Skip to main content
Download PDF

Integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses of the synergistic effect of polymyxin–rifampicin combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Journal of Biomedical Science volume 29, Article number: 89 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Understanding the mechanism of antimicrobial action is critical for improving antibiotic therapy. For the first time, we integrated correlative metabolomics and transcriptomics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to elucidate the mechanism of synergistic killing of polymyxin–rifampicin combination.

Methods

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and RNA-seq analyses were conducted to identify the significant changes in the metabolome and transcriptome of P. aeruginosa PAO1 after exposure to polymyxin B (1 mg/L) and rifampicin (2 mg/L) alone, or in combination over 24 h. A genome-scale metabolic network was employed for integrative analysis.

Results

In the first 4-h treatment, polymyxin B monotherapy induced significant lipid perturbations, predominantly to fatty acids and glycerophospholipids, indicating a substantial disorganization of the bacterial outer membrane. Expression of ParRS, a two-component regulatory system involved in polymyxin resistance, was increased by polymyxin B alone. Rifampicin alone caused marginal metabolic perturbations but significantly affected gene expression at 24 h. The combination decreased the gene expression of quorum sensing regulated virulence factors at 1 h (e.g. key genes involved in phenazine biosynthesis, secretion system and biofilm formation); and increased the expression of peptidoglycan biosynthesis genes at 4 h. Notably, the combination caused substantial accumulation of nucleotides and amino acids that last at least 4 h, indicating that bacterial cells were in a state of metabolic arrest.

Conclusion

This study underscores the substantial potential of integrative systems pharmacology to determine mechanisms of synergistic bacterial killing by antibiotic combinations, which will help optimize their use in patients.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen with a large genome (~ 6 Mb) encoding significant metabolic flexibility and many virulence factors [1, 2]. This organism is intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics and has a high propensity to develop resistance to all currently available anti-pseudomonals when used as monotherapy [3]. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa is a common cause of severe infections in healthcare settings and immunocompromised patients, and are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality [4]. Worryingly, the prevalence of MDR strains is increasing globally [5,6,7,8], with ~ 13% of severe healthcare-associated infections in the United States attributable to MDR P. aeruginosa [9]. Given the threat posed by this difficult-to-treat organism, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa one of the three Priority 1 (Critical) pathogens urgently requiring novel antibiotic treatments while the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) designated MDR P. aeruginosa as a Serious threat [9, 10].

The combination of the rapid emergence of MDR Gram-negative pathogens over the last few decades and lack of development of new antimicrobials [11, 12] has forced clinicians to re-examine the ‘old’ polymyxin class of antibiotics [13, 14]. Polymyxins are non-ribosomal poly-cationic cyclic lipopeptides with only polymyxin B and E (the latter known as colistin) available for use in the clinic [15]. Polymyxins were rarely used during the 1970s and 1990s due to concerns over nephrotoxicity which may occur in up to 60% of patients receiving intravenous polymyxin therapy [16]. However, with ever increasing resistance to the other antibiotics, polymyxin use has rapidly increased over the last two decades given they retain activity against problematic Gram-negative bacteria, including P. aeruginosa [17, 18]. Indeed, many MDR Gram-negative pathogens are only susceptible to the polymyxins [19].

While the precise mechanism(s) by which polymyxins ultimately kill bacteria remains unknown, initial electrostatic interactions between the cationic polymyxins and anionic phosphate groups of the lipid A moiety of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the Gram-negative outer membrane are a requirement for activity [20]. However, reports of polymyxin-resistant P. aeruginosa and other Gram-negative pathogens are increasing [21], with most reported resistance mechanisms involving lipid A modifications [22,23,24,25]. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies have shown the potential for the rapid emergence of resistance with polymyxin monotherapy, including treatments when polymyxins are used at concentrations exceeding those achieved in patients [26]. Therefore, polymyxin combination therapy has been suggested to enhance efficacy and minimize toxicity and the emergence of resistance [27, 28]. Polymyxins in combination with rifampicin are synergistic against MDR Gram-negative pathogens, including P. aeruginosa [29,30,31,32,33]. While it is known that disruption of the bacterial outer membrane by polymyxins facilitates penetration of rifampicin [31, 34,35,36], subsequent gene expression and cellular metabolic events which result in enhanced bacterial killing are unclear.

The present study is the first to integrate metabolomics and transcriptomics to investigate enhanced killing of P. aeruginosa by a polymyxin–rifampicin combination. Significant perturbations of bacterial metabolic and regulatory networks were identified with the combination, in particular changes in cross-membrane transport, lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, quorum sensing, and virulence. Our study highlights the potential of polymyxin combinations for the treatment of MDR P. aeruginosa infections.

Materials and methods

Strain, antibiotics and reagents

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 (hereafter PAO1) was from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of PAO1 to polymyxin B (0.5 mg/L) and rifampicin (32 mg/L) were determined via broth microdilution in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth (CAMHB; Oxoid, Australia; 20–25 mg/L Ca2+ and 10–12.5 mg/L Mg2+) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines [37]. Prior to experiments, solutions of polymyxin B (sulfate; Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, NSW, Australia; batch number: BCBD1065V) were prepared using Milli-Q water (Millipore, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia) and rifampicin (Sigma-Aldrich; batch number: 011M1159V) using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich). Stock solutions were sterilized by filtration with a 0.22-µm pore size Millex GP filter (Millipore) prior to dilution in sterilized Milli-Q water.

Bacterial culture preparation and time-kill kinetics

PAO1 was subcultured on nutrient agar from frozen stock (− 80 °C) and incubated for 16–18 h at 37 °C. Single colonies were subsequently inoculated into 15 mL of CAMHB and incubated for 16–18 h at 37 °C with shaking at 150 rpm. The overnight cultures were diluted (1:100) into four different reservoirs of 200 mL fresh CAMHB (one for each of three treatment regimens plus the control). To prevent excessive bacterial killing and obtain enough cells for the metabolomic and transcriptomic experiments, bacterial cultures were grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of ~ 0.5 (~ 108 CFU/mL) prior to addition of antibiotic(s). Considering the inoculum effect of polymyxin killing [38, 39], a preliminary time-kill study was conducted with an initial inoculum of ~ 1 × 108 CFU/mL over 24 h. Our preliminary results demonstrated synergistic activity at least over the first 4 h by the combination of polymyxin B (2 mg/L) and rifampicin (4 mg/L) (1.75 × 105, 3.42 × 105, 9.67 × 106 CFU/mL at 0.5, 1 and 4 h, respectively), with > 2 log10 CFU/mL additional killing over polymyxin B alone (2.62 × 107, 1.35 × 108, 1.11 × 109 CFU/mL at 0.5, 1 and 4 h, respectively); no killing was observed at any time points by rifampicin alone. Therefore, in the metabolomic and transcriptomic studies bacteria were treated with either (i) polymyxin B (1 mg/L), (ii) rifampicin (2 mg/L), and (iii) the combination of polymyxin B (1 mg/L) and rifampicin (2 mg/L); these concentrations of polymyxin B and rifampicin were chosen based on clinical relevance [40, 41] and to obtain sufficient bacterial cells for metabolomic and transcriptomic studies [42]. Untreated bacterial cultures served as controls. The metabolomic and transcriptomic studies were conducted with four and three biological replicates, respectively, on different days.

