Table 1 LncRNAs implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure

LncRNAs and myocardial infarction

Myocardial injury following myocardial infarction (MI) represents a particular challenge in clinical practice as it almost invariably leads to adverse cardiac remodeling and fibrosis, causing ischemic heart failure [49]. Determining the functional contribution of lncRNAs to MI may shed light on previously unknown cellular processes and serve as novel targets for therapeutics.

Studying the effects of lncRNAs on autophagy, Liu et al. [50] found that the lncRNA cardiac autophagy inhibitory factor (CAIF) showed cardioprotective properties by interacting with p53 protein, thereby blocking it from activating myocardin transcription and subsequent cardiac autophagy.

An interesting alternative mode of action of lncRNA was discovered when Greco et al. [51] studied the effect of β-secretase-1 (BACE1), the enzyme that produces the β-amyloid peptide, and its antisense transcript BACE1-AS on HF. They showed that BACE1-AS stabilizes the BACE1 sense transcript, resulting in their concordant upregulated expression in cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells. BACE1-AS positively regulates the level of BACE1 protein, leading to increased β-amyloid protein, the accumulation of which is toxic to endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes. These data suggest that the BACE1-AS/BACE1/β-amyloid pathway contributes to the pathogenesis of HF.

Similar to the case of cardiac hypertrophy, an increasing number of ceRNAs have emerged that regulate numerous processes of myocardial infarction and cardiac infarction through miRNA inhibition.

The ceRNA cardiac apoptosis-related lncRNA (CARL) [52] was shown to regulate mitochondrial fission and apoptosis by acting as an endogenous sponge of miR-539 in cardiomyocytes, a miRNA that represses the expression of PHB2, a critical inhibitor of mitochondrial fission and apoptosis. Modulating CARL-miR-539 and PHB2 axis thus could be helpful in improving survival of cardiomyocytes and preserving myocardial function.

Another ceRNA autophagy promoting factor (APF) was reported to target the miR-188-3p/ATG7 axis to induce adaptive cell autophagy in cardiomyocytes after MI [53]. In this study, miR-188-3p was shown to repress ATG7 expression, thereby inhibiting autophagy and causing cell death in cardiomyocytes. APF binds with miR-188-3p as a ceRNA and leads to increased ATG7 levels and enhanced cardiac autophagy. Increased cardiac levels of APF preserves myocardial function in response to ischemic/reperfusion (I/R) injury.

In addition to cell apoptosis and autophagy, ceRNAs have also been shown to regulate necrosis in cardiomyocytes. Necrosis-related factor (NRF), for example, regulates cardiomyocyte necrosis by targeting miR-873 and RIPK1 (receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1)/RIPK3 (receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 3). In vitro and in vivo experiments reveal that miR-873 inhibits H2O2-induced necrotic cell death and I/R injury-induced cardiomyocyte necrosis in mouse hearts by targeting RIPK1/RIPK3. NRF, a ceRNA that is transcriptionally activated by p53 upon I/R injury, binds miR-873, leading to increased cardiomyocyte necrosis mediated by RIPK1/RIPK3 [54].

LncRNAs linked to MI are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 LncRNAs linked to myocardial infarction

LncRNAs and cardiac fibrosis

Exploiting the RNA sequencing data obtained from mouse heart following MI, Micheletti et al. [55] identified Wisp2 super-enhancer-associated RNA (WISPER), a cardiac fibroblast-enriched lncRNA that regulates cardiac fibrosis through association with TIA1-related protein and the regulation of profibrotic lysyl hydroylase 2. Depletion of WISPER in vivo repressed fibroblast differentiation and proliferation, inhibiting the development of cardiac fibrosis, suggesting the potential of targeting WISPER as an antifibrotic therapeutic strategy.

Maternally expressed gene 3 (Meg3), a fibroblast-enriched lncRNA, was reported to be dysregulated in chronic pressure overload-induced cardiac fibrosis. Silencing Meg3 in cardiac fibroblasts inhibits P53-dependent transcriptional activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), an essential mediator of cardiac fibrosis and remodeling. In vivo inhibition of Meg3 prevented pressure overload-induced MMP-2 induction, leading to reduced cardiac fibrosis and improved diastolic function [56].

LncRNA MALAT1 has been shown to be upregulated in infarction-induced fibrotic mouse heart and angiotensin II (AngII)-treated cardiac fibroblasts, leading to the inhibition and downregulation of miR-145, a negative regulator of of TGFβ1. Knocking down MALAT1 in cardiac fibroblasts restored miR-145 expression and prevented AngII-induced fibroblast profileration, collagen production and α-SMA expression [57].

In addition to its role in MI and cardiac hypertrophy, recent research has shown that lncRNA MIAT also play roles in cardiac fibrosis. MIAT is markedly upregulated in post-infarct fibrotic mouse heart, which was accompanied by by downregulation of miR-24 and upregulation of Furin and TGFβ1 [48]. Knocking down MIAT1 in the mouse heart or cardiac fibroblasts attenuated fibrogenic response following pathological stimulations.

LncRNAs shown to contribute to cardiac fibrosis are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3 LncRNAs contributing to cardiac fibrosis

LncRNAs in cardiac arrhythmias and electrical remodeling

Electrical remodeling, a process involving the dysregulation/dysfunction of cardiac ion channels and transporters under pathological conditions, creates a proarrhythmogenic substrate that predisposes to the development of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Recently, lncRNAs have been shown to contribute to the development of myocardial electrical remodeling and cardiac arrhythmias.

Downregulation of TCONS_0007546, a lincRNA reported to act as a competing endogenous RNA of miR-328, was found to shorten the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and reduce atrial fibrillation (Afib) inducibility in rabbits as a result of downregulation of CACNA1C protein secondary to increased miR-328 levels [58, 59].

Recently, lncRNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) was found to mediate the cardioprotective effects of fentanyl against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury [60]. Zhu et al. performed further study on the potential interaction between MALAT1 and ion channels. MALAT1 was highly upregulated in the cardiomyocytes from rats with post-MI ventricular arrhythmias, and like endometrioid adenocarcinoma, MALAT1 acts as a sponge for miR-200c in cardiomyocytes. The overexpression of MALAT1 notably inhibited the level of miR-200c, which was shown to target high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), leading to reduced levels of Kv4.2 and Kv4.3 channel, α subunits of the potassium channels that encode cardiac transient outward currents (Ito) [61]. Taken together, lncRNA MALAT1 regulates cardiac electrophysiology through miR-200c/HMGB1/Kv channel pathway [62].

LncRNAs were also found to contribute to the pathogenesis of ventricular arrhythmia. LncRNA Kcna2-AS, for example, negatively regulates Kcna2, which encodes Kv1.2 potassium channel subunit that plays a pivotal role in regulating several physiological functions, including heart rate [63]. Long et al. observed that the Kcna2-AS level was significantly upregulated, while the expression of Kcna2 was downregulated, in rat failing cardiac ventricles. In addition, knocking down Kcna2 in the heart led to reductions in delayed rectifier potassium current IKs and prolonged action potential (AP) durations in rats. Therefore, the upregulation of cardiac Kcna2-AS downregulates Kcna2/Kv1.2, leading to increased susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias in rats with CHF [63].

Connexins (Cx), known as gap junction proteins, are indispensable for the electrical conduction in the myocardium. Recently, lncRNA CCRR (cardiac conduction regulatory RNA) was found to regulate connexin 43 (Cx43), normally localized at the intercalated disc that connects cardiomyocytes, via binding with CIP85 (Cx43- interacting protein of 85 kDa). CIP85 interacts with Cx43 and promotes its endocytosis and degradation. Zhang et al. demonstrated that CCRR protected Cx43 from endocytic trafficking through forming the CCRR:CIP85 complex. Therefore, overexpression of CCRR increased cardiac Cx43 levels, rescued intercellular conduction block and contractile dysfunction in heart failure (HF) mice [64].

Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) serves as the major Ca2+ efflux mechanism in cardiomyocytes and plays an essential role in maintaining sarcolemmal Ca2+ homeostasis and excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. During HF, the transcript/protein expression levels and enzyme activity of SERCA2a, the principal SERCA isoform in cardiomyocytes, are significantly reduced, leading to delayed clearance of cytosolic Ca2+, elevated diastolic [Ca2+], reduced SR Ca2+ store and decreased peak Ca2+ transient, which can lead to cardiac contractile dysfunction and electrical instability. LncRNA ZFAS1, which was upregulated with ischemic HF, was found to represses the expression and availability of SERCA2a, resulting in intracellular Ca2+ overload in cardiomyocytes. Mechanistically, ZFAS1 directly binds SERCA2a protein, leading to reduced SERCA2a activity and expression levels. Targeting the functional domain by which ZFAS1 interacts with SERCA2a with an antisense oligonucleotide fragment (AsZFAS1-FD) blocks the deleterious effects of ZFAS1 in the heart [65].

Although lncRNAs, by definition, do not encode proteins, recent studies discovered that some lncRNAs actually have open reading frames (ORFs) and may be translated into functional micropeptides [66,67,68]. Micropeptides translated from putative long non-coding RNAs have been reported to play critical roles in modulating muscle function. Magny et al. reported a 31 amino-acid micropeptide Sacrolamban (Scl), encoded from the ORF of pncr003:2 L (putative noncoding RNA 003 in 2 L), in Drosophila. They showed that this arthropod peptide exhibits homologous structure and function with sacrolipin and phospholamban in vertebrate cardiac tissue. Scl peptides is localized to Drosophila SR membrane and regulates SERCA activity directly. Alteration of the level of Scl leads to dysregulation in calcium trafficking and irregular cardiac contraction [69]. In mammals, a 34 amino-acid micropeptide DWORF (dwarf open reading frame) encoded from lncRNA LOC100507537, was highly enriched in muscle tissue. Nelson et al. showed that DWORF shares the same binding sites with other SERCA binding regulators, such as phospholamban (PLN) in cardiac muscle, sacrolipin (SLN) in atrium, or myoregulin (MLN) in fast skeletal muscle, on the M6 transmembrane alpha-helix of SERCA. DWORF acts as a physiological competitive antagonist that interferes the interaction between PLN, SLN, or MLN with SERCA. In contrast with the inhibitory effects of SERCA activity by PLN, SLN, or MLN, increased DWORF activated the calcium influx induced by SERCA that resulted in decreasing the time of individual contraction-relaxation cycle. Increasing DWORF levels in failing heart relieved the inhibition of SERCA2a by PLN and restored cardiac contractile function [70, 71]. Table 4 summarized the aforementioned lncRNAs shown to regulate cardiac arrhythmias and electrical remodeling.

Table 4 LncRNAs reported to regulate cardiac arrhythmias and electrical remodeling

LncRNAs in atherosclerotic vascular diseases

Atherosclerosis is the underlying cause of cardiovascular diseases including coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease, aortic aneurysm, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), which are the precursors of myocardial infarction, stroke, limb ischemia and sudden cardiac death [72]. Collectively, cardiovascular diseases resulting from atherosclerosis have become the leading cause of death around the world, and the incidence is on the rise as a result of the international epidemic of obesity, type 2 diabetes and aging, all of which are potent risk factors for atherosclerosis [73].

The early events that lead to the development of the atherosclerotic plaque include endothelial activation and recruitment of circulating leukocytes to the affected arterial intima, as well as local deposition of lipids and accumulation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and extracellular matrix proteins [74, 75]. VSMCs and endothelial cells (ECs) play crucial roles in vascular remodeling and atherosclerosis. Dysfunction of the endothelial lining of the arterial vasculature is an important contributor to the pathobiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Pathological stresses, such as oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) and hyperglycemia, lead to changes in lncRNA expression in human EC [76, 77]. On the other hand, atherogenic cytokines and growth factors transform VSMCs from a contractile, quiescent state to an active, synthetic state with increased VSMC proliferation, migration and extracellular matrix protein deposition. In addition, abnormal lipid metabolism contributes critically to the development of atherosclerotic lesions. Emerging evidence suggests that lncRNAs serve as a key regulators of lipid homeostasis. Here, we focus on atherorelevant lncRNAs that function through regulating ECs, VSMCs and lipid metabolism.

LncRNAs in endothelial cells (ECs)

H19 is one of the first identified maternally imprinted lncRNAs, and is involved in cell differentiation and growth. H19 is abundantly expressed during embryonic development and subsequently suppressed in adult vasculature [78, 79]. Interestingly, even though its expression was only retained in a few adult tissues, H19 was found to be involved in the dysregulation of ECs during atherosclerosis. Hyperglycemia leads to H19 downregulation in ECs, which is linked to impaired angiogenesis in diabetes through repressing insulin-PI3K-Akt signaling. Both Akt activity in ECs and diabetic wound healing were enhanced by extracellular vesicle-mimetic nanovesicles carrying H19 [80], strongly suggesting the critical role of H19 in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.

MALAT1 is a conserved lncRNA ubiquitously expressed in a number of cells and tissues, and can be induced in response to many pathological stimulations including hypoxia, high glucose and oxidative stress. Silencing MALAT1 reduced endothelial cell proliferation by inhibiting cell cycle progression through reducing the S-phase cyclins CCNA2, CCNB1, and CCNB2, while increasing the cell cycle inhibitors P21 and P27kip1 [81]. Malat1−/− mice showed a delayed vessel extension in the retina revascularization, while pharmacological inhibition of MALAT1 reduced blood flow recovery and capillary density after hindlimb ischemia and ameliorate diabetic retinopathy, such as microvascular leakage, and retinal inflammation [81, 82], suggesting an important role of MALAT1 in promoting endothelial cell proliferation and blood vessel growth. Interestingly, genetic deletion of Malat1 in mice did not impact the recovery of blood flow and capillary density under non-ischemic conditions [83].

LncRNA MEG3 is found to regulate both angiogenesis and diabetes-related microvascular dysfunction. It has been shown that MEG3 affects angiogenesis through Notch signaling. In a stroke model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion, MEG3 was downregulated. Silencing of MEG3 resulted in a proangiogenic effect through upregulation of Notch pathway-related genes in both ischemia brains and endothelial cells, leading to enhanced functional recovery and reducing the focal ischemia volume after a stroke [84]. In addition, MEG3 was highly increased in senescent HUVECs and human atrial samples, whereas silencing MEG3 prevented aging-mediated suppression of vascular sprouting activity and led to improved blood flow in an ischemic hindlimb mouse model by enhancing regenerative angiogenesis [85]. Meg3-KO mice showed increased expression of VEGF pathway genes and increased cortical microvessel density in Meg3-null embryos, suggesting the importance of MEG3 in vascularization and angiogenesis [86]. MEG3 expression is down-regulated in the retinas of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice, where reduced MEG3 leads to capillary degeneration and increased microvascular leakage and inflammation. In this context, MEG3-mediated endothelial regulation is mediated by the activation of PI3K/Akt signaling [87].

