Skip to main content
Download PDF

cjrABC-senB hinders survival of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli in the bloodstream through triggering complement-mediated killing

Journal of Biomedical Science volume 27, Article number: 86 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) is a common gram-negative organism causing various infections, including urinary tract infections (UTIs), bacteremia, and neonatal meningitis. The cjrABC-senB gene cluster of E. coli contributes to ExPEC virulence in the mouse model of UTIs. Consistently, the distribution of cjrABC-senB is epidemiologically associated with human UTIs caused by E. coli. cjrABC-senB, which has previously been proposed to encode an iron uptake system, may facilitate ExPEC survival in the iron availability-restricted urinary tract. Given that the bloodstream is also an iron limited environment to invading bacteria, the pathogenic role of cjrABC-senB in ExPEC bacteremia, however, remains to be investigated.

Methods

The ability of ExPEC RS218 strains with and without cjrABC-senB to survive in the mouse bloodstream and human serum was evaluated. Subsequently, the role of this gene cluster in the ExPEC interaction with the complement system was evaluated. Finally, the distribution of cjrABC-senB in human clinical E. coli isolates was determined by PCR. The frequency of cjrABC-senB in bacteremia isolates that were not associated with UTIs (non-UTI bacteremia isolates) was compared with that in UTI-associated isolates and fecal isolates.

Results

Expression of cjrABC-senB attenuated the survival of RS218 in the mouse bloodstream and human serum. The cjrABC-senB-harboring strains triggered enhanced classical- and alternative-complement pathway activation and became more vulnerable to complement-mediated killing in serum. cjrA was identified as the major gene responsible for the attenuated serum survival. Expressing cjrABC-senB and cjrA increased bacterial susceptibility to detergent and induced periplasmic protein leakage, suggesting that the expression of these genes compromises the integrity of the outer membrane of ExPEC. In addition, the frequency of cjrABC-senB in non-UTI bacteremia isolates was significantly lower than that in UTI-associated isolates, while the frequencies in non-UTI bacteremia isolates and fecal isolates showed no significant difference. Consistently, this epidemiological investigation suggests that cjrABC-senB does not contribute to E. coli bacteremia in humans.

Conclusion

The contribution of cjrABC-senB to the pathogenesis of ExPEC is niche dependent and contradictory because the genes facilitate ExPEC UTIs but hinder bacteremia. The contradictory niche-dependent characteristic may benefit the development of novel strategies against E. coli-caused infections.

Background

Extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) is one of the major causes of extraintestinal infections, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs), bacteremia, and neonatal meningitis [1]. Antibiotic treatment is the traditional measure used to treat E. coli-caused infections. However, the rapid emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains has become a critical issue for managing these infections [1,2,3]. The development of novel antimicrobial strategies is desperately needed. Given that bacterial virulence factors are potential targets for developing such strategies, understanding the roles of the virulence factors and the ways they facilitate infections are fundamental.

The E. coli cjrABC-senB gene cluster, which contains the genes cjrA, cjrB, cjrC, and senB, is located on virulence plasmids of many ExPEC strains and has been shown to contribute to the uropathogenesis of ExPEC [4,5,6]. It is proposed that the gene cluster facilitates iron uptake by ExPEC in the urinary tract, where the availability of iron is low [4, 7, 8], because the cjrABC genes are predicted to encode iron uptake factors. CjrA is homologous to a Pseudomonas aeruginosa protein, PhuW, which is important for heme uptake. CjrB is homologous to TonB proteins of various bacteria, while CjrC is homologous to TonB-dependent outer membrane heme/hemoglobin or siderophore receptors [5, 9]. It has been noted that many ExPEC virulence factors contribute to infections in different tissues, while some contribute to infection in only specific tissues [1]. As bacterial survival in the bloodstream is a critical step for ExPEC to cause lethal systemic infections, it is of interest to elucidate the role of cjrABC-senB in ExPEC survival in the bloodstream, where iron availability is restricted for invading pathogens [10, 11].

The complement system is the first line of innate defense in the bloodstream against invading pathogens. The complement system can be activated by three distinct pathways: the classical, alternative, and lectin pathways [12]. Activation of the three pathways leads to the production and deposition of the complement protein C3b on the surface of invading pathogens. C3b deposition triggers the activation of the downstream common terminal complement pathway, resulting in the formation of membrane attack complexes (MACs) on the pathogen surface, thus killing the pathogen. The direct binding or indirect, antibody-dependent binding of C1q to invading pathogens can trigger the classical pathway (CP). The alternative pathway (AP) starts with the spontaneous hydrolysis of C3 to produce C3b, while the lectin pathway (LP) is initiated by the binding of mannose-binding lectin to the carbohydrate structures on the pathogen surface.

In this study, we found that ExPEC expressing the cjrABC-senB operon induced a significantly lower level of bacteremia in a mouse bacteremia model than cognate strains without this operon. Our results suggest that the complement system in the bloodstream is responsible for the decreased survival of cjrABC-senB-harboring pathogens. The detailed mechanism was further elucidated within this study.

Methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids

E. coli K1 strain RS218 (O18:K1:H7) is a bacteremia clinical isolates which is isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from a neonate with meningitis [13,14,15,16]. The spontaneous streptomycin-resistant derivative of RS218 and its derivatives were used in this study (Table 1). The RS218 mutants were constructed by a PCR-based method described previously [20, 21] (Table 1). The low-copy-number plasmid pCL1920 was utilized to clone cjrABC-senB and the individual genes in this gene cluster (Table 1).

Table 1 E. coli strains and plasmids used in this study
Full size table

The bacteremia E. coli isolates that were not associated with UTIs and biliary tract infections (BTIs) were collected in National Cheng Kung University Hospital between October and December of 2005.

Human sera, and C1q

The normal human serum (NHS) used in this study was pooled from the serum of 8 healthy adults and stored in aliquots at − 80 °C. Heat-inactivated NHS (HI-NHS) was prepared by heating the NHS at 56 °C for 30 min. The C1q-depleted and factor B-depleted sera (Calbiochem) supplemented with 5 mM CaCl2 and 2 mM MgCl2 and then diluted with PBS were served and CP- and AP- blocked sera. In addition, heat-inactivated C1q anti-serum or heat-inactivated properdin anti-serum (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany, and Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were added to the final concentrations of 10 and 15% in 40% NHS diluted with PBS to block CP and AP respectively [22, 23] . To inhibit the LP pathway, NHS was treated with 100 mM mannose [24]. The purified C1q protein was purchased from Complement Technology, Inc. (Tyler, TX).

In vivo complement depletion with cobra venom factor (CVF)

Complement depletion in mice with cobra venom factor CVF) was performed as describe previously [25]. Briefly, CVF (Quidel) was diluted in PBS at a concentration of 2.5 U/100 μl. Mice (n = 15) were intraperitoneally injected with 5 U of CVF twice with an interval of 6 h. In the control group, animals (n = 15) were injected with 200 μl of PBS instead of CVF. At 48 h after the last CVF/PBS injection, the animals were subjected to co-infection experiments. Before the infection experiments, the levels of the CVF treatment-induced complement depletion was determined by the 50% haemolytic complement (CH50) activity of serum as previously described [26, 27]. Briefly, 200 μl mouse serum was serially diluted 2-fold with Veronal Buffered Saline (VBS) and then was incubated with 200 μl rabbit red blood cells (RBC) in VBS at 37 °C for 30 min. The intact RBC were pelleted by centrifugation at 1500 g for 5 min and O.D.540 of the supernatant was measured. The percentage of hemolysis was used the following formula: hemolysis (%) = [(A - B)/(C - B)] × 100%. A is the O.D.540 reading of the RBC incubated with CVF- or PBS-treated serum, B is the O.D.540 reading of the RBC incubated with VBS buffer only, and C is the O.D.540 nm reading of the RBC incubated with H2O. H2O induced the lysis of all the RBC. The lysis percentage induced by the CVF-treated and PBS-treated sera were plotted against dilution factors. Based on the resulting graphs, the dilutions required for 50% hemolysis (CH50) of CVF- and PBS- treated serum were calculated. The CH50 of the CVF-treated serum was approximately 15% of CH50 of the PBS-treated serum, indicating that CVF treatment induced 85% of complement depletion in the animals, compared to the PBS treated ones.