RNA extraction and analysis of RNA-seq data

For RNA extraction, samples of bacterial cultures (1.5 mL) were collected immediately before antibiotic treatment (i.e., 0 h) and at 1 h and 24 h after treatment. All samples were normalized to an optical density (OD600) of ~ 0.5 (~ 108 CFU/mL) with fresh CAMHB. RNA was extracted according to the RNeasy Mini Kit manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen) [43] and its quality and quantity were checked using Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All samples (n = 27) were subjected to RNA-seq (100-bp single-end) using Illumina HiSeq 1500 platform at Hudson Medical Research Institute (Clayton, Victoria, Australia). The reads were aligned to the PAO1 genome obtained from the Pseudomonas Genome Database [44] using SubRead [45] with default settings. The counts of mapped reads were summarized by FeatureCounts [45]. Overall, 97,676,777 raw reads were obtained for 1 and 24 h (n = 3), with 63.7–97.1% of reads successfully aligned to the coding regions of P. aeruginosa PAO1 genome [1]. Differential gene expression was identified using Degust (www.vicbioinformatics.com/degust), a graphic interface of Voom and Limma packages [46]. The statistical significance of differential gene expression (DEG) was determined with Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment to control the false discovery rate (FDR). DEG was defined with a combination of fold change (FC) > 2 (i.e. > 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC) and FDR ≤ 0.05. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of DEGs of the polymyxin B and rifampicin combination was performed using Reduce and Visualize Gene ontology (REVIGO) [47].

Preparation of cellular metabolite extracts

Cellular metabolites were extracted by a previously optimized method with slight modifications [48]. Samples for metabolite extraction and viable counting were collected immediately before antibiotic treatment (i.e., 0 h) and at 0.25, 1, 4 and 24 h after treatment. For the fingerprint samples (i.e., intracellular metabolites), 20 mL of the bacterial culture was collected and immediately transferred onto ice. The samples were then quenched in a dry ice/ethanol bath and preserved on ice for all the following steps. Samples were normalized to an optical density (OD600) of ~ 0.5 (~ 108 CFU/mL) with fresh CAMHB and 10 mL transferred into new 15 mL falcon tubes (Thermo Fisher, Australia) for immediate metabolite extraction. Samples were then centrifuged for 10 min at 3220×g at 4 °C. Cell pellets were thrice washed with 0.9% NaCl (4 °C) and centrifuged at 3220×g for 3 min at 4 °C. Cell pellets were then resuspended in 250 µL of chloroform:methanol:water (CMW; 1:3:1, v/v; − 80 °C) containing generic and physiologically diverse internal standards (CHAPS, CAPS, PIPES and TRIS; all 1 µM) for cellular metabolite extraction. Samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and allowed to thaw on ice. This freeze–thaw process was repeated three times after which the samples were vortexed to lyse the cells and release cellular metabolites. The extracted samples were centrifuged at 3220×g for 10 min at 4 °C and the supernatant collected and further centrifuged at 14,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove cell debris. The final particle-free supernatant samples (200 μL) were transferred to injector vials for LC–MS analysis. For footprint samples, aliquots of the supernatant were rapidly filtered through a 0.22-µm membrane filter; 10 μL of the supernatant was mixed with 250 μL of CMW (1:3:1, v/v) and centrifuged at 14,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C to collect particle-free supernatant for LC–MS analysis.

LC–MS analysis of metabolites

LC–MS analyses were performed on a Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher) coupled to a Dionex high-performance liquid chromatograph (U3000 RSLC HPLC, Thermo Fisher) with a ZIC-pHILIC column (5 μm, polymeric, 150 × 4.6 mm; SeQuant, Merck). The MS system was operated at 35,000 resolution in both positive and negative electro-spray ionization (ESI) mode (rapid switching) with a detection range of 85 to 1275 m/z. The LC solvent consisted of 20 mM ammonium carbonate (A) and acetonitrile (B) with a multi-step gradient system from 80% B to 50% B over 15 min, then to 5% B at 18 min, followed by a wash with 5% B for 3 min and re-equilibration for 8 min with 80% B, with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min [49]. The injection sample volume was 10 μL and the run time was 32 min. All samples were analyzed in the same run and the chromatographic peaks, signal reproducibility and analyte stability monitored by assessment of pooled quality control samples (10 μL aliquot of each sample, including both footprints and fingerprints) analyzed periodically throughout the batch. Mixtures of pure standards containing over 200 metabolites were included and analyzed within the batch to assist metabolite identification.

Data processing, bioinformatics and statistical analyses

Metabolomic data analyses were performed as previously described [48] using IDEOM (http://mzmatch.sourceforge.net/ideom.php) [50]. The quantification of each metabolite was based on the chromatogram raw peak height and univariate and multivariate analyses conducted with MetaboAnalyst 3.0 [51]. Prior to analysis, relative peak intensity data were normalized by the median, log transformed and scaled (by auto scale function) to reduce variance between the samples. Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted with global metabolic profiles at each time point. Significantly changed metabolites of treated samples relative to untreated control samples at each time point were identified by One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA, FDR ≤ 0.05) followed by post-hoc analysis using Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (Tukey’s HSD). Metabolites with > 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC were further analyzed and subjected to metabolic pathway analysis.

Reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic network (GSMN) for P. aeruginosa PAO1

We previously constructed a GSMN iPAO1 for P. aeruginosa PAO1 containing a total of 4265 reactions, 3022 metabolites, 1458 genes and 110 metabolic pathways [52]. The metabolomic and transcriptomic data were casted, mapped to and visualized on the metabolic network of iPAO1 using VANTED [53]. The significantly changed genes and metabolites of the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination at 1 h and 24 h were mapped using iPath (http://pathways.embl.de/index.html) [54] to demonstrate the general overview of the metabolic pathway perturbations using KEGG.