Nexilin F-actin–binding protein (NEXN), also called Nexilin, is an actin-binding protein that regulates cell adhesion and migration. NEXN and its anti-sense lncRNA NEXN antisense RNA 1 (NEXN-AS1), expressed both in humans and mice, are reduced in human atherosclerotic plaques; circulating NEXN is also significantly decreased in patients with CAD, MI or HF. NEXN-AS1 interacts with the chromatin remodeler BAZ1A to increase the transcriptional activity of the 5′ flanking region of the NEXN gene. NEXN exerts atheroprotective effects by inhibiting endothelial activation and monocyte recruitment via the TLR4/NF-κB–mediated pathway. In addition to endothelial cells, NEXN-AS1 was also shown to modulate NEXN expression in monocytes and VSMCs. NEXN+/−ApoE−/−mice (NEXN−/−ApoE−/− mice were embryonically lethal) had substantially increased atherosclerotic burden and thinner cap fibroatheroma than ApoE−/−mice, indicating that NEXN plays a protective role against the development of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques and atherosclerosis [88].

Hemodynamic disturbed flow pattern makes endothelia atherosusceptible, and hence atherosclerosis preferentially develops at sites of curvature, branching and bifurcation in elastic and muscular arteries. MANTIS, a nuclear-localized lncRNA controlled by the histone demethylase JARID1B, regulates angiogenesis by interacting in trans with BRG1 and facilitates the binding of BRG1 and BRG1-stimulating factor BAF155 on angiogenic genes [89]. Of note, the expression of MANTIS in endothelial cells was induced by atheroprotective flow and statin through mechanisms involving epigenetic rearrangements and the transcription factors KLF2 and KLF4. MANTIS, especially its Alu element, limits endothelial ICAM-1 expression by reducing the binding of the BRG1 at the ICAM-1 promoter. Interestingly, statins also mediate their atheroprotective effects, at least partially, through MANTIS. Importantly, the expression of MANTIS in human carotid artery endarterectomy material was lower compared with healthy vessels and this effect was prevented by statin therapy [90].

LncRNAs in vascular smooth muscle cells

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) revealed a strong association between DNA sequence variants on chromosome 9p21.3 and the risk of coronary artery disease, accounting for ~ 10–15% of disease in non-African populations [91,92,93,94]. The 9p21.3 risk locus is adjacent to the last exons of the antisense ncRNA in the INK4 locus (ANRIL) and encompasses multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The function of ANRIL remains incompletely understood, but a number of studies suggest ANRIL regulates cell proliferation and senescence of VSMCs either by Alu motif-dependent trans regulation of atherorelevant genes through polycomb protein complexes [95], or by regulating miR-181a/Sirt1 [96]. Using iPSC-derived VSMCs, VSMCs carrying 9p21.3 risk allele exhibit globally altered transcriptional networks that intersect with previously identified coronary artery disease (CAD) risk genes and pathways and risk-dependent gene networks drive cell state instability, partially through ANRIL [97]. Deleting the risk haplotype rescues VSMC stability, while expression ANRIL induces risk phenotypes in non-risk VSMCs. This provides evidence for crosstalk between CAD risk loci and possible vascular therapeutic targets.

Although H19 expression is normally suppressed in adult vasculature, it is re-expressed in the neointimal lesions, particularly in VSMCs, upon vascular injury [79]. H19 is barely detectable in proliferating neointimal VSMCs, but becomes highly abundant in postconfluent, differentiated neointimal VSMCs, suggesting its role in the phenotypic changes of VSMCs during post-injury neointimal formation [79]. H19 is by far the only lncRNA that has been linked to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). H19 was highly upregulated in the medial layer, particularly in VSMCs, of aortic tissues from human AAA patients, as well as from mouse models of AAA induced by Ang II or porcine pancreatic elastase. Increased H19 levels promote VSMC apoptosis, independent of miR-675, through cytoplasmic interaction with hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and sequential p53 stabilization. Knockdown of H19 with site-specific antisense oligonucleotides (LNA-GapmeRs) in vivo significantly limited aneurysm growth in mouse models of AAA [98]. However, opposite effects of H19 have also been reported, where knockdown of H19 using siRNA suppressed proliferation and promoted apoptosis in human aortic VSMCs following the treatment of ox-LDL, both in normoxic and hypoxic condition [99, 100]. The contradictory effects of H19 on VSMCs observed in different studies may result from differences in the knockdown strategy and the atherogenic stimuli used.

LncRNA MALAT1 has also been shown to contribute to vascular diseases. In VSMCs, MALAT1 form a ternary complex with histone deacetylase HDAC9 and the chromatin-remodeling enzyme BRG1 to recruit PRC2 and inhibit gene expression of contractile proteins by epigenetical silencing [101]. Targeting HDAC9-BRG1-MALAT1 complex by deletion of Malat1 or Hdac9 in vivo restores contractile protein gene expression, improves aortic mural architecture, and inhibits experimental aneurysm growth in Fbn1C1039G/+ (Marfan syndrome) mouse model.

LncRNAs in lipid metabolism

LncLSTR (liver-specific triglyceride regulator) is a mouse lncRNA predominantly expressed in liver, but no human orthologue was found. Mice with liver-specific depletion of lncLSTR exhibit a marked reduction in plasma triglyceride (TG) levels through clearance of TG by ApoC2-mediated lipoprotein lipase activation. Interestingly, lncLSTR doesn’t regulate ApoC2 through a cell-autonomous mechanism. It was found lncLSTR regulates expression of Cyp8b1, a rate-limiting enzyme in bile acid biosynthesis, by interacting with RNA-binding protein TDP-43 to reduce TDP-43 occupancy and inhibition of the Cyp8b1 promoter. The change in bile pool composition by Cyp8b1 alters the activity of bile acid receptor FXR in liver, leading to induction of ApoC2 genes, an important component of very low-density lipoproteins and chylomicrons. Moreover, FXR deficiency did not completely block the lipid-lowing effects of lncLSTR depletion, which indicated the interaction between lncLSTR and TDP-43 might have additional molecular and physiological functions [102]. Importantly, lncLSTR not only plays a unique role in TG metabolism, but also exhibits tissue- and species-specific characteristics of lncRNAs.

LeXis (liver-expressed LXR induced sequence) is a conserved, liver-enriched lncRNA that is robustly induced by high cholesterol diet and activation of liver X receptor (LXR). LeXis inhibits cholesterol biosynthesis by acting as an important conduit between the nutrient-sensing nuclear receptor liver X receptor and the master cholesterol regulator SREBP2. LeXis reduces cholesterol synthesis by interacting with and affecting the DNA interactions of RALY, a heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein that acts as a transcriptional cofactor for cholesterol biosynthetic genes in the mouse liver [103]. Notably, a gene therapy utilizing AAV8.hTBG.LeXis significantly reduced atherosclerotic burden in Ldlr−/− mice [104].

MeXis (macrophage-expressed LXR-induced sequence), a conserved and macrophage-enriched lncRNAs, is an amplifier of LXR-dependent transcription of the gene Abca1, a critical regulator of cholesterol efflux. MeXis expression is markedly induced by physiologic lipid signals, such as oxidized or acetylated LDL, and LXR activation. MeXis−/− mice show reduced Abca1 expression in a tissue-selective manner in response to Western diet, and MeXis is required for maximal Abca1 expression in the face of macrophage cholesterol loading. MeXis modulates nearby gene Abca1 expression through interacting with and guiding promoter binding of the transcriptional coactivator DDX17. Furthermore, loss of MeXis in mouse bone marrow cells alters chromosome architecture at the Abca1 locus, impairs cellular responses to cholesterol overload, and accelerates the development of atherosclerosis, supporting role of macrophage MeXis in Abca1-mediated cholesterol efflux and atherosclerosis development [105]. Table 5 summarized lncRNAs that are implicated in the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.