The mouse model of E. coli bacteremia

To determine the role of cjrABC-senB in ExPEC bacteremia, equal numbers (1 × 107 CFU) of the E. coli strains with or without these genes were co-inoculated or independently inoculated into 8-week-old BALB/c mice (n = 15) thorough intraperitoneal injection as previously described [18]. At 14 h post-infection, the bacterial blood counts were determined. In the co-inoculation experiments (n = 10), the two bacterial strains were differentiated by the colors of their colonies (blue and white) after cultivation on LB agar containing 0.5 mM IPTG and 20 μg/ml X-gal.

Preparation of IgG-depleted serum

To remove serum IgG, 1 ml of 40% NHS diluted with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was incubated with 0.6 ml of recombinant protein G-Sepharose (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) at 4 °C for 1 h. The IgG depleted serum was obtained from the supernatant by centrifugation at 1500 g for 10 min at 4 °C. More than 90% of the IgG was removed in the depleted serum based on Western blot analysis (data not shown).

Serum survival assay

For the serum survival assays with WT-RS218 and ∆cjr-RS218 (Table 1), 20 μl of the overnight bacterial culture was inoculated in 2 ml of fresh LB medium containing 200 μM 2, 2′-dipyridyl (DIP), a high affinity of iron chelator, at a ratio of 1:100 for 2 h to induce the expression of cjrABC-senB [28]. For the assays performed with the E. coli strains transformed with the empty vector pCL1920 or the plasmids harboring the cjrABC-senB genes (Table 1), overnight cultures of the bacteria were used. These strains didn’t need DIP treatment because the cjrABC-senB genes in the plasmids were under the control of the lac promoter provided by the plasmid. The leakage of the lac promoter allowed the constitutive expression of these genes. For the serum survival experiment, E. coli (1 × 106 CFU) cells were incubated at 37 °C in 100 μl of 40% serum (NHS, HI-NHS, or modified serum) diluted with PBS. After different time periods of incubation, the live bacteria counts were determined by plating the solution on LB agar.

Flow cytometry analysis

Bacteria (3 × 106 CFU/ml) were incubated at 37 °C in 40% human sera (NHS, HI-NHS, or modified sera with and without heat inactivation) diluted with veronal buffer (Lonza, Walkersville, MD) or in 100 μl of veronal buffer containing 25 μg/ml of C1q protein for different time periods. The levels of the serum components deposited on bacteria were determined by probing with the corresponding primary and secondary antibodies as previously described [18, 23] and then analyzed on a FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson).

Purification of bacterial outer and inner membrane fractions and lipopolysaccharides

The bacterial inner and outer membrane fractions were separated using the detergent sodium lauryl sarcosinate as previously described [29]. The lipopolysaccharides (LPS) on the E. coli strains were purified according to methods described by Kariyawasam et al. [30].

Ribonuclease (RNase) leakage assay

The overnight bacterial culture was adjusted to OD600 = 0.2 in PBS. Then, 10 μl of the culture was added to LB agar plates containing 2.5% (w/w) Toluidine blue O and 0.2% (w/w) yeast RNA. After incubation for 2 days at 37 °C, pink halos around the bacterial colony on the agar were observed because of the RNase leakage from the periplasm of bacteria [31,32,33].

Distribution rate of cjrABC-senB in the bacteremia E. coli isolates that were not associated with UTIs and BTIs

The frequency of cjrABC-senB in the in the bacteremia E. coli isolates that were not associated with UTIs and BTIs was determined by PCR as described previously [5].

Statistical analysis

For the mouse model of E. coli bacteremia, the coinfection results were analyzed using a nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pair test, while the independent infection results were analyzed used non-parametric Mann-Whitney test [34]. Comparisons involving the distribution rates of cjrABC-senB in different groups were measured by using two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. For the rest of the experiments, Student’s t-test was used. A P value of < 0.05 was set as the threshold for statistical significance.

Results

Deletion of cjrABC-senB increases ExPEC’s ability to cause bacteremia

To investigate whether cjrABC-senB plays a role in ExPEC bacteremia, we utilized the archetypal K1 bacteremia E. coli strain RS218 [14], which harbors a copy of cjrABC-senB encoded in the plasmid pRS218 [6]. Equal numbers of the wild-type RS218 (WT-RS218) and a cjrABC-senB deletion mutant of RS218 (∆cjr-RS218) were independently inoculated into mice through intraperitoneal injection. At 14 h post-inoculation the blood counts of the bacteria were determined. As shown in Fig. 1a, the bacterial blood counts of ∆cjr-RS218 were significantly higher than those of WT-RS218, suggesting that expression of cjrABC-senB decreases RS218 survival in the bloodstream.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The survival of RS218 strains with and without cjrABC-senB in the mouse bloodstream and human serum. (a) Independent infections of mice with WT-RS218 and ∆cjr-RS218 (1 × 107 CFU/mouse). Bacterial blood counts were determined at 14 h post-inoculation. (b) Coinfection of mice with equal numbers of ∆cjr-RS218 and ∆lacZ-RS218 (1 × 107 CFU/strain/mouse). Bacterial blood counts were determined at 14 h post-inoculation. (c) Coinfection of mice with equal numbers of ∆cjr-RS218/pCL1920 and ∆cjr∆lacZ-RS218/pCL1920-cjrABC-senB. Blood counts were determined at 14 h post-infection. The horizontal bars represent the median values. For (b) and (c) the bacterial counts derived from same animals are connected with lines. (d) and (e) The serum survival of the RS218 strains with and without cjrABC-senB (1 × 107 CFU/ml) after 1 h and 3 h incubation in 40% NHS (d) and 40% HI-NHS(e). The results are shown as the means ± standard deviations, and the data are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. *, P value < 0.05; **, P value < 0.01; ***, P value < 0.001

Full size image

In addition, we further investigated whether RS218 strains with and with cjrABC-senB also show different bloodstream survival when co-inoculated in mice. Equal amounts of ∆cjr-RS218 and the otherwise wild-type RS218 (∆lacZ-RS218) were intraperitoneally co-inoculated into mice, and the counts of the two strains in the bloodstream was determined at 14 h post-inoculation (lacZ deletion did not affect bloodstream survival of E. coli; data not shown). To differentiate and enumerate the bacteria in the bloodstream, blood samples from the infected animals were spread on LB agar containing IPTG and X-gal. The two strains can be differentiated by their colony colors because the colonies of E. coli harboring an intact lacZ (∆cjr-RS218) would be blue and those of the bacteria without lacZ (∆lacZ-RS218) would be white on the agar. Consistent with the results of the independent inoculation, ∆cjr-RS218 outcompeted ∆lacZ-RS218 in the blood (Fig. 1b). Then, we performed a complementary experiment. Equal numbers of the ∆cjr-RS218 strain harboring the low-copy-number plasmid vector pCL1920 and the ∆cjr-RS218 strain with a lacZ deletion (∆cjr∆lacZ-RS218; Table 1) harboring the plasmid encoding cjrABC-senB (pCL1920-cjrABC-senB; Table 1) were inoculated intraperitoneally into animals, and the blood counts of each bacteria were determined at 14 h post-inoculation by plating on LB agar containing IPTG and X-gal. Consistently, the strain without cjrABC-senB outcompeted the strain with this gene cluster (Fig. 1c). These results further confirmed that the expression of cjrABC-senB hinders bacterial survival in the bloodstream.