Results

Significantly perturbed metabolome induced by polymyxin B and rifampicin alone and in combination

Polymyxin B was employed as the representative of polymyxins in this study. Clinically relevant concentrations of polymyxin B (1 mg/L) and rifampicin (2 mg/L) were investigated [40, 41]; 0.25 h, 1 h and 4 h were examined for the initial antibacterial effect while 24 h was for persistent effect and potential emergence of resistance. Overall, 2520 metabolites in PAO1 were putatively identified. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) results showed that polymyxin B alone slightly overlapped with the combination at 0.25 h (Fig. 1A(i)). Whereas from 1 h onwards polymyxin B and rifampicin monotherapies were grouped together with the untreated control with minor metabolic changes observed (Fig. 1A(ii–iv)). With rifampicin, the very minimal metabolites changed (Additional file 1: Tables S1–S4) was consistent with the complete lack of bacterial killing observed when used as monotherapy (Additional file 2: Fig. S1). The combination at 0.25 h was distinct from the untreated control with 99 significantly changed metabolites and 37 of these 99 metabolites were significantly perturbed by polymyxin B monotherapy (Fig. 1A(i), Additional file 1: Table S1). Our results showed that at early stage the combination was mostly driven by polymyxin B. At 1 and 4 h, 174 and 200 metabolites were significantly changed by the combination, respectively; while only 14 and 15 metabolites were perturbed by polymyxin B alone correspondingly. However, at 24 h only 14 significantly altered metabolites were observed by the combination, including 9 metabolites significantly changed by rifampicin alone and only one metabolite by polymyxin B alone (Fig. 1A(iv), Additional file 1: Table S4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A PCA plots (left) and Venn diagrams (right) of global metabolic changes in response to no treatment (CTRL) or treatment with polymyxin B (PB) or rifampicin (RIF) alone, and in combination (COMBO), at (i) 0.25 h, (ii) 1 h, (iii) 4 h and (iv) 24 h. B (i) PCA plot and Venn diagrams of gene expression changes at (ii) 1 h and (iii) 24 h. The numbers in brackets represent the metabolites or genes that were significantly changed (up- and down-regulated). Significantly changed metabolites and genes were identified with > 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05

Full size image

Gene expression changes following treatments of polymyxin B and rifampicin alone and in combination

PCA results show drastic gene expression variations induced by the treatment duration (PC1) and treatment groups (PC2). Of particular interest is that the combination exhibits a distinct gene expression pattern compared to the untreated control and each monotherapy (Fig. 1B(i)). In contrast to each antibiotic alone, the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination caused substantial perturbations in gene expression, evident by 823 and 445 differentially expressed genes at 1 and 24 h, respectively; this is consistent with their synergistic activity against P. aeruginosa PAO1 (Fig. 1B(ii, iii), Additional file 1: Tables S7 and S10). Approximately 97% (798/823) and 68% (301/445) of the genes were exclusively expressed by the combination only at 1 and 24 h, respectively. Interestingly, at 24 h there were 15 common differentially expressed genes induced by the monotherapies and the combination (Table 1). Further gene ontology (GO) enrichment shows that the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination significantly perturbed various biological processes at 1 and 24 h, in particular transmembrane transport, lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, virulence, and phosphorylation (Additional file 2: Fig. S2).

Table 1 Common differentially expressed genes (> 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05) induced by polymyxin B (PB) alone, rifampicin (RIF) alone and the combination (COMBO) at 24 h
Full size table

Integration of metabolomic and transcriptomic data

To elucidate the dynamic changes of gene expression and cellular metabolism in response to the treatments, we mapped the correlative transcriptomic and metabolomic data to the metabolic network (iPAO1) of P. aeruginosa PAO1 and analyzed the underlying mechanism in a pathway-specific manner (Additional file 2: Fig. S3). The following sections highlight the significant biochemical pathway changes induced by mono- and combination therapies.

Polymyxin-induced cell envelope changes and lipid A modification

Across the first 4 h, polymyxin B monotherapy and the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination significantly perturbed (> 1.0 log2 fold change [FC], false discovery rate [FDR] ≤ 0.05) membrane-associated lipids, particularly fatty acids and glycerophospholipids, with the effect of the combination at 1 and 4 h greater than that of polymyxin B monotherapy (Fig. 2). At these time points, phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylglycerol (PG) species with long fatty acyl chains were markedly altered by the combination, compared to polymyxin B monotherapy. Consistently, the gene expression of fatty acid biosynthesis (PA5524, PA0098, fabl, fabH2, atoB) and phospholipase (pldA) was altered by the combination at 1 h (Additional file 1: Table S7). At late stage (24 h), the abundance of several fatty acids was significantly perturbed by rifampicin alone and the combination (Fig. 2); while phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase gene cdsA was downregulated by 1.7-fold and 2.3-fold, respectively (Additional file 1: Tables S9 and S10).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Perturbations of membrane-related lipids. Heatmap profiles of the significantly changed lipids at i 0.25 h, ii 1 h, iii 4 h and iv 24 h. Polymyxin B alone and the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination predominantly altered the fatty acids and glycerophospholipids of PAO1 at 0.25, 1 and 4 h. Few fatty acids were perturbed by either monotherapy or the combination at 24 h. Lipids were putatively annotated with reference to accurate mass. PB polymyxin B, RIF rifampicin, COMBO polymyxin B/rifampicin combination. Significantly changed metabolites were identified with > 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05

Full size image

Significant changes in metabolites of LPS and cell wall biosynthesis were observed only with the combination and only across the first 4 h of treatment. The abundance of several key intermediate metabolites of cell wall biosynthesis, namely UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc), UDP-N-acetylmuramate (UDP-MurNAc), UDP-MurNAc-l-Ala-gamma-d-Glu-meso-2,6-diaminopimelate and UDP-MurNAc-l-Ala-gamma-d-Glu-meso-2,6-diaminopimeloyl-d-Ala-d-Ala, were all significantly elevated by at least 1.8 fold at 0.25, 1 and 4 h in response to the combination treatment (Fig. 3). Likewise, an intermediate metabolite of LPS synthesis (3-deoxy-d-manno-octulosonate, KDO) and a precursor metabolite for peptidoglycan and LPS synthesis (d-sedoheptulose 7-phosphate) were both significantly increased by the combination at these time points (Fig. 4). The transcriptomic result also showed a significant increase in the expression of a gene involved with peptidoglycan biosynthesis (ampDh3; > 1.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) at 1 h with combination therapy (Additional file 1: Table S7). Two genes associated with biosynthesis of (KDO)2-lipid A (lpxB) and peptidoglycan (murL) were significantly downregulated (< − 1.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) at 24 h by rifampicin alone and the combination (Additional file 2: Table S12). Lipid A modification genes arnA, arnB, arnC, arnE (Fig. 4) and pagL were significantly upregulated only in response to polymyxin B monotherapy, particularly at 1 h. Upregulation of these genes is in line with the significant increase (> 1.4 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) in UDP-glucoronate, a key precursor for LPS biosynthesis, observed with both polymyxin B monotherapy and the combination (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Perturbations of the peptidoglycan biosynthesis pathway. The polymyxin B/rifampicin combination significantly upregulated intracellular metabolites and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with peptidoglycan biosynthesis over the first 4 h of treatment. PB polymyxin B, RIF rifampicin, COMBO polymyxin B/rifampicin combination. Red and * indicates the significantly changed metabolites and DEGs that were identified with > 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Perturbations of the LPS modification pathway at 1 h. Polymyxin B alone significantly upregulated arnA (rxn07473, rxn07475), arnB (rxn07474), arnC (rxn07476) and UDP-glucoronate causing the addition of 4-aminoarabinose to the lipid A of LPS. PB, polymyxin B; RIF, rifampicin; COMBO, polymyxin B/rifampicin combination. Red and * indicate the significantly changed metabolites and differentially expressed genes that were identified with > 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05