Table 5 LncRNAs implicated in the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases

LncRNAs in cardiac development

LncRNA Bvht (Braveheart), transcribed from a regulatory locus located on mouse chromosome 18, has specific expression pattern during the mouse embryonic stem cells (ESC) differentiation and cardiac lineage commitment. The depletion of Bvht using short hairpin RNA (shRNA) results in failure to promote a MESP1-driven gene expression program because Bvht regulates upstream of Mesp1. Bvht has also been revealed to react to SUZ12, a core component of PRC2, a complex that has histone methyltransferase activity and mediates transcriptional repression. Therefore, Bvht is thought to play a critical role in mediating gene expression in the developing heart [106]. Linc1405 (Large intergenic non-coding RNAs-1405) was also shown to be involved in regulation of Mesp1 expression. Eomes, a transcription factor participating in the control of developmental progression, was recruited to Mesp1 promotor by Linc1405. Meanwhile, it has been shown that the Linc1405/Eomes complex united WDR5 and GCN5 to activate Mesp1 in primitive streak, thereby promoting cardiac mesoderm specification and cardiogenesis [107].

Like Bvht, CARMEN (Cardiac mesoderm enhancer-associated noncoding RNA), a lncRNA overlapping with the miR143/miR145 locus, also interacts with EZH2 and SUZ12 of the PRC2 complex. CARMEN knockdown leads to inhibition of cardiac specification and differentiation in cardiac precursor cells. CARMEN silencing also represses Bvht induction without affecting miR143/miR145 expression, indicating that CARMEN controls upstream of Bvht. Moreover, CARMEN also regulates the expression of cardiac transcription factors and differentiation makers, inclusive of GATA4, NKX2.5, TBX5, MYH6, MYH7, and TNNI [108].

Another lncRNA Fendrr (Fetal-lethal non-coding developmental regulatory RNA), which is restricted to the caudal end of the lateral mesoderm, is located upstream of and co-expressed with Foxf1. Fendrr was found to occupy the promoters of specific transcriptional factor (Foxf1, Pitx2 and Irx3) by modulating PRC2 and TrxG/MLL complexes, leading to increased level of H3K27me3 and epigenetic silencing of these transcription factor genes. Moreover, knockdown of Fendrr in embryonic stem cells significantly increases the level of H3K4me3 at the promoter of Gata6 and Nkx2–5, resulting in gene activation [109].

PITX2 expression is a critical factor that determines left-right organ pattern and gut looping during development. Several lncRNAs have been reported to control PITX2 expression. PANCR (PITX2 adjacent noncoding RNA) and PITX2 express coordinately during the cardiogenic differentiation. Knockdown of PANCR decrease the expression of PITX2 in hESC-derived cardiomyocytes, suggesting that PITX2 expression require PANCR [110, 111]. Another lncRNA Playrr (Pitx2 locus-asymmetric regulated RNA), transcribed from right-specific enhancer element 926 (e926), is expressed on the right side and repressed by Pitx2 and Playrr and Pitx2 were found to exhibit mutual antagonism. These genes are parts of topologically associating domain (TAD). Conformational changes which alter the distance between the Pitx2 and Playrr loci modulate their expression in this TAD, and CTCF (CCCTC-binding factor), a sequence-specific scaffold protein, is required to this interaction between Pitx2 and Playrr [112].

HAND2, a transcription factor playing a critical role in cardiac development and reprogramming cardiac fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes, was found to be regulated by lncRNAs Upperhand and Handdown, two lncRNAs that were transcribed from upstream and downstream of Hand2 DNA locus, respectively. Upperhand, also named as Uph or Hand2os1, is a cardiac-enriched lncRNA that shares a bidirectional promoter with Hand2, has been shown to be essential for the transcription of Hand2. Anderson et al. revealed that Uph regulates the expression of Hand2 through recruiting GATA4 to interact with Uph-HAND2 super-enhancer. Knockout of lncRNA Uph locus resulted in congenital heart defects and perinatal lethality in mice, demonstrating the essential role of Uph-Hand2 regulatory partnership in cardiac development [113]. On the other hand, another lncRNA locus Handdown (also named as Hdn), located 7.2 kb downstream of Hand2, is active in early cardiac cells. The transcriptional activity of Hdn locus, but not Hdn transcript itself, suppresses Hand2 expression and is essential for murine development [113,114,115].

Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is one of the most common congenital heart diseases, characterized by defective ventricular septum and irregular cardiomyocyte differentiation, leading to the narrowing of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). Wang et al. reported that increased cardiac tissue (RVOT) levels of HA117, a lncRNA known to have anti-differentiation function, is associated with poorer McGoon ratio, Nakata index, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) in patients with TOF [116]. In addition, patients with higher levels of HA117 had longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, ICU stay and poorer percentage improvement in SpO2 at 6 months after surgery. Although the functional contribution of HA117 to the pathogenesis of TOF remains unknown, Wang et al. proposed that HA117 could serve as a prognostic biomarker for TOF [116]. Table 6 summarizes lncRNAs that are involved in the development of cardiovascular system.

Table 6 LncRNAs involved in cardiovascular development

LncRNAs in cardiac regeneration

LncRNA CAREL (cardiac regeneration-related lncRNA), a lncRNA that was continuously upregulated in the postnatal heart in parallel with the loss of regenerative capacity, was found to suppress cardiomyocyte division and proliferation by functioning as a ceRNA for miR-296. MiR-296 suppresses the expression of Trp53inp1, a protein known to repress the proliferation in neural stem cell [117], as well as Itm2a, a protein essential for chondrogenic cellular differentiation [118]. Low expression levels of CAREL increases miR-296, thereby repressing the levels of anti-proliferative Trp53inp1 and Itm2a proteins, leading to the regeneration and differentiation of cardiomyocytes both in vitro and in vivo. Myh6-driving cardiomyocyte-specific CARE trans-genic (TG) mice had lower cardiac regenerative capacity, which was rescued by miR-296 [119].

CPR (cardiomyocyte proliferation regulator) is a cardiac-restricted lncRNA that shows significant upregulation in adult than in embryonic mouse heart [120]. The percentage of EdU, pH 3 and Aurora B-positive CMs was significantly increased in the CPR KO neonatal mice, indicating the deletion of CPR promoted postnatal CM proliferation. By contrast, neonatal cardiomyocyte proliferation and cardiac regeneration were significantly suppressed in transgenic mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of CPR (CPR Tg). Although the gross morphology of CPR Tg mouse heart was practically identical to that in WT, the biomarkers of cardiac hypertrophy, including ANF (atrial natriuretic factor) and β-MHC (β myosin heavy chain) were substantially upregulated in CPR Tg, compared to WT control, mouse heart. These results suggest that overexpressing lncRNA CPR induce cardiac hypertrophic response instead of the CM proliferation in adult mice. Mechanistically, CPR was found to function by targeting minichromosome maintenance 3 (Mcm3), an initiator of DNA replication and cell cycle progression, thereby suppressing cardiomyocyte proliferation [120, 121]. CPR inhibits MCM3 transcription by directly interacting with and recruiting DNMT3A (DNA-methyltransferase 3A) at Mcm3 promoter, leading to hypermethylation and suppressed Mcm3 promoter activity [120].

NR_045363, a mice ortholog lncRNA of human LOC101927497, was remarkably conserved in other mammals and birds during neonatal cardiac regeneration. The overexpression of NR_045363 was found in the period of embryonic and neonatal stages and gradually reduced from childhood to adulthood. LncRNA NR_045363 promotes CM proliferation and cardiac regeneration by sponging miR-216a, a negative regulator of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway [122].