Because serum-mediated killing is one of the major defenses against invading bacterial pathogens in the bloodstream, we investigated whether cjrABC-senB is involved in the serum survival of RS218. RS218 strains with and without cjrABC-senB were independently cultured in 40% normal human serum (NHS) or 40% heat-inactivated NHS (HI-NHS). After 1 h and 3 h incubation, the counts of live bacteria were determined. WT-RS218 showed significantly lower survival than ∆cjr-RS218 after 3 h of incubation in NHS (Fig. 1d). A complementary experiment showed consistent results. The ∆cjr-RS218 strain trans-complemented with pCL1920-cjrABC-senB (this strain was designated Cjr+-RS218) showed significantly lower survival than the ∆cjr-RS218 strain harboring the plasmid vector pCL1920 (this strain was designated Cjr−-RS218) after 1 h and 3 h incubation in NHS (Fig. 1d). These results suggest that expressing CjrABC-senB attenuates ExPEC survival in NHS.

However, in HI-NHS, the cjrABC-senB-harboring strains showed survival levels similar to those of the corresponding strains without this gene cluster (Fig. 1e). Given that the complement system plays an important role in resisting invading bacteria in the serum and that the function of this system is heat labile, the results suggest that the complement system may be responsible for the differential killing of the ExPEC strains with and without the CjrABC-senB gene cluster.

cjrABC-senB-expressing ExPEC encounters a stronger complement attack in NHS than cjrABC-senB-deficient ExPEC

In serum, the levels of C3b and MAC deposition on bacteria reflect the intensity of complement activation that occurs on the bacterial surface [18]. To investigate whether ExPEC with and without cjrABC-senB encounter different levels of complement-mediated attack in the serum, the levels of C3b and MAC deposition on Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218 were measured by flow cytometry after incubation with NHS. As shown in Fig. 2a-2d, after incubation in 40% NHS for 2 and 3 h, the levels of C3b and MAC deposition on Cjr+-RS218 were significantly higher than those on Cjr−-RS218, indicating that the presence of cjrABC-senB triggers a stronger complement-mediated attack on the bacteria, which may be responsible for the attenuated ExPEC serum survival due to the expression of this gene cluster.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Deposition of C3b and MAC on Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218 in 40% NHS for various periods. (a) Levels of C3b deposition on Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218 after incubation with NHS for the indicated time periods. (b) Flow cytometry histogram of C3b deposition on the bacteria after 3 h of incubation in NHS. (c) Levels of MAC deposition on Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218 after incubation with NHS for the indicated time periods. (d) Flow cytometry histogram of MAC deposition on the bacteria after 3 h of incubation in NHS. For (a) and (c) The data are presented with geometric mean fluorescence intensity (GMFI). The HI-NHS control groups were bacteria incubated in HI-NHS, while the unstaining control groups were the bacteria without fluorescence staining. The results are shown as the means ± standard deviations, and the data are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. *, P value < 0.05

Full size image

The CP and AP are responsible for the decreased serum survival of the cjrABC-senB-expressing ExPEC

The roles of the three complement pathways in the differential killing of Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218 were investigated. The strains were independently incubated in 40% NHS and 40% NHS with a blocked CP (C1q-depleted serum), AP (factor B-depleted serum), or LP (mannose treated serum). After 3 h of incubation, the survival rates of each strain in these sera were determined. Then, the survival rate of Cjr−-RS218 in a serum was compared with that of Cjr+-RS218 in the same kind of serum. As shown in Fig. 3a, the survival rates of Cjr−-RS218 were 24.8 ± 4.7, 1.1 ± 0.2, 1.5 ± 0.1, and 22.9 ± 4.3-fold greater than those of Cjr+-RS218 in normal (NHS), CP-blocked, AP-blocked, and LP-blocked sera, respectively. The fold difference of the bacterial survival in the CP- and AP-blocked sera was significantly lower than that in NHS, while the survival difference in NHS and the LP-blocked serum showed no statistical significance (Fig. 3a). When these sera were heat inactivated, Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218 showed similar survival rates (Fig. 3b). In addition, it is known that anti-C1q and anti-properdin antibodies can block CP and AP, respectively [22, 23]. Consistently, the survival difference of Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218 in the serum treated with anti-C1q antibody or anti-properdin antibody-treated sera was significantly lower that the difference in NHS (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). These results suggest that the complement-mediated differential killing of Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218 in NHS is due to mainly CP- and AP-mediated bactericidal activity.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The fold difference in the serum survival of Cjr−-RS218 compared to that of Cjr+-RS218 and the deposition of C1q and properdin on the strains. (a) The fold difference in the serum survival (the survival rate of Cjr−-RS218/the survival rate of Cjr+-RS218) after 3 h of incubation in 40% sera, which were NHS and NHS with the classical, alternative, or lectin pathway inhibited. The horizontal dashed line represents 1-fold (the survival of the two strains is similar). The serum survival of Cjr−-RS218 was approximately 24.8-, 1.1-, 1.5-, and 22.9-fold greater than that of Cjr+-RS218 in NHS or NHS in which the classical, alternative, or lectin pathway was inhibited, respectively. (b) The fold difference in survival in 40% HI-NHS and 40%-modified HI-NHS, in which the classical, alternative, or lectin pathway was inhibited. Cjr−-RS218 and Cjr+-RS218 showed similar serum survival in these sera. For (a) and (b), the results are shown as the mean ± standard deviation, and the data are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Classical− NHS, C1q-depleted NHS in which the CP is blocked; Alternative− NHS, factor B-depleted NHS in which the AP is blocked; Lectin− NHS, mannose-treated NHS in which the LP is blocked; Classical− HI-NHS, heat-inactivated C1q-depleted NHS; Alternative− HI-NHS, heat-inactivated factor B-depleted NHS; Lectin− HI-NHS, heat-inactivated mannose-treated NHS. (c) The levels of C1q deposition after incubation in 40% NHS. (d) Flow cytometry histogram of C1q deposition on the bacteria after 3 h of incubation in NHS. (e) The levels of properdin deposition after incubation in 40% NHS. (f) Flow cytometry histogram of properdin deposition on the bacteria after 3 h of incubation in NHS. For (c) and (e), the data are presented with GMFI. The results are shown as the means ± standard deviations, and the data are derived from three independent experiments. The HI-NHS control groups were bacteria incubated in HI-NHS, while the unstaining control groups were the bacteria without fluorescence staining. *, P value < 0.05; **, P value < 0.01; ***, P value < 0.001

Full size image

The above findings directed us to speculate that Cjr+-RS218 may trigger stronger CP- and AP-mediated complement activation than Cjr−-RS218. In NHS, C1q binding to the bacteria initiates CP activation, while properdin is a positive regulator and an initiator of the AP [35,36,37]. Thus, after incubation in serum, higher levels of C1q and properdin deposition on the bacterial surface indicate that higher levels of CP and AP activation are triggered by the bacteria [18, 37]. To investigate whether Cjr+-RS218 triggers higher levels of CP and AP activation than Cjr−-RS218 in NHS, the levels of C1q and properdin deposition on the bacteria were determined by flow cytometry after incubation with NHS. As shown in Fig. 3c, d, e, and f, Cjr+-RS218 exhibited significantly higher levels of C1q and properdin deposition than Cjr−-RS218 after 2 h and 3 h of incubation in 40% NHS, suggesting that expression of cjrABC-senB triggers stronger activation of the CP and AP in NHS.