Full size image

The polymyxin B/rifampicin combination significantly perturbed nucleotide and amino acid metabolism

Over the first 4 h, neither rifampicin nor polymyxin B monotherapy induced significant changes in nucleotide metabolism, whereas the levels of purine and pyrimidine nucleotides were significantly altered in response to the combination treatment with a majority of nucleotides increased (> 1.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05; Fig. 5). At 1 h, both transcriptomic and metabolomic data showed significant changes in amino acid metabolism following combination therapy only (Table 2). Specifically, the combination significantly altered the biosynthesis of alanine, serine, glycine and phenylalanine, as well as increasing the degradation of valine, leucine, histidine and tyrosine. Notably, at 1 h there was an increase in the relative abundance of 3-methylbutanoyl-CoA (> 2.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05), a metabolite associated with leucine degradation; and a reduction in the expression of genes (liuA, liuB, liuE; < − 2.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) associated with the breakdown of this metabolite. Similarly, the relative abundance of tyrosine was significantly increased (> 2.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) while the expression of genes associated with its degradation, namely phhC, hpd, hmgA, maiA, and fahA, was significantly decreased (< − 1.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05). At 24 h, while genes associated with leucine and tyrosine degradation were significantly upregulated by both rifampicin monotherapy and the combination, no changes in associated metabolites were detected at this timepoint (Table 3).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Perturbations of purine and pyrimidine nucleotides. The polymyxin B/rifampicin combination induced significant increases in the levels of a large number of nucleotides at i 0.25 h, ii 1 h and iii 4 h. There were no significant changes in nucleotide levels at 24 h following treatment with either monotherapy or the combination. No treatment (CTRL); PB polymyxin B, RIF rifampicin, COMBO polymyxin B/rifampicin combination. Significantly changed metabolites were identified with > 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05

Full size image
Table 2 Significantly changed metabolites and differentially expressed genes (DEGs; > 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05) associated with amino acid metabolism induced by the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination at 1 h
Full size table
Table 3 Differentially expressed genes (> 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05) at 24 h associated with amino acid metabolism induced by rifampicin (RIF) monotherapy and the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination (COMBO)
Full size table

The polymyxin B/rifampicin combination significantly perturbed central carbon metabolism

Metabolomic (at 0.25, 1 and 4 h) and transcriptomic (at 1 h) effects of the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination on glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) are shown in Fig. 6. No significant perturbations to central carbon metabolism were observed with the combination at 24 h or with either monotherapy at any time. Across the first 4 h of treatment, the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination significantly perturbed phosphoenolpyruvate and pyruvate in glycolysis, and 2-oxoglutarate and acetyl-CoA in TCA cycle (Fig. 6). Several essential genes involved in glycolysis and the TCA cycle, namely PA3416, PA3417, lpdV, and icd, were also significantly downregulated at 1 h following combination therapy (Fig. 6 and Additional file 1: Table S7). Collectively, these results indicate that glycolysis and the TCA cycle were rapidly inhibited by the combination. Additionally, d-sedoheptulose 7-phosphate, d-ribose 5-phosphate and fructose 6-phosphate, were increased across the first 4 h of the combination treatment, indicating upregulation of pentose phosphate pathway (Fig. 6). Moreover, the results show that the combination caused considerable downregulation (< − 2.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) of genes associated with aerobic electron transfer, namely PA0521, cioB, cioA and PA4133 (Table 5).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Perturbations of central carbon metabolism by the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination. The combination significantly altered metabolite levels and gene expression associated with the TCA cycle, glycolysis, and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), with significantly changed metabolites at 0.25, 1, and 4 h shown in red. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) at 1 h (either upregulated or downregulated as indicated with arrows) are shown in blue. Box plots show the upper and lower quartiles (top and bottom of box), median (line within box), and the spread of data that are not outliers (whiskers). No significantly altered metabolites or DEGs were observed at 24 h with either monotherapy or the combination. Significantly changed metabolites and DEGs were identified with > 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05. The figure is modified from the KEGG with reference to P. aeruginosa PAO1

Full size image

The polymyxin B/rifampicin combination significantly altered expression of virulence genes

The polymyxin B/rifampicin combination exclusively reduced the expression of a large number of cellular virulence factors in PAO1 at 1 h (Table 5). Notably, phenazine synthesis (via phzA1 and phzA2 operons encoding pyocyanin biosynthesis) was markedly suppressed (< − 2.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) by the combination treatment at 1 h (Table 5); while polymyxin B alone resulted in the significant upregulation (> 1.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) of phzM and phzA1 (Table 4). At 1 h the combination also downregulated (< − 1.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) the genes associated with the Type II secretion system (PA3095–PA3105), Type IV pili (flp), Type IV fimbrial biogenesis (PA4551–PA4556), Type VI secretion system (vgrG6, hcpB), and biofilm formation (PA2231–PA2241). Virulence determinants were predominantly regulated by the quorum sensing (QS) system [55], and the QS-regulatory genes lasA, lasB, rhlI, rhlR, rhlA and rhlB were all downregulated (< − 1.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) at 1 h by the combination (Table 5). At 1 h, the combination significantly increased the expression of lasI, a gene responsible for biosynthesis of QS signal molecule N-3-oxo-dodecanoyl homoserine lactone (3OC12-HSL; > 1.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05), as well as the narK1K2GHJI operon for nitrate uptake and utilization (> 2.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05). Additionally, the combination significantly downregulated the expression of sigma factor rpoS, a general stress response regulator in bacteria (< − 1.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) [56]. Notably, both polymyxin B alone and the combination significantly upregulated genes (mexX and mexY) involved in MexXY multidrug efflux transporters (> 1.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05; Tables 4 and 5).

Table 4 Differentially expressed genes (> 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05) at 1 h induced by polymyxin B monotherapy
Full size table
Table 5 Differentially expressed genes (> 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05) at 1 h induced by the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination
Full size table

At 24 h, only 21 DEGs were observed with polymyxin B alone, including the significant upregulation of PA0806 and PA2358 (> 5.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) and downregulation of kdpC (< − 4.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) (Additional file 1: Table S8). In contrast, 165 DEGs were identified with rifampicin alone, including upregulated genes (> 2.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) associated with phenazine biosynthesis (Additional file 1: Table S9). Substantially more (n = 445) DEGS were observed with the combination, including upregulated genes associated with virulence determinants such as the QS regulatory genes (rhlR, lasI, lasA; > 1.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05), phenazine biosynthesis proteins (phzH, phzA1, phzA2, phzB2; > 2.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05), and protease secretion system (aprD, aprE, aprF; > 2.0 log2FC, FDR ≤ 0.05) (Additional file 1: Table S10).