In another study, comparative RNA-Seq analyses on fetal and normal adult human heart identified lncRNA NONHSAG007671, or CRRL (cardiomyocyte regeneration-related lncRNA), as a novel mediator of CM regeneration. CRRL is highly conserved across species, including human, chimp, mouse and rat. Loss of CRRL significantly attenuated post-MI LV remodeling and fibrosis compared to control. Knockdown of CRRL in vivo enhanced cardiac function and activated CM proliferation, but not hypertrophy, after myocardial infarction. Mechanistically, CRRL acts as a ceRNA by sponging miR-199a-3p, thereby increasing the expression levels of Hopx, a miR-199a-3p target gene that plays a critical role in repressing CM proliferation [123]. Using a similar approach, the same group identified another CM proliferation regulator lncRNA ECRAR (Endogenous cardiac regeneration-associated regulator). Overexpression of ECRAR increased the number of EdU, pH 3, aurora B-positive cardiomyocytes in both postnatal and adult rat hearts after 14 days of the MI surgery, suggesting that ECRAR modulated CM proliferation and post-MI regeneration without causing hypertrophy. ECRAR promotes CM proliferation by direct binding with and increasing the phosphorylation of ERK1/2, a critical mediator of cell cycle progression. In addition, further analysis revealed that E2F1 transcriptionally upregulates ECRAR. Therefore, E2F1-ECRAR-ERK1/2 form a positive feedback loop to drive CM proliferation [124].

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling has been shown to be essential for CM proliferation and cardiac regeneration [125, 126], Li et al. discovered that Sirt1 antisense lncRNA was highly upregulated in cardiomyocytes following IGF 1 treatment [127]. Sirt1 antisense lncRNA is highly expressed in the embryonic day 16.5 (E16.5) CMs and sharply decreases from embryonic heart to postnatal heart. Overexpression of Sirt1 antisense lncRNA promotes the proliferation of CMs, while depletion of Sirt1 antisense lncRNA represses CM proliferation. Mechanistically, Sirt1 antisense lncRNA stabilizes Sirt1 mRNA by direct binding with the 3’UTR region of Sirt1 mRNA [127]; moderately increased SIRT1 levels then promotes CM proliferation and cardiac regeneration.

AZIN2-sv, a splice variant of AZIN2 (Antizyme inhibitor 2), is highly expressed in adult, compared to fetal, human heart [128]. Li et al. showed that AZIN2-sv repressed the proliferation of cardiomyocytes both in vitro and in vivo and the loss of AZIN2-sv stimulated the CMs proliferation and preserved cardiac function in post-MI mouse heart. Moreover, AZIN2-sv acts as a ceRNA for miR-214, a miRNA which negatively regulated the expression of PTEN (Phosphatase and tensin homolog). PTEN, a tumor suppressor that inhibits Akt/PKB signaling pathway, was also directly interacted with and stabilized by AZIN2-sv. Thus, the silence of AZIN2-sv promotes CM proliferation and cardiac regeneration through direct and indirect modulation of PTEN/Akt/PKB signaling pathway [128]. LncRNAs shown to be involved in the process of cardiac regeneration are summarized in Table 7.

Table 7 LncRNAs shown to be involved in the process of cardiac regeneration

LncRNAs as biomarkers for cardiovascular diseases

The potential value of lncRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers has been widely explored. Although lncRNAs are not as abundant as other non-coding RNAs, the cell type- and disease-specific expression pattern make them suitable biomarker candidates. Because of the space limit, this review only covers a few of the important and well-established lncRNAs as biomarkers for CV diseases.

As mentioned earlier, ANRIL, located adjacent to the 9p21.3 risk locus, has been linked to increased CAD risk in several GWAS. This increased CAD risk associated with the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in this region is independent of all known CAD risk factors [93]. Interestingly, the risk alleles for atherosclerosis-related phenotypes were consistently associated with a low expression levels of ANRIL splice variant spanning exons 1–2, but not exon 17–18, of ANRIL, suggesting that different splicing variants of ANRIL might play distinct roles [129]. Indeed, different ANRIL splice variants have distinct expression patterns in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from carriers of the risk haplotype, which suggests that differential splicing or transcript stability may confer different atherosclerosis susceptibility [130]. In one study enrolling 414 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention, levels of hypoxia inducible factor 1A antisense RNA 2, KCNQ1OT1, MALAT1 and ANRIL in peripheral blood cells were significantly altered with AMI. Among them, ANRIL and KCNQ1OT1 improved the prediction of post-MI left ventricular dysfunction in a multivariate, prognostic regression model that includes demographic features, clinical parameters, and cardiac biomarkers [131].

CoroMarker, also named as Aldo-Keto Reductase Family 1 Member B1 Pseudogene 3, was discovered in a cohort study of patients receiving diagnostic coronary angiography for suspected CAD. CoroMarker from PBMCs was found to be a good biomarker with high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of CAD. The expression levels of CoroMarker showed positive correlation with genes involved in atherosclerosis. Of note, CoroMarker was stable in plasma [132] and knockdown of CoroMarker decreased the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines from THP-1 monocytes [133]. However, the exact mechanisms via which CoroMarker regulates monocytes or atherosclerosis remain to be determined.

LIPCAR (long intergenic noncoding RNA predicting cardiac remodeling), a mitochondria-derived lncRNA, is highly expressed and consistently detectable in human plasma samples. Plasma LIPCAR has been shown to be an independent predictor for CAD and correlates with the severity of clinical presentation (highest in patients with AMI) [134]. In another study on patients with AMI, LIPCAR was downregulated early after AMI but upregulated during later stages, suggesting its role in chronic heart failure. Consistent with this observation, plasma LIPCAR level is elevated even more in CAD patients with heart failure. In addition, LIPCAR expression level is associated with future maladaptive cardiac remodeling in patients who experienced an episode of AMI. Of note, LIPCAR is independently associated with cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic heart failure, regardless of the pathogenesis [135]. The mechanism, however, underlying the correlation between LIPCAR and CAD/AMI remains unclear.

LncRNA GAS5 was significantly increased in the plaque of atherosclerosis patients compared to normal people [136]. However, the expression level of plasma lncRNA GAS5 was significantly lower in patients with CAD. GAS5 decreased the level of p-mTOR without change of total mTOR in human coronary artery endothelial cells, which is an important initiator of pro-inflammatory response of monocytes/macrophages [137]. Furthermore, gain- and loss- of function studies showed that GAS5 modulates macrophages and ECs apoptosis in vitro. Interestingly, these effects of GAS5 on EC apoptosis is mediated by macrophage derived exomes after oxLDL stimulation, which demonstrated the interplay of macrophage and EC during atherosclerosis development [138].

SENCR (Smooth muscle and Endothelial cell enriched migration/differentiation-associated long NonCoding RNA) is highly expressed in ECs, SMCs and aortic tissues (vascular-enriched lncRNA) [139]. SENCR, localized mainly in the cytoplasm, stabilizes the contractile state of VSMCs by increasing myocardin expression [139]. Moreover, it was found that SENCR contributes to endothelial commitment in pluripotent cells and angiogenic capacity of ECs. SENCR expression was diminished in vascular ECs derived from superficial forearm veins of patients with critical limb ischemia and pre-mature coronary artery disease [140]. Using FISH-Flow assay, SENCR is downregulated in circulating ECs, but upregulated in monocytes, in early-onset CAD patients (EOCAD). Moreover, the combination of four molecular markers (intra-circulating EC SENCR, intra-monocyte SENCR, surface/intra-circulating EC CD146 and surface/intra-monocyte CD14) along with diabetes mellitus may serve as the early diagnostic tool for EOCAD [141].

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), accounting for nearly 50% of deaths in this population [142, 143]. In a cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with or without cardiovascular (CV) event, circulating lncRNA expression profiles discriminate between ESRD patients with and without an adverse CV event. Among the differentially expressed lncRNAs, eight plasma lncRNAs were identified as potential predictors of adverse CV outcomes in uremic patients, and lncRNA DKFZP434I0714 was confirmed as an independent predictor of adverse CV outcomes in patients with ESRD. LncRNA DKFZP434I0714 is not dysregulated in human failing heart, but it is shown to regulate endothelial function. Gain- and loss- of function studies showed lncRNA DKFZP434I0714 modulates stress-induced EC apoptosis, endothelial dysfunction, and vascular inflammation, which are hallmarks of vascular complications associated with uremia [144]. Table 8 summarizes the examples of lncRNAs that have been shown to be potential biomarkers for cardiovascular diseases.