In addition, it is known that ExPEC can actively suppress the activation of the complement system through recruiting host complement regulators on its surface. For example, ExPEC can recruit the CP regulator C4bp to block the activation of the CP [38], while the bacteria can recruit the AP regulator factor H (FH) to block the activation of the AP [39]. Thus, we investigated C4bp and FH deposition on Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218. However, the strains showed similar deposition of the regulators (data not shown), suggesting that expression of cjrABC-senB does not affect ExPEC’s ability to recruit the complement regulators.

Expression of cjrABC-senB triggers robust antibody-dependent CP activation

The CP can be activated through direct binding of C1q onto the bacteria or through antibody-dependent binding of C1q by binding of this component to the antibody that has already bound to the bacteria. We investigated whether the expression of cjrABC-senB affects antibody-independent and antibody-dependent C1q deposition by flow cytometry analyses. In NHS, Cjr+-RS218 exhibited a significantly higher level of IgG binding than Cjr−-RS218 (Fig. 4a and b). However, after incubation with purified C1q, the two strains showed similar levels of C1q deposition (Fig. 4c and d), in contrast to the above results showing that Cjr+-RS218 recruited higher levels of C1q deposition in NHS in which IgG is present (Fig. 3c and d). This result suggests that the expression of cjrABC-senB in ExPEC triggers stronger activation of the antibody-dependent CP.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The deposition of serum IgG and purified C1q proteins on Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218. (a) Levels of IgG deposition on the indicated strains after incubation in 40% NHS. (b) Flow cytometry histogram of IgG deposition on the bacteria after 3 h of incubation in 40% NHS. (c) Levels of purified C1q protein on the indicated strains after incubation with a solution containing 32 μg/ml C1q protein for 3 h. (d) Flow cytometry histogram of C1q deposition on the bacteria after incubation with a solution containing 32 μg/ml C1q protein for 3 h. For (a) and (c), the data are derived from flow cytometry analyses and presented as GMFI. The IgG depleted-NHS control group was bacteria incubated in IgG depleted-NHS, while the unstaining control groups were the bacteria without fluorescence staining. *, P value < 0.05

Full size image

Expression of cjrABC-senB increases bacterial sensitivity to MAC-mediated attack

To better understand why Cjr+-RS218 has lower serum survival, we further investigated whether Cjr+-RS218 is more vulnerable to the complement (MAC)-mediated attack than Cjr−-RS218 by assessing the survival of the two strains under the same level of MAC binding. For Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218 to have a similar level of MAC deposition in the serum, we incubated the bacterial strains in different concentrations of NHS and determined the MAC deposition on the bacteria. We found that the MAC deposition level on Cjr+-RS218 incubated in 30% NHS was similar to that on Cjr−-RS218 incubated in 80% NHS (Fig. 5a and b), suggesting that Cjr+-RS218 in 30% NHS and Cjr−-RS218 in 80% NHS encounter a similar level of complement-mediated attack. As shown in Fig. 5c, the survival of Cjr+-RS218 in 30% NHS was significantly lower than that of Cjr−-RS218 in 80% NHS, suggesting that Cjr+-RS218 is more vulnerable (susceptible) to the complement-mediated attack than Cjr−-RS218.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The survival of Cjr−-RS218 and Cjr+-RS218 under a similar level of MAC-mediated attack in human serum. (a) Cjr−-RS218 and Cjr+-RS218 showed a similar level of MAC binding to their surfaces after incubation with 80 and 30% NHS, respectively, for 3 h. The data are derived from flow cytometry analyses and presented as GMFI. The unstaining control group was the bacteria without fluorescence staining. (b) Flow cytometry histogram of MAC deposition on Cjr−-RS218 and Cjr+-RS218 after 3 h of incubation in 80 and 30% NHS, respectively. (c) The relative survival rates of Cjr−-RS218 and Cjr+-RS218 after incubation in 80% serum (NHS or HI-NHS) and 30% serum (NHS or HI-NHS), respectively, for 3 h. The data are shown as the relative survival rates compared with those of Cjr−-RS218. The results are shown as the means ± standard deviations, and the data are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. *, P value < 0.05

Full size image

Bloodstream survival of RS218 strains with and without cjrABC-senB in cobra venom factor-treated mice

To investigate whether complement contributes to the differential killing of RS218 strains with and without cjrABC-senB in vivo, we used cobra venom factor (CVF) to deplete complement activity in mice. The CVF treatment depleted approximately 85% of the complement activity in sera (data not shown). Equal amounts of Cjr−-RS218 and Cjr+-∆lacZ-RS218 (the Cjr+-RS218 strain with a lacZ deletion) were co-inoculated into mice pretreated with CVF or PBS. At 14 h post-inoculation, the blood counts of the Cjr− and Cjr+ bacteria were differentiated and determined by plating on LB agar containing IPTG and X-gal. The bacterial ratio (Cjr− /Cjr+) in the blood was normalized by the ratio in inoculum to calculate the competitive (CI). The CI in the CVF-treated mice was significantly lower than that in the PBS-treated mice (Fig. 6). This result indicates that depletion of complement activity significantly decreases the survival difference between the Cjr− and Cjr+ bacteria in the bloodstream, suggesting that complement contributes to the differential killing of RS218 strains with and without cjrABC-senB in vivo. Additionally, in the CVF-treated mice, the CI of Cjr− v.s. Cjr+ was still higher than 1 in CVF-treated mice, suggesting that the Cjr− bacteria still exhibits a higher survival than the Cjr+ bacteria in the animals. The residual complement activity or/and factors other than complement in the animals may contribute to the differential killing of the bacteria in the bloodstream.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The survival of RS218 strains with and without cjrABC-senB in the bloodstream of CVF-treated mice and PBS-treated mice. Equal numbers of Cjr−-RS218 and Cjr+-∆lacZ-RS218 were co-inoculated into mice pretreated with CVF or PBS. At 14 h post-inoculation, the competitive index (CI) of Cjr−-RS218 v.s. Cjr+-∆lacZ-RS218 in the animals were determined. The CI was calculated as follows: CI = (bacterial counts of Cjr−-RS218/bacterial counts of Cjr+-∆lacZ-RS218)/ (inoculum counts of Cjr−-RS218/inoculum counts of Cjr+-∆lacZ-RS218). The horizontal bars represent the median values. *, P value < 0.05; ***, P value < 0.001

Full size image

CjrA is responsible for the decreased serum survival of the cjrABC-senB-expressing ExPEC

Individual genes in cjrABC-senB were assessed for their contribution to the attenuated serum survival of ExPEC. The RS218 strains CjrA-RS218, CjrB-RS218, CjrC-RS218, and SenB-RS218, which express only CjrA, CjrB, CjrC, or SenB, respectively (Table 1), were analyzed for their serum survival. CjrA-RS218 showed a significantly lower survival rate in NHS than Cjr−-RS218, while the strains expressing the other genes showed similar or even slightly higher NHS survival rates than Cjr−-RS218 (Fig. 7a). On the other hand, they showed similar survival rates in HI-NHS (Fig. 7b). This finding suggests that CjrA is the major protein responsible for the decreased serum survival of cjrABC-senB-expressing ExPEC. Based on its sequence, CjrA is a potential inner membrane (IM) lipoprotein. We consistently found that the CjrA protein is located in the IM fraction of ExPEC (Fig. 7c), suggesting that expression of CjrA in the IM may indirectly interfere with outer membrane (OM) integrity, which affects the interaction between ExPEC and the complement system.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Survival of the RS218 strains harboring individual genes of the cjrABC-senB gene cluster in NHS or HI-NHS and localization of CjrA. (a) and (b) The survival rates of the bacterial strains were determined after the strains were incubated for 3 h in 40% NHS (a) or 40% HI-NHS (b). The data are shown as relative survival rates compared with those of Cjr−-RS218. The results are shown as the means ± standard deviations, which are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. (c) The localization of CjrA. The outer and inner membrane (OM and IM) fractions of CjrA-RS218, which expresses C-terminally His6-tagged CjrA, were isolated and subjected to Western blot analysis with an anti-His6 antibody or OmpA antiserum. OmpA serves as an OM marker. *, P value < 0.05