Discussion

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) optimization is required for rational antibiotic combination therapy, which can be substantially enhanced by systems investigations on the mechanism of synergistic killing [57]. In the present study, transcriptomic and metabolomic approaches were integrated using strain-specific GSMN modelling to examine the mechanism of synergistic killing by a polymyxin/rifampicin combination against P. aeruginosa. PAO1 was employed as it is a major reference strain used for molecular, genomics, biochemical and pharmacological studies on P. aeruginosa [1, 58]. GSMN incorporates 4265 biochemical reactions in PAO1 cell and associates the metabolic genes to the corresponding reactions. Most importantly, the GSMN iPAO1 has 1169 and 367 reactions for biosynthesis of lipopolysaccharide and glycerophospholipid, respectively; whereas the corresponding numbers are 49 and 93 in KEGG database [52, 59]. Therefore, we mapped the metabolomic and transcriptomic data to the PAO1 GSMN, which links the changes in gene expression and metabolite level for each reaction and helps to identify the significantly perturbed metabolic reactions and pathways under different antibiotic treatments. Enhanced bacterial killing of PAO1 by the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination occurred rapidly (observable at 0.25 and 1 h) and was driven by polymyxin B (Fig. 1A(I, ii) and Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2), with minimal or no killing at 24 h by rifampicin (Fig. 1B(iii) and Additional file 2: Table S12). Interestingly, very few significantly changed metabolites were identified at 24 h with either treatment (4 metabolites for rifampicin alone and 14 metabolites for the combination; Fig. 1A(iv) and Additional file 1: Table S4), indicating that the metabolism of PAO1 was not substantially perturbed and that the disorganizing effect of polymyxin B on the outer membrane was minimal.

Notable early (at 0.25 h) changes in membrane-associated lipids with polymyxin B alone or the combination, primarily of glycerophospholipids and fatty acids, were associated with the outer membrane disorganizing action of polymyxin B (Fig. 2) [60]. Similar early changes in membrane-associated lipids have been reported in metabolomic studies of P. aeruginosa [61,62,63,64,65] and A. baumannii [48, 66, 67] treated with polymyxin (polymyxin B or colistin) alone or combinations. For example, at 1 and 4 h (but not 24 h) fatty acids and lysophospholipids were significantly decreased in a polymyxin-susceptible strain of P. aeruginosa PAK treated with 4 mg/L polymyxin B [61]. Significant perturbations to peptidoglycan biosynthesis have also been demonstrated in P. aeruginosa with polymyxin B alone and its combinations with tamoxifen [62, 65] and enrofloxacin [63]; and in A. baumannii with colistin alone and its combination with doripenem [48], sulbactam [66], and aztreonam [67]. As rifampicin is hydrophobic and does not ordinarily pass through the outer membrane of Gram-negative pathogens [68], significant metabolomic changes were only observed when combined with polymyxin B, the latter likely causing considerable membrane disruption which increased the permeability of the outer membrane to rifampicin, improving access to its target sites within the cytoplasm. Very likely due to the stationary growth, at 24 h the relative abundance of metabolites associated with peptidoglycan and LPS biosynthesis had restored to the control level with any treatment (Figs. 3 and 4).

Polymyxin resistance in P. aeruginosa is most commonly due to lipid A modification, a process which is tightly controlled by two-component regulatory systems (TCRs), including PmrAB [69], PhoPQ [70], and ParRS [71]. External stimuli (i.e. cationic antimicrobial peptides such as polymyxin B) and specific mutations in these TCRs result in the phosphorylation of their response regulators (e.g., PmrA, PhoP, ParR) and the expression of the arnBCADTEF-pmrE operon which adds 4-aminoarabinose (L-Ara4N) to lipid A phosphates [72]. In the present study, the overexpression of genes of the ParRS-regulated operons (PA1559-PA1560, PA4773-PA4775-pmrAB and arnBCADTEF) by polymyxin B alone at 1 h (Fig. 4 and Table 4) was consistent with the literature [71, 73]. The upregulation of UDP-glucoronate (Fig. 4), a precursor metabolite for the L-Ara4N synthesis [74], strongly indicates the emergence of polymyxin resistance in PAO1 due to lipid A modification. Furthermore, the significant upregulation of PA4661 (pagL) by polymyxin B alone in the present study suggests lipid A deacylation, a process which contributes to polymyxin resistance by decreasing the hydrophobic interaction between the N-terminus and positions 6/7 of polymyxins with the fatty acyl chains of lipid A (Table 4) [61]. Interestingly, the activated ParRS system likely induced the MexXY/OprM system [73], with significant upregulation of mexXY genes occurring with both polymyxin B alone and the combination (Tables 4 and 5). In addition, the overexpression of two genes associated with phenazine synthesis phzM and phzA1 by polymyxin B alone (Table 4) suggests increased virulence of PAO1 and further in vivo studies are warranted.

Many antibiotics, including rifampicin, cause significant nucleotide perturbations in bacteria [75,76,77]. Such perturbations have also been observed in P. aeruginosa [62, 63, 65] and A. baumannii [48, 66, 67] with polymyxins alone or in combinations, and were also evident in the present study with the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination (Fig. 5). Rifampicin treatment significantly increased the levels of nucleotides in S. aureus, indicating that bacterial metabolism was arrested [77]. De novo biosynthesis of purine and pyrimidine starts from a common metabolite, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate (PRPP) from the pentose phosphate pathway [78]. The metabolites of pentose phosphate pathway were increased by the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination (Fig. 6), which indicated the direct correlation with the significant increase of most nucleotides (Fig. 5).

Antibiotic-induced cell death can be due to altered bacterial cellular respiration and central metabolism via carbon flux within the TCA cycle [77, 79, 80]. Several metabolomic and transcriptomic studies have demonstrated that antibiotics (i.e. ampicillin, kanamycin, gentamicin, rifampicin and norfloxacin) significantly increase the rate of cellular metabolism in treated bacteria [77, 81]. Polymyxins can differentially alter the levels of metabolites associated with central carbon metabolism in P. aeruginosa [61,62,63, 65] and A. baumannii [48, 66, 67]. In the present study, both metabolomic and transcriptomic data consistently showed that only the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination significantly perturbed the central carbon metabolic pathways including glycolysis, TCA cycle and PPP in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (Fig. 6). The combination inhibited the conversion of phosphoenolpyruvate (levels of which were increased) to pyruvate (levels decreased) by downregulating several associated genes (e.g. PA3416, PA3417).

RpoS is a sigma factor and a general stress response regulator in bacteria; and is positively regulated as a counter-measure to conditions that include osmotic and oxidative stress [82]. In the present study, rpoS was significantly downregulated at 1 h by the combination (Table 5). Significant suppression of rpoB by rifampicin alone and the combination at 24 h (Additional file 2: Table S12) indicates the reduced expression of the β subunit of RNA polymerase in P. aeruginosa PAO1, thereby reducing the binding with rifampicin and survival. Moreover, at 24 h the differentially upregulated sodM (encoding superoxide dismutase) suggests that rifampicin alone and the synergistic combination caused oxidative stress in PAO1 that was mainly driven by rifampicin (Additional file 2: Table S12).