Table 8 LncRNAs as biomarkers for cardiovascular diseases

Even though the cellular and pathological specificity of lncRNAs make them as suitable biomarkers, using lncRNAs as clinical biomarkers is potentially limited by the difficulties in their isolation and quantification. RNA is very difficult to isolate in reasonable quantities from acellular bodily fluids such as plasma or serum. In addition, the high cost and low throughput associated with RNA processing and quantification also limits the application of lncRNA as a biomarker. For example, it seems unlikely that lncRNA could replace cardiac troponins in the diagnosis of AMI, as clinical tests for cardiac troponins are relatively cheap, fast and well-validated. Therefore, the potential usage of lncRNAs as biomarkers is more likely to be prognostic, rather than diagnostic, in cardiovascular diseases.


Emerging evidence indicates the important roles of lncRNAs in the complex regulatory network of cardiovascular development and diseases. It has been well-demonstrated that many of these lncRNAs could be utilized as novel therapeutic targets and/or biomarkers for diagnosis/prognosis for cardiovascular diseases including cardiac hypertrophy, myocardial infarction, heart failure and atherosclerosis. It will require extensive efforts, however, to refine the approaches of modulating lncRNA expression in vivo and to improve/standardize the quantitative assays for lncRNA biomarkers to make clinical translation possible.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.


  1. 1.

    Hannenhalli S, et al. Transcriptional genomics associates FOX transcription factors with human heart failure. Circulation. 2006;114(12):1269–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kittleson MM, et al. Identification of a gene expression profile that differentiates between ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2004;110(22):3444–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Margulies KB, et al. Mixed messages: transcription patterns in failing and recovering human myocardium. Circ Res. 2005;96(5):592–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Matkovich SJ, et al. Reciprocal regulation of myocardial microRNAs and messenger RNA in human cardiomyopathy and reversal of the microRNA signature by biomechanical support. Circulation. 2009;119(9):1263–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ramani R, et al. A micro-ribonucleic acid signature associated with recovery from assist device support in 2 groups of patients with severe heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(22):2270–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mattick JS. The central role of RNA in human development and cognition. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(11):1600–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mercer TR, Dinger ME, Mattick JS. Long non-coding RNAs: insights into functions. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(3):155–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Esteller M. Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(12):861–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Navarro P, et al. Tsix-mediated epigenetic switch of a CTCF-flanked region of the Xist promoter determines the Xist transcription program. Genes Dev. 2006;20(20):2787–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gupta RA, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010;464(7291):1071–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Huarte M, et al. A large intergenic noncoding RNA induced by p53 mediates global gene repression in the p53 response. Cell. 2010;142(3):409–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Guttman M, et al. lincRNAs act in the circuitry controlling pluripotency and differentiation. Nature. 2011;477(7364):295–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hung T, et al. Extensive and coordinated transcription of noncoding RNAs within cell-cycle promoters. Nat Genet. 2011;43(7):621–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Faghihi MA, et al. Expression of a noncoding RNA is elevated in Alzheimer's disease and drives rapid feed-forward regulation of beta-secretase. Nat Med. 2008;14(7):723–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Johnson R. Long non-coding RNAs in Huntington's disease neurodegeneration. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;46(2):245–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Calin GA, et al. Ultraconserved regions encoding ncRNAs are altered in human leukemias and carcinomas. Cancer cell. 2007;12(3):215–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yildirim E, et al. Xist RNA is a potent suppressor of hematologic cancer in mice. Cell. 2013;152(4):727–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Garding A, et al. Epigenetic upregulation of lncRNAs at 13q14.3 in leukemia is linked to the In Cis downregulation of a gene cluster that targets NF-kB. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(4):e1003373.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhao J, et al. Polycomb proteins targeted by a short repeat RNA to the mouse X chromosome. Science. 2008;322(5902):750–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Beltran M, et al. A natural antisense transcript regulates Zeb2/Sip1 gene expression during Snail1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Genes Dev. 2008;22(6):756–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ogawa Y, Sun BK, Lee JT. Intersection of the RNA interference and X-inactivation pathways. Science. 2008;320(5881):1336–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Carrieri C, et al. Long non-coding antisense RNA controls Uchl1 translation through an embedded SINEB2 repeat. Nature. 2012;491(7424):454–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang KC, Chang HY. Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. 2011;43(6):904–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yang KC, et al. Deep RNA sequencing reveals dynamic regulation of myocardial noncoding RNAs in failing human heart and remodeling with mechanical circulatory support. Circulation. 2014;129(9):1009–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Li H, et al. Identification of cardiac long non-coding RNA profile in human dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114(5):747–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Saddic LA, et al. The Long Noncoding RNA Landscape of the Ischemic Human Left Ventricle. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2017;10:1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ounzain S, et al. Genome-wide profiling of the cardiac transcriptome after myocardial infarction identifies novel heart-specific long non-coding RNAs. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(6):353–68a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zangrando J, et al. Identification of candidate long non-coding RNAs in response to myocardial infarction. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Viereck J, et al. Long noncoding RNA Chast promotes cardiac remodeling. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(326):326ra22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang Z, et al. The long noncoding RNA Chaer defines an epigenetic checkpoint in cardiac hypertrophy. Nat Med. 2016;22(10):1131–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Nakamura M, Sadoshima J. Mechanisms of physiological and pathological cardiac hypertrophy. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(7):387–407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Han P, et al. A long noncoding RNA protects the heart from pathological hypertrophy. Nature. 2014;514(7520):102–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Luo Y, et al. The mechanism of myocardial hypertrophy regulated by the interaction between mhrt and myocardin. Cell Signal. 2018;43:11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wang K, et al. The long noncoding RNA CHRF regulates cardiac hypertrophy by targeting miR-489. Circ Res. 2014;114(9):1377–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wo Y, et al. Long non-coding RNA CHRF facilitates cardiac hypertrophy through regulating Akt3 via miR-93. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2018;35:29–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhu XH, et al. LncRNA MIAT enhances cardiac hypertrophy partly through sponging miR-150. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20(17):3653–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Li Z, et al. Long noncoding RNA myocardial infarctionassociated transcript is associated with the microRNA1505p/P300 pathway in cardiac hypertrophy. Int J Mol Med. 2018;42(3):1265–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Li Y, et al. LncRNA myocardial infarction-associated transcript (MIAT) contributed to cardiac hypertrophy by regulating TLR4 via miR-93. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018;818:508–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Liu, L., et al., The H19 long noncoding RNA is a novel negative regulator of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res, 2016. 111(1): p. 56–65.

  40. 40.

    Lai Y, et al. HOTAIR functions as a competing endogenous RNA to regulate PTEN expression by inhibiting miR-19 in cardiac hypertrophy. Mol Cell Biochem. 2017;432(1–2):179–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jiang F, Zhou X, Huang J. Long non-coding RNA-ROR mediates the reprogramming in cardiac hypertrophy. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0152767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhang Q, et al. Long noncoding RNA MAGI1-IT1 regulates cardiac hypertrophy by modulating miR-302e/DKK1/Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2019.

  43. 43.