Full size image

The expression of cjrABC-senB compromises outer membrane integrity

The OM of E. coli is what the complement system interacts with. It has been shown that OM integrity is important for E. coli modulation of complement system activation [18, 23, 38, 39] and for E. coli resistance to complement-mediated attack [40]. Because an intact OM is required for bacteria to resist detergent [41, 42], the OM integrity of Cjr−-RS218, Cjr+-RS218, and CjrA-RS218 was measured through evaluating their detergent resistance. Equal amounts of the bacteria were inoculated into LB with or without different concentrations of SDS (0.01–5%). After 2 h of incubation, we found that Cjr+-RS218 and CjrA-RS218 showed significantly lower turbidity (OD600) than Cjr−-RS218 in the cultures with SDS, while they showed similar turbidity in LB (Fig. 8a). These results indicated that the detergent resistance of Cjr+-RS218 and CjrA-RS218 is significantly lower than that of Cjr−-RS218, thus suggesting that expressing CjrA or CjrABC-senB may interfere with OM integrity.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The effects of cjrABC-senB expression on the OM properties of the E. coli strain RS218. (a) SDS sensitivity assays of Cjr−-RS218, Cjr+-RS218, and Cjr-RS218. The bacterial cultures were adjusted to O.D.600 = 1 in LB with different concentrations of SDS. After 2 h of incubation at 37 °C, the turbidity (O.D.600) of each bacterial culture was determined. (b) An RNase assay with Cjr−-RS218, Cjr+-RS218, and CjrA-RS218. The bacteria were grown on an RNase test agar plate. The pink halos around the colonies indicate the leakage of periplasmic RNase into the agar. (c) Rifampicin sensitivity assay. Cjr−-RS218, Cjr+-RS218, and CjrA-RS218 (5 × 105 CFU/ml) were cultured in Mueller-Hinton broth containing different concentrations of rifampicin in a 96 well plate (200 μl/ well). After 8 h of incubation at 37 °C, the turbidity (O.D.600) of each bacterial culture was determined. For (a) and (c) the results are shown as the mean ± standard deviation, and the data are representative of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. The asterisks indicate significant differences (*, P value < 0.05; **, P value < 0.01; ***, P value < 0.001) between the O.D.600 value of the indicated strain and that of Cjr−-RS218

Full size image

In addition, we assessed the abilities of these strains to retain periplasmic proteins, which reflects their OM integrity. A periplasmic RNase assay was performed [31,32,33]. When grown on RNase test agar plates (see Materials and Methods), RNase leakage from the periplasm formed pink halos around bacterial colonies. As shown in Fig. 8b, Cjr+-RS218 and CjrA-RS218 showed more significant leakage of periplasmic RNase than Cjr−-RS218, consistently demonstrating that expression of cjrABC-senB and cjrA compromises OM integrity.

The higher levels of periplasmic protein leakage of Cjr+-RS218 and CjrA-RS218 (Fig. 8b) suggest that expression of cjrABC-senB and cjrA increases OM permeability. OM permeability may affects the sensitivity of bacteria to some antibiotics (eg. Rifampicin). We measured the survival of Cjr−-RS218, Cjr+-RS218, and CjrA-RS218 in different concentration of rifampicin. As shown in Fig. 8c, the survival of Cjr+-RS218 and CjrA-RS218 was significantly lower than Cjr−-RS218 in the media containing 8 μg/ml and 16 μg/ml of rifampicin, suggesting that expression of cjrABC-senB and cjrA may increase bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics.

Finally, we investigated whether cjrABC-senB expression affects the expression of the OM components LPS, OmpA, and NlpI and of the periplasmic protease Prc, which have been shown to contribute to ExPEC resistance to the host complement system [18, 23, 43, 44]. However, the expression levels of these factors were not significantly different in Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218 (Additional file 2: Fig. S2a and S2b), suggesting that these bacterial factors are not involved in the decreased serum survival of the cjrABC-senB-expressing ExPEC strains.

The distribution of cjrABC-senB in non-UTI-associated E. coli bacteremia isolates suggests that the gene cluster does not contribute to human non-UTI-associated bacteremia

In addition to demonstrating that cjrABC-senB is epidemiologically associated with E. coli UTIs in humans, as mentioned in the “Introduction” section, our previous study, in contrast, shows that the distribution of cjrABC-senB is not associated with biliary tract infection (BTI)-associated bacteremia, suggesting that cjrABC-senB does not contribute to BTI-associated ExPEC bacteremia in humans [5]. To further investigate whether cjrABC-senB is involved in non-UTI-associated and non-BTI-associated bacteremia in humans, 48 E. coli bacteremia isolates that are not associated with UTI and BTI were collected and designated non-UBTI bacteremia isolates. The distribution rate of cjrABC-senB in the non-UBTI group was determined by PCR. Then, the resulting distribution rate was compared with that in fecal and UTI-associated (cystitis-, pyelonephritis-, and urosepsis-associated) isolates. The distribution rates in the fecal and UTI-associated groups were quoted from the previous study [5]. As shown in Table 2, the frequency of cjrABC-senB in the non-UBTI-associated group of isolates was 17%. The frequency in these isolates was significantly lower than those in the UTI-associated isolates, while the distribution showed no significant difference between this group and the fecal group. In combination with the previous finding that cjrABC-senB is not associated with BTI-associated bacteremia, these findings suggest that cjrABC-senB does not contribute to non-UTI-associated bacteremia (bacteremia not associated with UTIs) in humans. These epidemiological findings are in agreement with the results derived from the mouse model of bacteremia and human serum survival assays in the present study.

Table 2 Distributio of cjrABC-senB in different source groups of E. coli isolates
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that cjrABC-senB, which has been previously shown to contribute to the pathogenesis of E. coli UTIs, hinders ExPEC bloodstream survival. Expression of this gene cluster decreased the pathogen’s ability to resist serum-mediated killing. In NHS, bacteria with cjrABC-senB encountered a stronger complement-mediated attack than those without the gene cluster because the harboring strains triggered stronger activation of the complement system through the AP and antibody-dependent CP. Additionally, expression of cjrABC-senB increased the pathogen’s susceptibility to complement-mediated attack. Thus, the complement system was responsible for the decreased ability of the cjrABC-senB-expressing ExPEC to survive in the bloodstream. Consistently, the molecular epidemiological investigation showed that the distribution of cjrABC-senB was not associated with E. coli-caused human bacteremia, although it has been previously shown to be associated with E. coli-caused human UTIs.

cjrABC-senB plays niche-dependent and contradictory roles in the pathogenesis of ExPEC because it contributes to ExPEC UTIs [4] but hinders the bacteria from causing bacteremia. Bacterial virulence factors with similar properties have been reported in other pathogenic bacteria. For example, the PilU protein of Neisseria meningitidis contributes to the microcolony formation of the pathogen on host epithelial cells, which is the essential pathogenic step to initiate infection, while expression of this protein decreases the pathogen’s ability to survive in NHS [45]. Additionally, the capsule of Klebsiella pneumoniae is known to contribute to bacterial resistance to serum killing and phagocytosis, whereas the capsule impedes pathogen binding to and invasion of epithelial cells [46]. These findings suggest that bacterial virulence factors with niche-dependent and contradictory roles are broadly present in various bacterial pathogens. Identification and understanding of such bacterial factors would help in the development of more precise and efficient therapeutic and preventive measures when utilizing virulence factors as anti-infection targets.