Another major finding of the present study is that at 1 h the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination significantly downregulated the expression of genes involved with quorum sensing and virulence (e.g., phenazine biosynthesis genes) (Table 5). The two quorum sensing systems las and rhl in P. aeruginosa are potential antimicrobial targets due to their involvement in pathogenicity [55]. Chorismate serves as a precursor for aromatic amino acid and phenazine biosynthesis at the branch point of the shikimic acid pathway [83]. The polymyxin B/rifampicin combination significantly depleted intracellular phenylpyruvate and l-tryptophan (Table 2 and Additional file 1: Table S2) which are intermediate metabolites of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis, indicating that chorismate metabolism was significantly downregulated. This observation aligns well with suppression of the phenazine biosynthesis operons (i.e., phzA1 and phzA2) by the combination (Table 5). Given the important role of quorum sensing in the virulence of P. aeruginosa [55], as well as the additional suppression of other virulence factors by the combination, clinical use of the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination has the potential to not only increase bacterial killing but also decrease pathogenesis. Further studies on the effect of this combination on pathogenesis are warranted.

Additionally, we identified perturbations to the denitrification genes at 1 h by the combination, including the enhanced expression of narK1K2GHJI operon (nitrate uptake and utilization) and decreased expression of nirSMCFDLGHJEN operon (nitrite reduction and heme biosynthesis, Table 5). It was demonstrated that the transcription of nar operon requires binding of the activated 3OC12-HSL receptor LasR to its promoter region [84]. Here, we discovered that lasI, the critical gene for 3OC12-HSL biosynthesis, was also upregulated at 1 h by the combination. This is very likely because 3OC12-HSL activated the LasI cognate receptor LasR, which in turn positively regulated the expression of nar operon as previously reported [84]. Since the medium was not supplemented with nitrate or nitrite in the present study, it is unlikely that P. aeruginosa PAO1 employed denitrification as a major energy source to sustain cellular activities. The mechanism of differential expression of denitrification genes remains unclear and warrants further investigation.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to apply an integrated systems pharmacology approach to investigate synergistic killing of P. aeruginosa by polymyxin/rifampicin combination. Using our PAO1 GSMN with a detailed representation of lipopolysaccharide and glycerophospholipid biosynthesis, integrative analysis of transcriptomic and metabolomic results substantially enhanced the identification of significantly perturbed key metabolic pathways by the combination, in particular membrane lipid and peptidoglycan synthesis, nucleotide and amino acid metabolism. Interestingly, the combination also substantially impacted quorum sensing regulation and virulence factors. Better understanding of the complex bacterial metabolic and transcriptomic responses to antibiotic combinations will assist in the optimization of their use in patients.

Availability of data and materials

All the data that support the findings of this study are available in the article and Additional files.

Abbreviations

MDR:

Multidrug-resistant

CDC:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

PK/PD:

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

CAMHB:

Cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth

CLSI:

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

DEG:

Differential gene expression

FDR:

False discovery rate

REVIGO:

Reduce and Visualize Gene ontology

CMW:

Chloroform:methanol:water

ESI:

Electro-spray ionization

PCA:

Principal component analysis

GSMN:

Genome-scale metabolic network

GO:

Gene ontology

PE:

Phosphatidylethanolamine

PG:

Phosphatidylglycerol

TCA:

Tricarboxylic acid

PPP:

Pentose phosphate pathway

QS:

Quorum sensing

TCR:

Two-component regulatory system

PRPP:

Phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate

References

  1. Stover CK, Pham XQ, Erwin AL, Mizoguchi SD, Warrener P, Hickey MJ, et al. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature. 2000;406:959–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moradali MF, Ghods S, Rehm BHA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lifestyle: a paradigm for adaptation, survival, and persistence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, Lin TJ, Cheng Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37:177–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Raman G, Avendano EE, Chan J, Merchant S, Puzniak L. Risk factors for hospitalized patients with resistant or multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McCracken MG, Adam HJ, Blondeau JM, Walkty AJ, Karlowsky JA, Hoban DJ, et al. Characterization of carbapenem-resistant and XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Canada: results of the CANWARD 2007–16 study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74:iv32–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Walkty A, Lagace-Wiens P, Adam H, Baxter M, Karlowsky J, Mulvey MR, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 2906 Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates obtained from patients in Canadian hospitals over a period of 8 years: results of the Canadian Ward surveillance study (CANWARD), 2008–2015. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;87:60–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sader HS, Castanheira M, Duncan LR, Flamm RK. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from United States Medical Centers stratified by infection type: results from the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) Surveillance Program, 2015–2016. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;92:69–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe—annual report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) 2017. Stockholm: ECDC; 2018.

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019.

  10. World Health Organization (WHO). Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. 2017.

  11. Ventola CL. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats. P&T. 2015;40:277–83.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Antibacterial agents in clinical development: an analysis of the antibacterial clinical development pipeline. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