    Wu H, et al. Long noncoding RNA Meg3 regulates cardiomyocyte apoptosis in myocardial infarction. Gene Ther. 2018;25(8):511–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lv L, et al. The lncRNA Plscr4 controls cardiac hypertrophy by regulating miR-214. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;10:387–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wang Y, et al. SP1-SYNE1-AS1-miR-525-5p feedback loop regulates Ang-II-induced cardiac hypertrophy. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(8):14319–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Chen Y, et al. The long noncoding RNA XIST protects cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by targeting miR-330-3p. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;505(3):807–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Xiao L, et al. The long noncoding RNA XIST regulates cardiac hypertrophy by targeting miR-101. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(8):13680–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Qu X, et al. MIAT is a pro-fibrotic Long non-coding RNA governing cardiac fibrosis in post-infarct myocardium. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Prabhu SD, Frangogiannis NG. The biological basis for cardiac repair after myocardial infarction: from inflammation to fibrosis. Circ Res. 2016;119(1):91–112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Liu CY, et al. LncRNA CAIF inhibits autophagy and attenuates myocardial infarction by blocking p53-mediated myocardin transcription. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Greco S, et al. Increased BACE1-AS long noncoding RNA and beta-amyloid levels in heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2017;113(5):453–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wang K, et al. CARL lncRNA inhibits anoxia-induced mitochondrial fission and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes by impairing miR-539-dependent PHB2 downregulation. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Wang K, et al. APF lncRNA regulates autophagy and myocardial infarction by targeting miR-188-3p. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6779.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wang K, et al. The long noncoding RNA NRF regulates programmed necrosis and myocardial injury during ischemia and reperfusion by targeting miR-873. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(8):1394–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Micheletti R, et al. The long noncoding RNA Wisper controls cardiac fibrosis and remodeling. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Piccoli MT, et al. Inhibition of the cardiac fibroblast-enriched lncRNA Meg3 prevents cardiac fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction. Circ Res. 2017;121(5):575–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Huang S, et al. Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 mediates cardiac fibrosis in experimental postinfarct myocardium mice model. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(3):2997–3006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lu Y, et al. MicroRNA-328 contributes to adverse electrical remodeling in atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2010;122(23):2378–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Li Z, et al. Altered long non-coding RNA expression profile in rabbit atria with atrial fibrillation: TCONS_00075467 modulates atrial electrical remodeling by sponging miR-328 to regulate CACNA1C. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2017;108:73–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Zhao ZH, et al. Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 functions as a mediator in cardioprotective effects of fentanyl in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cell Biol Int. 2017;41(1):62–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Liu W, et al. High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) downregulates cardiac transient outward potassium current (Ito) through downregulation of Kv4.2 and Kv4.3 channel transcripts and proteins. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010;49(3):438–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Zhu P, et al. Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 downregulates cardiac transient outward potassium current by regulating miR-200c/HMGB1 pathway. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(12):10239–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Long QQ, et al. Long Noncoding RNA Kcna2 Antisense RNA Contributes to Ventricular Arrhythmias via Silencing Kcna2 in Rats With Congestive Heart Failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:12.

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Zhang Y, et al. Long non-coding RNA CCRR controls cardiac conduction via regulating intercellular coupling. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zhang Y, et al. LncRNA ZFAS1 as a SERCA2a inhibitor to cause intracellular Ca(2+) overload and contractile dysfunction in a mouse model of myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2018;122(10):1354–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Chilley PM, et al. The POLARIS peptide of Arabidopsis regulates auxin transport and root growth via effects on ethylene signaling. Plant Cell. 2006;18(11):3058–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Bi P, et al. Control of muscle formation by the fusogenic micropeptide myomixer. Science. 2017;356(6335):323–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Stein CS, et al. Mitoregulin: a lncRNA-encoded microprotein that supports mitochondrial Supercomplexes and respiratory efficiency. Cell Rep. 2018;23(13):3710–20 e8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Magny EG, et al. Conserved regulation of cardiac calcium uptake by peptides encoded in small open reading frames. Science. 2013;341(6150):1116–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Nelson BR, et al. A peptide encoded by a transcript annotated as long noncoding RNA enhances SERCA activity in muscle. Science. 2016;351(6270):271–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Anderson DM, et al. A micropeptide encoded by a putative long noncoding RNA regulates muscle performance. Cell. 2015;160(4):595–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis. Nature. 2000;407(6801):233–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Braunwald E. Shattuck lecture--cardiovascular medicine at the turn of the millennium: triumphs, concerns, and opportunities. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(19):1360–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Ross R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(2):115–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 2002;420(6917):868–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Singh KK, et al. Endothelial long non-coding RNAs regulated by oxidized LDL. Mol Cell Biochem. 2017;431(1–2):139–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Singh KK, et al. A global profile of glucose-sensitive endothelial-expressed long non-coding RNAs. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2016;94(9):1007–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Lustig O, et al. Expression of the imprinted gene H19 in the human fetus. Mol Reprod Dev. 1994;38(3):239–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Kim DK, et al. H19, a developmentally regulated gene, is reexpressed in rat vascular smooth muscle cells after injury. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(1):355–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Tao SC, et al. Extracellular vesicle-mimetic nanovesicles transport LncRNA-H19 as competing endogenous RNA for the treatment of diabetic wounds. Drug Deliv. 2018;25(1):241–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Michalik KM, et al. Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 regulates endothelial cell function and vessel growth. Circ Res. 2014;114(9):1389–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Liu JY, et al. Pathogenic role of lncRNA-MALAT1 in endothelial cell dysfunction in diabetes mellitus. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Zhang X, et al. Long Non-Coding RNA Malat1 Regulates Angiogenesis in Hindlimb Ischemia. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Liu J, et al. Downregulation of the Long non-coding RNA Meg3 promotes angiogenesis after ischemic brain injury by activating notch signaling. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(10):8179–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Boon RA, et al. Long noncoding RNA Meg3 controls endothelial cell aging and function: implications for regenerative angiogenesis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(23):2589–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Gordon FE, et al. Increased expression of angiogenic genes in the brains of mouse meg3-null embryos. Endocrinology. 2010;151(6):2443–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Qiu GZ, et al. Long noncoding RNA-MEG3 is involved in diabetes mellitus-related microvascular dysfunction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;471(1):135–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Hu YW, et al. Long noncoding RNA NEXN-AS1 mitigates atherosclerosis by regulating the actin-binding protein NEXN. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(3):1115–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Leisegang MS, et al. Long noncoding RNA MANTIS facilitates endothelial Angiogenic function. Circulation. 2017;136(1):65–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Leisegang MS, et al. Pleiotropic effects of laminar flow and statins depend on the Kruppel-like factor-induced lncRNA MANTIS. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(30):2523–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Samani NJ, et al. Genomewide association analysis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(5):443–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Helgadottir A, et al. A common variant on chromosome 9p21 affects the risk of myocardial infarction. Science. 2007;316(5830):1491–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    McPherson R, et al. A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease. Science. 2007;316(5830):1488–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Myocardial Infarction Genetics, C, et al. Genome-wide association of early-onset myocardial infarction with single nucleotide polymorphisms and copy number variants. Nat Genet. 2009;41(3):334–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Holdt LM, et al. Alu elements in ANRIL non-coding RNA at chromosome 9p21 modulate atherogenic cell functions through trans-regulation of gene networks. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(7):e1003588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Tan P, et al. LncRNA-ANRIL inhibits cell senescence of vascular smooth muscle cells by regulating miR-181a/Sirt1. Biochem Cell Biol. 2019.

  97. 97.