Several studies have suggested that the complement system facilitates ExPEC to cause UTIs, although some other studies have shown that the complement system is functional in urinary tracts (UTs) and thus supposed to facilitate the clearance of invading pathogens in UTs [47,48,49,50,51]. It is reported that mice deficient of the C3 component are resistant to E. coli colonization of upper UTs [52]. In addition, opsonization of ExPEC by C3 promotes bacterial binding and invasion of uroepithelial cells [48]. Invasion of uroepithelial cells lining the UTs enhances the survival of infecting E. coli by providing protection from host immunity and enable the bacteria to invade into deeper tissues [48]. Given that cjrABC-senB facilitates ExPEC colonization of UTs [4] and the distribution of the gene cluster is associated with UTIs (Table 2) [5], the cjrABC-senB-induced complement deposition may facilitate E. coli to cause UTIs. Li et al. have shown that although the maximum C3 concentration in the urine collected from patients with UTIs is about 1.4% of the C3 concentration in serum. The urine C3 concentration is shown to be sufficient to opsonize E. coli in UTs [48]. However, the low C3 concentration in urine suggests that the complement-mediated bactericidal activity in UTs would be significantly lower than that in the serum. It is likely that in UTs cjrABC-senB expressing E. coli is benefited from the C3 oposonization for binding and invading uroepithelium in UTI, while the effect of the cjrABC-senB-raised complement-mediated killing on the bacteria is neglectable.

Our results suggest that Cjr+-RS218 can recruit higher levels IgG and properdin deposition, and thus trigger higher levels of CP and AP activation, in comparison with Cjr−-RS218. Given that the OM is where the complement system initiate its activation, the compromised OM integrity and increased OM permeability caused by cjrABC-senB expression may increase the accessibility of bacterial targets of serum IgG and properdin, enabling higher levels of IgG and properdin binding on bacterial surface and thus triggering higher levels of antibody-dependent CP activation and AP activation. Consistently, a similar mechanistic pattern was found in one of our previous studies showing that a Prc protease mutation of E. coli induces compromised OM integrity and increased OM permeability [18]. The Prc mutant can also trigger a higher level of antibody-dependent CP activation in NHS.

In addition, the cjrABC-senB-induced interference in the OM integrity may be responsible for the lower survival of Cjr+-RS218 in comparison with that of Cjr−-RS218 under a similar level of MAC-mediated attack (Fig. 5c). The OM of E. coli is where the complement exerts bactericidal activity. It is known that MAC-mediated bactericidal effect occurs through disrupting the OM of E. coli, thereby increasing the OM permeability and consequently inducing lethal changes in the inner membrane [53, 54]. The increased OM permeability in Cjr+-RS218 may facilitate MAC-mediated bactericidal activity, thus increasing the vulnerability (susceptibility) of the cjrABC-senB-expressing bacteria to the MAC-mediated attack.

CjrA was located in the IM fraction of E. coli, but its expression affected OM integrity (Fig. 7c). Some IM proteins are known to be involved in maintaining the OM integrity of E. coli. For example, the IM proteins TolA, TolQ, and TolR interact with the Pal and TolB proteins to form the Tol-Pal protein complex, which spans the periplasm to link the inner and outer membranes [55]. The intact Tol-Pal complex is required to stabilize the OM. Thus, deletion of these IM proteins compromises OM integrity [56]. It is likely that CjrA may affect OM integrity through interfering with the function of other IM proteins that contribute to OM integrity.

Although among the cjrABC-senB genes, cjrA is the main factor causing the compromised OM integrity of ExPEC, it may not be fully responsible for the impaired integrity. CjrA-RS218 showed a higher level of SDS resistance than Cjr+-RS218 (Fig. 8a), suggesting that, in addition to cjrA, other genes in the cjrABC-senB gene cluster also contribute to the compromised OM integrity. The subcellular localization of CjrB and CjrC suggests their potential contribution to the compromised OM integrity. CjrB shows significant similarities to TonB and thus is predicted to be a periplasm-exposed IM protein [28]. It is likely that the presence of CjrB in the IM affects the OM integrity in a way similar to that of CjrA. As CjrC is predicted to be an OM protein [28], the presence of CjrA in the OM may directly interfere with the OM structure and thus impair the membrane integrity. senB is proposed to play a role in enterotoxin production of enteroinvasive E. coli [28]. Its involvement in interfering with the OM integrity cannot be excluded. Additionally, E. coli expressing the whole gene cluster (Cjr+-RS218) showed significantly lower serum survival than E. coli expressing only CjrA (CjrA-RS218). However, expressing CjrB, CjrC, and SenB, respectively, did not decrease bacterial survival in the serum (Fig. 7a). These results suggest that the combined effect of expressing all or multiple of the cjrABC-senB genes may be required to induce a level of interference with the OM integrity high enough to further decrease the ability of serum survival, in addition to the effect caused by CjrA alone.

Several lines of evidence suggest that the cjrABC-senB gene cluster encodes an iron-uptake system. In addition to the fact that the encoding proteins of the gene cluster are homologous to iron uptake-related proteins (see Introduction), a functional fur box is located upstream of cjrABC-senB, and the expression of cjrABC-senB is negatively regulated by iron [28], which is a typical iron-dependent regulation mode of iron uptake systems in bacteria [57]. In addition, CjrB and CjrC are known to be involved in colicin Js uptake and are consequently essential for colicin Js sensitivity [28]. It has been known that iron uptake systems are employed to import colicins into sensitive bacterial strains [58]. These findings all indicate that cjrABC-senB encodes a potential iron uptake system. However, it remains to be further confirmed whether cjrABC-senB facilitates iron uptake.

Conclusions

Bacterial factors, such as cjrABC-senB, with contradictory niche-dependent pathogenic roles may contribute to the development of novel antimicrobial strategies with which we may directly interfere with the proper expression of virulence factors to achieve an antimicrobial effect. For example, increasing cjrABC-senB expression in ExPEC may facilitate host elimination of invading ExPEC in the bloodstream. In addition, knowledge of the niche specificity of virulence factors is critical for developing efficient antimicrobial strategies using virulence factors as antimicrobial targets because this knowledge provides information concerning when and where the antivirulence strategy would be the most effective. However, given that most ExPEC virulence genes exist in only a portion of the ExPEC strains and that none of the virulence factors alone is sufficient to account for the virulence properties of the pathogens, an effective and widely usable strategy against ExPEC infections may require a combination of multiple virulence factors as targets. Thus, it is necessary to identify additional virulence factors and understand where and how they contribute to infections.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials are fully available and are shown within the manuscript.