  13. Yang Q, Pogue JM, Li Z, Nation RL, Kaye KS, Li J. Agents of last resort: an update on polymyxin resistance. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2020;34:723–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nang SC, Azad MAK, Velkov T, Zhou QT, Li J. Rescuing the last-line polymyxins: achievements and challenges. Pharmacol Rev. 2021;73:679–728.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Velkov T, Roberts KD, Nation RL, Thompson PE, Li J. Pharmacology of polymyxins: new insights into an old class of antibiotics. Future Microbiol. 2013;8:711–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Azad MAK, Nation RL, Velkov T, Li J. Mechanisms of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity. In: Li J, Nation R, Kaye K, editors. Polymyxin antibiotics: from laboratory bench to bedside. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 1st ed. Springer: Cham; 2019. p. 305–19.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Gales AC, Castanheira M, Jones RN, Sader HS. Antimicrobial resistance among Gram-negative bacilli isolated from Latin America: results from SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (Latin America, 2008–2010). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;73:354–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones RN, Guzman-Blanco M, Gales AC, Gallegos B, Castro ALL, Martino MDV, et al. Susceptibility rates in Latin American nations: report from a regional resistance surveillance program (2011). Braz J Infect Dis. 2013;17:672–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zavascki AP, Goldani LZ, Li J, Nation RL. Polymyxin B for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens: a critical review. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:1206–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Z, Velkov T. Polymyxins: mode of action. In: Li J, Nation R, Kaye K, editors. Polymyxin antibiotics: from laboratory bench to bedside. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 1st ed. Springer: Cham; 2019. p. 37–54.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu YY, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi LX, Zhang R, Spencer J, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:161–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Raetz CRH, Reynolds CM, Trent MS, Bishop RE. Lipid A modification systems in Gram-negative bacteria. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:295–329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Han ML, Velkov T, Zhu Y, Roberts KD, Le Brun AP, Chow SH, et al. Polymyxin-induced lipid A deacylation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa perturbs polymyxin penetration and confers high-level resistance. ACS Chem Biol. 2018;13:121–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moffatt JH, Harper M, Harrison P, Hale JDF, Vinogradov E, Seemann T, et al. Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is mediated by complete loss of lipopolysaccharide production. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:4971–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu Y, Lu J, Han ML, Jiang X, Azad MAK, Patil NA, et al. Polymyxins bind to the cell surface of unculturable Acinetobacter baumannii and cause unique dependent resistance. Adv Sci. 2020;7:2000704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheah SE, Johnson MD, Zhu Y, Tsuji BT, Forrest A, Bulitta JB, et al. Polymyxin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: genetic mutations and transcriptomic changes in response to clinically relevant dosage regimens. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bergen PJ, Smith NM, Bedard TB, Bulman ZP, Cha R, Tsuji BT. Rational combinations of polymyxins with other antibiotics. In: Li J, Nation R, Kaye K, editors. Polymyxin antibiotics: from laboratory bench to bedside. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 1st ed. Springer: Cham; 2019. p. 251–88.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsuji BT, Pogue JM, Zavascki AP, Paul M, Daikos GL, Forrest A, et al. International consensus guidelines for the optimal use of the polymyxins: endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), International Society for Anti-infective Pharmacology (ISAP), Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP). Pharmacotherapy. 2019;39:10–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Parchem NL, Bauer KA, Cook CH, Mangino JE, Jones CD, Porter K, et al. Colistin combination therapy improves microbiologic cure in critically ill patients with multi-drug resistant Gram-negative pneumonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35:1433–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lim TP, Tan TY, Lee W, Sasikala S, Tan TT, Hsu LY, et al. In-vitro activity of polymyxin B, rifampicin, tigecycline alone and in combination against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Singapore. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e18485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee HJ, Bergen PJ, Bulitta JB, Tsuji B, Forrest A, Nation RL, et al. Synergistic activity of colistin and rifampin combination against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:3738–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Tascini C, Tagliaferri E, Giani T, Leonildi A, Flammini S, Casini B, et al. Synergistic activity of colistin plus rifampin against colistin-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:3990–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Elemam A, Rahimian J, Doymaz M. In vitro evaluation of antibiotic synergy for polymyxin B-resistant carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:3558–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Macnair CR, Brown ED. Outer membrane disruption overcomes intrinsic, acquired, and spontaneous antibiotic resistance. MBio. 2020;11:01615–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vaara M. Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane. Microbiol Rev. 1992;56:395–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Krishnamoorthy G, Wolloscheck D, Weeks JW, Croft C, Rybenkov VV, Zgurskaya HI. Breaking the permeability barrier of Escherichia coli by controlled hyperporination of the outer membrane. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:7372–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). In Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 31st edition. CLSI supplement M100 Laboratory Standard Institute, USA. 2021.

  38. Tam VH, Schilling AN, Vo G, Kabbara S, Kwa AL, Wiederhold NP, et al. Pharmacodynamics of polymyxin B against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:3624–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bulitta JB, Yang JC, Yohonn L, Ly NS, Brown SV, D’Hondt RE, et al. Attenuation of colistin bactericidal activity by high inoculum of Pseudomonas aeruginosa characterized by a new mechanism-based population pharmacodynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:2051–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Sandri AM, Landersdorfer CB, Jacob J, Boniatti MM, Dalarosa MG, Falci DR, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous polymyxin B in critically Ill patients: implications for selection of dosage regimens. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:524–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Stott KE, Pertinez H, Sturkenboom MGG, Boeree MJ, Aarnoutse R, Ramachandran G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of rifampicin in adult TB patients and healthy volunteers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:2305–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Maifiah MHM, Cheah SE, Johnson MD, Han ML, Boyce JD, Thamlikitkul V, et al. Global metabolic analyses identify key differences in metabolite levels between polymyxin-susceptible and polymyxin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. QIAGEN. RNeasy mini handbook. Sample Assay Technologies. 2012.