    Lo Sardo V, et al. Unveiling the role of the Most impactful cardiovascular risk locus through haplotype editing. Cell. 2018;175(7):1796–810 e20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Li DY, et al. H19 induces abdominal aortic aneurysm development and progression. Circulation. 2018;138(15):1551–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Zhang L, et al. H19 knockdown suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis by regulating miR-148b/WNT/beta-catenin in ox-LDL -stimulated vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biomed Sci. 2018;25(1):11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Hou J, et al. Long noncoding RNA H19 upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor a to enhance mesenchymal stem cells survival and angiogenic capacity by inhibiting miR-199a-5p. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Lino Cardenas CL, et al. An HDAC9-MALAT1-BRG1 complex mediates smooth muscle dysfunction in thoracic aortic aneurysm. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Li P, et al. A liver-enriched long non-coding RNA, lncLSTR, regulates systemic lipid metabolism in mice. Cell Metab. 2015;21(3):455–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Sallam T, et al. Feedback modulation of cholesterol metabolism by the lipid-responsive non-coding RNA LeXis. Nature. 2016;534(7605):124–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Tontonoz P, et al. Long noncoding RNA facilitated gene therapy reduces atherosclerosis in a murine model of familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2017;136(8):776–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Sallam T, et al. Transcriptional regulation of macrophage cholesterol efflux and atherogenesis by a long noncoding RNA. Nat Med. 2018;24(3):304–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Klattenhoff CA, et al. Braveheart, a long noncoding RNA required for cardiovascular lineage commitment. Cell. 2013;152(3):570–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Guo X, et al. A Linc1405/Eomes complex promotes cardiac mesoderm specification and Cardiogenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(6):893–908 e6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Ounzain S, et al. CARMEN, a human super enhancer-associated long noncoding RNA controlling cardiac specification, differentiation and homeostasis. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;89(Pt A):98–112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Grote P, et al. The tissue-specific lncRNA Fendrr is an essential regulator of heart and body wall development in the mouse. Dev Cell. 2013;24(2):206–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Banerjee P, et al. Long noncoding RNA RP11-380D23.2 drives distal-proximal patterning of the lung by regulating PITX2 expression. Stem Cells. 2018;36(2):218–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Gore-Panter SR, et al. PANCR, the PITX2 adjacent noncoding RNA, is expressed in human left atria and regulates PITX2c expression. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(1):e003197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Welsh IC, et al. Chromatin architecture of the Pitx2 locus requires CTCF- and Pitx2-dependent asymmetry that mirrors embryonic gut laterality. Cell Rep. 2015;13(2):337–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Anderson KM, et al. Transcription of the non-coding RNA upperhand controls Hand2 expression and heart development. Nature. 2016;539(7629):433–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Han X, et al. The lncRNA Hand2os1/Uph locus orchestrates heart development through regulation of precise expression of Hand2. Development. 2019;146:13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Ritter N, et al. The lncRNA locus Handsdown regulates cardiac gene programs and is essential for early mouse development. Dev Cell. 2019.

  116. 116.

    Wang Q, et al. Potential association of long noncoding RNA HA117 with tetralogy of Fallot. Genes Dis. 2018;5(2):185–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Garg N, et al. microRNA-17-92 cluster is a direct Nanog target and controls neural stem cell through Trp53inp1. EMBO J. 2013;32(21):2819–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Deleersnijder W, et al. Isolation of markers for chondro-osteogenic differentiation using cDNA library subtraction. Molecular cloning and characterization of a gene belonging to a novel multigene family of integral membrane proteins. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(32):19475–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Cai B, et al. The Long noncoding RNA CAREL controls cardiac regeneration. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(5):534–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Ponnusamy M, et al. Long noncoding RNA CPR (Cardiomyocyte proliferation regulator) regulates Cardiomyocyte proliferation and cardiac repair. Circulation. 2019;139(23):2668–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Thommes P, et al. Properties of the nuclear P1 protein, a mammalian homologue of the yeast Mcm3 replication protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20(5):1069–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Wang J, et al. A long noncoding RNA NR_045363 controls cardiomyocyte proliferation and cardiac repair. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2019;127:105–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Chen G, et al. Loss of long non-coding RNA CRRL promotes cardiomyocyte regeneration and improves cardiac repair by functioning as a competing endogenous RNA. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2018;122:152–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Chen Y, et al. Long non-coding RNA ECRAR triggers post-natal myocardial regeneration by activating ERK1/2 signaling. Mol Ther. 2019;27(1):29–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Kajstura J, et al. The IGF-1-IGF-1 receptor system modulates myocyte proliferation but not myocyte cellular hypertrophy in vitro. Exp Cell Res. 1994;215(2):273–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Huang Y, et al. Igf signaling is required for Cardiomyocyte proliferation during Zebrafish heart development and regeneration. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e67266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Li B, et al. Sirt1 antisense Long noncoding RNA promotes Cardiomyocyte proliferation by enhancing the stability of Sirt1. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(21):e009700.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Li X, et al. Loss of AZIN2 splice variant facilitates endogenous cardiac regeneration. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114(12):1642–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Congrains A, et al. Genetic variants at the 9p21 locus contribute to atherosclerosis through modulation of ANRIL and CDKN2A/B. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220(2):449–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Holdt LM, et al. ANRIL expression is associated with atherosclerosis risk at chromosome 9p21. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(3):620–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Vausort M, Wagner DR, Devaux Y. Long noncoding RNAs in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2014;115(7):668–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Yang Y, et al. Plasma long non-coding RNA, CoroMarker, a novel biomarker for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Clin Sci (Lond). 2015;129(8):675–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Cai Y, et al. Circulating ‘lncRNA OTTHUMT00000387022’ from monocytes as a novel biomarker for coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;112(3):714–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Zhang Z, et al. Increased plasma levels of lncRNA H19 and LIPCAR are associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease in a Chinese population. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Kumarswamy R, et al. Circulating long noncoding RNA, LIPCAR, predicts survival in patients with heart failure. Circ Res. 2014;114(10):1569–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Chen L, et al. Global transcriptomic study of atherosclerosis development in rats. Gene. 2016;592(1):43–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Yin Q, Wu A, Liu M. Plasma Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) GAS5 is a new biomarker for coronary artery disease. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:6042–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Chen L, et al. Exosomal lncRNA GAS5 regulates the apoptosis of macrophages and vascular endothelial cells in atherosclerosis. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0185406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Bell RD, et al. Identification and initial functional characterization of a human vascular cell-enriched long noncoding RNA. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34(6):1249–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Boulberdaa M, et al. A role for the Long noncoding RNA SENCR in commitment and function of endothelial cells. Mol Ther. 2016;24(5):978–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Ziaee S, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of early-onset coronary artery disease based on cell type-specific gene expression analyses. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;108:1115–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32(5 Suppl 3):S112–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Go AS, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(13):1296–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Lai CF, et al. Circulating long noncoding RNA DKFZP434I0714 predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with end-stage renal disease. Int J Cardiol. 2019;277:212–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references




This work was funded by Taiwan Ministry of Science Technology Grants 103–2320-B-002-068-MY2 (KCY), 105–2628-B-002 -042-MY4, 108–2314-B-002-199-MY3 (KCY);; Taiwan National Health Research Institute Career Development Grant NHRI-EX104-10418SC and Innovative Research Grant NHRI-EX109-(KCY); a CRC Translational Research Grant from the Institute of Biomedical Sciences at Academia Sinica, Taiwan IBMS-CRC108-P03 (KCY) and grants from National Taiwan University Hospital NTUH.109-T15 (PNT), 106-P02, 105-CGN01, UN106–026, 106-N3740, VN106–12, 107-T02, UN107–019, 107-N4062, VN107–03, 108-T16, VN108–06, NTUH.108-P04, 108-N4198, 108-S4247, 108-EDN03 (KCY). These funding agencies had no role in the preparation of the manuscript or decision to publish.

Author information




C.F.Y., Y.C.C., C.Y.L. C.F.H. W.T.C. and K.C.Y. drafted, revised and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai-Chien Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeh, C., Chang, Y.E., Lu, C. et al. Expedition to the missing link: Long noncoding RNAs in cardiovascular diseases. J Biomed Sci 27, 48 (2020).

Download citation


  • Long noncoding RNA
  • Cardiovascular
  • Disease
  • Development