Abbreviations

ExPEC:

Extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli

UTIs:

Urinary tract infections

MACs:

Membrane attack complexs

CP:

Classical pathway

AP:

Alternative pathway

LP:

Lectin pathway

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

BTIs:

Biliary tract infections

NHS:

Normal human serum

HI-NHS:

Heat-inactivated NHS

CFU:

Colony-forming unit

LB:

Luria Bertani

IACUC:

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee

DIP:

2, 2′-dipyridyl

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharides

hr.:

Hour

IM:

Inner membrane

OM:

Outer membrane

CI:

Competitive index

GMFI:

Geometric mean fluorescence intensity

CVF:

Cobra venom factor

References

  1. Mellata M. Human and avian extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: infections, zoonotic risks, and antibiotic resistance trends. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013;10(11):916–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Broaders E, Gahan CG, Marchesi JR. Mobile genetic elements of the human gastrointestinal tract: potential for spread of antibiotic resistance genes. Gut Microbes. 2013;4(4):271–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pitout JD. Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: an update on antimicrobial resistance, laboratory diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2012;10(10):1165–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cusumano CK, Hung CS, Chen SL, Hultgren SJ. Virulence plasmid harbored by uropathogenic Escherichia coli functions in acute stages of pathogenesis. Infect Immun. 2010;78(4):1457–67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mao BH, Chang YF, Scaria J, Chang CC, Chou LW, N T., Wu JJ, Tseng CC, Wang MC, Chang CC, Hsu YM and Teng CH. Identification of Escherichia coli genes associated with urinary tract infections. J Clin Microbiol 50(2):449–456, 2012.

  6. Wijetunge DS, Karunathilake KH, Chaudhari A, Katani R, Dudley EG, Kapur V, DebRoy C, Kariyawasam S. Complete nucleotide sequence of pRS218, a large virulence plasmid, that augments pathogenic potential of meningitis-associated Escherichia coli strain RS218. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:203.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Henderson JP, Crowley JR, Pinkner JS, Walker JN, Tsukayama P, Stamm WE, Hooton TM, Hultgren SJ. Quantitative metabolomics reveals an epigenetic blueprint for iron acquisition in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(2):e1000305.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Seed PC, Hultgren SJ. Blueprinting the regulatory response of Escherichia coli to the urinary tract. Trends Microbiol. 2005;13(6):246–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan A.C., Lelj-Garolla B., F I.R., Pedersen K.A., Mauk A.G. and Murphy M.E. Cofacial heme binding is linked to dimerization by a bacterial heme transport protein. Journal of molecular biology 362(5):1108–1119, 2006.

  10. Aisen P, Enns C, Wessling-Resnick M. Chemistry and biology of eukaryotic iron metabolism. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2001;33(10):940–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Skaar EP. The battle for iron between bacterial pathogens and their vertebrate hosts. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(8):e1000949.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Walport MJ. Complement. First of two parts The New England journal of medicine. 2001;344(14):1058–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Achtman M, Mercer A, Kusecek B, Pohl A, Heuzenroeder M, Aaronson W, Sutton A and Silver RP. Six widespread bacterial clones among Escherichia coli K1 isolates. 39 1:315–335., 1983.

  14. Cole BK, Scott E, Ilikj M, Bard D, Akins DR, Dyer DW, Chavez-Bueno S. Route of infection alters virulence of neonatal septicemia Escherichia coli clinical isolates. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189032.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Day M.W., Jackson L.A., Akins D.R., Dyer D.W. and Chavez-Bueno S. Whole-Genome Sequences of the Archetypal K1 Escherichia coli Neonatal Isolate RS218 and Contemporary Neonatal Bacteremia Clinical Isolates SCB11, SCB12, and SCB15. Genome Announc 3(1), 2015.

  16. Silver RP, Aaronson W, Sutton A, Schneerson R. Comparative analysis of plasmids and some metabolic characteristics of Escherichia coli K1 from diseased and healthy individuals. Infect Immun. 1980;29(1):200–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Teng CH, Tseng YT, Maruvada R, Pearce D, Xie Y, Paul-Satyaseela M, Kim KS. NlpI contributes to Escherichia coli K1 strain RS218 interaction with human brain microvascular endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 2010;78(7):3090–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang CY, Wang SW, Huang WC, Kim KS, Chang NS, Wang YH, Wu MH and Teng CH. Prc contributes to Escherichia coli evasion of classical complement-mediated serum killing. Infection and immunity, 2012, pp. 3399-3409.

  19. Lerner CG, Inouye M. Low copy number plasmids for regulated low-level expression of cloned genes in Escherichia coli with blue/white insert screening capability. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18(15):4631.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(12):6640–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang WC, Lin CY, Hashimoto M, Wu JJ, Wang MC, Lin WH, Chen CS, Teng CH. The role of the bacterial protease Prc in the uropathogenesis of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27(1):14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gupta-Bansal R, Parent JB, Brunden KR. Inhibition of complement alternative pathway function with anti-properdin monoclonal antibodies. Mol Immunol. 2000;37(5):191–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tseng YT, Wang SW, Kim KS, Wang YH, Yao Y, Chen CC, Chiang CW, Hsieh PC, Teng CH. NlpI facilitates deposition of C4bp on Escherichia coli by blocking classical complement-mediated killing, which results in high-level bacteremia. Infect Immun. 2012;80(10):3669–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Petersen SV, Thiel S, Jensen L, Vorup-Jensen T, Koch C, Jensenius JC. Control of the classical and the MBL pathway of complement activation. Mol Immunol. 2000;37(14):803–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin YC, Liao YJ, Lee YH, Tseng SF, Liu JY, Chen YS, Shui HA, Lin FZ, Lin KH, Chen YC, Tsai MC, Sytwu HK, Wang CC, Chuang YP. Staphylococcal phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C potentiates lung injury via complement sensitisation. Cell Microbiol. 2019;21(10):e13085.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Costabile M. Measuring the 50% haemolytic complement (CH50) activity of serum. J Vis Exp (37), 2010.