  44. Winsor GL, Griffiths EJ, Lo R, Dhillon BK, Shay JA, Brinkman FSL. Enhanced annotations and features for comparing thousands of Pseudomonas genomes in the Pseudomonas genome database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D646–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. The subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41: e108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43: e47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. Revigo summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e21800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Maifiah MHM, Creek DJ, Nation RL, Forrest A, Tsuji BT, Velkov T, et al. Untargeted metabolomics analysis reveals key pathways responsible for the synergistic killing of colistin and doripenem combination against Acinetobacter baumannii. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang T, Creek DJ, Barrett MP, Blackburn G, Watson DG. Evaluation of coupling reversed phase, aqueous normal phase, and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with orbitrap mass spectrometry for metabolomic studies of human urine. Anal Chem. 2012;84:1994–2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Creek DJ, Jankevics A, Burgess KEV, Breitling R, Barrett MP. IDEOM: an excel interface for analysis of LC-MS-based metabolomics data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1048–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Xia J, Sinelnikov IV, Han B, Wishart DS. MetaboAnalyst 3.0-making metabolomics more meaningful. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W251–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhu Y, Czauderna T, Zhao J, Klapperstueck M, Maifiah MHM, Han ML, et al. Genome-scale metabolic modeling of responses to polymyxins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. GigaScience. 2018;7: giy021.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Junker BH, Klukas C, Schreiber F. VANTED: a system for advanced data analysis and visualization in the context of biological networks. BMC Bioinform. 2006;7:109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Yamada T, Letunic I, Okuda S, Kanehisa M, Bork P. IPath2.0: interactive pathway explorer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W412–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Smith RS, Iglewski BH. Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing as a potential antimicrobial target. J Clin Investig. 2003;112:1460–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Battesti A, Majdalani N, Gottesman S. The RpoS-mediated general stress response in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011;65:189–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Abdul Rahim N, Cheah SE, Johnson MD, Zhu Y, Yu HH, Sidjabat HE, et al. Transcriptomic responses of a New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate to the combination of polymyxin B and chloramphenicol. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56: 106061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Klockgether J, Munder A, Neugebauer J, Davenport CF, Stanke F, Larbig KD, et al. Genome diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 laboratory strains. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:1113–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28:1947–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Nikaido H. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003;67:593–656.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Han ML, Zhu Y, Creek DJ, Lin YW, Gutu AD, Hertzog P, et al. Comparative metabolomics and transcriptomics reveal multiple pathways associated with polymyxin killing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mSystems. 2019;4: e00149-18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Hussein M, Han ML, Zhu Y, Zhou Q, Lin YW, Hancock REW, et al. Metabolomics study of the synergistic killing of polymyxin B in combination with amikacin against polymyxin-susceptible and -resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e01587-e1619.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lin YW, Han ML, Zhao J, Zhu Y, Rao G, Forrest A, et al. Synergistic combination of polymyxin B and enrofloxacin induced metabolic perturbations in extensive drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Han ML, Zhu Y, Creek DJ, Lin YW, Anderson D, Shen HH, et al. Alterations of metabolic and lipid profiles in polymyxin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e02656-17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Hussein M, Han ML, Zhu Y, Schneider-Futschik EK, Hu X, Zhou QT, et al. Mechanistic insights from global metabolomics studies into synergistic bactericidal effect of a polymyxin B combination with tamoxifen against cystic fibrosis MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2018;16:587–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Han ML, Liu X, Velkov T, Lin YW, Zhu Y, Creek DJ, et al. Comparative metabolomics reveals key pathways associated with the synergistic killing of colistin and sulbactam combination against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Han ML, Liu X, Velkov T, Lin YW, Zhu Y, Li M, et al. Metabolic analyses revealed time-dependent synergistic killing by colistin and aztreonam combination against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2776.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Wehrli W. Rifampin: mechanisms of action and resistance. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5(Suppl 3):S407–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. McPhee JB, Lewenza S, Hancock REW. Cationic antimicrobial peptides activate a two-component regulatory system, PmrA–PmrB, that regulates resistance to polymyxin B and cationic antimicrobial peptides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol. 2003;50:205–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Macfarlane ELA, Kwasnicka A, Ochs MM, Hancock REW. PhoP–PhoQ homologues in Pseudomonas aeruginosa regulate expression of the outer-membrane protein OprH and polymyxin B resistance. Mol Microbiol. 1999;34:305–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Fernández L, Gooderham WJ, Bains M, McPhee JB, Wiegand I, Hancock REW. Adaptive resistance to the “last hope” antibiotics polymyxin B and colistin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated by the novel two-component regulatory system ParR-ParS. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:3372–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. McPhee JB, Bains M, Winsor G, Lewenza S, Kwasnicka A, Brazas MD, et al. Contribution of the PhoP–PhoQ and PmrA–PmrB two-component regulatory systems to Mg2+-induced gene regulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:3995–4006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Muller C, Plésiat P, Jeannot K. A two-component regulatory system interconnects resistance to polymyxins, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, and β-lactams in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:1211–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Wang X, Quinn PJ. Lipopolysaccharide: biosynthetic pathway and structure modification. Prog Lipid Res. 2010;49:97–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Dörries K, Schlueter R, Lalk M. Impact of antibiotics with various target sites on the metabolome of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:7151–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Belenky P, Ye JD, Porter CBM, Cohen NR, Lobritz MA, Ferrante T, et al. Bactericidal antibiotics induce toxic metabolic perturbations that lead to cellular damage. Cell Rep. 2015;13:968–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Lobritz MA, Belenky P, Porter CBM, Gutierrez A, Yang JH, Schwarz EG, et al. Antibiotic efficacy is linked to bacterial cellular respiration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:8173–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Hove-Jensen B, Andersen KR, Kilstrup M, Martinussen J, Switzer RL, Willemoës M. Phosphoribosyl diphosphate (PRPP): biosynthesis, enzymology, utilization, and metabolic significance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2017;81:e00040-16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Chittezham Thomas V, Kinkead LC, Janssen A, Schaeffer CR, Woods KM, Lindgren JK, et al. A dysfunctional tricarboxylic acid cycle enhances fitness of Staphylococcus epidermidis during β-lactam stress. mBio. 2013;5:e00437-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Dwyer DJ, Belenky PA, Yang JH, MacDonald IC, Martell JD, Takahashi N, et al. Antibiotics induce redox-related physiological alterations as part of their lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E2100–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Kohanski MA, Dwyer DJ, Hayete B, Lawrence CA, Collins JJ. A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell. 2007;130:797–810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Schuster M, Hawkins AC, Harwood CS, Greenberg EP. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa RpoS regulon and its relationship to quorum sensing. Mol Microbiol. 2004;51:973–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Mavrodi DV, Blankenfeldt W, Thomashow LS. Phenazine compounds in fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. biosynthesis and regulation. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2006;44:417–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Fan Z, Xu C, Pan X, Dong Y, Ren H, Jin Y, et al. Mechanisms of RsaL mediated tolerance to ciprofloxacin and carbenicillin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Curr Genet. 2019;65:213–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a research grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (R01 AI132681 and AI132154). J.L. is an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Principal Research Fellow.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (R01 AI132681 and AI132154). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health. J.L. is an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Principal Research Fellow (APP1157909).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia

    Mohd Hafidz Mahamad Maifiah & Darren J. Creek

  2. International Institute for Halal Research and Training, International Islamic University Malaysia, 50728, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Mohd Hafidz Mahamad Maifiah

  3. Infection Program and Department of Microbiology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia

    Yan Zhu & Jian Li

  4. Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Brian T. Tsuji

  5. Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Tony Velkov

Authors
  1. Mohd Hafidz Mahamad Maifiah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brian T. Tsuji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Darren J. Creek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tony Velkov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JL conceived the project. JL, MHMM, YZ, and DC designed the experiment. MHMM performed the experiment, analysed the results, and wrote the original draft. YZ performed the GSMN and analysed the results. DC validated the results. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

JL and TV licensed their new-generation polymyxin molecules to Qpex Biopharma. JL received grant support, seminar honorarium and consultation fees from Northern Antibiotics, Qpex Biopharma, Avexa, Genentech, Healcare, CTTQ, Aosaikang, Jiayou Medicine, MedCom, DanDi BioScience, and Xellia ApS. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Significantly changed metabolites at 15 min. Table S2. Significantly changed metabolites at 1 h. Table S3. Significantly changed metabolites at 4 h. Table S4. Significantly changed metabolites at 24 h. Table S5. DEGs induced by polymyxin B at 1 h. Table S6. DEGs induced by rifampicin B at 1 h. Table S7. DEGs induced by the combination of polymyxin B and rifampicin at 1 h. Table S8. DEGs induced by polymyxin B at 24 h. Table S9. DEGs induced by rifampicin at 24 h. Table S10. DEGs induced by the combination of polymyxin B and rifampicin at 24 h.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Time-kill kinetics of polymyxin B (PolyB; 1 mg/L), rifampicin (Rif; 2 mg/L), and their combination against P. aeruginosa PAO1 at starting 600 nm (OD600) of ~ 0.5 (~ 108 CFU/mL). Figure S2. GO enrichment analysis of the significantly changed genes with the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination at (A) 1 h and (B) 24 h: (i) downregulation and (ii) upregulation of various biological processes. Figure S3. Overview of metabolic pathways of P. aeruginosa PAO1 affected by the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination at (A) 1 h and (B) 24 h. Blue edges represent the significantly changed enzymatic reactions and red nodes represent the significantly changed metabolites. Significant metabolites and DEGs (including both up- and down-regulated) were identified with > 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05. Table S11. Common differentially expressed genes (> 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05) induced by polymyxin B (PB) alone and the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination (COMBO) at 1 h and 24 h. Table S12. Common differentially expressed genes (> 1.0 and < − 1.0 log2FC and FDR ≤ 0.05) induced by rifampicin (RIF) alone and the polymyxin B/rifampicin combination (COMBO) at 24 h.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahamad Maifiah, M.H., Zhu, Y., Tsuji, B.T. et al. Integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses of the synergistic effect of polymyxin–rifampicin combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Biomed Sci 29, 89 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-022-00874-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-022-00874-3

Keywords

Journal of Biomedical Science

ISSN: 1423-0127