  27. Ratelade J, Verkman AS. Inhibitor(s) of the classical complement pathway in mouse serum limit the utility of mice as experimental models of neuromyelitis optica. Mol Immunol. 2014;62(1):104–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Smajs D, Weinstock GM. The iron- and temperature-regulated cjrBC genes of Shigella and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli strains code for colicin Js uptake. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(13):3958–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Filip C, Fletcher G, Wulff JL, Earhart CF. Solubilization of the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli by the ionic detergent sodium-lauryl sarcosinate. J Bacteriol. 1973;115(3):717–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kariyawasam S, Wilkie BN, Hunter DB, Gyles CL. Systemic and mucosal antibody responses to selected cell surface antigens of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in experimentally infected chickens. Avian Dis. 2002;46(3):668–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lazzaroni JC, Portalier RC. Genetic and biochemical characterization of periplasmic-leaky mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1981;145(3):1351–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lazzaroni JC, Portalier RC. Isolation and preliminary characterization of periplasmic-leaky mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 FEMS microbiology letters 5:411–416; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Quaas R, Landt O, Grunert HP, Beineke M, Hahn U. Indicator plates for rapid detection of ribonuclease T1 secreting Escherichia coli clones. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17(8):3318.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lloyd AL, Smith SN, Eaton KA, Mobley HL. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli suppresses the host inflammatory response via pathogenicity island genes sisA and sisB. Infect Immun. 2009;77(12):5322–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Blatt AZ, Pathan S, Ferreira VP. Properdin: a tightly regulated critical inflammatory modulator. Immunol Rev. 2016;274(1):172–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. O'Flynn J, Kotimaa J, Faber-Krol R, Koekkoek K, Klar-Mohamad N, Koudijs A, Schwaeble WJ, Stover C, Daha MR, van Kooten C. Properdin binds independent of complement activation in an in vivo model of anti-glomerular basement membrane disease. Kidney Int. 2018;94(6):1141–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Spitzer D, Mitchell LM, Atkinson JP, Hourcade DE. Properdin can initiate complement activation by binding specific target surfaces and providing a platform for de novo convertase assembly. J Immunol. 2007;179(4):2600–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Prasadarao NV, Blom AM, Villoutreix BO, Linsangan LC. A novel interaction of outer membrane protein a with C4b binding protein mediates serum resistance of Escherichia coli K1. J Immunol. 2002;169(11):6352–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li W, Wen L, Li C, Chen R, Ye Z, Zhao J, Pan J. Contribution of the outer membrane protein OmpW in Escherichia coli to complement resistance from binding to factor H. Microb Pathog. 2016;98:57–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Miajlovic H, Smith SG. Bacterial self-defence: how Escherichia coli evades serum killing. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;354(1):1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kramer VC, Nickerson KW, Hamlett NV, O'Hara C. Prevalence of extreme detergent resistance among the Enterobacteriaceae. Can J Microbiol. 1984;30(5):711–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rajagopal S, Sudarsan N, Nickerson KW. Sodium dodecyl sulfate hypersensitivity of clpP and clpB mutants of Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(8):4117–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Pluschke G, Mayden J, Achtman M, Levine RP. Role of the capsule and the O antigen in resistance of O18:K1 Escherichia coli to complement-mediated killing. Infect Immun. 1983;42(3):907–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Weiser JN, Gotschlich EC. Outer membrane protein a (OmpA) contributes to serum resistance and pathogenicity of Escherichia coli K-1. Infect Immun. 1991;59(7):2252–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Eriksson J, Eriksson OS, Jonsson AB. Loss of meningococcal PilU delays microcolony formation and attenuates virulence in vivo. Infect Immun. 2012;80(7):2538–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Sahly H, Podschun R, Oelschlaeger TA, Greiwe M, Parolis H, Hasty D, Kekow J, Ullmann U, Ofek I, Sela S. Capsule impedes adhesion to and invasion of epithelial cells by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2000;68(12):6744–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Brooimans RA, Stegmann AP, van Dorp WT, van der Ark AA, van der Woude FJ, van Es LA, Daha MR. Interleukin 2 mediates stimulation of complement C3 biosynthesis in human proximal tubular epithelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1991;88(2):379–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Li K, Feito MJ, Sacks SH, Sheerin NS. CD46 (membrane cofactor protein) acts as a human epithelial cell receptor for internalization of opsonized uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Immunol. 2006;177(4):2543–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Li K, Sacks SH, Sheerin NS. The classical complement pathway plays a critical role in the opsonisation of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Mol Immunol. 2008;45(4):954–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Seelen MA, Brooimans RA, van der Woude FJ, van Es LA, Daha MR. IFN-gamma mediates stimulation of complement C4 biosynthesis in human proximal tubular epithelial cells. Kidney Int. 1993;44(1):50–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Song D, Zhou W, Sheerin SH, Sacks SH. Compartmental localization of complement component transcripts in the normal human kidney. Nephron. 1998;78(1):15–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Springall T, Sheerin NS, Abe K, Holers VM, Wan H, Sacks SH. Epithelial secretion of C3 promotes colonization of the upper urinary tract by Escherichia coli. Nat Med. 2001;7(7):801–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. MacKay SL, Dankert JR. Bacterial killing and inhibition of inner membrane activity by C5b-9 complexes as a function of the sequential addition of C9 to C5b-8 sites. J Immunol. 1990;145(10):3367–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wright SD, Levine RP. How complement kills E. coli. I. Location of the lethal lesion. J Immunol. 1981;127(3):1146–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Godlewska R, Wisniewska K, Pietras Z, Jagusztyn-Krynicka EK. Peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein (pal) of gram-negative bacteria: function, structure, role in pathogenesis and potential application in immunoprophylaxis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;298(1):1–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Webster RE. The Tol gene products and the import of macromolecules into Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1991;5(5):1005–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Troxell B, Hassan HM. Transcriptional regulation by ferric uptake regulator (Fur) in pathogenic bacteria. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013;3:59.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Cascales E, Buchanan SK, Duche D, Kleanthous C, Lloubes R, Postle K, Riley M, Slatin S, Cavard D. Colicin biology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71(1):158–229.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (grants MOST 108–2320-B-006-034-MY3, MOST 104–2320-B-006-003, and NSC 102–2628-B-006-004-MY3) and National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Taiwan (grant NCKUH-10301001). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wen-Chun Huang and Yi-Jyun Liao are contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 4th F, 367 Sheng Li Road, North District, Tainan City, Taiwan

    Wen-Chun Huang, Yi-Jyun Liao, Masayuki Hashimoto, Kuan-Fu Chen, Po-Chuen Hsu & Ching-Hao Teng

  2. Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan

    Wen-Chun Huang, Masayuki Hashimoto, Shuying Wang & Ching-Hao Teng

  3. Center of Infectious Disease and Signaling Research, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan

    Masayuki Hashimoto, Shuying Wang & Ching-Hao Teng

  4. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Biopharmaceuticals, National Chiayi University, Chiayi City, Taiwan

    Chishih Chu

  5. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan

    Shuying Wang

  6. Department of Biotechnology and Bioindustry Sciences, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan

    Shuying Wang

Authors
  1. Wen-Chun Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi-Jyun Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masayuki Hashimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kuan-Fu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chishih Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Po-Chuen Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shuying Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ching-Hao Teng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WCH, YJL, QFC and PCH carried out the experiments in this study. WCH, MH, and CHT contributed to the study conception, planning experiments, data analysis and interpretation. CSC and SYW participated in the result discussion and technical support. WCH and CHT wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-Hao Teng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All animal studies were performed according to the guideline by Council of Agriculture Executive Yuan Guideline for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, Republic of China. All of the animal experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of National Cheng Kung University, Tainan City, Taiwan (Approval number. 99228). The procedures for collecting blood were approved by the Institutional Reviewer Board of National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan City, Taiwan (IRB No. B-ER-101-361).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors do not have any commercial or other association that might pose a conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1 Fig. S1.

The fold difference in the serum survival of Cjr−-RS218 compared to that of Cjr+-RS218 in 40% NHS and 40% NHS with anti-C1q antibody or Anti-properdin antibody treatment. (a) The fold difference in the serum survival (the survival rate of Cjr−-RS218/the survival rate of Cjr+-RS218) after 3 h of incubation in 40% sera, which were NHS, anti-C1q antibody treated NHS, anti-properdin antibody-treated NHS and mannose-treated NHS. The horizontal dashed line represents 1-fold (the survival of the two strains is similar). The serum survival of Cjr−-RS218 was approximately 24.8-, 2.2-, 4.1-, and 22.9-fold greater than that of Cjr+-RS218 in NHS, anti-C1q antibody treated NHS, anti-properdin antibody-treated NHS and mannose-treated NHS, respectively. (b) The fold difference in survival in 40% HI-NHS and 40% of the heat inactivated modified NHS. Cjr−-RS218 and Cjr+-RS218 showed similar serum survival in these sera. The results are shown as the mean ± standard deviation, and the data are derived from three independent experiments.

Additional file 2 Fig. S2.

The expression of OmpA, NlpI, Prc, and LPS in Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218 (a) The levels of OmpA, NlpI, and Prc in Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218. Equal amounts of bacterial lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and then probed with OmpA, NlpI, and Prc antisera. (b) LPS of Cjr+-RS218 and Cjr−-RS218. LPS samples derived from equal amounts of bacteria were analyzed by silver staining after separation by SDS-PAGE.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, WC., Liao, YJ., Hashimoto, M. et al. cjrABC-senB hinders survival of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli in the bloodstream through triggering complement-mediated killing. J Biomed Sci 27, 86 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-020-00677-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-020-00677-4

Keywords

Journal of Biomedical Science

ISSN: 1423-0127